Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel a bit hurt about childcare differences between grandchildren?

467 replies

OneLovingMoose · 01/04/2026 21:41

Ive just had a baby and we’ve already had to confirm nursery. I’ve arranged 4 days a week when I go back (using a mix of annual leave and flexible working for the first 10 months, then we’ll reassess). My husband does contract work so can’t commit a day but will do pick ups/drops off around his contracts. I am very much of the opinion that it’s our responsibility to arrange childcare and whilst I would accept help I am not going to expect this or put this onto others - it’s theirs to offer as it’s a lot!

Here’s where I’m struggling a bit…

My sister had a baby 2 years ago and my mum looks after my nephew 2 days a week, with nursery the other 3. This was an arrangement she offered when my sister went back to work 2 days a week after Easter. As she’s a teacher this meant she didn’t have to arrange nursery until September. My sister then went back 5 days a week from the September and my mum continued to look after my nephew 2 days with him in nursery the other 3.

My mum has very strong views that nursery isn’t right for young children and has always blamed any illness or toddler behaviour on it 🙄. Both my sister and I have pushed back on this (especially when she suggests my sister should stop working), but those views have remained based on nothing but her opinion. When I say to her I think my nephew has a good balance of 2 days with her and 3 in nursery (8.15-4pm) she snaps that’s he’s too young to be in 3 full days Q (he’s 2 next month).

What’s confusing/hurtful is that there’s been no mention of a similar arrangement for my baby. I haven’t asked outright, and she hasn’t offered. What’s hurting me most is the acknowledgement- if my mum can’t offer the same to my baby as she’s committed to my nephews arrangement and can’t see herself doing more, fine, but an acknowledgment of this would go a long way. It also feels like double standards that she rants about the negatives of nursery for my nephew but there has been no mention of this for my baby.

The thing is, my mum is brilliant with my nephew and clearly loves it, but it does tire her out. She often seems irritable afterwards and has been ill more, but won’t acknowledge it’s a lot and insists she wants to do it and takes it personally when I mention how it’s a lot for her especially when I make a joke of a bad mood she may be in after a tough couple of toddler tantrum days.

My sister and her husband accept the help (understandably as it saves them a lot), but also put up with the moods and comments. I am also hurt that they haven’t mentioned the disparity either to me or I don’t think my mum.

My husband says my mum and sister are similar and live more in the moment so may not have even occurred to them that even though it’s a year away arrangements have to be made now and they aren’t thinking about it. I see that but don’t accept this as surely it’s pretty obvious, when I was pregnant but now the baby is here.

I’m reluctant to ask my mum directly because I don’t want any sense of obligation or guilt for either of us. I also see how tiring it is for her and couldn’t bear the guilt knowing it was my baby doing this and it hadn’t just been her choice. But equally I wonder if she assumes I don’t need help because I’m seen as the “capable” one and then I’ve been clear I value nursery for socialisation and that I do want to go back to work.

I think what’s bothering me most is the inconsistency. She was so adamant about nursery negatives with my nephew, yet hasn’t said anything similar to me about my child. And longer term, it feels a bit unfair that my child may be in nursery 4 days a week while my nephew (if this continues) only does 3 who will be 2 years older, plus there’s a significant financial difference for us vs my sister.

I fully appreciate no one owes me childcare, and we’ve made plans we can afford — but I can’t shake the feeling of it being a bit unequal.

AIBU to feel hurt by this, or am I overthinking it?

OP posts:
Tableforjoan · 02/04/2026 17:59

I get it. She thinks babies shouldn’t be in nursery yet she’s only offered for one of her children’s babies to be watched by her.

We have it the other way in that we have the older grandchildren and was never offered yet when the sibling had children suddenly nanny daycare to the rescue and even now both at school she does regular pick ups and sleep overs.

Honestly yes it has affected the children’s relationships with their nan she favours the others and ours feel left out and unwanted so have stopped bothering with her.

