Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is MN feeding unhealthy attitudes towards men?

538 replies

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 09:07

Some threads I've read this morning have helped me to realise that my thinking about men has changed since joining MN. And not in a good way.

There's an undertone that men need to do things the woman's way, or it's wrong. That men should be grateful for any sex that women are willing to give in a long term relationship, even if that peters out to no sex at all.

Men are seen to be babies who can't do anything for themselves, and need to have someone pre plan and organise their lives, but god forbid they fall into the pattern of behaviour of expecting their female partner to do these things for them, as that's what they've always done.

This thinking is observable to a greater or lesser extent across the boards.

I've also recognised where this thinking has affected the way I think about my wonderful man, and sometimes in things I've said to him or actions towards him. I need to watch this in future.

I'm concerned that the general thinking about men on this website can't be good for society if this is the way women think, and are encouraged to think by others.

If women treat men this way collectively and have low expectations around them, no wonder the bar is getting lower.

OP posts:
likelysuspect · 01/04/2026 11:33

5128gap · 01/04/2026 11:32

If you've been saving that anecdote since the 1930s (lunatic asylum..?) then I think you've chosen a poor place to unveil it. The posts on here are almost all a calm and measured exchange of views on the topic. In fact yours is probably the most hyperbolic I've seen.

Absolutely, you got in before me. What a load of bullshit!!

5128gap · 01/04/2026 11:32

Elbowpatch · 01/04/2026 11:23

A long time ago I knew a man who had been a nurse in a lunatic asylum. He told me the there were certain trigger words that would get the patients jumping around screaming, shouting and frothing at the mouth. To amuse themselves on otherwise boring night shifts the nurses would shout the trigger words into the wards, then stand back and watch the resulting pandemonium.

This thread is the MN equivalent.

If you've been saving that anecdote since the 1930s (lunatic asylum..?) then I think you've chosen a poor place to unveil it. The posts on here are almost all a calm and measured exchange of views on the topic. In fact yours is probably the most hyperbolic I've seen.

Bolonese · 01/04/2026 11:29

Elbowpatch · 01/04/2026 11:23

A long time ago I knew a man who had been a nurse in a lunatic asylum. He told me the there were certain trigger words that would get the patients jumping around screaming, shouting and frothing at the mouth. To amuse themselves on otherwise boring night shifts the nurses would shout the trigger words into the wards, then stand back and watch the resulting pandemonium.

This thread is the MN equivalent.

This made me burst out laughing. Thanks for relieving a little tension in here!

Crikeyalmighty · 01/04/2026 11:28

Ninerainbows · 01/04/2026 10:45

We're still dealing with some men who were raised by a generation of some dads who can't microwave a jacket potato or turn on a washing machine (nor had they ever dreamt of learning).

My dad is 70 and could run a house on his own but mainly because he was raised by a single working mum and had no choice but to cook for himself and sort his school uniform. I'm not sure if that would be the case had his dad not died.

I agree with that - my FIL is 86 and on his own now- he’s a very lovely man but when he comes to our house or we go to his he never once offers to put the kettle on or take his pots to the sink after a meal - it very much seems that it’s woman’s job to run around after him ‘if ‘ one is present - yet on his own he has nice meals and a lovely clean house , does all his washing etc - it’s if once a woman is present then she will do the donkey work

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 11:28

RedToothBrush · 01/04/2026 10:57

The Manosphere basically advocates for women to be servants to men and encourages the use of violence towards women if they do not serve a man to his standards.

MN advocates for women not to put up with being treated as a servant and to leave a man if he is controlling or being violent. It advocates for their independence from men rather than being treated poorly.

Men want the use of women as part of dominance over women. Women want themselves and advocate for others to be free of men and to do things on their own terms not on the terms set for them which aren't in their interests and sometimes are actually harmful because no thought has been given to them.

I encourage everyone here to read 'Invisible Women' for lots of examples of how women are not considered - everything from health care to product design to issues around childcare. It is not extreme or particularly radical in the slightest. It merely points out the stuff that gets unnoticed because it's men who make decisions and don't have the life experiences of women and women are excluded from these conversations for various reasons.

Women are advocating greater equality, visibility of their issues or just general independence from having to be dependent on men on MN. The Manosphere advocates for the subservience of women and the loss of women's voices.

