Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I want the house. AIBU?

415 replies

HouseFair · 02/04/2026 18:05

I feel like this might be controversial…

My boyfriend and I are buying a house. We have been together three years and I’m pregnant! Happy surprise. I own a flat but we live together in a rented house as he has three older kids so my flat isn’t big enough for us all. I’m selling it to provide the deposit on the house.

Part of the mortgage discussion is on life insurance. I have told him I want mirror policies in place which pay off the mortgage which leave the house in the surviving person’s name. He seems reticent about this and I think it’s because he thinks it should be left to his kids.

AIBU?

OP posts:
UniquePinkSwan · 03/04/2026 18:11

andthat · 02/04/2026 21:36

Why? She is far more solvent than he is!

if the sexes were reversed you’d be making sure the woman got married. It should be the same for the man

user1485851222 · 03/04/2026 18:07

Under no circumstances, sell your flat until this is sorted. DO NOT agree to
• sorting it at a later date, (it will be too late).
• only buy the property if he agrees that if he dies first, house goes to you & vice versa

Or

• seek legal advice, to see if possible, that if he dies first, his share goes to his children upon your death OR you can buy the children out of their share & vice versa if you were in agreement.

Don't be afraid to discuss your fears with him, you love each other & you can sort this, you just need to address the issues on both sides.

But obviously ring fence your deposit.

Judecb · 03/04/2026 18:05

If you got married, you'd get it all if he died. Just saying!

OldScribbler · 03/04/2026 17:54

Always operate on the assumption something will go wrong

Shittyyear2025 · 03/04/2026 14:03

HouseFair · 02/04/2026 19:32

But he’s renting so right now there is no inheritance that way. He’s got nothing in savings to contribute to the deposit.

My fear is that he’d die, and his ex would sue me for lost CMS or something, I’d have to give up my child’s home whilst in mourning to give a payout to his kids.

If he wants to take out insurance policies or save up to leave money to his kids, that’s great. I don’t see why they have to be given our home.

He can take out additional life insurance. You both can. But his % of the equity in the house should absolutely go to his kids!

Let's say you remain unmarried and the house is bought as joint tenants, should either of you die the house passes to the other immediately.

If he dies, you get everything and his older kids get nada.

If you buy as tenants in common, where you ringfence your deposit and split the remaining according to accrued equity then you get your original share back as a % and the rest is split
(Say purchase price £100k, you put in 50k, set up tenants in common at 75%yours, 25% his so if he dies you keep your share as a proportion of your original investment, ALL his kids get a share of his 25% of accrued equity)

If you're married then I believe you'd get his share anyway unless he writes a will. He could still write a will passing his share to ALL his kids leaving you a lifetime interest.

You could both get extra life insurance as if either one of you dies then the expense of bringing up your joint child alone would be covered. He can take extra to ensure his own DC are taken care of.

As an aside, you're more likely to be critically ill than die during your mortgage term, worth considering this insurance too.

HouseFair · 03/04/2026 13:52

Rileysp · 03/04/2026 06:39

I think you need to take legal advice. But there are clearly solutions as this isn’t an unusual situation

my thoughts

1- I don’t think either are wrong. You need an adult conversation about this, and it should really have taken place before putting in an offer on a property.

2- I think the best short term solution is he takes out another Insurance policy for his 3 children with an ex partner. Especially in this period where your financial contributions on the house are so different. It’s something as a family you’ll have to budget for, but it’ll probably meet both your needs

3- there’s a lot of baseless judgements made about this man. As normal. When I bought, my now wife didn’t have a deposit. Sometimes life goes like that. We know nothing about him. What divorce cost him, what he financially gave up. Nothing at all. So calls on his character are very premature

3- the OP is thinking very short term here. What I get. But if he’s another 30 years, and he’s contributing financially to the home, then I get the issue with his children being disinherited. So in the short term he needs an additional policy, but longer term I also think there needs to be a consideration again

4- it’s pretty clear that buying a place requires her selling the flat. Obviously in an ideal world she keeps it…. But clearly they can’t. Renting is throwing money away when you’ve 4 kids and need security. It’s in nobody’s interest.

Thank you for this balanced view.

I’d be happy to discuss again when our child is say, 10, and then 18. I’m not trying to rip off his children, just to protect mine’s childhood security if the worst happens.

OP posts:
HouseFair · 03/04/2026 13:43

D0RA · 02/04/2026 22:52

I know two mums who did this and then both sadly died in their 30s ( one of cancer and one from Covid ). The same thing happened in both cases .

