Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Potential skin cancer, NHS and private waiting times

117 replies

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 13:46

This is more of a rant than anything else.

My GP referred me yesterday to dermatology on the cancer pathway. I was very anxious, so today I paid £200 to see a private consultant. She thinks I need a biopsy. If I do it with that clinic, it will be another £650, but I should get results within a few days.

I also have private health insurance (have been paying for it for several years). If I go through them, it should be covered, but the wait is around 7 to 8 weeks in total for the consultation, biopsy appointment and results. I was told by them that because the NHS is so busy, more people use private now hence the longer waiting times...

With the NHS, I do not even know how long it will take.

How did we get here? I have lived in this country for more than 20 years. I have spent thousands on education, visas and citizenship. I have worked continuously and paid a huge amount in tax. And now I am sitting here wondering whether it was all really worth it. What happens when I am 50, 60 or 70 and my health gets worse? How did we let politicians run the healthcare system into this state?

OP posts:
Lemonfrost · 14/04/2026 17:11

TeenLifeMum · 14/04/2026 17:09

My results will take 6 weeks but that’s due to how the tests are done and how they need to watch the cells over a short period to get an accurate diagnosis. They don’t just pop it in a drawer and ignore it.

Yes, I am quite aware of that thank you.

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 17:10

Londonrach1 · 14/04/2026 17:00

NHS is fast when it comes to cancer treatment. It kicks in quick. Id always advise to go NHS for cancer treatment as you get the backup and fast treatment. Both my parents have had cancer ..mum was seen within 48 hours and dad was having his treatment within a week.

Thank you. I am still on their path (as I also hope they will be faster than the private hospital) but I know it's not guaranteed they will be fast

OP posts:
TeenLifeMum · 14/04/2026 17:09

Lemonfrost · 14/04/2026 17:06

You may well have to wait that long. I had an NHS excision biopsy on Dec 6th last year and didn't get the results until Feb 16th. That's over 2 months and the wait was awful.

My results will take 6 weeks but that’s due to how the tests are done and how they need to watch the cells over a short period to get an accurate diagnosis. They don’t just pop it in a drawer and ignore it.

Thisisnotmyid · 14/04/2026 17:08

Sadly I think it’s a mix of an increased population and dwindling staffing. They cannot cope with the amount of patients referred each week. It’s not dermatology but my local gynaecology department has roughly 150 referrals per week, that’s not including cancer pathways. This is on top of return patients. It’s not sustainable.

RedRosie · 14/04/2026 17:07

Yes I'm fine @Comfortable8520 It was on my face (poor old face) so I have a (neat now, but I looked like Frankenstein's monster for a bit) scar, and will always be worried another will pop up. As an adult, I'm very very careful in the sun. But I grew up in the 1970s when we were pretty much all running about in the summer with no protection. The dermatologist said it probably started then. I tell people about it all the time, to raise awareness.

I hope you are seen soon. The treatment I had under the NHS for this was brilliant really, and I'm very grateful.

TeenLifeMum · 14/04/2026 17:07

I had a biopsy last week. 6 weeks from referral to biopsy but 2 appointments before biopsy stage. NHS waits for cancer aren’t bad as there’s a lot of investment in that area.

Lemonfrost · 14/04/2026 17:06

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:16

She said she did not.

I don't think it's ok to wait for 2 months to get a biopsy results for whatever cancer it is. Would you like to wait for 2 months in my case?

You may well have to wait that long. I had an NHS excision biopsy on Dec 6th last year and didn't get the results until Feb 16th. That's over 2 months and the wait was awful.

Octavia64 · 14/04/2026 17:03

I am disabled.

honestly these days there is big demand for private because many people are aware of the big waits on the nhs.

i’m medically retired and in various u3a groups etc and so many people now go private for hip operation/knee replacement etc etc.

personally I just pay. I don’t have operations and similar but I do need to see consultants and nhs waits are long.

Londonrach1 · 14/04/2026 17:00

NHS is fast when it comes to cancer treatment. It kicks in quick. Id always advise to go NHS for cancer treatment as you get the backup and fast treatment. Both my parents have had cancer ..mum was seen within 48 hours and dad was having his treatment within a week.

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:59

RedRosie · 14/04/2026 16:50

It is stressful, especially if there's a possibility of melanoma (which is what mine was in the end). As other people have said, the others are less urgent although obviously you want them treated.

This happened to me last year, and I'm in South West London (treated by the Chelsea and Westminster hospital, under the NHS). Once I'd got a initial appt with the GP (a week), I was sent for medical photography (another week), and then saw a dermatologist (about five days later), biopsy the following week, then a two week wait for results, then plastic surgery two weeks or so later. I thought that was quite impressive - about 7/8 weeks in all.

I hope you are well and it's good that they dealt with it efficiently

OP posts:
Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:58

Didimum · 14/04/2026 16:43

I didn't say it was. I said it mattered what type of cancer was suspected. None of this was in your OP or subsequent posts.