She actually gets quite annoyed that ours practically avoid her now but somehow hasn’t put two and two together.

She has been called out on her blatant favouritism but goes oh no it’s not like that…. Don’t think that….

Her loss.

YerMotherWasAHamster · 02/04/2026 17:57

Don't bring it up with her but if she criticised it thats when I'd be saying well, since we don't get family help we aren't left with a lot of options.

Sdevo · 02/04/2026 17:49

Interesting comments in this thread!
I have young kids but live in a different country from my mum so this issue hasn’t come up.

I think the grandma should have absolute discretion to say how much childcare she’s comfortable doing (for any grandkids). And if she’s aged a bit since the current arrangement with the sister was agreed, or has found it hard going, she has every right to pull out. She doesn’t have to help OP just to ‘even things up’.

however I agree with the OP that if grandma keeps going with caring for the toddler and does nothing for OP’s baby - I would feel hurt if I was in OP’s shoes. Both because babies benefit more in a home environment and are (I think) easier to care for than an active 3 year old, and because of the issue of fairness between the sisters.

BUT the OP is being very unreasonable for making a lot of assumptions without just talking to her mum. OP you should do that and see where she stands!

Changename12 · 02/04/2026 17:40

Seedlingsparrow · 02/04/2026 15:15

Is favouritism of grandmothers also wrong? I see on here so often that it is ‘natural’ for a mother to favour her own parents. By your logic, having favourites whether children, grandchildren or grandparents is also wrong. There are no laws.It is important to remember that fairness should go ‘up’ the generations as well as down. As you say, @Changename12, favouritism is horrible.

No. It is usual for each child to favour their parents. OP has stated that her Dad is not around. Sons can favour their own parents too.
It doesn’t quite apply the other way round. You are responsible for the children you bring up. You are not responsible for your parents. If they don’t treat you well you can ignore them.

Americasfavouritefightingfrenchman · 02/04/2026 16:52

TheNorns · 02/04/2026 16:45

That’s of no relevance to the OP’s situation, rather the opposite. The OP appears to want her mother to ‘sack off’ her pre-existing arrangement to look after her sister’s child in order to look after hers.

The OP wants the grandkids to be treated broadly similarly. The fact grandma always looked after their cousin but never after the OPs child will absolutely be noticed by the OPs child as they get older and watching them feel hurt by it will be upsetting. Kids absolutely notice when grandparents are always with their other grandkids. It’s not an identical situation but the eventual outcome could very well be the same. It’s disingenuous to suggest all it’s about is demanding free childcare

TheNorns · 02/04/2026 16:45

Americasfavouritefightingfrenchman · 02/04/2026 16:19

You genuinely can’t see any unfairness in your treatment of your grandchildren if you have 2 of them if you chose to spend 8+ hours a day, twice a week with one but had no regular time with the other. You don’t imagine as they got older they would come to equate the time/attention each got to how you felt about them? My father in law is like this. He will sack our daughters off at the drop of a hat to look after his grandson (SILs youngest). My kids absolutely notice and are mystified as to what they did wrong that means their grandad shows a marked preference for their cousin. Having observed their experience and how much it’s hurt my OH I will never behave that way.

That’s of no relevance to the OP’s situation, rather the opposite. The OP appears to want her mother to ‘sack off’ her pre-existing arrangement to look after her sister’s child in order to look after hers.

Fundays12 · 02/04/2026 16:37

Americasfavouritefightingfrenchman · 02/04/2026 16:19

You genuinely can’t see any unfairness in your treatment of your grandchildren if you have 2 of them if you chose to spend 8+ hours a day, twice a week with one but had no regular time with the other. You don’t imagine as they got older they would come to equate the time/attention each got to how you felt about them? My father in law is like this. He will sack our daughters off at the drop of a hat to look after his grandson (SILs youngest). My kids absolutely notice and are mystified as to what they did wrong that means their grandad shows a marked preference for their cousin. Having observed their experience and how much it’s hurt my OH I will never behave that way.