Even this thread is the stuff of the manosphere as it's seeking to crush this idea of women speaking for themselves, about themselves and advocating for themselves.

The comparison between the two is a fundamental lack of understanding of the Manosphere and trying to draw false equivalency.

Women do not have equality in many areas. People who say differently aren't really paying attention.

Women do not have equality in many areas

  • I agree with this : which areas do you think are the worst equality-wise?
Laurmolonlabe · 01/04/2026 11:25

Yes, but it is worth remembering that the way women think about men is entirely informed by the way they have been treated by men.

Elbowpatch · 01/04/2026 11:23

A long time ago I knew a man who had been a nurse in a lunatic asylum. He told me the there were certain trigger words that would get the patients jumping around screaming, shouting and frothing at the mouth. To amuse themselves on otherwise boring night shifts the nurses would shout the trigger words into the wards, then stand back and watch the resulting pandemonium.

This thread is the MN equivalent.

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 11:23

5128gap · 01/04/2026 11:21

You will have not seen posts maligning ALL women in responses to the actions of women in an OP no. Of course you wouldn't, when most of the posters will be women themselves and are not going to generalise in a way that includes them.
What you will see is strong attacks made against subsets of women based on generalisations and stereotypes. Older women (rude), Mothers in law (needy, interfering), school gate mums (cliquey), teenage girls (mean, worse than boys) female colleagues (back stabbing) etc.
Ime this is equally as prevalent as any generalisations made about men on the site.

That's true. To be fair there's lots of threads about awful FILs too, but MILs may get criticised more as they may be more likely to be intervening in his grandkids should be brought up, so more likely to clash.

Bolonese · 01/04/2026 11:23

BoredZelda · 01/04/2026 10:52

If you are so influenced by one singular website that it skews your own relationship then you have bigger problems.

Was that article leaning towards the ridiculous “toxic femininity” narrative that manosphere influencers have started using to try and debunk toxic masculinity? Do you believe a single article must be taken as fact? I’ve read articles that spewed the most ridiculous bullshit. My next step is to find others which balance the view or back it up. Then I take a wider view.

Reddit is a cesspit. You can find any sub which will support your world view.

Yes I had post natal depression at the time.

The findings of the study are published in the Scientific Reports journal.

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 11:21

likelysuspect · 01/04/2026 11:12

I remember a particular thread that made me feel very uncomfortable and overtly had more of the views that Ive seen over other threads but were less overt on those other threads

It was about an OP whose daughter had beaten up her brother. OP was proud of this because she said that the brother had pushed or hit the daughter first. As it turned out, he was defending himself from her (younger but bigger sister) in quite rough play. I never know if these things are all made up stories and you can never question it if you doubt it otherwise you get deleted, but not only was OP pleased with the daughters aggression, the vast vast majority of posters on that thread had this kid down as some mini Andrew Tate who 'wouldnt be using his misogyny again having had it kicked out of him by the sister'. Despite the fact that she had been the aggressor from the start

I mean at least wait until they're 18 before you really hate on them!!

Yes, I mean that IS a kind of 'girls are always in the right' attitude which could ironically reinforce Andrew Tate's message that the world is against men.

5128gap · 01/04/2026 11:21

AntiqueBabyLoanSmurf · 01/04/2026 11:08

MNers rarely hold back from saying what they think of shitty behaviour from women.

This is true, but I personally have never seen anybody saying "Women are rubbish/women are just useless/why do women do this?/I hate women" in response to a post about one/a few specific women who have behaved appallingly.

I think that, by dismissing all men en masse as useless/nasty/selfish/terrible people, as well as being unfair to the decent ones, it also gives an automatic free pass to the shitty ones who indeed should be held to account for their actions and behaviours - as though they couldn't possibly be expected to be any better, because men are all just inherently dreadful and they can't help it, bless 'em.

You will have not seen posts maligning ALL women in responses to the actions of women in an OP no. Of course you wouldn't, when most of the posters will be women themselves and are not going to generalise in a way that includes them.
What you will see is strong attacks made against subsets of women based on generalisations and stereotypes. Older women (rude), Mothers in law (needy, interfering), school gate mums (cliquey), teenage girls (mean, worse than boys) female colleagues (back stabbing) etc.
Ime this is equally as prevalent as any generalisations made about men on the site.

Viviennemary · 01/04/2026 11:20

Seems to be a few categories on here.