Well that's because I have no idea... And even if they said it would be a less dangerous one I'd want it to be tested asap as the visual assesment can not confirm it for sure

OP posts:
Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:56

WontGetFooledAgain3 · 14/04/2026 16:41

I was diagnosed with a malignant melanoma in 2022. I had to wait several weeks for a private appointment with my dermatologist (had seen her previously for other things and specifically wanted her). She took one look at the mole and organised the biopsy for the next day (which was a bit of a shock in itself), results took 10 days (due to it being an extended bank holiday) and the actual treatment (wide local excision) was three weeks after that (carried out by a plastic surgeon). My health insurer AXA covered all the costs and also covered the costs for 3 month check-ups for the following 2 years (normally 6 month check-ups for 2 years on the NHS I believe). I now pay for 6 month check-ups and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Two months prior to my diagnosis, I had the mole checked by a mole scanning company in Cambridge who said it was absolutely fine.

Thank you for sharing. I am with AXA too and the hospital says once I had the appointment with them the biopsy will be done in 3-4 weeks and then I'd have to wait for the results.

OP posts:
RedRosie · 14/04/2026 16:50

It is stressful, especially if there's a possibility of melanoma (which is what mine was in the end). As other people have said, the others are less urgent although obviously you want them treated.

This happened to me last year, and I'm in South West London (treated by the Chelsea and Westminster hospital, under the NHS). Once I'd got a initial appt with the GP (a week), I was sent for medical photography (another week), and then saw a dermatologist (about five days later), biopsy the following week, then a two week wait for results, then plastic surgery two weeks or so later. I thought that was quite impressive - about 7/8 weeks in all.

hahabahbag · 14/04/2026 16:47

When I had a suspect mole it was under 2 weeks from gp to removal as the skin clinic can remove it when you attend up to a certain size, you then wait 3-4 weeks for the histology report (all clear in my case) I had a follow up appointment tentatively scheduled for 6 weeks after the removal which they cancelled as it wasn’t suspicious

lovealieinortwo · 14/04/2026 16:44

What happens when I am 50, 60 or 70 and my health gets worse?

It will be dire.

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:43

BlueCh1ck · 14/04/2026 16:39

Wouldn’t it be better to try the NHS, you’ll be seen and biopsy done within the 2 weeks, removal will be very soon after. Private is way longer wait for dermatology as they’re doing so many minor things. I’ve had experience re both and nhs was 100 times better with consultants from the same team .

I am still staying on the NHS pathway too (in case it would take faster than private). It's good if this is the case, I am just saying it's not guaranteed

OP posts:
Didimum · 14/04/2026 16:43

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:16

She said she did not.

I don't think it's ok to wait for 2 months to get a biopsy results for whatever cancer it is. Would you like to wait for 2 months in my case?

I didn't say it was. I said it mattered what type of cancer was suspected. None of this was in your OP or subsequent posts.

WontGetFooledAgain3 · 14/04/2026 16:41

I was diagnosed with a malignant melanoma in 2022. I had to wait several weeks for a private appointment with my dermatologist (had seen her previously for other things and specifically wanted her). She took one look at the mole and organised the biopsy for the next day (which was a bit of a shock in itself), results took 10 days (due to it being an extended bank holiday) and the actual treatment (wide local excision) was three weeks after that (carried out by a plastic surgeon). My health insurer AXA covered all the costs and also covered the costs for 3 month check-ups for the following 2 years (normally 6 month check-ups for 2 years on the NHS I believe). I now pay for 6 month check-ups and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Two months prior to my diagnosis, I had the mole checked by a mole scanning company in Cambridge who said it was absolutely fine.

tinyspiny · 14/04/2026 16:41

I was seen and treated in 3 weeks with potential ( it wasn’t) skin cancer with Benenden and that 3 weeks included Christmas . The dermatologist I saw even treated something else that I hadn’t been referred for while I was there .

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:40

Chewbecca · 14/04/2026 16:35

Dermatologists know exactly what they suspect (and schedule accordingly). The different types present very differently.

Well the private one said she didn't know, unless you think she had reasons to lie?..

The NHS one, still have to see them. It took 2 weeks for the GP appt alone so far.

OP posts:
BlueCh1ck · 14/04/2026 16:39

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:23

Well not necessary. 2 weeks is what they aim for but that's not guaranteed. Someone I know with a skin cancer had to wait weeks for every step

Wouldn’t it be better to try the NHS, you’ll be seen and biopsy done within the 2 weeks, removal will be very soon after. Private is way longer wait for dermatology as they’re doing so many minor things. I’ve had experience re both and nhs was 100 times better with consultants from the same team .

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:38

SDV29 · 14/04/2026 16:37

I’m in the Midlands and they have really long waiting lists. It’s going to be another 4 weeks until I get my results.

I am sorry to hear and I feel your pain. I hope you are ok!

OP posts:
SDV29 · 14/04/2026 16:37

I’m in the Midlands and they have really long waiting lists. It’s going to be another 4 weeks until I get my results.

Chewbecca · 14/04/2026 16:35

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:33

Erm. I think if you suspected it (or did not know what it was) your opinion would have changed.

I can't imagine why anyone would think it's appropriate given the amount of tax we pay.

Dermatologists know exactly what they suspect (and schedule accordingly). The different types present very differently.

Comfortable8520 · 14/04/2026 16:33

Chewbecca · 14/04/2026 16:30

If it was a BCC, that's totally appropriate. They take decades to spread, if at all.

Erm. I think if you suspected it (or did not know what it was) your opinion would have changed.

I can't imagine why anyone would think it's appropriate given the amount of tax we pay.

OP posts: