Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I want the house. AIBU?

415 replies

HouseFair · 02/04/2026 18:05

I feel like this might be controversial…

My boyfriend and I are buying a house. We have been together three years and I’m pregnant! Happy surprise. I own a flat but we live together in a rented house as he has three older kids so my flat isn’t big enough for us all. I’m selling it to provide the deposit on the house.

Part of the mortgage discussion is on life insurance. I have told him I want mirror policies in place which pay off the mortgage which leave the house in the surviving person’s name. He seems reticent about this and I think it’s because he thinks it should be left to his kids.

AIBU?

OP posts:
Ang69 · 07/04/2026 18:27

If you bought as joint tenants then the property would pass automatically to you if he died first and vice versa. However, as an estate planner, I would not buy a property with someone who is not willing to put basic protection in place such as life insurance and a Will. His estate would be open to being contested under the Inheritance Act as he has dependents. This would be an absolute no from me and I think you are much better buying your own property.

Also, when you make your own Will, make sure you have your situation documented as he could also possibly claim under the Inheritance Act if he can show he has been financially dependent on you and you don't provide for him in your Will.. You should document you have fronted the deposit and that you are paying the mortgage. Charge him rent and document the fact he is able to financially support himself without your assistance in any way. PM me if you need further guidance.

Blondeshavemorefun · 07/04/2026 18:23

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 16:43

We don’t share all household bills, so it’d be me paying it. He’s said he won’t pay it. And frankly I don’t know why I should have to shoulder all the monthly payments to provide for his kids, if he can’t be bothered?

Why isn’t he sharing the household bills?

tho my stbeh didn’t either. I paid for it all. Yes muggins here

glad you have decided not to buy with him @HouseFair

most mortgagee will want to see proof of life insurance - equally he could cancel it 6mths later and sounds like he might

Rileysp · 07/04/2026 18:05

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:57

I’m asking that he puts a £50 a month policy in place to protect me and his child (and ideally other ones for his other children) to give me peace of mind and match what I’d give him.

If he doesn’t want to do that, I don’t want to buy a house with him.

Well you’re not though are you?

you’re asking him to take out a policy to ensure you remain in sole o ownership of the house and asset, and an additional policy to ensure the previous kids can’t take their dads share off you

now, as you know, I think he ought to suck it up and do it, to keep you happy. But let’s not pretend this is anything other than you wanting to financially gain as much as you can for you and your child. It’s not about equity. Splitting is share of the marital home does that

BlueMum16 · 07/04/2026 18:04

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:57

I’m asking that he puts a £50 a month policy in place to protect me and his child (and ideally other ones for his other children) to give me peace of mind and match what I’d give him.

If he doesn’t want to do that, I don’t want to buy a house with him.

Hindsight...such a wonderful thing.

Lots of these discussions should have taken place BEFORE deciding to have a baby with a men with completely different outlook to you.

Neither of you is right/wrong but you are polar opposites.

You are right though, best not to buy a home together and work out how to co parent/have a relationship for your child's benefit without living together.

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:57

Rileysp · 07/04/2026 17:46

You’re sacrificing your child growing up with both parents on this alter. What seems very much cutting off your nose to spite your face.

it’s probably best you don’t buy. Because this is the tip of the iceberg. You don’t sound like the sort of person who can honestly be in a blended family of this extent. This before your own has even come along. It’ll only get worse

I’m asking that he puts a £50 a month policy in place to protect me and his child (and ideally other ones for his other children) to give me peace of mind and match what I’d give him.

If he doesn’t want to do that, I don’t want to buy a house with him.

OP posts:
Trusttheawesome · 07/04/2026 17:55

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:46

If I had three children from a previous relationship, I’d have insurance policies and a will in place naming the children already.

I’d set up my estate to ensure all of my children were financially provided for and had a stable home if I passed. How much I left to the dad of one would depend on loads of factors: whether he’d adopted the others, what his financial situation was, how much I could afford, whether he would raise our child or all or none, his health, more…

Remember, this isn’t just me giving him hundreds of thousands of pounds. It’s an insurance policy. It’d be £40 a month for peace of mind. I am hoping neither of us will die in the next 20 years! If we split, we’d each take what we put in.

