Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think face coverings in public should be banned?

464 replies

OpheliaWasntMad · 06/04/2026 14:53

Should all types of face covering in public be banned? I think they should. Mainly I’m concerned that people in balaclavas and face coverings are shoplifting and stealing phones etc with impunity.
People with balaclavas on marches look threatening and sinister.
Women with niqabs create a barrier between themselves and others as it’s hard to form connections if you can’t see someone’s facial expressions.
I think all face covering should be banned. It contributes to a society that feels more unsafe and divided.

OP posts:
Westfacing · 06/04/2026 17:06

catspyjamas1 · 06/04/2026 17:02

Well, their faces are covered so it's hard to tell age 😉 but yes, have seen them with presumably mothers, aunts etc. also in niqab. It's a tiny minority but have seen from time to time.

Tiny minority - that might explain why I truly have never seen any such thing.

How tiny?

You may not have seen their faces but surely from their size you could take a guess at their age?

Believe me, I am not a proponent of the covering of women never mind schoolgirls but I find your argument disingenuous

Nothungrycat · 06/04/2026 17:06

I've been to a couple of feminist events, where the protestors against us (held back by police) were mainly masked/balaclava-d. We weren't. And I have to say, it is really intimidating and frightening to have people yelling abuse at you from behind masks. It presumably does make them less easy to identify by the police. I'd be very keen to ban them but I can't imagine it will ever happen.

OpheliaWasntMad · 06/04/2026 17:05

FernandoSor · 06/04/2026 17:00

Faces are routinely covered in airports - many East Asian travellers wear face masks when flying to minimise the risk of catching or transmitting infections. I’ve never heard anyone have an issue with this but presumably OP would think it prevents them from ‘making connections’.

No - I think travelling in an airport is a bit different to walking around your own neighbourhood.
By “making connections” I just meant the opportunity to have casual chat with someone on the bus etc … I think it’s part of what makes people feel they live in a community. I do think people wearing niquabs miss out on that to some extent. I DO NOT think niquab wearers are criminal- but I do think there is a chance they are victims of oppression. Obscuring your face makes you anonymous. I don’t think that’s a good thing.

OP posts:
TheCatSitterDM · 06/04/2026 17:05

@OpheliaWasntMad Does your proposed ban stop me putting my scarf over my nose in the icy cold winds?
My child also wears an adorable blue dog style balaclava hat with floppy brown ears, shall I just let his face freeze on the school run?

MyThreeWords · 06/04/2026 17:04

OpheliaWasntMad · 06/04/2026 15:11

Yes - I acknowledge that there will be difficulties pinning down the details. There will always be exceptions. I think anyone who is immune compromised should have an exemption to wear a mask in public .Anyone wrapped up in a scarf on a bitterly cold day should uncover their face in shops and cafes .
Essentially, I think anyone covering their face in a public place should be challenged by police . It’s routine where I live for some young people to zoom around on stolen lime bikes with balaclavas on . The shoplifters where I live all wear face covering and charge in and out of shops grabbing whatever they like.

People who shoplift and ride stolen bikes are already breaking the law, @OpheliaWasntMad . If the police can't respond adequately to those crimes they are hardly likely to be able to respond to the illegally adjusted clothing that accessorises the criminality.

And regarding the niqab, you seriously think it is ok to make something illegal on the grounds that it reduces the opportunity for body language and creates social barriers? So presumably you'd also like to make it illegal to wear headphones/ear buds in public? Or sunglasses with mirrorised lenses?

ginasevern · 06/04/2026 17:04

TheCatSitterDM · 06/04/2026 16:41

As an aside, I’d welcome a ban on all face coverings.

Have you ever walked your kids to school in the icy cold winds in the Yorkshire Dales?! Even in my pink fluffy balaclava style hat my nose is still painfully numb Dec - Feb and the school is only a 15 minute walk each way. Why should I not be able to keep warm in the winter?!

Edited

That really, really isn't the same as having to wear the niqab every single day when out in public because men might otherwise get sexually arosed by the very sight of you.

catspyjamas1 · 06/04/2026 17:03

TheCatSitterDM · 06/04/2026 16:57

Do I get to put my scarf over my nose in the icy cold winds or would that go against western norms too? Not a rhetoric question

Edited

What is your obsession with icy cold winds and pulling your scarf up from the cold on a walk?! 😆

JHound · 06/04/2026 17:02

YABU

catspyjamas1 · 06/04/2026 17:02

Westfacing · 06/04/2026 16:50

I most definitely see young schoolgirls regularly in London wearing niqabs

I am very anti young schoolgirls even wearing hijabs - but truly have never seen them in niqabs! Are you sure? What age?

