Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What happens to kids if AI takes entry level jobs? What you advising them?

312 replies

Tffjyvkbh · 23/04/2026 09:56

On back of the worming class boys thread. If AI takes over white collar jobs, what happens to all the m.c. communities. Education and aspiration became a feature post industrialisation once blue collar jobs disappeared and you needed education to get ahead in office jobs. What happens now? My kid is only 6 but already thinking about this.

If AI takes jobs, does education become pointless. How are parents guiding their kids? Looking at parts that lost industries, will parts of South east become like that once office jobs go?

If even Oxbridge and STEM is no longer enough to guarantee a comfortable life, then what for the young people?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
GoatsOfNavahoe · 24/04/2026 20:35

Growingasaperson · 24/04/2026 17:04

My eldest DD is at university training to be a veterinary surgeon - long course but AI can’t do that!

it will.

FuckRealityBringMeABook · 24/04/2026 20:31

What a waste of human capital. People whose talents lie in art, languages, critical thinking, music etc encouraged to become plumbers to hope they can keep earning a crust. Nowt at all wrong with being a plumber if that's where your talents lie, but we should be building a society that lets everyone flourish within their skill set.

flygenza · 24/04/2026 20:16

rootootoot · 24/04/2026 17:02

I’d rather a robot wipe my arse than a human

😂there is that

Decisionsdecisions1 · 24/04/2026 18:40

Trades and apprenticeships are touted as the solution but the reality is there aren’t anywhere near enough apprenticeships or entry level roles. Not much you can do with those trade btechs without on the job training. Preferably
paid.

It costs companies to take on apprenticeships/train entry level candidates. Self employed contractors/small businesses are even less likely to be able to afford it. In a struggling economy they’re unlikely to be investing in trainees. AI isn’t necessarily the reason for that. It’s everyone trying to cut costs to the bone.

A lot of young people are going on to further education after 18 simply because there often isn’t a reliable alternative. Zero hours precarious work that doesn’t pay enough to live on or offer any scope for progression isn’t much of an alternative.

FernandoSor · 24/04/2026 17:19

Growingasaperson · 24/04/2026 17:04

My eldest DD is at university training to be a veterinary surgeon - long course but AI can’t do that!

And when all the comfortably-off professionals who happily hand over thousands for treatment for their furbabies lose their jobs?

BridgetJonesDaiquiri · 24/04/2026 17:18

Growingasaperson · 24/04/2026 17:04

My eldest DD is at university training to be a veterinary surgeon - long course but AI can’t do that!

Robotic surgery will be more widely adopted in human medicine certainly but I don’t think veterinary surgeons will be completely immune from the onslaught of AI automation and robotics, sadly.

https://hub.jhu.edu/2025/07/09/robot-performs-first-realistic-surgery-without-human-help/

It’s a better bet than studying to be an accountant or a lawyer though.

Growingasaperson · 24/04/2026 17:04

My eldest DD is at university training to be a veterinary surgeon - long course but AI can’t do that!

rootootoot · 24/04/2026 17:02

I’d rather a robot wipe my arse than a human

FernandoSor · 24/04/2026 16:56

If @Badbadbunny if robots can do a job better than humans, that's a bonus, not a requirement.

Badbadbunny · 24/04/2026 14:24

FernandoSor · 24/04/2026 12:43

The people who want their children and elderly relatives to be cared for by humans will have to pay a premium to do so then.

No-one cares if AI or robots do things better than real people - only that they can do it cheaper and at a better profit margin.

Does self-service at the supermarket make the customer experience in any way better? Of course not, but it lowers costs and therefore increases profits for the supermarket owners and that's all that matters.

If people want robots to look after the elderly, or the severely disabled, or those with dementia, etc., then realistically, they'd be looking at having to have those people restrained and/or locked up, or the robots would have to be trained to use restraining forces. Confused or mentally disabled people aren't going to just sit back and let strange robots get personal with them!!

Re self service tills, I am one of many who think they DO make the customer experience better. They certainly reduce queueing for a start. None of this getting stuck behind 90 year old Mabel counting out her loose chain or faffing around trying to find her debit card. I greatly prefer shops with a self service option.