And he (if he wasn’t an idiot) would make all those same calculations. He has 4 children. You are raising one. He’d have life insurance to pay off the house. Half of an £800k house is more than enough for that, your joint child would get 1/4 of his share, his other kids would get 1/4 each of his share as well. You’d have plenty to raise your joint child, and that child would have their own pile of money when they hit 18. I’d also have insurance set up to give extra as they are are young right now.
But he isn’t doing that. He won’t do anything. He sounds like an idiot. So, he was the wrong guy to choose really. But if he had been right right guy who sorted life insurance, then his way of willing the house would be the correct way. Yours isn’t.

When you’re on the other side of it and you have the child, remember that.

Rileysp · 07/04/2026 17:46

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 14:41

It’s the principle for me. If he doesn't want to consider me at all then I don’t want to facilitate buying a house that I’ll provide the deposit for and pay the lion’s share for. Why would I? I can afford my own house.

Realistically, if I died, he’d need financial support to raise our DC, which I am putting in place. Why shouldn’t he do the same?

You’re sacrificing your child growing up with both parents on this alter. What seems very much cutting off your nose to spite your face.

it’s probably best you don’t buy. Because this is the tip of the iceberg. You don’t sound like the sort of person who can honestly be in a blended family of this extent. This before your own has even come along. It’ll only get worse

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:46

SandyHappy · 07/04/2026 17:29

Genuine question: If you had a child (or three) from a previous relationship, would you be gifting an fully paid up £800k house to your boyfriend upon your death to raise just one of your children in?

If I had three children from a previous relationship, I’d have insurance policies and a will in place naming the children already.

I’d set up my estate to ensure all of my children were financially provided for and had a stable home if I passed. How much I left to the dad of one would depend on loads of factors: whether he’d adopted the others, what his financial situation was, how much I could afford, whether he would raise our child or all or none, his health, more…

Remember, this isn’t just me giving him hundreds of thousands of pounds. It’s an insurance policy. It’d be £40 a month for peace of mind. I am hoping neither of us will die in the next 20 years! If we split, we’d each take what we put in.

OP posts:
Trusttheawesome · 07/04/2026 17:39

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:30

Unless he wins the lottery, he won’t be buying a house, so it’s a moot point anyway.

I’m talking about you. If you ever end up in a new, serious relationship.

You don’t leave your asset to a new partner when you have kids from a previous relationship.

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:30

Trusttheawesome · 07/04/2026 17:27

In a nuclear set up, it’s actually more likely to be safe to do it your way. Because then they won’t he a step parent cutting out your biological kids.

The way you want to do it means biological kids from a previous relationship can (and are) cut out. There isn’t always a lot of assets beyond a home, most people who do get life insurance just get enough to cover the house and a small amount more.

The house would be his asset. He can leave it to his kids.

If you go and move in with a new man at any point, please do not leave the house to him. Leave your share of any house to your children. And for god’s sake, speak to a solicitor because someone needs to knock this sense into you.

Unless he wins the lottery, he won’t be buying a house, so it’s a moot point anyway.

OP posts:
Trusttheawesome · 07/04/2026 17:30

The fact is @HouseFair that the way you are suggesting doing it just simply isn’t how it is done when there are kids from a previous relationship. You might not like it, but it’s just not how it is done. There is too much risk of those kids being cut out.

The way it is done means everyone is kept safe and secure. The only reason it won’t work here is because you’ve got with an idiot who won’t get life insurance. You picked the wrong man.

If this works out, great, but it sounds like it won’t because he doesn’t sound like a keeper. If you go on to a new relationship and buy a home with someone, please please try legal advice about protecting your assets for your kid.

SandyHappy · 07/04/2026 17:29

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:27

He’s entitled to feel that way! Just as he’s entitled to not take out life insurance or worry about how his kids will survive without him.

The result will be SC don’t get anything if he dies, and we don’t buy a house together.

Genuine question: If you had a child (or three) from a previous relationship, would you be gifting an fully paid up £800k house to your boyfriend upon your death to raise just one of your children in?

