Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The tradwife movement

169 replies

Chocaholick · 11/04/2026 21:49

AIBU to find the ‘tradwife’ movement absolutely horrific?

Essentially it’s a small core of women with deep internalised misogyny, who are making £££ by pretending they don’t work and indoctrinating young women to be ‘submissive’ to men and wait on them hand and foot, while feeding the manosphere and emboldening its members. It uses Christianity to brainwash followers into believing it’s God’s will for husbands to basically treat their wives like servants and ‘lead them’, and imposes a very long list of ‘duties’ on women while all that is expected of men is to work a job (like they wouldn’t be if they were single!).

It seems to be really catching on, even here in the UK.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Moltencheese · 12/04/2026 07:46

CatPawprints · 11/04/2026 22:34

As a Christian, their misuse and manipulation of the Bible is very frustrating. I've read that book, cover to cover several times and I can't think of one example where women are told not to work. But I do know that:

Deborah was a Judge and prophetess of Israel

Abigail saved the lives of everyone on her estate when she overruled her husband's decision to not supply David's army with food.

Proverbs 31 describes a wife of noble character who buys land and manages finances and staff

Priscilla was a tent maker and ran a church alongside her husband

Submission is a huge theme in the Bible but the primary idea is that everyone should submit to God first, and then should serve one another in love. And if you have any power or authority over people then you are accountable to God for them and so should see yourself as there to serve and sacrifice for them - you know, like Jesus did. I don't see any of that approach in the tradwives media.

Wouldn't mind it if it didn't present as 'this is the Christian way'

Excellent post

I think trad wife is a luxury belief, almost like cosplaying, because women in the past fought for women to have equal pay, education, the vote, the right to own property, to divorce if necessary, the establishment of refuges and charities, to claim benefits and child maintenance if they do find themselves a single parent, to have access to birth control, for marital rape to be illegal etc. women can choose a trad lifestyle but are not trapped as women in the past could be (and women currently are in oppressive countries) They need to be careful not to discredit these rights or pull the ladder up behind them, just because they’ve found a rich man prepared to keep them in a lifestyle they’re happy to go along with while everything’s going well.

ApplebyArrows · 12/04/2026 07:46

The mid-twentieth century was an odd time where household appliances had started to significantly reduce household labour, but wider social shifts meant middle-class families could no longer afford to keep servants. This had big effects on the nature of women's work both in the home and out of it.

I get the impression that tradwives tend to be going less for "the 1950s" and more for a sort of romanticised nineteenth century rural America?

ByDreamyNavyDreamer · 12/04/2026 07:46

GirlWednesday · 11/04/2026 22:01

I suppose it’s a choice. If it appeals to some people then fair enough.

I’ve worked with some young women who have said that they feel as though feminism has done a number on them. They complained that they now feel as though they have to work when really they’d rather be at home spending time with their kids and keeping the house clean.

Obviously it’s good that women have the opportunity to work if that’s what they want to do, but we have to respect that not all women want that.

I recently read somewhere that women in the 1950s were happier than they are now so maybe there’s something in it.

It wouldn’t be for me but I can kind of see the appeal. As long as it’s a choice then there’s no exploitation?

Women weren’t allowed to have their own bank account without permission from their dad or husband until the 70s. Doesn’t give you much chance if your husband is abusive. I don’t think women with abusive husbands are happier. I would prefer to have the choice - equal choice as men to do what I want. I think that’s what feminism has given us hasn’t it?

gannett · 12/04/2026 07:43

I always think the massive contradiction (hypocrisy) of tradwife influencers is that they are making money working for themselves by being very opinionated on social media? They're selling a tradwife aesthetic but if they were serious about the tradwife life they'd get off Instagram, for starters.

Chocaholick · 12/04/2026 07:43

SnugglyJumpersMakeItBetter · 12/04/2026 01:23

I've nannied for 2 well-known social media 'Tradwives'. In both households I was one of 2 nannies (they had maternity nurses for their babies too, who would do overnights). They had housekeepers who would take care of the majority of the cooking, all the grocery shopping and and all the laundry. They would kit themselves and the kids up in white floaty things for filming, then back into jeans and T-shirts for real life. The parents had very little to do with their own children outside of filming content, and in one family the couple themselves had a strained relationship.

These people had hundreds of thousands of 'followers', admiring and envious of their 'lifestyle'. In both households it was all a complete veneer and what was portrayed on their Instagram was wildly different from the reality.

The logical part of me knows this is true. One of the most ‘traditional’ tradwives was forced to sheepishly admit she had a cleaner and part time childcare (despite having only 1 baby and no job).

But it still paints a mythical picture for men to point to when it comes to their ‘wifely expectations’. And yes the marital rape endorsement is horrendous.

