Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Who is going to pay for your state pension/ care in old age?

796 replies

itsadlibitum · 01/04/2026 15:38

Apparently birth rates are falling, and this is putting future pensions (and I would imagine general tax income) in jeopardy as the population will proportionally age.

What's the solution? Should we just write off our paid for "right" to a state pension and state support for care in older age?

Does this change your view on public investment in supporting people to have children if you otherwise thought this was a personal choice and you should support/ pay for your own children?

AIBU to think that NI contributions for "pension" is essentially government mandated mis-selling and state pension will go out the window in the next few decades?

OP posts:
TheMrsCampbellBlack · 03/04/2026 03:40

Question from an Aussie - do workers get compulsory superannuation contributions as part of your salary package? Here you have to have very little money and assets to be granted an old age pension which is only about 600 a week i think?

dinbin · 03/04/2026 03:24

Retirement age will soon be moved to 67 then I expect beyond this. Many people will just work until they fall seriously ill then die.

Its already 68 for those under a certain age

And some of those with a public sector pension (teachers, NHS, civil service) now have that linked to their state pension age.

Carla786 · 03/04/2026 02:47

itsadlibitum · 01/04/2026 16:29

According to the government: It can be defined as ‘a measure of the average number of years a person would expect to live in good health based on contemporary mortality rates and prevalence of self-reported good health’.

You can read more here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/understanding-the-drivers-of-healthy-life-expectancy/understanding-the-drivers-of-healthy-life-expectancy-report#:~:text=It%20can%20be%20defined%20as,prevalence%20of%20self%2Dreported%20good%20health'.

The stats on healthy life expectancy need to be put into context.

That report you quote says : ' behavioural and socioeconomic risk factors such as physical activity, smoking status, education and household income are also associated with self-reported poor health in England and likely to have important and complex relationships with each other and physical health status'. Statustically speaking, people posting on Mumsnet are more likely to be higher income and educated, so will probably not be hit hardest, although obviously many posters are not.

Recent Oxford study said this : 'US falling behind due to stalling improvements in deaths from cardiovascular disease and from increases in deaths from metabolic, respiratory and nervous system causes. The US disadvantage in these causes suggests longer-term processes that contribute to chronic diseases such as high levels of obesity, which are more extreme in the USA compared with peer countries.'

  • this study found both the US and UK were falling behind : the fact that obesity and general health were driving the US chronic disease rates is important imo. If US and UK are worse than other European countries health wise, surely lifestyle must be part of this? And this can be altered. Diet and other lifestyle improvements are things we can all at least try to do, to protect ourselves.

It also found :

'Our results suggest that, although the UK performs relatively well on external causes such as suicide, homicide and transport accidents, this is countered by stalling improvements in cardiovascular disease and cancer, and drug deaths are also increasing. Our analyses did not separate the UK into its constituent countries but previous work has shown much higher midlife mortality in Scotland, with drug mortality in recent years even higher than it is in the USA.24'

Imo this is significant. Scotland could well have affected results for other countries, we need to separate into the 4 countries to understand properly

https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/53/2/dyae024/7632338?login=false

IvyEvolveFree · 03/04/2026 01:58

echt · 03/04/2026 00:27

Governments, not generations. This sounds like covert swipe at those born 1946-64.

It’s a swipe at Bevan, an economist who knew he was creating an unfunded pyramid scheme. We secured the welfare of a few generations of pensioners but at what cost? People used to think more about the legacy for future generations, now it’s more saddling them with obligations for present benefit.

KimberleyClark · 03/04/2026 00:29

It is already planned that pension age will increase to 67 imminently and 68 within the next 20 years.

My pension age is already 67. Has been for years.

echt · 03/04/2026 00:27

Governments, not generations. This sounds like covert swipe at those born 1946-64.

IvyEvolveFree · 03/04/2026 00:25

Pensions need to be changed to investment funds instead of National Insurance contributions paying for the current cohort of pensioners. This was a huge mistake and previous generations robbed future generations by placing this debt on them.