Trusttheawesome · 07/04/2026 17:27

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:24

But you’re ignoring the fact that insurance policies exist (as do pensions, death in service benefits, investments, savings). There’s many ways to provide for a child outside of leaving them a share of the home you live in with someone who isn’t their parent.

In a nuclear set up where we shared only children together and were married, I’d do what you suggest. But that isn’t the case here.

In a nuclear set up, it’s actually more likely to be safe to do it your way. Because then they won’t he a step parent cutting out your biological kids.

The way you want to do it means biological kids from a previous relationship can (and are) cut out. There isn’t always a lot of assets beyond a home, most people who do get life insurance just get enough to cover the house and a small amount more.

The house would be his asset. He can leave it to his kids.

If you go and move in with a new man at any point, please do not leave the house to him. Leave your share of any house to your children. And for god’s sake, speak to a solicitor because someone needs to knock this sense into you.

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:27

SandyHappy · 07/04/2026 17:25

I think I probably wouldn’t ever marry until all children involved are adults.

You aren't married and have no intention of getting married, you have absolutely no rights to dictate why your partner does with his half of a shared asset, it isn't and won't ever be a marital asset, you are just two people owning a house together.

No one with existing children would gift their portion of a house to their girlfriend over their kids, the "fair" thing is for him to leave it to all his dependents equally.

Anyone saying that is unfair only cares about themselves.

He’s entitled to feel that way! Just as he’s entitled to not take out life insurance or worry about how his kids will survive without him.

The result will be SC don’t get anything if he dies, and we don’t buy a house together.

OP posts:
Justbloodydoit · 07/04/2026 17:25

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:21

Oh you mean buildings insurance. But we are talking about life insurance.

If you read the thread of that topic I was saying to a PP that you don’t HAVE to have life insurance but you do have to insure the asset 🤦‍♀️

SandyHappy · 07/04/2026 17:25

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:10

I have thought about what you’re saying. If I had a second relationship, I would leave money to whoever would be likely to raise my child, whether that’d be current DP, new DP or my sister, to ensure they had a secure home throughout childhood. So the scenario doesn’t translate because DP’s kids already have a main home with their mum. And I’ve said if he wants to take out separate policies for SC (or their mum!) then great.

Ensuring a secure childhood home is very important to me. As is leaving assets to my kids.

I think I probably wouldn’t ever marry until all children involved are adults.

I think I probably wouldn’t ever marry until all children involved are adults.

You aren't married and have no intention of getting married, you have absolutely no rights to dictate why your partner does with his half of a shared asset, it isn't and won't ever be a marital asset, you are just two people owning a house together.

No one with existing children would gift their portion of a house to their girlfriend over their kids, the "fair" thing is for him to leave it to all his dependents equally.

Anyone saying that is unfair only cares about themselves.

Trusttheawesome · 07/04/2026 17:24

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:10

I have thought about what you’re saying. If I had a second relationship, I would leave money to whoever would be likely to raise my child, whether that’d be current DP, new DP or my sister, to ensure they had a secure home throughout childhood. So the scenario doesn’t translate because DP’s kids already have a main home with their mum. And I’ve said if he wants to take out separate policies for SC (or their mum!) then great.

Ensuring a secure childhood home is very important to me. As is leaving assets to my kids.

I think I probably wouldn’t ever marry until all children involved are adults.

You also do not leave money to whoever is going to raise your child. You leave it to the child.

And why would he have his ex as a beneficiary? He would will his share of the house and any cash/policies he has to his children. Not to his ex.

You’re just showing how little you know.

You’re about to be a parent. Go and find out this stuff.

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:24

Trusttheawesome · 07/04/2026 17:19

It’s bit just about money to raise them through childhood. If you buy a house with someone, and will it the way you suggest then your child won’t inherit anything as an adult. Maybe some cash if you have any, but the house would go to your spouse. If they remarry, and then die, the house that you paid for will go to some random woman far removed from you. And your kid would get nothing. They might not be a child anymore but most of us would want the asset we paid into, to go to our adult child. Rather than risk it going to a new spouse of our partner or being lost in a divorce.

But you’re not a parent yet, or you’ve onto got a young baby? And you’ve never been faced with the possibility of the situation. Maybe just take the advice from those of us who have.