The kids went to stay with her parents while the mum was dying in hospital ( as the dads couldn’t cope and so they could be at the hospital etc ).

After the death, the kids stayed with their GPs as the dad was grieving and couldn’t cope.

Then very VERY quickly, the dads were in new relationships, moved their new partner into the family home and didn’t want their kids back, as they thought it would be “ too unsettling for them “. In one family, the kids were very young ( toddler and new born baby) , so after 6 months of not seeing their dad they hardly even remembered him.

Now these children are being brought up by their maternal grandparents , who get no money and little support from the kids dads .None of these kids will get any of the money / half of the house that their mum left them until their dad dies, which will probably be another 50 or even 60 years. Because that’s what was in the will - the surviving spouse could live there as life rent.

Now I know you are thinking “ my kids dad would never do that “. But half of all days stop seeing their kids completely within 5 years of a separation / divorce so it’s not logical to think that widowed men will act completely differently.

I also have close friends whose mum died suddenly when they were at university . She had left her half of the house to her kids , to go to them straightaway on her death. Their dad said he would “ buy them out “ and put the money into an account for them to buy flats when they graduated. Of course they agreed to this as they didn’t want him to sell the family home as they would have no where to go on university holidays and that was where they had grown up.

The dad he very quickly remarried, sold the house and moved about 400 miles to the other end of the counrty. The kids never saw the a penny of the money he promised them and when he died, the whole house was left to his second wife and then to her children.

Thank You for sharing. As DP has fought very hard to stay in his children’s lives, I don’t think he’d walk away from our child. I do think I’d be swiftly replaced though! And if he and
another woman ended up raising my child along with SC, I think it’s fair enough that they get a paid off house to do it in, and hopefully they’d have a better qualify of childhood. DP comes from a country where you can’t disinherit a child so although it’s possible, I think it’s unlikely he’d disinherit them.

I’ll have separate insurance policies and trusts going to my child in trust.

OP posts:
mcmuffin22 · 03/04/2026 12:50

Op, you sound much more financially savvy than him. I would advise waiting a while after the baby is born to see what kind of parent he is to a young child and how he is as a father to your child before becoming financially entwined with this man. Also I suspect he may feel like it is your job to finance your child while he focuses on the other three

sunshinestar1986 · 03/04/2026 11:31

Another2Cats · 03/04/2026 06:47

This is just the trope of the 'wicked stepmother' in reverse. If you reverse the sexes then it makes it plain what you are saying here:

Never trust a woman with other kids, her loyalties are too divided.
She might even prioritise her older kids over yours because they were born first.

Women have to protect themselves, simple as. They always have more to lose. In every way.
Men should also protect their kids. Blending families is very complicated.

ElizabethReed · 03/04/2026 11:22

BlueMum16 · 03/04/2026 11:11

Presume he's paying half the mortgage for the other 90% of the property.

Don’t presume anything
He’s got three children and an ex that’s still rinsing him

BlueMum16 · 03/04/2026 11:11

Ihatetomatoes · 03/04/2026 09:51

This.

Also its the OPS flat sale that's providing the deposit! What's he contributing? Yet wants HIS kids to take precedent over OP if he dies!

Presume he's paying half the mortgage for the other 90% of the property.

Ihatetomatoes · 03/04/2026 09:51

PinkyFlamingo · 02/04/2026 18:08

I wouldnt be buying a house with anyone who was going to leave me potentially homeless if they died that's for sure

This.

Also its the OPS flat sale that's providing the deposit! What's he contributing? Yet wants HIS kids to take precedent over OP if he dies!

Zebedee999 · 03/04/2026 09:47

BlueMum16 · 02/04/2026 18:07

Could it be his half to all 4 kids but with you being able to live there until you meet someone's/move out?

You then leave your half to your DC with him being able to live there?

We are doing similar with our home.

Good compromise.

carnivalcat · 03/04/2026 09:21

Soontobe60 · 03/04/2026 08:57

It sounds like if he died tomorrow ie before the house purchase, his Dc wouldn’t get anything as he doesn’t have any money or life insurance?
In your situation you need to ensure that your deposit is ringfenced so if you’re providing a 20% deposit, you get back 20% of any future equity should you split up. It’s important to use % rather than amount - if you only ringfence a deposit of £50k, you’ll only get £50k back if you split, but that amount will not be increased for inflation.
‘You also need to own the house as tenants in common, not joint tenants. Then you need to insure his life to the value of half the mortgage. You can also take out insurance against your own life for your own children.
What he chooses to do in terms of life insurance is up to him. You don’t need a joint policy.
He comes across as grabby!