SouthernNights59 · 03/04/2026 00:23

Dfdd · 02/04/2026 23:46

Again people who have "paid in" via NI probably deserve some lump sum payment back.

We need to transition out of this government Ponzi school and have people privately save up for their retirement.

As an outsider looking in this NI stuff is just ridiculous. Here we simply pay tax and it covers everything the government funds.

SouthernNights59 · 03/04/2026 00:20

Boogery · 02/04/2026 22:25

I moan and I complain.

As an activist I also campaign, advocate , support and press for change on the issues ( for example pensions) that I, and millions of others, moan about.

If we all had your " mustn't grumble" mindset we'd still be sending kids down the mine or working seven days a week.

If you really think having to work a few extra years is in any way comparable to sending kids down the mine then you are nuts.

Honestly, while I agree there are many things in this world which need to be moaned about and actions taken to change, this isn't one of them. I give people like you a wide berth in real life, no-one likes a whiner (especially when it's over something they haven't a hope of changing!)

Maxme · 03/04/2026 00:08

It is already planned that pension age will increase to 67 imminently and 68 within the next 20 years.

Denmark (and others) have plans to increase to 70 in the same time frame and It would not suprise me with public finances being poor if the UK follows suit and pushes up plans.

It's an easy stealth tax change , as people don't tend to prioritise long term. How much traction did previous changes get?

I do expect there would be a lot of noise from people who could have already started early retirement (age 55) and this would not be politically possible to affect them. But this changes to 57 very soon too.

At the same time, healthy living age has gone down probably due to COVID. At age of 70 approx 50% of people in the UK have a life limiting disease or disability.

Maybe I was a little dramatic with my last post,
But it's not too unreasonable to say if you are not 55 now, don't count in the government pension as you are likely to work untill you are seriously ill or dead.

echt · 03/04/2026 00:06

ApriloNeil2026 · 02/04/2026 23:56

how do pensioner's and medical costs that cost quite alot to society with little return on investment for society ?

Maybe these savings in unclaimed benefits would off-set the treatment of these fucking leeches:
https://policyinpractice.co.uk/publication/unclaimed-aa/

People of pension age may be missing out on £5.2 billion | Policy in Practice

https://policyinpractice.co.uk/publication/unclaimed-aa/

ApriloNeil2026 · 03/04/2026 00:00

XenoBitch · 02/04/2026 23:58

What do you suggest we do otherwise? Let elderly people starve and not give them any sort of medical care?

well people complain about the welfare bill and the pensioner's are the biggest part of it,

XenoBitch · 02/04/2026 23:58

ApriloNeil2026 · 02/04/2026 23:56

how do pensioner's and medical costs that cost quite alot to society with little return on investment for society ?

What do you suggest we do otherwise? Let elderly people starve and not give them any sort of medical care?

ApriloNeil2026 · 02/04/2026 23:56

how do pensioner's and medical costs that cost quite alot to society with little return on investment for society ?

XenoBitch · 02/04/2026 23:50

Dfdd · 02/04/2026 23:26

Which makes me ask why did you choose to do this line of work if it pays badly?

PP said she really loves her job.
To me, that is more important than money.

Dfdd · 02/04/2026 23:46

Again people who have "paid in" via NI probably deserve some lump sum payment back.

We need to transition out of this government Ponzi school and have people privately save up for their retirement.

Dfdd · 02/04/2026 23:26

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 02/04/2026 20:23

I have absolutely upskilled and future proofed.

Your comment was incredibly rude though. It’s possibly to be highly skilled but not highly paid

Which makes me ask why did you choose to do this line of work if it pays badly?

Boogery · 02/04/2026 22:25

SouthernNights59 · 02/04/2026 21:22

What a moaner! Do you really think the UK is the only country where the age of entitlement to state superannuation has increased? When I started work the retirement age here was 60, it is now 65 and will probably increase again at some stage. So what? I have literally never heard one person complain about it.

Maybe stop comparing what you might get to what others had in the past, you might just find life a bit more enjoyable.

I moan and I complain.

As an activist I also campaign, advocate , support and press for change on the issues ( for example pensions) that I, and millions of others, moan about.

