Bums hanging out of the bottom of teeny tiny shorts

What are their parents thinking!

Gosh I remember the days when my Dad accused me of trying to get out of the house without remembering to put my skirt on - his way of telling me my skirt was about as long as a belt!

Sadly, three children and 4 decades later I have neither the confidence or the size 8 body to dare to wear anything that left so little to the imagination. But if I still had both, I'd be wearing teeny-tiny shorts if I wanted to.

Brings to mind the 80"s TV show, Mini Pops, quickly cancelled after complaints but there is a line and beyond that line things just get very odd and creepy.

This

My daughters classmates wear them. Some of them are still only 9!

I don't think anyone should have their bum like that. There need to be basic dress standards. Men shouldn't be able to wear whatever they want, either. If a gay man wore shorts like that to appeal to men, that would also be unacceptable .

Really surprised Gloriia hasn’t rocked up all guns blazing to obsessively focus on how appalling the language is used be a few

But why would a young woman not be bothered by a much older man looking at her in a sexual way? That does not make any sense.

As many other posters have said though unless you are the "Daisy Duke" type it isn"t having the desired effect, people are making fun of them on the internet now? It is the lack of reality filter that is the fascinating part really, a bit like a fat bald bloke on the beach with a hankie tied round his head thinking he looks like Jason Statham?

Because they’re young, rebellious, and they know what effect it has, but they don’t care?

Good point, because they obviously don"t give a flying toss about that concern do they?

Ok, fair enough.

If that's your concern, then why do so many teenage girls and young women not share that same concern?

Yes. I thought it was blimmin' obvious that we were working on the assumption that the man is willing since the complaint was about women liking attention when it comes from men they like as opposed to men they don't. 'Of Course' men don't have to be attracted to or date anyone either but I really didn't think I had to explain that too.

Flaming Nora.

Bar owners want them on the premises for obvious reasons, they might not admit it but it is good for business, men with tops off are generally looking for a fight so they are obviously discouraged because that is bad for business.

Not sure I follow. You complain about signs asking men and not women to put shirts on when men and not women go shirtless but you're not suggesting some kind of like for like comparison?

At any rate this hideous trend of naked arses in shops and pubs is pretty new. Hopefully it'll die a swift death (sunburned bums?). If it goes on long enough, shops etc will probably switch to signs saying they have the right to eject anyone who's not dressed appropriately. There are definitely a lot more shirtless men than women with their bums out.

Im not talking about topless women, simply notices about what people wear

"Women get to choose which men they want to be attracted to them "

You mean choose who they go out with? If a man isn"t attracted no amount of choosing will change that.

I don't care enough and it won't make any difference to the ridiculous misogyny of complaining about a woman's right to like one man and not another.

Well I thought it was obvious I was simply referring to notices about what people wear and the appropriateness of that. I wasnt suggesting its like for like and that its about women being topless. Its about there never being any notices about what women wear, yet some women (and now girls) wear very revealing and sexualised items.

We have had this issue with guides when we take them for a hike. It really isn't appropriate and one day in the peake district we got a complaint from a member of public and i couldn't help but to agree with them

The girls are representing the guides yet look like they are about to do a shit at a strip club

I blame the parents as we have asked on multiple occasions for shorts to be mid thigh as a shortest length yet they still drop them off looking like street walkers

Maybe not, but it is crystal clear that that is what you were referring to when accusing 'provocatively' dressed young women of tempting predators at the end of the first post of yours to which I responded, there can be no other reasonable interpretation of your words.
I am unsure why you are being so coy about using the 'r-word', as you bafflingly describe it, and prefer to employ euphemism and obfuscation, but I guess the 'r-word' causes the same amount of pearl-clutching for you as young women being out in public while not being covered from head to toe does!
Since you seem to think that rape victims are at least partially responsible for being attacked you should have the decency to state your regressive and misogynistic views in unequivocal language. At least have the courage of your convictions, even if they are morally reprehensible.

Well advanced search can always be your friend here. Just sayin' 🙂

I'm implying that you're a man who's pissed off because women get to choose which men they want to be attracted to them and you don't qualify often enough and you think their right to reject you makes them hypocritical.

Obviously you will furiously deny it and probably claim you're a woman who absolutely hates that women can choose to say yes or no, but I won't believe you. And even if it's true, that won't make it any less of a ridiculous and misogynistic view.

Perhaps someone can explain why people’s clothing offends them so much, there’s a current thread about people daring to have their feet on display.

It seems like an excuse to rip into other women (generally) under the guise of ‘being helpful’. It’s nasty, shallow and reductive.

It is a shame that people have nothing else to think about when they are out and about.

Oh and know that the sort of people on this thread are judging the hell out of every little detail of your appearance