Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel a bit hurt about childcare differences between grandchildren?

467 replies

OneLovingMoose · 01/04/2026 21:41

Ive just had a baby and we’ve already had to confirm nursery. I’ve arranged 4 days a week when I go back (using a mix of annual leave and flexible working for the first 10 months, then we’ll reassess). My husband does contract work so can’t commit a day but will do pick ups/drops off around his contracts. I am very much of the opinion that it’s our responsibility to arrange childcare and whilst I would accept help I am not going to expect this or put this onto others - it’s theirs to offer as it’s a lot!

Here’s where I’m struggling a bit…

My sister had a baby 2 years ago and my mum looks after my nephew 2 days a week, with nursery the other 3. This was an arrangement she offered when my sister went back to work 2 days a week after Easter. As she’s a teacher this meant she didn’t have to arrange nursery until September. My sister then went back 5 days a week from the September and my mum continued to look after my nephew 2 days with him in nursery the other 3.

My mum has very strong views that nursery isn’t right for young children and has always blamed any illness or toddler behaviour on it 🙄. Both my sister and I have pushed back on this (especially when she suggests my sister should stop working), but those views have remained based on nothing but her opinion. When I say to her I think my nephew has a good balance of 2 days with her and 3 in nursery (8.15-4pm) she snaps that’s he’s too young to be in 3 full days Q (he’s 2 next month).

What’s confusing/hurtful is that there’s been no mention of a similar arrangement for my baby. I haven’t asked outright, and she hasn’t offered. What’s hurting me most is the acknowledgement- if my mum can’t offer the same to my baby as she’s committed to my nephews arrangement and can’t see herself doing more, fine, but an acknowledgment of this would go a long way. It also feels like double standards that she rants about the negatives of nursery for my nephew but there has been no mention of this for my baby.

The thing is, my mum is brilliant with my nephew and clearly loves it, but it does tire her out. She often seems irritable afterwards and has been ill more, but won’t acknowledge it’s a lot and insists she wants to do it and takes it personally when I mention how it’s a lot for her especially when I make a joke of a bad mood she may be in after a tough couple of toddler tantrum days.

My sister and her husband accept the help (understandably as it saves them a lot), but also put up with the moods and comments. I am also hurt that they haven’t mentioned the disparity either to me or I don’t think my mum.

My husband says my mum and sister are similar and live more in the moment so may not have even occurred to them that even though it’s a year away arrangements have to be made now and they aren’t thinking about it. I see that but don’t accept this as surely it’s pretty obvious, when I was pregnant but now the baby is here.

I’m reluctant to ask my mum directly because I don’t want any sense of obligation or guilt for either of us. I also see how tiring it is for her and couldn’t bear the guilt knowing it was my baby doing this and it hadn’t just been her choice. But equally I wonder if she assumes I don’t need help because I’m seen as the “capable” one and then I’ve been clear I value nursery for socialisation and that I do want to go back to work.

I think what’s bothering me most is the inconsistency. She was so adamant about nursery negatives with my nephew, yet hasn’t said anything similar to me about my child. And longer term, it feels a bit unfair that my child may be in nursery 4 days a week while my nephew (if this continues) only does 3 who will be 2 years older, plus there’s a significant financial difference for us vs my sister.

I fully appreciate no one owes me childcare, and we’ve made plans we can afford — but I can’t shake the feeling of it being a bit unequal.

AIBU to feel hurt by this, or am I overthinking it?

OP posts:
ElinoristhenewEnid · 03/04/2026 13:13

I future planned the care of my gcs. When my first arrived I offered my dd 1 day a week childcare with the proviso I would offer my ds the same if and when he has a dc. He did so I do 2 days a week 1 per dc. Set the boundaries early to ensure fairness.

HazelMember · 03/04/2026 13:04

Blondeshavemorefun · 03/04/2026 12:59

Fair wouid be to stop looking after the older grandchildren and do 2yrs of younger /other child kids

no obv nanny shouldn’t tire her self out but I can understand if the second sibling to have kids and no help yet they helped other sibling , for them to be a bit peeved

The OP's mum is already finding it a struggle yet she should do another 2 years to make it fair?

So women need to keep giving and giving?

Blondeshavemorefun · 03/04/2026 12:59

HazelMember · 03/04/2026 08:20

It is unfair?

my mum is brilliant with my nephew and clearly loves it, but it does tire her out. She often seems irritable afterwards and has been ill more

So OP's mum has to keep providing more childcare regardless of what effect it has on her to be fair?

As usual no one expects this of men.

