Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How to treat children in a coaching environment

70 replies

TheRedEngine · 01/04/2026 10:03

I have started working in a sporting teaching environment with children. One of the instructors has a habit of giving a child a high five, then ‘down low’ but moving his hand away so they miss and saying ‘too slow’. I know I would have hated being treated like that at that age (and possibly even now too!). I can just hear my seven-year-old self complaining to my parents about this person.

The teaching guidelines specifically say children should not be humiliated.

Is this acceptable behaviour? Or indeed something I should be adopting because it’s ‘funny’?

All children seem to be addressed as ‘buddy’ which seems horrific but then I haven’t been a child for several decades.

And a group of children were told to hold out their hands as though they were carrying two ice cream cones. Instructor asks one of them ‘what’s in your cones?’ child says ‘… strawberry and…’ and whilst thinking instructor says ‘too slow, let’s go practise.’ Again, I think this is not a very pleasant way to behave towards any human being, let alone a strange child.

Thanks for your thoughts!

OP posts:
Hobnobswantshernameback · 01/04/2026 19:41

Ah the guardian says it so it must be true
god this place used to be funny with some chatty interesting threads from thoughtful articulate posters
now it's this sort of bollocks

NerrSnerr · 01/04/2026 19:37

I have two sensitive children and they would not be upset with any of this. There is a big variation of high fives and jokes etc. One coach makes my daughter do a high five high up out of her reach so she has to jump. Buddy is no issue either. it all sounds absolutely fine.

LittleBearPad · 01/04/2026 19:36

It’s an odd approach to look up buddy or she high fiveing was invented.

Both are fine - buddy is friendly. The ‘too slow’ malarkey has been about for ages. I think sports coaching for 6, 7 😉 year olds is less formal than you are used to and perhaps you would be suited to something else.

ChoosingMyOwnRandomUsername · 01/04/2026 19:33

I have started working in a sporting teaching environment with children

The best thing for everyone concerned here would be if you found something else to do.

Your thinking is so twisted, dramatic and downright unfathomable about such mundane non-issues it really doesn't seem like a good fit for you.

Chatsbots · 01/04/2026 19:31

If the coach is liked, does good coaching and isn't doing anything that would be a safeguarding conncern, then he is entitled to coach in his own style.

I was pulled up for being ride by another coach. I am not rude and no-one else thought I was being rude, it's just how I am (ND, so less filter than some) and it's very good-natured.

It didn't suit her, that's fine but her coaching style irritates me, so I have moved on from doing sessions at the same time as her. Neither of us is wrong, we're just different and we will probably appeal to different people.

Buddy is fine. It's nice and neutral.

People can be different, that's life.

TakeALookAtTheseSwatches · 01/04/2026 19:28

Calling a pet name "horrific" is a ridiculous overreaction. As is thinking there's something wrong with playing the "too slow" high five game which has been around at least as long as I have (born in the 80s) I highly doubt anyone has been left traumatised by being too slow to high five someone 🤦

Barrenfieldoffucks · 01/04/2026 19:27

TheRedEngine · 01/04/2026 19:11

I’m sticking with horrific for ‘Buddy’, mostly for the sake of the tutor. Children are not a teacher’s friends. (Those who say their children don’t mind are missing my point. I’m not surprised they don’t mind!)

Probably in an informal setting like this it’s fine most of the time. But then there’s the time it’s not fine. The instructor, in what can be a dangerous environment where having authority matters, has lost authority by suggesting that the relationship with a child is that of friend, rather than leader.

Even a Guardian article agrees with me.

https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2016/oct/08/secret-teacher-students-arent-friends-mate-discipline#:~:text=It's%20not%20only%20parents%20who,an%20equal%20or%20even%20inferior.

I am also not convinced that it’s a gender-neutral term, but rather that it is a specifically male term. I really thought modern pedagogy had moved away from this sort of thing. (Unlike ‘Guys’ gender neutralised decades ago.)

It really is a term I had never heard used before in this way and I am struggling to embrace it!

This is an opinion piece, in effect, you seem to be citing it as some sort of evidence?

Teeheehee1579 · 01/04/2026 19:27

Also on the coaching - my son’s football coaches use mates and buddy all the time - it’s not school and it’s a great way to build rapport in a team. I don’t think we could use you as a coach 😀

Barrenfieldoffucks · 01/04/2026 19:26

Buddy has been around for eons. As has guys, mate, people etc. I feel like you are quite literally looking for offence here. Using a word you do not like does not equate to "the decline of the English language".

1000StrawberryLollies · 01/04/2026 19:25

And ‘Buddy’? Definitely a horrific Americanism!

I think maybe you should reflect on why, in your mind, a harmless, friendly way to address someone is 'horrific' just because it's most commonly used in a different country. The rabid anti-American comments on MN actually make my jaw drop sometimes. I'm not American, but there are Americans on MN. They must find it very unpleasant.

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 01/04/2026 19:23

If I had complained about that to my parents when I was 7, they would have suggested that I should get a grip.

If any of the children find it distressing, I’m sure that will be obvious. However children can have a sense of humour.

Teeheehee1579 · 01/04/2026 19:22

on the off chance this is not a wind up - my CHRIST you need to get the stick out of your bottom. You would hate the holiday clubs we run (always full with waiting lists a few days after dates launch and with mostly repeat kids). I mean obviously if a child could not cope with the high five game then we’d move on but please!!!! If my child came home complaining I’d a. Explain it is a joke and b. Use the opportunity to teach them to get a grip.