How on earth is he grabby for wanting to protect his share of the house (which he will contribute to over time) for the sake of his children?

Surely in this situation the grabby character would be the one insisting that they get all of the house, at the exclusion of children.

Rileysp · 03/04/2026 08:57

carchi · 03/04/2026 08:55

Exactly this. If you have a property that already has a large amount of equity and it sounds like yous does then that's an amazing asset. You can use it to make money by renting. If you can wait a while then get the rent as part of your earnings for the mortgage. Also somewhere to go if you ever need it (hopefully you won't)

But it’s clear she needs the equity for the deposit isn’t it? And presumably doesn’t want the instability of renting.

like most when they move house

Soontobe60 · 03/04/2026 08:57

It sounds like if he died tomorrow ie before the house purchase, his Dc wouldn’t get anything as he doesn’t have any money or life insurance?
In your situation you need to ensure that your deposit is ringfenced so if you’re providing a 20% deposit, you get back 20% of any future equity should you split up. It’s important to use % rather than amount - if you only ringfence a deposit of £50k, you’ll only get £50k back if you split, but that amount will not be increased for inflation.
‘You also need to own the house as tenants in common, not joint tenants. Then you need to insure his life to the value of half the mortgage. You can also take out insurance against your own life for your own children.
What he chooses to do in terms of life insurance is up to him. You don’t need a joint policy.
He comes across as grabby!

carchi · 03/04/2026 08:55

TwinklyRoseTurtle · 02/04/2026 18:10

Don’t sell your flat!

Exactly this. If you have a property that already has a large amount of equity and it sounds like yous does then that's an amazing asset. You can use it to make money by renting. If you can wait a while then get the rent as part of your earnings for the mortgage. Also somewhere to go if you ever need it (hopefully you won't)

Rileysp · 03/04/2026 08:54

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

No I don’t. I just think there are an awful lot of conclusions jumped to here about the guys reliability on the basis of very little, other than the poster is fortunate to have her own property, whilst the bloke who has three dependent children doesn’t. I think flip the genders here and people’s responses are very different

for me the solution is simple anyway. He gets a secondary policy to cover his kids, and gives the partner the stability she wants. It won’t cost that much really, in reality. Another 20-40 quid a month.

ElizabethReed · 03/04/2026 08:54

Rileysp · 03/04/2026 08:48

No you don’t. The poster hasn’t elaborated at all on anything really concerning the context of the relationship beyond the ex partner is very financially dependent on him. As is her right by the way

Ex-wives might have a claim to equity acquired during the marriage. Ex partners do not have the right to be financially dependent as we’re all told in no uncertain terms on a regular basis on this forum.

Hardwick · 03/04/2026 08:50

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Rileysp · 03/04/2026 08:48

ElizabethReed · 03/04/2026 08:37

I think we know enough to be fair

No you don’t. The poster hasn’t elaborated at all on anything really concerning the context of the relationship beyond the ex partner is very financially dependent on him. As is her right by the way

Grumpyeeyore · 03/04/2026 08:47

Can you afford the mortgage yourself? If so buy it on your own and don’t get married and then you will own all the house and can do what you want with it. He can contribute to share bills and save / invest what he isn’t paying to a mortgage for his kids. If you need him to contribute to the mortgage and to buy jointly then he can do what he wants with his share.

Justbecauseyoucandoesntmeanyoushould · 03/04/2026 08:42

You need to see a solicitor and have wills and LPoA drawn up together. Buy as tenants in common. To be fair to everyone, when one of you dies, their half of the estate should go into a life interest trust to protect that half from ever being swallowed up by care home fees. The survivor has the right to remain in the house and to use the trust to purchase a new house for their lifetime/until they meet a new partner. On their death, the estate is then divided between the heirs. In our case, my half will go to my 2 DC, DH's half will be divided between his 4 DC. His older DC have already inherited from their mother and her family: my DC will inherit their mother's estate.

ElizabethReed · 03/04/2026 08:37

Rileysp · 03/04/2026 08:34

You know nothing about the bloke to make this call.

neither had it anything to do with the question

I think we know enough to be fair

Hardwick · 03/04/2026 08:37

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Swipe left for the next trending thread