And yes, people DO care that robots can do things better than a human. If you look at the automated/robotic production/manufacturing processes, you get a consistent quality of end result. You don't suffer the "Friday afternoon" British Leyland faulty car anymore do you? A robot doesn't care what day it is, doesn't get stressed or lazy, doesn't go to work high on drink or drugs. I was the accountant in a factory in the 90s and we were just moving over onto CAD/CAM computerised manufacturing - it was an absolute revelation to watch the components churn off the production line, literally every last one of identical quality. It really wasn't just the money saving - the equipment cost hundreds of thousands of pounds and would take years to recover the costs - it was the standardisation, the reduced need to quality check every item, the reduced need, cost, time to re-work faulty man made items, and it massively increased efficiency as far more was produced in the factory space compared with having manual manufacturing equipment meaning we didn't have to buy a bigger factory!

Tuiy · 24/04/2026 14:03

flygenza · 24/04/2026 13:59

The assisted dying bill is even more sinister in the context of this thread.

Yup. Hate to be doom and gloom but I see ai taking a lot of jobs not just white collar but blue collar too. We have robotic arms that can build cars in Chinese factories how long until they’re building houses and delivering food here.
It’s easy to say there will always be a few fire place builders but there can only be so many people doing the remaining jobs.

The elites aren’t going to want to pay for universal income/credit for 80% of the population

flygenza · 24/04/2026 13:59

The assisted dying bill is even more sinister in the context of this thread.

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 24/04/2026 12:59

FernandoSor · 24/04/2026 12:53

Well, in tech where AI is replacing entry level positions at an alarming rate, senior leaders literally don't care because they cannot see beyond the end of next quarter. And by the time it becomes a problem they will have cashed out and moved on - the average senior leader in tech changes company every 2-4 years.

My husband is in tech as well and the rapid changes are quite scary, tbh. He still has a job but… who knows 🤷‍♀️😐

We (where we live) are currently still experiencing a shortage of attorneys but who knows how soon that will change.

FernandoSor · 24/04/2026 12:57

Octavia64 · 24/04/2026 12:51

Robots are routinely used for repeatable tasks in a controlled physical environment.

factories are great - you can build in the exact specs.

they aren’t used much in agriculture - because the physical environment varies too much and you need to move from place to place in a difficult physical environment.

they’re also not good at interactions with humans who have a level of cognitive impairment - so either babies or children whose minds are still developing, or at the other end of life people with dementia.

people need social interaction to develop as children and to keep their minds going for as long as possible. AI isn’t capable of that at the moment and it’s probably a way off developing that level of responsiveness.

Robots in agriculture are already here and seeing widespread adoption: https://www.deere.com/en/autonomous/

FernandoSor · 24/04/2026 12:53

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 24/04/2026 12:50

I’m an attorney and I am wondering (or worrying) about that as well.

How will we train a new generation of lawyers when the easy, entry level work is done by AI?

Well, in tech where AI is replacing entry level positions at an alarming rate, senior leaders literally don't care because they cannot see beyond the end of next quarter. And by the time it becomes a problem they will have cashed out and moved on - the average senior leader in tech changes company every 2-4 years.

Octavia64 · 24/04/2026 12:51

Robots are routinely used for repeatable tasks in a controlled physical environment.

factories are great - you can build in the exact specs.

they aren’t used much in agriculture - because the physical environment varies too much and you need to move from place to place in a difficult physical environment.

they’re also not good at interactions with humans who have a level of cognitive impairment - so either babies or children whose minds are still developing, or at the other end of life people with dementia.

people need social interaction to develop as children and to keep their minds going for as long as possible. AI isn’t capable of that at the moment and it’s probably a way off developing that level of responsiveness.

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 24/04/2026 12:50

Savvysix1984 · 23/04/2026 11:02

I heard on the radio that entry level graduate type roles are going due to AI. I’ll be keeping an eye on jobs markets over the next few years (dd14) and encouraging her as best I can to chose a career that has longevity. I’ve read that the ones most likely to survive AI are trades, nursing, teaching, accounting and law.

I’m an attorney and I am wondering (or worrying) about that as well.

How will we train a new generation of lawyers when the easy, entry level work is done by AI?

FernandoSor · 24/04/2026 12:43

Tuiy · 24/04/2026 09:36

Jobs involving caring for older people and children are probably the only safe ones left. Not many people will want their beloved kids and relatives being cared for by robots.