Your idea of how to will the house is just really not how it’s done, for a reason. Not when you’ve got kids. Think about it much more carefully if the time ever does come.

But you’re ignoring the fact that insurance policies exist (as do pensions, death in service benefits, investments, savings). There’s many ways to provide for a child outside of leaving them a share of the home you live in with someone who isn’t their parent.

In a nuclear set up where we shared only children together and were married, I’d do what you suggest. But that isn’t the case here.

OP posts:
Pineapplewhip · 07/04/2026 17:22

If your house is worth £300k he needs to insure himself for £600k - then you can pay off the mortgage if he dies and his kids get £100k each.

Your deposit is then protected and mortgage paid off as expected as if he wasnt bringing any children into the relationship (financially speaking)

JustAboutHangingInThere · 07/04/2026 17:22

Life insurance with a mortgage isn’t mandatory.

Your plan(s) sound sensible OP, not stupid. DP sounds like a passenger expecting you to do all the driving. You’re not his parent. Imagine taking out a life insurance policy for him, and paying for it, because he doesn’t want to. You’ll be expected to wipe his arse next.

Bit of parental responsibility and future proofing finances from him would make all the difference. Really quite simple actions too. You’re not asking for the moon OP.

Stick to your guns, and good luck xx

OneGreatUmberZebra · 07/04/2026 17:22

I am always astonished at people who let their partner impregnate them when they clearly don’t yet know them properly….!

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:21

Justbloodydoit · 07/04/2026 17:18

That’s not what I’m saying. You are supposed to have buildings insurance when you have a mortgage - the bank owns the home, what if it burns down? Not linked to the mortgage as such. It is in the T&C of the contract

Oh you mean buildings insurance. But we are talking about life insurance.

OP posts:
HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:20

SandyHappy · 07/04/2026 17:17

I’d want DP to own a paid-off house so he was financially comfortable for the duration of DC’s childhood.

You've just hit the nail on the head there, which is why I'm so baffled that you genuinely can't see the difference in your approaches and why you both have differing views??

How is him leaving the house to YOU upon his death making sure his other children are financially comfortable for THEIR childhood.. yes, it would secure you and his child with you, but what about his other three? Fuck them I guess? They can wait till they are 18 for a pay out from an insurance policy and be happy about it.

If you had an existing child from a previous relationship you absolutely would not be gifting the house to your partner upon your death and sending your other child to live with their dad with nothing.

If he cared about that, he could take out a policy naming his ex as a beneficiary. I can guarantee she hasn’t done the same!

OP posts:
Trusttheawesome · 07/04/2026 17:19

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 17:10

I have thought about what you’re saying. If I had a second relationship, I would leave money to whoever would be likely to raise my child, whether that’d be current DP, new DP or my sister, to ensure they had a secure home throughout childhood. So the scenario doesn’t translate because DP’s kids already have a main home with their mum. And I’ve said if he wants to take out separate policies for SC (or their mum!) then great.

Ensuring a secure childhood home is very important to me. As is leaving assets to my kids.

I think I probably wouldn’t ever marry until all children involved are adults.

It’s bit just about money to raise them through childhood. If you buy a house with someone, and will it the way you suggest then your child won’t inherit anything as an adult. Maybe some cash if you have any, but the house would go to your spouse. If they remarry, and then die, the house that you paid for will go to some random woman far removed from you. And your kid would get nothing. They might not be a child anymore but most of us would want the asset we paid into, to go to our adult child. Rather than risk it going to a new spouse of our partner or being lost in a divorce.

But you’re not a parent yet, or you’ve onto got a young baby? And you’ve never been faced with the possibility of the situation. Maybe just take the advice from those of us who have.

Your idea of how to will the house is just really not how it’s done, for a reason. Not when you’ve got kids. Think about it much more carefully if the time ever does come.

Justbloodydoit · 07/04/2026 17:18

HouseFair · 07/04/2026 16:51

I’ve never taken out insurance with my mortgage provider, or given details. It’s definitely not legally required.

That’s not what I’m saying. You are supposed to have buildings insurance when you have a mortgage - the bank owns the home, what if it burns down? Not linked to the mortgage as such. It is in the T&C of the contract

Swipe left for the next trending thread