Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to ask my partner to move out over benefits?

259 replies

TWD123 · 07/04/2026 09:23

I have been with my partner for around 2 years. I have health issues which I have been quite unwell with since January. Around 2-3 weeks ago, my partner unofficially moved in here to help me out, I say unofficially because she doesn’t contribute to the bills at the moment because that would mean her legally living here in the eyes of UC. It was a 2-3 week trial run until I was back on my feet a bit more to decide what to do next.

We have started going through benefit calculations to see how it would all work with her officially moving in. Now, I was always under the impression that she doesn’t earn very much, living on the breadline - because that’s what she has always told me - now it transpires that she earns a lot more than she said and also has quite a bit in savings.

This means that I would be losing around £1000 a month, having to pay for school meals/prescriptions/dental care/etc whilst she would be around £1000 better off because my house bills aren’t as much as hers.

She is going to have to move straight back out isn’t she?

I hate to make it all about money but my income resources are pretty limited due to being too unwell to work and I have children - one that is autistic - to provide for…

OP posts:
cloverblue · 07/04/2026 11:40

I get what you're saying.

Number of things really, the benefit system isn't to be played so if she moves in, and financially she isn't entitled to benefits due to earnings, that's great. You pool your income with her knowing she makes up what you dont have without her input. You are a couple and commit as such, your benefits stop/reduce.

Or if she's better off, you move in with her and she becomes the main earner/provider.

Or you live apart, knowing she has lied to you about her income, knows you are struggling and keeps her finances separate. Which she is entitled to do, but perhaps you aren't as serious of a couple as you thought.

Or you live apart and play the system, where you get max benefits, she retains her income, she stays over as if you live together but financially you're better off because you're both maximising your individual financial gains.

But you know in every scenario, she wasn't honest about her money and that's a red flag.

Jane143 · 07/04/2026 11:32

TWD123 · 07/04/2026 09:41

Ever since I have known her, she’s always gone on about how she’s hardly got any money left until payday, struggling to afford bills, can’t afford to buy herself new clothes or new shoes so wears them completely out - her last payslip that she showed me was nearly £2800 and she has thousands in a savings account that she showed me too - but she only disclosed this information once she unofficially moved in here so to me that feels quite deceptive

It’s not really deceptive. She didn’t need to tell you the amount until she moved in and she’s been honest with you now when she needed to

TheOnlyLivingBoyInNewCross · 07/04/2026 11:29

I would think the main objection to her moving in on a permanent basis is that your posts don’t seem to suggest that you like her that much 🤷🏻‍♀️

Lovingbooks · 07/04/2026 11:27

From a benefits point of view Moving a partner in is not a temporary situation. Why was the financials not discussed before taking this step. I’m surprised if she’s living there and you haven’t reported a change in circumstances. Someone working would of course be expected to contribute to op bills and household.

NiceCupOfChai · 07/04/2026 11:26

Hm, so from the partner’s perspective she’d need to pay £1000 per month to become a carer? It sounds like the OP is never going to work again and her health is deteriorating so partner is committing to a life of being primary financial and practical provider. It’s absurd to break a relationship down to financials only, and if that’s what you’re doing then the relationship probably isn’t a ‘partnership’ at all.

I also don’t think it’s unreasonable to keep financial information private while dating. She’s been upfront at the point where it matters - when the relationship seems to be moving on. I think that’s fair. Why should she tell everyone she dates her exact income and savings?

Aavalon57 · 07/04/2026 11:26

The first issue here should be about the deceit, then the finances, then the upheaval to your routines. I would definitely not move in together. (Also, ignore all the posters piling on about you being on benefits.)

Liveshives · 07/04/2026 11:23

OP, this is actually a no brainer.
She has lied to you about her finances.
Why would you trust that person to impact your household income.

This is not going to benefit you or your children and actually is disruptive.

As a single pardnt your 100% loyalty is to your children.

Do not blow up your situation when you already have so much to contend with.

Illness and an autistic child?
That's enough to deal with.

She should not be moving in under these circumstances and I would completely rethink a relationship with someone whom has lied to me about finances.

Red flag.

RandomMess · 07/04/2026 11:20

2 practical things.