Well said kids do notice. My kids know who the favourite grand child is in dhs family. They even comment on granny always talking about X child or caring for her.

Americasfavouritefightingfrenchman · 02/04/2026 16:31

OttersOnAPlane · 02/04/2026 16:26

@Americasfavouritefightingfrenchman - I'm now singing your user name at the top of my lungs 😄

😂 it’s a bit of a favourite of mine. My youngest learnt it off by heart and it was very amusing watching her get to grips with it

OttersOnAPlane · 02/04/2026 16:26

@Americasfavouritefightingfrenchman - I'm now singing your user name at the top of my lungs 😄

Americasfavouritefightingfrenchman · 02/04/2026 16:19

Eggandspoonrace2 · 02/04/2026 13:14

The gran is literally allowed to do anything she likes with her own time. That's fairness.

The only "consequence" comes about if her grasping bludger of an entitled daughter makes unfair demands or throws a wobbly. OP is owed not a single second of her mother's time or free labour. Not one second. If she'd accepted that and internalised it she wouldn't be throwing this petulant tantrum.

Time for the OP, you and everyone else to get it. It's not your right or entitlement to expect even a single second of childcare from your mother - no matter what else they are doing. Her mother's time and free labour is not a resource to be shared out by anybody at all. Her mother has the right to do whatever she wants, however she wants, with whomever she wants. No explanation required. That's the fair and right thing.

Once you accept this, it all becomes clear. If OP wants to blow up her relationship with her mother because she thinks she has a right to her mother's free labour, that's her choice.

You genuinely can’t see any unfairness in your treatment of your grandchildren if you have 2 of them if you chose to spend 8+ hours a day, twice a week with one but had no regular time with the other. You don’t imagine as they got older they would come to equate the time/attention each got to how you felt about them? My father in law is like this. He will sack our daughters off at the drop of a hat to look after his grandson (SILs youngest). My kids absolutely notice and are mystified as to what they did wrong that means their grandad shows a marked preference for their cousin. Having observed their experience and how much it’s hurt my OH I will never behave that way.

saraclara · 02/04/2026 15:56

Seedlingsparrow · 02/04/2026 13:12

@Aiming4Optimistic
Have you read the statistics for the age of mothers in the UK?
Over half (approx. 54%) of all live births in England and Wales are to mothers aged 30 and over, reflecting a long-term trend of delayed childbearing. The average age of mothers has risen to 31 years.
The great majority of grandmothers in their ( to quote you) forties and fifties will still be working so unable to provide childcare. There are fewer and fewer grandmothers in their forties and fifties, anyway.
Some MN posters are unbelievably entitled about their (imagined ) right to childcare from an army of increasingly elderly ladies.

My grandmother was 42 when her first grandchild was born.
My mum was 53 when her first grandchild was born
I was 64 when my first grandchild was born.
That's a phenomenal change in the generations. And pretty standard.

Back in 1986, at 30 I was the oldest in my NHS antenatal classes.
My daughter, at 32, was the first and youngest of her peer group, and similar aged cousins, to give birth. Incidentally an unplanned (but happy) pregnancy.

SLAMSreadmore · 02/04/2026 15:49

The "getting to know the grandkids" is always muddied up with some "free time" for the parents.

HazelMember · 02/04/2026 15:29

Aiming4Optimistic · 02/04/2026 13:21

@Seedlingsparrowyour problem is your own over entitled children, that you need to deal with. I think you've gotten yourself into a situation that you are struggling to get out of now and it's way too much for you. I would advise that you give your children notice to find alternative arrangements, particularly the ones whose children you have looked after for the longest. You might find that eased your burden and frees up more time for you to enjoy your retirement.