Fair wouid be to stop looking after the older grandchildren and do 2yrs of younger /other child kids

no obv nanny shouldn’t tire her self out but I can understand if the second sibling to have kids and no help yet they helped other sibling , for them to be a bit peeved

Aiming4Optimistic · 03/04/2026 12:58

@HazelMember I think that might be because there's perceived favouritism here. A dad who does nothing, largely does nothing for all his kids. With the mum, it's the perception that she'll help one but not both.

Namechange3345 · 03/04/2026 12:53

You’re massively overthinking this. I didn’t start looking at nurseries until I was 9m pp and the nursery was clear it’s fine to drop/add days when he finally starts (will be 15 months when I go back to work)

HazelMember · 03/04/2026 12:47

Aiming4Optimistic · 03/04/2026 12:33

My dad used to pick me and ds1 up on the morning and drive me to work before I passed my test. My mum prob did do more of the childcare but he did loads of driving us around, diy, helping me to choose a car, shopping, cooking (no one wants my mum doing that lol). I hope I managed to pay back some of that when he was ill and needed support. Lots of dads are fantastic and help in their own way, even if that's different to how mums help.

The expectations and criticism are reserved mostly for grandmothers not grandfathers.

HazelMember · 03/04/2026 12:46

WhiteJasmin · 03/04/2026 12:33

This isn't a gender based comment. My in laws are divorced. My FIL is fair in my opinion. My issue with MIL's treatment is purely based on how she treats my SIL's kid and paying for her nanny.

All your criticism is of the MIL and SIL.

What childcare does FIL do?

Aiming4Optimistic · 03/04/2026 12:33

My dad used to pick me and ds1 up on the morning and drive me to work before I passed my test. My mum prob did do more of the childcare but he did loads of driving us around, diy, helping me to choose a car, shopping, cooking (no one wants my mum doing that lol). I hope I managed to pay back some of that when he was ill and needed support. Lots of dads are fantastic and help in their own way, even if that's different to how mums help.

WhiteJasmin · 03/04/2026 12:33

HazelMember · 03/04/2026 08:19

Yes older women should be at your beck and call for childcare.

You are upset at MIL and SIL. Are all the men dead in the family?

This isn't a gender based comment. My in laws are divorced. My FIL is fair in my opinion. My issue with MIL's treatment is purely based on how she treats my SIL's kid and paying for her nanny.

HazelMember · 03/04/2026 12:15

Aiming4Optimistic · 03/04/2026 11:42

Just to defend dads a bit - my dad did as much as my mum when it came to helping me out.

People say this but the research shows the most grandfathers do more of the playing, picking up and entertaining whereas grandmothers meal plan, feed, look after children when they are ill, help toilet train and other drudgery.

Aiming4Optimistic · 03/04/2026 11:42

Just to defend dads a bit - my dad did as much as my mum when it came to helping me out.

DreamyJade · 03/04/2026 11:23

notenoughalonetime · 03/04/2026 11:02

We're all different. I know I could do it (I don't want to) but I do keep up with two dogs and an active collection of older kids. Maybe gc would energise us? My limit would be one or two days a week though. I'd be happy to have any number of grandkids on those days. Beyond that, I just don't want to do it. I don't feel at all obligated to do any childcare, but I'd be willing to do that much.

I’m destroyed after one day ad-hoc babysitting, I don’t think it would energise me! I love children but I just can’t do what I used to do (numerous health conditions, chronic pain plus menopause had finished me off).

I have a friend who has her 5 pre-school dgc every day - and she’s in her 60s! I really don’t know how she does it.

CharlotteRumpling · 03/04/2026 11:16

notenoughalonetime · 03/04/2026 11:07

Yes, it's not longer enough to just be part of the family. You have to give, give and give some more. Even if it compromises your health, personal life or personal finances. Otherwise you're terrible and maybe should be gone NC with.

Edited

Ah, the everpresent threat of NC! Like a sword of Damocles.
If any child of mine expected me to provide childcare 4 days a week- to make it even with both- and never go on holiday, I am happpy for them to go NC.

notenoughalonetime · 03/04/2026 11:07

CharlotteRumpling · 03/04/2026 11:04

Your PILS don't actually seem to be doing much except ' financially'. Checking in is not the same as childcare

I am somewhat appalled by the notion that GPs now not only have to provide chiildcare, they also have to finance their grandchildren to be considered good GPs .
Maybe I can get away with financial support as the lives of most GPs on here sounds miserable.