Well, their faces are covered so it's hard to tell age 😉 but yes, have seen them with presumably mothers, aunts etc. also in niqab. It's a tiny minority but have seen from time to time.

OpheliaWasntMad · 06/04/2026 17:00

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/crime-and-policing-bill-2025-factsheets/crime-and-policing-bill-public-order-factsheet#:~:text=Current%20legislation%20gives%20police%20the%20power%20to,for%20the%20purpose%20of%20concealing%20their%20identity.

There is already some legislation around this. I think it should be extended to include people in public urban spaces / shopping centres etc

Updated in Feb 2026
Concealing identity at a protest
Current legislation gives police the power to direct people to remove face coverings in designated areas and to seize face coverings where they reasonably believe people are wearing these wholly or mainly for the purpose of concealing their identity. Individuals may therefore follow the direction of an officer to remove their face covering but then move to a new area and put the face covering back on. In some circumstances, using a face covering to conceal identity may be used for the purpose of avoiding conviction for criminal activity in a designated area.
The new criminal offence will prohibit the wearing or otherwise using of an item to conceal identity in an area designated by the police under the new provisions. The offence will carry a maximum penalty of one month imprisonment, a £1000 fine, or both.

Crime and Policing Bill: public order offences factsheet 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/crime-and-policing-bill-2025-factsheets/crime-and-policing-bill-public-order-factsheet#:~:text=Current%20legislation%20gives%20police%20the%20power%20to,for%20the%20purpose%20of%20concealing%20their%20identity.

OP posts:
FernandoSor · 06/04/2026 17:00

Mushypeasandchipstogo · 06/04/2026 16:34

Absolutely agree faces should not be covered in shops or airports for whatever reason whatsoever. As an aside, I spend a lot of time in Austria where there is a ban on face coverings. Saudi and Kuwaiti women actively break this rule by permanently wearing medical type face masks. They even expect the poor Filipino nannies to do the same but that is a whole other thread….

Faces are routinely covered in airports - many East Asian travellers wear face masks when flying to minimise the risk of catching or transmitting infections. I’ve never heard anyone have an issue with this but presumably OP would think it prevents them from ‘making connections’.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 06/04/2026 17:00

I don’t think so.

I agree some professionals don’t lend themselves to someone with their face covered - primary school teaching being an obvious example. But banned entirely doesn’t seem right.

The problem is, not so much for those
women who choose to wear them, but for those who don’t, who ironically are often the people the “ban face coverings” brigade say they want to protect.

These women wouldn’t then miraculously be able to go out without a face covering. Many would then not be able to go out at all, or be severely restricted, as male family members would then not allow them.

The better thing is education.

Usernamenotfound1 · 06/04/2026 16:57

OpheliaWasntMad · 06/04/2026 16:48

No one is equating shop lifting and women’s dress.
Two distinct and separate reasons why face covering is bad .

  1. Face covering facilitates criminal behaviour
  2. Isolates women who cover their faces and is divisive

so say you ban niquab’s.

now those women aren’t allowed in public or in the vicinity of non-related men because their culture requires them to be covered.

so your attempt to reduce isolation actually results in increased isolation.

then what?

TheCatSitterDM · 06/04/2026 16:57

catspyjamas1 · 06/04/2026 16:55

Are France, Denmark, Belgium, Switzerland etc. etc. etc. oppressive governments?

Is it oppressive to instil Western norms (e.g. you don't cover your face when you leave the house because #men #culture) for those that live in Western countries?

Is it more or less oppressive for men in families to dictate what women wear or the government of a Western country?

Rhetorical questions.

Do I get to put my scarf over my nose in the icy cold winds or would that go against western norms too? Not a rhetoric question

BillieWiper · 06/04/2026 16:57

Somnambule · 06/04/2026 14:59

Have you actually spent time with women in niqab? Although it's very uncommon where I live, from time to time I work alongside women in niqab and I honestly don't feel it creates a barrier at all. A huge amount of non-verbal communication happens through the eyes.

I admittedly only ever worked with one niqab wearer, and it made no difference at all to the way we interacted. We had a laugh, chatted normally. Nobody seemed to have any issues communicating with her and she was very friendly and popular.