If we all had your " mustn't grumble" mindset we'd still be sending kids down the mine or working seven days a week.

Katypp · 02/04/2026 22:25

Maxme · 02/04/2026 21:55

Retirement age will soon be moved to 67 then I expect beyond this. Many people will just work until they fall seriously ill then die.

Unless you are 55 or older now, I would not count on any state pension.

It's a mystery to me why people say things like this.
So you seriously think than before the next 12 years are up, the state pension will be abolished?
On what basis, other than dramatic rhetoric?
No Government so far even dares to dicuss the triple lock. It's quite a jump to get from there to abolition in little more than a decade

Maxme · 02/04/2026 21:55

Retirement age will soon be moved to 67 then I expect beyond this. Many people will just work until they fall seriously ill then die.

Unless you are 55 or older now, I would not count on any state pension.

SouthernNights59 · 02/04/2026 21:22

Boogery · 02/04/2026 14:40

I don't care how much notice I had.
It wouldn't matter a jot if they had told me this in 1984 the day after I started working.

We still have to slog on almost a decade more than people born a few years earlier. And we're entitled to fucking moan about it because...You think everyone is in a position to have started pension funds?
That's some privilege talking right there!!
Some people have slogged to just pay the mortgage/ rent and put food on the table for over forty years. All the while making their NI contributions. Why should we be happy to continue working till we bloody drop.

Some of the thinking on this thread stinks.
" But my doctor and consultant friends all retired at fifty"
"Most people are still healthy and chipper till their seventies"
"You were warned , you should have saved, like me!"

Nobody expects a luxury lifestyle funded retirement. Nobody.
But fuck me if I'm supposed to be happy about a measurably more miserable financial future than the generation before.

What a moaner! Do you really think the UK is the only country where the age of entitlement to state superannuation has increased? When I started work the retirement age here was 60, it is now 65 and will probably increase again at some stage. So what? I have literally never heard one person complain about it.

Maybe stop comparing what you might get to what others had in the past, you might just find life a bit more enjoyable.

Mushypeasandchipstogo · 02/04/2026 20:48

I retired at 56 and get a reasonable pension but, despite having 39 years of NI contributions I will not get a full state pension at 68. Friends in Australia tell me that the state pension is means tested and you only get it if your works pension is low.

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 02/04/2026 20:23

Dfdd · 02/04/2026 16:13

My son is 25 and on £30k. It's an early career salary and for his industry this is seen as the low side. His friends are on £40k with a sizeable on at least £50k plus.

I don't know your life story. Maybe you've had challenges and setbacks in life. But you've bene working for 30+ years now (I assume), have you not done anything at all to upskill yourself and take responsibility for your life?

I have absolutely upskilled and future proofed.

Your comment was incredibly rude though. It’s possibly to be highly skilled but not highly paid

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 02/04/2026 20:17

XenoBitch · 02/04/2026 20:12

Sorry, was annoyed at the person I quoted, not you.
My DP is highly qualified in his role and on £30k. He can't go any higher.

There is also nothing wrong with not wanting a career.

If you love your job, in my eyes you are a winner in life.

Sorry if you misread what I said. I am rubbish at explaining things.

Edited

No worries. But I do a job that not many people have the skillset to do. (Most people don’t understand the job description not sure I do tbf) It’s not that well paid because of the sector it is in. My previous job is likely to disappear in the next few years so I played the long game to get the job I wanted - not bad for a 55 yo 😬

XenoBitch · 02/04/2026 20:12

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 02/04/2026 20:05

I am not sure what is worse - the comment implying I was too thick to upskill or the implication that I was one of those who didn’t want a career. I live to work. I adore my job,

I have a career, thank you very much. In fact I have just qualified at a very high level.

Not every career pays £100k plus.

Sorry, was annoyed at the person I quoted, not you.
My DP is highly qualified in his role and on £30k. He can't go any higher.

There is also nothing wrong with not wanting a career.

If you love your job, in my eyes you are a winner in life.

Sorry if you misread what I said. I am rubbish at explaining things.