Yes, it's not longer enough to just be part of the family. You have to give, give and give some more. Even if it compromises your health, personal life or personal finances. Otherwise you're terrible and maybe should be gone NC with.

CharlotteRumpling · 03/04/2026 11:04

OneLovingMoose · 03/04/2026 10:56

Agreed men do get away with this!

I don’t have a dad as he passed away when I was little and my PIL are 4 hours away. They are supportive in other ways - financially, checking in a lot during pregnancy and asking what they can get sorted when we eventually go them.

My mum moved 6 years ago to be closer to me and my sister - it was 4 years before the first DGC (my sisters LO)!arrived who will be 2 next month.

My husband is v hands on (as he should be) but he doesn’t have regular 9-5 so can’t commit to a full day childcare.

Your PILS don't actually seem to be doing much except ' financially'. Checking in is not the same as childcare

I am somewhat appalled by the notion that GPs now not only have to provide chiildcare, they also have to finance their grandchildren to be considered good GPs .
Maybe I can get away with financial support as the lives of most GPs on here sounds miserable.

notenoughalonetime · 03/04/2026 11:02

DreamyJade · 03/04/2026 10:29

I’ve also had five and in my early fifties. I’m completely knackered. I’d struggle to look after a cat these days, never mind a toddler!

We're all different. I know I could do it (I don't want to) but I do keep up with two dogs and an active collection of older kids. Maybe gc would energise us? My limit would be one or two days a week though. I'd be happy to have any number of grandkids on those days. Beyond that, I just don't want to do it. I don't feel at all obligated to do any childcare, but I'd be willing to do that much.

OneLovingMoose · 03/04/2026 10:56

HazelMember · 03/04/2026 08:13

Of course dads also play a part before anyone jumps down on me!

You have just added that at the end while focusing exclusively on the women in this situation. The OP has a DH, the sister has a DH too I assume. Are there two potential FILs in this situation or do they get off scot free as usual while the women tie themselves up in knots trying to work out childcare?

Agreed men do get away with this!

I don’t have a dad as he passed away when I was little and my PIL are 4 hours away. They are supportive in other ways - financially, checking in a lot during pregnancy and asking what they can get sorted when we eventually go them.

My mum moved 6 years ago to be closer to me and my sister - it was 4 years before the first DGC (my sisters LO)!arrived who will be 2 next month.

My husband is v hands on (as he should be) but he doesn’t have regular 9-5 so can’t commit to a full day childcare.

OP posts:
ElizabethReed · 03/04/2026 10:31

DreamyJade · 03/04/2026 10:29

I’ve also had five and in my early fifties. I’m completely knackered. I’d struggle to look after a cat these days, never mind a toddler!

Same

DreamyJade · 03/04/2026 10:29

notenoughalonetime · 01/04/2026 22:32

I've had five kids and looked after far more. I'm only in my early 50s. It's not that hard.

I’ve also had five and in my early fifties. I’m completely knackered. I’d struggle to look after a cat these days, never mind a toddler!

Loopylalalou · 03/04/2026 10:07

youalright · 01/04/2026 21:48

You're overthinking their are so many things it could be maybe your mum is worn down from looking after your nephew and regrets agreeing to it. Maybe she thinks you don't want her looking after your child since you didn't ask or she could simply think you are more capable and cope better then your sister. Is your sister a single mum

Absolutely this!

SLAMSreadmore · 03/04/2026 10:06

dollywobbles · 03/04/2026 09:06

I was in a similar position, my son has never been looked after by my parents. They took him to the cinema a couple of times but nothing else. They were heavily involved in my nieces’ care. Took them on holidays, looked after them for days at a time. This continued into their teens. Anyway, what I wanted to say is that my son loves his grandparents just as much as my nieces do. He would say he has a great relationship with them (and his cousins who he adores, and they him). It is a different relationship he has with my parents, but I don’t think it’s worse. It’s fine. He feels loved and he loves them. I wouldn’t worry too much about that.

I’d say similar - my kids are secure, they got enough attention and love from dh and I - they don’t begrudge or complain about what didn’t occur with their grandparents- it’s a non event.

notenoughalonetime · 03/04/2026 10:03

Fromthesidelines · 03/04/2026 09:36

I totally agree - just noting that the voting split suggests this is not a majority view and wondering how those who think the DM is unfair think.

A classic example of how things change: I offered to watch GC (who didn't come about, it was just a conversation) and help out for a child who was married and thinking about things. I did warn them at the time that things can change and the child was ultimately their responsibility, so don't count on anything I was saying indefinitely. My health can change, what if I died, etc. They need to make the decision based on their own resources, but this is how I felt at the time about what I could give in that moment.