Absolute saints who earn a great salary do loads of housework and child care.and good looking and great in bed. (this is a miniscule percentage)

Other end of scale absolute swines

Others pretty useless at nearly everything and just a general nuisance who should pack his bags. (Seems to be quite a lot of these.)

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 11:17

likelysuspect · 01/04/2026 11:12

I remember a particular thread that made me feel very uncomfortable and overtly had more of the views that Ive seen over other threads but were less overt on those other threads

It was about an OP whose daughter had beaten up her brother. OP was proud of this because she said that the brother had pushed or hit the daughter first. As it turned out, he was defending himself from her (younger but bigger sister) in quite rough play. I never know if these things are all made up stories and you can never question it if you doubt it otherwise you get deleted, but not only was OP pleased with the daughters aggression, the vast vast majority of posters on that thread had this kid down as some mini Andrew Tate who 'wouldnt be using his misogyny again having had it kicked out of him by the sister'. Despite the fact that she had been the aggressor from the start

I mean at least wait until they're 18 before you really hate on them!!

I remember that thread too.

Another one I couldn't post on. as I couldn't get on the bandwagon of "yay, amazing", and didn't have time to argue my pov from all the posters I'd have expected to leap on it.

Maybe MN is the middle class British version of grown up Mean Girls?

OP posts:
EarthlyNightshade · 01/04/2026 11:14

CoralOP · 01/04/2026 10:45

1000% correct. Mumsnet is like the manosphere for women, Louis needs to interview some of the women on here to understand where their hatred stems from.
I'm just glad no one I know in real life is as judgemental, sexist and pure nasty as they are on here 🤷‍♀️

Do you think that Mumsnet is leading to an increase in women being violent towards men? Or an increase in women murdering men?

likelysuspect · 01/04/2026 11:12

I remember a particular thread that made me feel very uncomfortable and overtly had more of the views that Ive seen over other threads but were less overt on those other threads

It was about an OP whose daughter had beaten up her brother. OP was proud of this because she said that the brother had pushed or hit the daughter first. As it turned out, he was defending himself from her (younger but bigger sister) in quite rough play. I never know if these things are all made up stories and you can never question it if you doubt it otherwise you get deleted, but not only was OP pleased with the daughters aggression, the vast vast majority of posters on that thread had this kid down as some mini Andrew Tate who 'wouldnt be using his misogyny again having had it kicked out of him by the sister'. Despite the fact that she had been the aggressor from the start

I mean at least wait until they're 18 before you really hate on them!!

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 11:11

BoredZelda · 01/04/2026 10:59

The rest of the story doesn’t matter. She insists he doesn’t do washing probably because he’s incapable of reading a label and checking how to wash clothes. He did it anyway and did the thing she has been trying to avoid happening. You appear to suggest we should accept basic adulting failures on the basis that “at least he is helping” which is a really low bar. Nobody suggests LTB because someone has shrunk a jumper.

Of course the rest of the story matters.

How simplistic to think it doesn't.

OP posts:
C8H10N4O2 · 01/04/2026 11:10

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 09:23

All very good points.

AIBU is a crazy place at times.

I find the sex board users the most realistic and down to earth about both sexes.

I find the sex board users the most realistic and down to earth about both sexes

<checks date>

<parks thread in the bit bucket>

Dweetfidilove · 01/04/2026 11:10

CasperGutman · 01/04/2026 09:58

I agree with much of this post, but it shows a gobsmacking lack of understanding and sympathy in relation to erectile dysfunction.

Can you imagine how you'd react if a man in his forties posted about a woman partner with sexual dysfunction and specifically difficulties in achieving physical arousal, and asked "who wants to be saddled with that?" I'm sure they'd be absolutely slated on here, and rightly so.

If a woman in her forties has sexual dysfunction and she refuses to engage with medical advice, dietary or physical changes, etc; she's a problem too.

That is not a lack of understanding or compassion, just intolerance for poor excuses. If you do not care enough to engage with anything that will help to improve circumstances, you're short changing your partner, to the detriment of the relationship.

OtterlyAstounding · 01/04/2026 11:09

To answer your title, no.

I think Mumsnet does bring awareness to the negative ways in which men behave, and as always, people complain about the negative more than they praise the positive. But there's often mention of really lovely DHs, so I don't think it's all doom and gloom - it's usually fairly balanced, for the internet.