The OP here isn't demanding anything - she's wondering why her mum is willing to offer lots of support to her sibling but not to her. I do think the fair thing in this situation is for gran to step back from the older gc and support the younger one, if she is still willing/able to offer any childcare. If she isn't able to do that for the OP because childcare has become too much, then surely it's too much to continue for the older one as well?

The OP here isn't demanding anything - she's wondering why her mum is willing to offer lots of support to her sibling but not to her.

OP has the answer to this already. She said it herself:

The thing is, my mum is brilliant with my nephew and clearly loves it, but it does tire her out. She often seems irritable afterwards and has been ill more.

Yet OP is still confused and bewildered.

Seedlingsparrow · 02/04/2026 15:15

Changename12 · 02/04/2026 14:59

@Seedlingsparrow
Nobody has the right to anybody else’s time.

If OP’s mum is feeling tired she should stop doing childcare completely.
However, most good parents don’t treat their children differently.
Favouritism of children/grandchildren is horrible.

Is favouritism of grandmothers also wrong? I see on here so often that it is ‘natural’ for a mother to favour her own parents. By your logic, having favourites whether children, grandchildren or grandparents is also wrong. There are no laws.It is important to remember that fairness should go ‘up’ the generations as well as down. As you say, @Changename12, favouritism is horrible.

Changename12 · 02/04/2026 14:59

@Seedlingsparrow
Nobody has the right to anybody else’s time.

If OP’s mum is feeling tired she should stop doing childcare completely.
However, most good parents don’t treat their children differently.
Favouritism of children/grandchildren is horrible.

NorthXNorthWest · 02/04/2026 14:56

Seedlingsparrow · 02/04/2026 14:44

@Aiming4Optimistic
I did not ask for personal advice. My Life. I am not the OP. I was pointing out that the army of grandmothers expected to donate their retirement for childcare is ageing. You still haven't commented on the statistics which show this to be the case. These are women who will have worked until 65 or older who are then expected to donate the next ten years to childcare in the name of being 'fair'. Circumstances change. Most mothers do not stop at one. My point is that the OP's mother has cared for her grandson for three years and now the OP wants the same in the name of fairness . Then in the name of 'fairness , more grandchildren will arrive who need care and bang goes the grandmother's retirement. Just as you you @Aiming4Optimistic might feel fairness only applies to a young mum, think about older women who in your eyes don't have any rights but have to give their time freely and without complaint.
I am not alone in thinking that some posters think they are entitled to 'own' someone else's time. That kind of entitlement is dangerous and unfair.

The first 10 years after retirement are likely to be their healthiest too.

Seedlingsparrow · 02/04/2026 14:44

@Aiming4Optimistic
I did not ask for personal advice. My Life. I am not the OP. I was pointing out that the army of grandmothers expected to donate their retirement for childcare is ageing. You still haven't commented on the statistics which show this to be the case. These are women who will have worked until 65 or older who are then expected to donate the next ten years to childcare in the name of being 'fair'. Circumstances change. Most mothers do not stop at one. My point is that the OP's mother has cared for her grandson for three years and now the OP wants the same in the name of fairness . Then in the name of 'fairness , more grandchildren will arrive who need care and bang goes the grandmother's retirement. Just as you you @Aiming4Optimistic might feel fairness only applies to a young mum, think about older women who in your eyes don't have any rights but have to give their time freely and without complaint.
I am not alone in thinking that some posters think they are entitled to 'own' someone else's time. That kind of entitlement is dangerous and unfair.

Aiming4Optimistic · 02/04/2026 13:27

I found my newborns easier than my 3 year olds tbh - they stayed where you put them!
If it's the case for gran that she feels a 3 year old is easier to cope with, it's worth having that chat with OP so she understands her mum isn't just favouring one child over another. I think this is where a lot of the feeling is coming from - not entitlement or demands, but from wanting to feel that she's as important to her mum as her sister is and that their children will be loved equally.