OP posts:
Bluegreenbird · 12/04/2026 07:41

In times of stress people will be susceptible to propaganda about how to go back to a mythical time when everything was perfect. This also requires scapegoats. Nazi Germany had Jews and gypsies. The right and the religious have feminists.
Sell women and men a story about how good their life would be if they only had a happy provider/a submissive helpmeet.
Agree with PP that any woman who says she’s ’not a feminist’ needs a sharp retort about which rights she’s planning to give away.

cloudtreecarpet · 12/04/2026 07:28

Doesn't it dovetail in with the rise of the Manosphere?
Men in the so-called manosphere expect and want women to look after them in a traditional way.

SnugglyJumpersMakeItBetter · 12/04/2026 01:23

I've nannied for 2 well-known social media 'Tradwives'. In both households I was one of 2 nannies (they had maternity nurses for their babies too, who would do overnights). They had housekeepers who would take care of the majority of the cooking, all the grocery shopping and and all the laundry. They would kit themselves and the kids up in white floaty things for filming, then back into jeans and T-shirts for real life. The parents had very little to do with their own children outside of filming content, and in one family the couple themselves had a strained relationship.

These people had hundreds of thousands of 'followers', admiring and envious of their 'lifestyle'. In both households it was all a complete veneer and what was portrayed on their Instagram was wildly different from the reality.

YayRain · 12/04/2026 00:32

There have always been groups that promote this ideal of womanhood. I remember them well from the 90s.

LilytheThink · 12/04/2026 00:26

Lucelulu · 11/04/2026 22:23

The majority of 1950’s housewife’s worked. Those that didnt were living in a post-war world of rationing, shortages and a lot of hardship
as well as trauma.
We should be careful what we misunderstand and wish for.

I sometimes think every generation looks at other ones and think they have/had it better. My mum was a young married in the 1950s. She was a teacher but it was just assumed she would do all the cooking and cleaning etc. although she worked full time. She envied the fact that my DH did some housework.
I envied the fact that it was assumed her DH (my DF) would provide financially for his family. I was the main wage earner, although my DH did work, and I felt the pressure. I would have quite liked to be less responsible!
I look at my DILs who share some finances with their DHs, but the rest is separate ie their own.
For me it’s less about how people live their lives, it’s have they made that choice freely. People need to wise up to the lies told on social media, but unfortunately every generation has it’s gullible ones and that is how they are fooled today.

Forthesteps · 11/04/2026 23:52

GirlWednesday · 11/04/2026 22:01

I suppose it’s a choice. If it appeals to some people then fair enough.

I’ve worked with some young women who have said that they feel as though feminism has done a number on them. They complained that they now feel as though they have to work when really they’d rather be at home spending time with their kids and keeping the house clean.

Obviously it’s good that women have the opportunity to work if that’s what they want to do, but we have to respect that not all women want that.

I recently read somewhere that women in the 1950s were happier than they are now so maybe there’s something in it.

It wouldn’t be for me but I can kind of see the appeal. As long as it’s a choice then there’s no exploitation?

Women in the 1950s certainly weren't happier. 'Mother's little helpers' [tranquillisers]?

Choices are not made in a vacuum.Women doing this put themselves at risk and need at the very least to understand that.

5128gap · 11/04/2026 23:49

greenteaandlimes · 11/04/2026 23:24

THIS
I’m a feminist of course, but even I can see how much feminism has failed and actually betrayed women - we have more demands & expectations on us than ever before in history, and are given less time to be mothers with our children than many of us would like. It’s no real surprise why some women would want to opt out of this wage-slavery-plus-motherhood-household slog. I can certainly see the attraction of being able to focus on my children & home.

I think you're mixing up feminism with capitalism.
Its not feminism that exploits you in the workplace so you don't have enough time with your family.

horrifiedandunsure · 11/04/2026 23:39

PollyBell · 11/04/2026 23:34

So she has no say in her choices she jusy blindly unintelligent doesn't thinl for herself and let a man do all her thinking for her?

Are there any red flags of women and women who 'trap' men or does it only ever work one way?

She’s also constantly pregnant… do you really expect her to be able to think clearly? Do you not think that’s why he does it?

horrifiedandunsure · 11/04/2026 23:37

PollyBell · 11/04/2026 23:34

So she has no say in her choices she jusy blindly unintelligent doesn't thinl for herself and let a man do all her thinking for her?

Are there any red flags of women and women who 'trap' men or does it only ever work one way?

Not when you’ve been groomed from a teenager, no.
i thought this was 2026 and we knew about grooming and were better than victim blaming and misogyny?