Shallotsaresmallonions · 01/04/2026 19:20

You're bonkers, sorry.

DryIce · 01/04/2026 19:17

I use buddy as a generic word for all children, including my own. I've never thought of it as horrific. Am not American!

And the down low too slow thing has been around since I was a kid, I can't see that as being disrespectful.

TheRedEngine · 01/04/2026 19:11

Shallotsaresmallonions · 01/04/2026 11:21

Can't get over the dramatics of saying that a coach calling a child "buddy" is horrific! Like what??

Edited

I’m sticking with horrific for ‘Buddy’, mostly for the sake of the tutor. Children are not a teacher’s friends. (Those who say their children don’t mind are missing my point. I’m not surprised they don’t mind!)

Probably in an informal setting like this it’s fine most of the time. But then there’s the time it’s not fine. The instructor, in what can be a dangerous environment where having authority matters, has lost authority by suggesting that the relationship with a child is that of friend, rather than leader.

Even a Guardian article agrees with me.

https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2016/oct/08/secret-teacher-students-arent-friends-mate-discipline#:~:text=It's%20not%20only%20parents%20who,an%20equal%20or%20even%20inferior.

I am also not convinced that it’s a gender-neutral term, but rather that it is a specifically male term. I really thought modern pedagogy had moved away from this sort of thing. (Unlike ‘Guys’ gender neutralised decades ago.)

It really is a term I had never heard used before in this way and I am struggling to embrace it!

Secret Teacher: students aren't your friends, so don't call them 'mate'

Too many teachers and parents want to be liked by young people – but this undermines both discipline and respect

https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2016/oct/08/secret-teacher-students-arent-friends-mate-discipline#:~:text=It's%20not%20only%20parents%20who,an%20equal%20or%20even%20inferior.

OP posts:
ChipDaleRescueRangers · 01/04/2026 17:40

TheRedEngine · 01/04/2026 11:29

“I was born in the 70s and too slow was around then!”

Assuming you mean in the context of a ‘High Five” no it wasn’t. High Fiveing was invented on October 2 1977 at a match in the States. (Yes, I googled that this morning.)

I can assure you when I was growing up after being born in the *checks birth certificate 70s too slow in the context of high five was all over my childhood. We did it to parents, teacher, friends etc..... and they all did it to kids as well.

TSW12 · 01/04/2026 15:58

One of my grandson's has caught me out with the high five thing a few times which he thinks is hilarious! He also calls his little brother 'bud' or 'buddy' so he's obviously fine with both things. I think they are fine, actually.

LiftAndCoast · 01/04/2026 12:18

I was a shy and sensitive child and none of this would have bothered me, unless I was being singled out as 'too slow' compared to everyone else in the group, which isn't usually how the 'low five' joke goes. My uncle used to do a variant: high five! low five! quick five - too slow! and I thought it was hilarious.

'Buddy' is American but it's not remotely offensive and I'm guessing the coaches don't know all the children's names. It wouldn't have bothered me as a child, and for context, I used to object to being called a kid ('I'm not a baby goat!') so I do understand linguistic pedantry. A buddy is a friend. Nothing wrong with that.

clary · 01/04/2026 11:58

@TheRedEngine i work with words for a living and there is nothing wrong with using buddy as a generic term like that. It may be American in origin but so are lots of things (inc the high five). Not a reason to shun them as such.

It’s odd that the coaches see the DC once and never again but maybe this coach is trying to get a bit of a rapport in that short time. Btw if we are debating language, maybe save a term like “horrific” for situations which actually are. Otherwise you are seriously diluting the impact of the word.

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 01/04/2026 11:53

TheRedEngine · 01/04/2026 11:29

“I was born in the 70s and too slow was around then!”

Assuming you mean in the context of a ‘High Five” no it wasn’t. High Fiveing was invented on October 2 1977 at a match in the States. (Yes, I googled that this morning.)

So it was around in the 70’s as PP said.

Most people don’t live life by looking everything up and sticking rigidly to ‘guidelines’ they’ve read, there is nuance and context in everyday life.

corkscissorschalk · 01/04/2026 11:44

@TheRedEngine
Are you by any chance ND?
I am, and this sort of behaviour would have irritated me as a child, however as someone who has worked with children for almost 30 years I can assure you that the majority of children would be fine with this sort of interaction.

It true that someone with a lot of experience with children could probably sense which kids were more inclined to different types of engagement, and would be able to target their interaction, but on the whole, this is run of the mill stuff. Especially if the person involved only has the one session with the kids.

TheRedEngine · 01/04/2026 11:29

“I was born in the 70s and too slow was around then!”

Assuming you mean in the context of a ‘High Five” no it wasn’t. High Fiveing was invented on October 2 1977 at a match in the States. (Yes, I googled that this morning.)

OP posts:
OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 01/04/2026 11:28

You seem very rigid. I’m not sure kids coaching is for you.

takealettermsjones · 01/04/2026 11:26

April fool?

SquirrelRed · 01/04/2026 11:26

I genuinely don't think this is the right job for you. There is absolutely nothing horrific about being called buddy.

Swipe left for the next trending thread