It doesn’t seem viable due to her shift work, it’s just not practical.

Prescriptions you would purchase an annual prepayment certificate at £114.50. Glasses you go to ASDA even if it’s a trek as even their varifocals are including in their standard prices of £80. They have no overheads hence the bargain price.

However it does sound like your loss of financial independence would be at risk and a nightmare if it didn’t work out. Also not the best situation for your DC.

It was a trial run and you are not ready to live together.

Kirbert2 · 07/04/2026 11:18

Yep. She needs to move back out. Just for lying about her financial situation, to be honest but also because you need to put your children first.

Frauhubert · 07/04/2026 11:17

TWD123 · 07/04/2026 09:28

I’m more concerned about the extra outgoings I will have to - such as my child’s hot meals at school, my prescriptions of which I have quite a lot of, my glasses which my prescription changes a couple of times a year and they are quite expensive to buy, my dental care - all which I get help with now but won’t if she actually moves in

Welcome to the world of the taxpayer!

ArrghNoJustNo · 07/04/2026 11:17

TWD123 · 07/04/2026 10:00

If she was more upfront about her own financial situation and the impact it would have on the house, I could have done!

If your partner was a 'he', I can almost guarantee that this is what posters would focus on. Since she's a she, people are glossing over it and some are making excuses for her. She has been deceitful or atleast, not completely forthcoming with the real details of her financial situation. Perhaps she didn't want you to expect more from her if you knew.

However that alone would get me thinking twice about what more she could be hiding and if i want to be in a relationship where I can't quite trust how they show up.

As for your living situation, this is simple. If you and your kids are going to be worse off if she moves in, it's a no-brainer. She shouldn't move in.

Lovingbooks · 07/04/2026 11:16

What a strange post. OP likes living separate it was a temporary arrangement due to health just don’t get all this angst. Just go back to living arrangements in two separate households.

Tryagain26 · 07/04/2026 11:13

GrrrrEnergy · 07/04/2026 09:35

Sounds a bit like you view your partner as an asset rather than a person, and because she doesn't = more ££ for you, she's out!

That is very unfair.
OP can't afford to love 1k a month if her partner isn't willing to make up the shortfall.
OP you need to have this discussion with her. But it sounds as though it might be better if you both keep your separate homes

CeffylCoch · 07/04/2026 11:12

You have said earlier that you would rather not live with her, so why are you even considering it?

ToKittyornottoKitty · 07/04/2026 11:11

WTAFIsWrongWithPeople · 07/04/2026 11:10

Aren’t you already in breach by having her live there “unofficially”?

No, OP explained this in the first paragraph.

Acheyelbows · 07/04/2026 11:10

You've answered your own question. Now you're better you don't need her living there. Use the benefits excuse if you like but sounds like you prefer to live alone and not have to manage around her shift work.

WTAFIsWrongWithPeople · 07/04/2026 11:10

Aren’t you already in breach by having her live there “unofficially”?

ToKittyornottoKitty · 07/04/2026 11:08

GreenGodiva · 07/04/2026 11:00

Get a prepayment certificate for your prescriptions. Is maybe £12-13 a month by dd for everything. Ever changing glasses are by far the cheapest at goggles4 u firmoo etc. you just need your pupillary distance and you can get a tool online that does that. Make a packed lunch instead of school meals.

Change is scary, but if you have the means to get off/reduce your benefit reliance AND be in a happy committed relationship then you should do it surely?

You realise packed lunches still cost money right?

OP and her kids are reliant on benefits money and she doesn’t want to live with this woman after this trial, so it obviously doesn’t make sense

IWaffleAlot · 07/04/2026 11:07

Dweetfidilove · 07/04/2026 10:28

It boggles the mind that some many people end up in thks position. Anything that is to the detriment of the children's welfare should just be a no-brainer.

At least this OP isn't 6 months in, in debt and in doubt about having the conversation/moving the partner back out.

I alao find it odd how many people think she should focus on her feelings and the partner's emotional support; at the expense of feeding her children.

Edited

Blows my mind how many women put men/partners above their kids. The op is completely and indefinitely dependent on state support. That’s not the issue. The issue is that her financial situation is directly related to her kids wellbeing. That is a no brainer to me.