It also highlights (often unintentionally) the sadly low standards and blindness to bad behaviour and abuse that many women have, and the way they cling onto relationships with terrible men.

I read threads on Mumsnet and they just make me think how glad I am, in a world of rather awful men, to have found a very decent, good one. We support each other, make each other very happy, and work amazingly well as a team in life.

I think if you find you're thinking differently about your husband because of what you read on here, maybe it's either highlighting issues you have niggling under the surface that you haven't wanted to face up to, or you're a little suggestible and may need to step away.

You also appear to be saying that (somehow) women complaining about men's bad behaviour is why men behave badly, and why the bar for men is getting lower (?), which is both nonsensical and amusingly misogynistic.

AntiqueBabyLoanSmurf · 01/04/2026 11:08

echt · 01/04/2026 09:38

What I see on MN is year on year on year on year on year of the individual experiences of individual women. This is a site by name about women, so it makes sense that they are the ones voicing their experience. Men can post on Dadsnet, try their hand on MN, or fuck off to a man's site.

MNers rarely hold back from saying what they think of shitty behaviour from women.

MNers rarely hold back from saying what they think of shitty behaviour from women.

This is true, but I personally have never seen anybody saying "Women are rubbish/women are just useless/why do women do this?/I hate women" in response to a post about one/a few specific women who have behaved appallingly.

I think that, by dismissing all men en masse as useless/nasty/selfish/terrible people, as well as being unfair to the decent ones, it also gives an automatic free pass to the shitty ones who indeed should be held to account for their actions and behaviours - as though they couldn't possibly be expected to be any better, because men are all just inherently dreadful and they can't help it, bless 'em.

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 11:08

Pancakesandcream33 · 01/04/2026 10:43

If more woman valued self respect over sex and financial support then they wouldn't lower their standards and date these awful men.

This is an interesting post.

I don't think it's sex and financial support that is the motivator to date. I think it's the belief that they are seeing a good man and enjoy his company.

Good men in year 1, 2, 3 etc can change over time to be less good men. This can be due to a number of factors. Work, career, children, lifestyle etc

The way the woman treats them, and how they're interacting together, can be one of those negative factors. This is the truth that a few posters have acknowledged further up the thread. Some women are crap partners, or become crap partners, due to life factors around them.

I'm no longer shocked when people post on threads "why did you have children with him?" thus failing to acknowledge people change over time. Both men and women.

OP posts:
Maia77 · 01/04/2026 11:07

I find there is a lot of black-and-white, simplistic and emotionally-biased thinking, not just when it comes to men but in general.

Greenwitchart · 01/04/2026 11:06

April's Day Fool thread.

10namechangeslater · 01/04/2026 11:06

CoralOP · 01/04/2026 10:45

1000% correct. Mumsnet is like the manosphere for women, Louis needs to interview some of the women on here to understand where their hatred stems from.
I'm just glad no one I know in real life is as judgemental, sexist and pure nasty as they are on here 🤷‍♀️

It comes from decades of being on the receiving end of shitty treatment from men and witnessing other women also being treated badly by men. It doesn’t come from nowhere!

Bolonese · 01/04/2026 11:05

Sorry I don't know how to respond directly to a few people who responded to me. Firstly, thanks for the respectful tone and not jumping on me for having differing views (was actually a little anxious when I saw I'd been responded to directly!) Clearly I'm a Reddit novice as I didn't understand half of the terminology you were using! I've never come across the vile stuff you referred to but I don't doubt it's there. When I log on, I see a stream of posts about personal finance, films and tv, travel, parenting, local news etc. Basically the things that interest me. I notice if someone says something that comes across as insulting or abusive there, it gets down voted and kind of disappears. Where there's a discussion about e.g. how a co-parent has done something wrong, it doesn't automatically descend into a feeding frenzy about how awful that person is. But just to back up what some of your are saying, I referred back to the study on male / female hate speech - and it was actually based on male and female hating forums that are posted on Reddit! Anyway, on Mumsnet, I see lots of discussions with a general undertone that men are useless, pathetic, stupid, manipulative, a waste of space etc I guess if I saw women discussed the same way it would make me feel quite disgusted. I wonder whether this is part of the global trend that has emerged the last decade or so of divisive politics pitting the old against the young, men against women, native against foreign etc. Maybe I'm reading too much into it?!