TheignT · 06/04/2026 16:56

zantez · 06/04/2026 15:55

You can see the face, lips, cheeks, chin, ears and eyes with those.

My husband has a beard. You can't see his lips or chin. In cold weather he wears a wooly hat and you can't see his ears, in sunny weather he wears dark glasses and you can't see his eyes. His beard is white and little children often think he's father Christmas.

FernandoSor · 06/04/2026 16:55

“Women with niqabs create a barrier between themselves and others as it’s hard to form connections if you can’t see someone’s facial expressions”

So what? If people don’t want to form a connection with you or anyone else that is absolutely their prerogative.

if you ban face coverings you’ll criminalise a bunch of perfectly law abiding people while the thugs who cover their faces for nefarious purposes will continue to do so - you can’t legislate against surgical masks and scarves.

catspyjamas1 · 06/04/2026 16:55

TheCatSitterDM · 06/04/2026 16:08

But the goverment making laws about what women can and can't wear isn't oppressive? 🤔

Are France, Denmark, Belgium, Switzerland etc. etc. etc. oppressive governments?

Is it oppressive to instil Western norms (e.g. you don't cover your face when you leave the house because #men #culture) for those that live in Western countries?

Is it more or less oppressive for men in families to dictate what women wear or the government of a Western country?

Rhetorical questions.

TheCatSitterDM · 06/04/2026 16:51

I'm chucking at the idea me and the other Mums on the school run would be hauled away in the back of a police car for wearing our balaclava style hats / scarfs over our noses in the icy cold winds we get 3 months a year 😂
I hope the school after school club has space for all our little ones when we're having a peaceful night in the cells.
You're all ridiculous if you think banning a warming face covering would work in cooler parts of the UK

Westfacing · 06/04/2026 16:50

catspyjamas1 · 06/04/2026 16:40

OP isn’t talking about Jewish or any other women that wear wigs, head scarves and/or long, drab dresses. This is specifically about face coverings.

I lived in Whitechapel – PLENTY of niqabs. I now live in a shire town and work in central London – I see a lot less niqabs in the shire, mainly hijabs. In fact, it's rather jarring when I do see niqabs because, in this town, it's unusual but is increasing in a town that has a sizable Muslim population. I most definitely see young schoolgirls regularly in London wearing niqabs and plenty of women wearing them.

Edited

I most definitely see young schoolgirls regularly in London wearing niqabs

I am very anti young schoolgirls even wearing hijabs - but truly have never seen them in niqabs! Are you sure? What age?

gannett · 06/04/2026 16:50

This is such a weird issue to get het up about and the only people I've ever known to be bothered are Covid-era loons and racists (there's a substantial overlap).

Of all the social injustices and inconveniences in the world THIS is the one you stamp your foot about? Let other people cover, or not cover, themselves how they want. Wind your neck in.

catspyjamas1 · 06/04/2026 16:50

@thepariscrimefiles "Banning the niqab would be very illiberal and authoritarian"

France, basition of illiberal society and authoritarian government, would like a word.

OpheliaWasntMad · 06/04/2026 16:48

Westfacing · 06/04/2026 16:45

I have no time for Islamists, parents who put primary-aged girls in hijabs, Pakistani politics playing out on the streets of the UK, balaclava-wearing hoodlums careering around the streets and pavements on electric bikes, etc. but have even less time for those who are trying to equate shoplifting and anti-social behaviour with women's dress

No one is equating shop lifting and women’s dress.
Two distinct and separate reasons why face covering is bad .

  1. Face covering facilitates criminal behaviour
  2. Isolates women who cover their faces and is divisive
OP posts:
TheCatSitterDM · 06/04/2026 16:48

MightyDandelionEsq · 06/04/2026 16:27

Totally agree (see my above comment).

The amount of people who don’t see it as a tool to control women is amazingly naive.

But the goverment outlawing what women what they can and can't wear wouldn't be a controlling at all?
I trust women to make their own decisions with their own bodies and how they decide to dress them.

catspyjamas1 · 06/04/2026 16:47

BorisJohnsonsUnderpants · 06/04/2026 16:34

I think in future they may well be banned in certain circumstances, if they aren't already, because they interfere with the operation of face-recognition software in the fight against crime.

You make an excellent point (not that I'm in favour of facial recognition software!) . Think it will take a few years to get to that point though.