Imagine moving a partner in, losing benefits and it doesn’t work out. The only losers here are the poor kids who have no choice.

Pleasealexa · 07/04/2026 11:05

I will lose £1000 in income

Just a correction, it's not income. It's benefits paid from individual tax payers income.

GreenGodiva · 07/04/2026 11:00

TWD123 · 07/04/2026 09:28

I’m more concerned about the extra outgoings I will have to - such as my child’s hot meals at school, my prescriptions of which I have quite a lot of, my glasses which my prescription changes a couple of times a year and they are quite expensive to buy, my dental care - all which I get help with now but won’t if she actually moves in

Get a prepayment certificate for your prescriptions. Is maybe £12-13 a month by dd for everything. Ever changing glasses are by far the cheapest at goggles4 u firmoo etc. you just need your pupillary distance and you can get a tool online that does that. Make a packed lunch instead of school meals.

Change is scary, but if you have the means to get off/reduce your benefit reliance AND be in a happy committed relationship then you should do it surely?

MajorProcrastination · 07/04/2026 10:55

LIZS · 07/04/2026 09:39

If you are not ready to pool money, so one’s loss is offset by the other’s gain, you are probably not ready to live together.

This! Especially when there are children involved. I've got a step child (who's now an adult) and when I moved in with her dad I fully knew that his role as a parent would have an impact on our joint household finances, we had to factor in an extra bedroom when renting, he's always paid the same % to her mum. If your partner's not recognising that when you're moving in together, I'd say it's defo not time to do that.

MustWeDoThis · 07/04/2026 10:54

TWD123 · 07/04/2026 09:23

I have been with my partner for around 2 years. I have health issues which I have been quite unwell with since January. Around 2-3 weeks ago, my partner unofficially moved in here to help me out, I say unofficially because she doesn’t contribute to the bills at the moment because that would mean her legally living here in the eyes of UC. It was a 2-3 week trial run until I was back on my feet a bit more to decide what to do next.

We have started going through benefit calculations to see how it would all work with her officially moving in. Now, I was always under the impression that she doesn’t earn very much, living on the breadline - because that’s what she has always told me - now it transpires that she earns a lot more than she said and also has quite a bit in savings.

This means that I would be losing around £1000 a month, having to pay for school meals/prescriptions/dental care/etc whilst she would be around £1000 better off because my house bills aren’t as much as hers.

She is going to have to move straight back out isn’t she?

I hate to make it all about money but my income resources are pretty limited due to being too unwell to work and I have children - one that is autistic - to provide for…

She doesn't need to be paying bills for her to be legally living with you. The fact she has been living with you for 3 weeks should have been declared from the start. Your UC will be deducted 55p to the pound. The point in having a partner - They -should- financially support you. Benefits are there to make up for lack of a partner, lack of a wage etc...

You should apply for PIP and your partner can then be added to the UC claim and she can claim carers element. She can also claim CA, but that's deducted from UC. If she becomes your carer, then she can reduce her hours, if she wanted to.

Either way, you should have reported your CoC (change of circumstances), already. She can also have upto 16K in savings, before UC is closed. Anything over 6K and below 16K will be deducted from UC. However, if they love you, they will want to financially support you.

BudgetBuster · 07/04/2026 10:54

ToKittyornottoKitty · 07/04/2026 10:50

In some cases maybe, but a loving relationship does not automatically equally physically and financially supporting another person and their kids as soon as they move in together.

No but the poster I quited is saying why would the Partner want to move in with OP and kids if they are financially the same (no extra expenses). I was implying that the move would then be part of the evolving relationship and making a family unit.

gamerchick · 07/04/2026 10:53

ToKittyornottoKitty · 07/04/2026 10:14

Why should the partner be expected to move in and financially support OP and kids that aren’t hers though? That doesn’t make sense either.

That's how it works though.

If partner has thousands in the bank claims have a habit of being ended and the person moving in, takes the financial hit.

Add the disruption of the house and autistic kids thrown in to the nightshift thing. It's not going to work OP.

Swipe left for the next trending thread