Aiming4Optimistic · 02/04/2026 13:24

@Eggandspoonrace2shrs not throwing a tantrum. Stop projecting whatever you are pissed off about. She's asking if her feelings are unreasonable.

CharlotteRumpling · 02/04/2026 13:23

Aiming4Optimistic · 02/04/2026 13:21

@Seedlingsparrowyour problem is your own over entitled children, that you need to deal with. I think you've gotten yourself into a situation that you are struggling to get out of now and it's way too much for you. I would advise that you give your children notice to find alternative arrangements, particularly the ones whose children you have looked after for the longest. You might find that eased your burden and frees up more time for you to enjoy your retirement.

The OP here isn't demanding anything - she's wondering why her mum is willing to offer lots of support to her sibling but not to her. I do think the fair thing in this situation is for gran to step back from the older gc and support the younger one, if she is still willing/able to offer any childcare. If she isn't able to do that for the OP because childcare has become too much, then surely it's too much to continue for the older one as well?

3-year-olds are easier than newborns. Maybe OPs mum feels she can't cope with a newborn now.

Aiming4Optimistic · 02/04/2026 13:21

@Seedlingsparrowyour problem is your own over entitled children, that you need to deal with. I think you've gotten yourself into a situation that you are struggling to get out of now and it's way too much for you. I would advise that you give your children notice to find alternative arrangements, particularly the ones whose children you have looked after for the longest. You might find that eased your burden and frees up more time for you to enjoy your retirement.

The OP here isn't demanding anything - she's wondering why her mum is willing to offer lots of support to her sibling but not to her. I do think the fair thing in this situation is for gran to step back from the older gc and support the younger one, if she is still willing/able to offer any childcare. If she isn't able to do that for the OP because childcare has become too much, then surely it's too much to continue for the older one as well?

MJagain · 02/04/2026 13:21

OneLovingMoose · 01/04/2026 22:18

She does know I’ve confirmed the nursery and the number of days as I have mentioned it in to her.

As I said in my post, I don’t want to ask as I see the impact it has on her and would feel guilty if it was me asking as maybe she doesn’t want to take on more childcare duties! I believe the offer should come from her or as I said, an acknowledgement if she simply can’t commit of the disparity between what she will be doing for her two grandchildren. Not just financial but also the difference in time she will spend with them.

It sounds to me like you are the “coper” of the family and your sister is the one that needs looking after.

You are fueling this dynamic by not asking for help. If you want their help it’s ok to ask.

however in this situation the “help” actualy seems like a poisoned chalice of snide comments and guilt for 3 years until the kid goes to school. You need to decide if that’s actually what you want, or do you want the pride of knowing you’ve done it all yourself.
Either is fine, what will help you sleep better at night.

JassyRadlett · 02/04/2026 13:20

Eggandspoonrace2 · 02/04/2026 13:14

The gran is literally allowed to do anything she likes with her own time. That's fairness.

The only "consequence" comes about if her grasping bludger of an entitled daughter makes unfair demands or throws a wobbly. OP is owed not a single second of her mother's time or free labour. Not one second. If she'd accepted that and internalised it she wouldn't be throwing this petulant tantrum.

Time for the OP, you and everyone else to get it. It's not your right or entitlement to expect even a single second of childcare from your mother - no matter what else they are doing. Her mother's time and free labour is not a resource to be shared out by anybody at all. Her mother has the right to do whatever she wants, however she wants, with whomever she wants. No explanation required. That's the fair and right thing.

Once you accept this, it all becomes clear. If OP wants to blow up her relationship with her mother because she thinks she has a right to her mother's free labour, that's her choice.

Can you clarify? Why is she a bludger? What specifically is she grasping for?

HazelMember · 02/04/2026 13:19

Aiming4Optimistic · 02/04/2026 13:13

@HazelMember is the mum going to continue looking after the first grandchild? Despite being irritable, she isn't withdrawing that help.

How would I know?

IsItSnowing · 02/04/2026 13:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I agree