Everything else I can see is at risk including physical work like bricklaying they already have robotic limbs that can play table tennis at elite level.

It is quite worrying, what will the elite do with us “useless eaters” when they really do have no use for more than half of us?

The people who want their children and elderly relatives to be cared for by humans will have to pay a premium to do so then.

No-one cares if AI or robots do things better than real people - only that they can do it cheaper and at a better profit margin.

Does self-service at the supermarket make the customer experience in any way better? Of course not, but it lowers costs and therefore increases profits for the supermarket owners and that's all that matters.

Nonewnews · 24/04/2026 12:23

StandFirm · 23/04/2026 10:39

It's not that simple because what is really in the pipeline is a combination of robotics automation and AI. Humans will still be required to operate systems but ultimately let's face it, far less human positions will be required, even in the trades. Ultimately it will also end up being an issue for the owners of such tech as they will run out of consumers if we don't radically change our definition of growth and prosperity. AI, automation across the board and 20th century style capitalism are on a collision course. I agree it's pointless to worry about careers right now but at the same time we all need to acknowledge that a paradigm shift is on the horizon. Not a matter of if but when.

This

Most humans need human contact.

perhaps the jobs will come from an industry that doesn’t exist right now that will offer human interactions at a low cost.

Think bars and restaurants without the food and drink

MineThineYom · 24/04/2026 12:09

I have absolutely no faith that the rich will start pushing for an UBI or support it
@Catha537
I think that the people at the top who own and control everything will do whatever they think will allow them to hold on to their power and their status. They will see themselves as something akin to gods and they will not want to let go of that.
And let us not forget that absolute power corrupts absolutely.

AprilMizzel · 24/04/2026 11:05

Chersfrozenface · 24/04/2026 10:50

However they aren't going to be doing old fireplaces - or old building maintenance or the small projects in people gardens - at least not any time soon.

But people doing those jobs for pay depends on the owners of the fireplaces and old buildings and gardens having money to pay them.

There will always be some people with money - or have no choice but to do the work - alterntaives of leaving it being worse.

I'm not saying they'll need loads of brick layers in future - I'm saying few years ago there was a massive shortage of brick laying skills to point FIL could still be working now if he wanted.

Also saying and long term the new technqices and processes may well not be comptabile with existing buildings and all projects - so there will still be some need for bricklayers.

Chersfrozenface · 24/04/2026 10:50

However they aren't going to be doing old fireplaces - or old building maintenance or the small projects in people gardens - at least not any time soon.

But people doing those jobs for pay depends on the owners of the fireplaces and old buildings and gardens having money to pay them.

AprilMizzel · 24/04/2026 10:34

Jobs involving caring for older people and children are probably the only safe ones left. Not many people will want their beloved kids and relatives being cared for by robots.

The low brith rates may mean children sector not great plan long term. Schools are closing in South Korean, Japan and China.

I think Japans trying robots with elder care due to worker shortages - but they often aren't as good in practise as expected.

Everything else I can see is at risk including physical work like bricklaying they already have robotic limbs that can play table tennis at elite level.

Brick working interesting - as FIL was finding work into his late 60s because he had those skills at time of skill shortage. I see some new building techquies - lego slots then concete or 3 D printing ones - and maybe long term new houses might start using them in huge numbers.

However they aren't going to be doing old fireplaces - or old building maintenance or the small projects in people gardens - at least not any time soon. Perhaps it will end up like masons who once had work building catherdals and castles - and now are a rarer and very skilled profession often doing maintance on those momunments.

Tuiy · 24/04/2026 10:27

Chersfrozenface · 24/04/2026 09:52

Jobs involving caring for older people and children are probably the only safe ones left.

The problem is ensuring an economic system where people get paid a wage they can live on to do those jobs.

Yeah I mean I get paid minimum wage anyway so when my job eventually goes (which it will soon) the switch to working in an old peoples home won’t be a big deal to me personally.

Its going to be a hard pill to swallow for people in high paying jobs vulnerable to AI

Chersfrozenface · 24/04/2026 09:52

Jobs involving caring for older people and children are probably the only safe ones left.

The problem is ensuring an economic system where people get paid a wage they can live on to do those jobs.