PollyBell · 11/04/2026 23:34

horrifiedandunsure · 11/04/2026 23:04

If you read her accounts, she has no actual help. She spends weeks in bed recovering. He owns an airline and got her an apron for her birthday when she asked for a holiday. She was going to be a dancer and he trapped her

So she has no say in her choices she jusy blindly unintelligent doesn't thinl for herself and let a man do all her thinking for her?

Are there any red flags of women and women who 'trap' men or does it only ever work one way?

greenteaandlimes · 11/04/2026 23:24

GirlWednesday · 11/04/2026 22:01

I suppose it’s a choice. If it appeals to some people then fair enough.

I’ve worked with some young women who have said that they feel as though feminism has done a number on them. They complained that they now feel as though they have to work when really they’d rather be at home spending time with their kids and keeping the house clean.

Obviously it’s good that women have the opportunity to work if that’s what they want to do, but we have to respect that not all women want that.

I recently read somewhere that women in the 1950s were happier than they are now so maybe there’s something in it.

It wouldn’t be for me but I can kind of see the appeal. As long as it’s a choice then there’s no exploitation?

THIS
I’m a feminist of course, but even I can see how much feminism has failed and actually betrayed women - we have more demands & expectations on us than ever before in history, and are given less time to be mothers with our children than many of us would like. It’s no real surprise why some women would want to opt out of this wage-slavery-plus-motherhood-household slog. I can certainly see the attraction of being able to focus on my children & home.

PeloMom · 11/04/2026 23:21

One thing about the tradwives is that they’re mostly in their 20’s/ early 30’s. Even they come to their senses albeit later in life.

SavageTomato · 11/04/2026 23:21

It's white supremacy, at heart. Never forget that.

DrCoconut · 11/04/2026 23:17

I have been bombarded with these types on Facebook lately. It seems to be gaining ground. A lot is really awful such as a woman saying her husband had told her she was no good at making decisions so he now just tells her what to do and she obeys. Another telling everyone how she told her grand daughter that wanting to study medicine was bad because God made women to be submissive wives not doctors. Loads justifying marital rape. I'm seeing a lot of pages about having large families too, a lot of them seem to be attaching themselves to the quiverfull stuff which is not great. I just think it can't be real? It's got to be made up, acted out for the money because no one would seriously advocate that for themselves and their daughters.

WydeStrype · 11/04/2026 23:17

Lucelulu · 11/04/2026 23:09

Yes can’t find where I got that figure so can’t back it up. Have found one set that suggests 49.5% of working age women in employment in 1955 so less than I’d thought but also figures that correlate with your numbers more closely. I do believe that the numbers are underestimated due to casual and informal labour conditions

I guess a lot of those women were working pre marriage and children and then had to stop too.

Women were under pressure to give up jobs they had competently held during the war when men returned and wanted them. They were never paid the same as male counterparts for equal roles and had no real employment protections or maternity rights.

There was no real childcare, no wrap around at school, no fast food, no microwaves. My grandmother had a cold slab in the larder as she had no fridge and so needed to shop most days as nothing kept long. Housework was much more 'essential' and much more time consuming.

Franjipanl8r · 11/04/2026 23:16

Surely this is just a social media thing rather than a real life thing.

Offcom · 11/04/2026 23:16

It’s loathsome - the New York Times ran a piece this week about a small but growing movement in favour of reversing women’s suffrage because they think the Bible says… well I don’t know but it’s all tied up in that men are the head of the household belief.

Lucelulu · 11/04/2026 23:09

drippingsap · 11/04/2026 22:43

Don’t have statistics to hand mind you

It would be interesting to read them as I have always been taught the opposite.

“But in postwar Britain, the proportion of married women in regular paid work grew dramatically: from around one in five in 1951 to nearly half two decades later.”

“Table 109 in this publication shows that the activity rate for all females in 1931 and 1951 were 34.2% and 34.7% respectively”

Yes can’t find where I got that figure so can’t back it up. Have found one set that suggests 49.5% of working age women in employment in 1955 so less than I’d thought but also figures that correlate with your numbers more closely. I do believe that the numbers are underestimated due to casual and informal labour conditions

drippingsap · 11/04/2026 23:05

she definitely sells herself as a trad wife

horrifiedandunsure · 11/04/2026 23:04

underthehawthorntree · 11/04/2026 22:54

I find it so bizarre when people trot her out as an example of Tradwives...she's very clearly a businesswoman and has a wealthy husband and family. The only "trad" stuff she does is have a load of kids and make all her own food. She very openly has a huge team of assistants and staff. There's literally nothing submissive about her life...she just has enough money to be able to potter about making bread in between her multi million pound business and attending events.

If you read her accounts, she has no actual help. She spends weeks in bed recovering. He owns an airline and got her an apron for her birthday when she asked for a holiday. She was going to be a dancer and he trapped her