FF a few years, I have an adult child living at home who has developed some major health concerns. They are now immune compromised. This means the unanticipated change I spoke of hypothetically has come about. I didn't see that coming at all. Young kids get sick a lot. I can't help unless the child is healthy at the time, because my own adult child needs help and support, and it's too risky for me to be around a knowingly sick young child. That capacity to care and help has reduced. I didn't expect that. My own child's health (and that of other people with medical needs living in my household) comes first.

If I'd helped with one before this happened then had to change what I can do for a second, it's not unfair. It's life. Life happens. Change happens. We need to adapt according to situations at the time.

Fromthesidelines · 03/04/2026 09:36

notenoughalonetime · 03/04/2026 09:31

If a woman (or man) is able and willing to look after a gc (not pressured or emotionally blackmailed), then she can do so on her terms. That doesn't mean she has to do the same for subsequent gc. Life, health and situations change. As each new gc comes along, the person providing the care evaluates their capability and the situation as it stands at the time, and makes a decision about whether it works for them according to the current situation. It is not unfair that life changes and evolves and her decisions and ability/willingness change around it. Just the luck of the draw.

I totally agree - just noting that the voting split suggests this is not a majority view and wondering how those who think the DM is unfair think.

TheNorns · 03/04/2026 09:33

Fromthesidelines · 03/04/2026 09:07

I note that the majority think the OP is not unreasonable to feel that she is being unfairly treated by her DM who has not offered her childcare as yet (although it is still a year away and the OP has not raised it with her). I also note that the OP feels that the term-time only childcare DM provides for her sister is too much for her and that she is often unwell with bugs caught from her DGC. Nonetheless, she should already be offering future, year round, childcare to the OP when she will be another year older than she is now, in the interests of fairness.

Views differ on whether she should be taking charge of the one year old and the three year old simultaneously and catering to their different needs; no longer caring for the older child and replacing him with the newer child; or whether she should devote most of her remaining week days (plus the school holidays, which she previously had off) to care for them on different days. And any subsequent grandchildren?

I see lots of posts on here bemoaning DMs and DMILs who don't help with childcare despite being 'fit and active', with the usual response that if they don't help with childcare then, should they need help as they age, they can be told no.

So genuinely curious:
If a woman is a reasonably healthy sixty something (likely late sixties now if retired) and is able to do so, should she agree to provide regular childcare to her first grandchild? If she does so, is there then an implied contract that she will do the same for any potential future grandchildren so that the commitment grows even as she ages? Or should she refuse on the grounds of potential future fairness, even though she can't know for certain that there will be any future grandchildren?

She should do whatever she likes. She doesn’t exist as a support human for her adult children.

notenoughalonetime · 03/04/2026 09:31

Fromthesidelines · 03/04/2026 09:07

I note that the majority think the OP is not unreasonable to feel that she is being unfairly treated by her DM who has not offered her childcare as yet (although it is still a year away and the OP has not raised it with her). I also note that the OP feels that the term-time only childcare DM provides for her sister is too much for her and that she is often unwell with bugs caught from her DGC. Nonetheless, she should already be offering future, year round, childcare to the OP when she will be another year older than she is now, in the interests of fairness.

Views differ on whether she should be taking charge of the one year old and the three year old simultaneously and catering to their different needs; no longer caring for the older child and replacing him with the newer child; or whether she should devote most of her remaining week days (plus the school holidays, which she previously had off) to care for them on different days. And any subsequent grandchildren?

I see lots of posts on here bemoaning DMs and DMILs who don't help with childcare despite being 'fit and active', with the usual response that if they don't help with childcare then, should they need help as they age, they can be told no.

So genuinely curious:
If a woman is a reasonably healthy sixty something (likely late sixties now if retired) and is able to do so, should she agree to provide regular childcare to her first grandchild? If she does so, is there then an implied contract that she will do the same for any potential future grandchildren so that the commitment grows even as she ages? Or should she refuse on the grounds of potential future fairness, even though she can't know for certain that there will be any future grandchildren?

If a woman (or man) is able and willing to look after a gc (not pressured or emotionally blackmailed), then she can do so on her terms. That doesn't mean she has to do the same for subsequent gc. Life, health and situations change. As each new gc comes along, the person providing the care evaluates their capability and the situation as it stands at the time, and makes a decision about whether it works for them according to the current situation. It is not unfair that life changes and evolves and her decisions and ability/willingness change around it. Just the luck of the draw.