Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Are other full-time working families finding there is nothing left?

936 replies

fatface001 · 31/03/2026 08:40

Alarm went off at 5:30 this morning, then an hour stood on a packed train into London for the commute. We are a normal family: one child and two full-time jobs. I’ve always enjoyed working and have always worked hard, and I don’t mind that at all — but I do expect that full-time work should still mean there’s something left at the end of the month for a normal life.

But that really doesn’t feel like the case anymore.

There’s nothing left at the end of the month. Everything has been stripped back, all non-essentials have gone, and even basic things around the house are being put off or done ourselves because there isn’t spare money for trades. It’s just constant cutting back.

What’s hard is that we’re both working really long hours and doing everything we’re “supposed” to do, but it still feels like we’re going backwards rather than getting ahead.

When I hear talk about “those with the broadest shoulders” contributing more, I honestly don’t recognise it anymore in real life. It doesn’t feel like anyone in our position has anything left to give — it feels like the pressure is entirely on ordinary working households just to stand still.

I’m not looking for luxuries — just the sense that working still gives you a bit of breathing room. Right now it doesn’t feel like that at all.

Is anyone else feeling the same?

OP posts:
CoralOP · 31/03/2026 11:50

I think in some parts of the country people are screwed whatever they do but I live in the NE and feel pretty comfortable on a relatively low wage. We come out with around 4k net a month. Our mortgage is £480, we have a small, slightly banged up 10 year old car, our house is pretty small so bills are pretty small.
We have around 2k per month spare after all food petrol etc, I work part-time.
We go on holiday 3-4 times a year (my husband loves to find a bargain), we have a good chuck in savings.
We are considering getting a bigger house with around 900 a month morgage but I've never gave into lifestyle inflation before so thinking about it carefully.

My friend was baffled how I have just been to Asia for 2 weeks, which cost us about 4k but then proceeded to announce they just got a second 30k car, on finance, she now pays £750 a month for 2 cars on finance, I wouldn't dream of doing that! So yes I think some people are screwed with house prices but a lot of people expect what they want and don't consider a more frugle, cheaper option.

youalright · 31/03/2026 11:49

Onadark · 31/03/2026 09:54

lol, yeah they ususally "forget" about the other £30k worth of benefits they get in the form of housing benefit, universal credit, free school meals, free prescriptions, free dental care, PIP, child benefit, child support, council tax reduction yada yada yada I could go on.

No thats everything and I don't get free dental or council tax reduction or free school meals

PerfectPairofBoots · 31/03/2026 11:48

What does your monthly budget look like OP? Are you putting a lot into pensions, savings, investments? Will things look a lot different after nursery is finished, do you go on holiday, what's your mortgage?
We are two full time workers on min wage, no top.ups, and doing ok, so it's hard to tell without seeing your budget whether this is a post to wind people up, or a genuine I struggle to budget post.

Kirbert2 · 31/03/2026 11:45

x2boys · 31/03/2026 11:33

Do you think peoole on universal credit hsve never worked?
Some work full time and still need the top up.
I dont work now becsuse my son is severely autistic,hes 16 in may but functions at around 2/3 years
Im not exactly living the dream.

I thought the same thing.

A nice sunny day at the park? If only.

LookUpnotDown · 31/03/2026 11:44

The top 50 wealthiest families are richer than the bottom 34 million people in the U.K. we need to tax the super rich . They won’t just up and leave over 1% they have UK assets. The problem isn’t and has never been those on benefits.

IncessantNameChanger · 31/03/2026 11:42

We are on one very low wage in the SE. Although we occasionally get into trouble when a car needs a 2k repair it seems like we are more comfortable than others on this thread on over 100k. I am presuming that's because we bough the most basis house we could in the best part of a rough area decades ago. Once we had a house it was easier to move again. We absolutely went to our limit of what we could could afford to buy it putting down a big deposit. We couldn't of bought that house today.

We both drive 12 year old cars, don't go out, only go out to eat for birthdays. Second hand clothes mostly. Not had hair cut in years. Dd 11 has been to the hairdresses once in her life. Most splashing of cash is days out with the kids. Even then we have annual passes. Maybe it's because our accommodation is secure or maybe it's because we never did splash out in the first place. I don't resent my old car. It's reliable. I do worry about food and fuel increase.

What I do measure myself on was that we grew up as a working class family in a deprived town. It's still famously deprived. So maybe my measure of happiness is set back in my roots of growing up with just the basics.

But I was never cold and hungry as a kid. Something I can't always say about my own. We can not get our house warm and it's been low as 11 over winter and as high as 18. That's the time I feel the col hurt most.

Baaaadbunny · 31/03/2026 11:41

JaceLancs · 31/03/2026 09:49

How on earth to people think that those on benefits are not stretched! DP lost his job through no fault of his own and is struggling to find another one in his 60s
A single person on UC gets £400 pcm, local housing allowance does not even cover the rent which has to be topped up so he has less than £70 a week to cover all bills and food which is just not possible

I feel it needs to be legally challenged how little they give to single people with no dependents. It often doesn’t cover rent and bills let alone food.

Imisscoffee2021 · 31/03/2026 11:40

I'd imagine it's your mortgage/rent. I lived in Kingston for years and remember well the dreadful percentage of take home pay and the cost of trains season tickets. My cousins in the North earn less but their houses were half of what property is in the south and round london and its commuters towns, and palatial in comparison too. They eat out loads, kids are always on weekends away with them to mini spas or massive activities, money stretches further there.

dizzydizzydizzy · 31/03/2026 11:39

Coffeeandbooks88 · 31/03/2026 11:12

Anyway why are we talking benefits because OP is struggling to budget? It isn't the fault of UC claimants.

Because a PP said benefits claimants were winnings. (We’re not).

CoralOP · 31/03/2026 11:39

Well this has decended into fucking chaos hasn't it ladies. Anyway....back to what OP created the thread about....

Kirbert2 · 31/03/2026 11:39

Seelybe · 31/03/2026 10:57

@Kirbert2 because you're not up at 5.30am every morning with an hour's commute and full time work to achieve effectively the same thing. If you have an illness or disability that genuinely prevents you from working then you're definitely not winning. Otherwise, one of the multiple pressures on working folk is the ever increasing tax and NI hikes paying for the ballooning benefits bill.

I have a disabled child. 5:30am is a lay in.

Definitely not winning here.

givemesteel · 31/03/2026 11:37

Julen7 · 31/03/2026 11:31

And yet you get people saying 16K is not enough.

Agree. These days £16k in savings is doing pretty well. Threshold needs to be lowered.

Redskye · 31/03/2026 11:37

We have about a 40% higher household income than we did 10 years ago due to being at the peak of our careers now. We’ve got children and we did struggle then as we were just above the threshold for top up benefits and blended family which makes financiers extra stretched. Now we’re even more stretched despite being professionals at the top of our pay bands, promotions, etc. Everything seems to have at least doubled in price and the mortgage interest rates have gone up, trying to look at what else we can cut back

CostOfLoving · 31/03/2026 11:37

Summerhut2025 · 31/03/2026 10:24

Oh how terrible for them penalised by £4.35 per month because they’ve managed to have savings collecting money from the tax payer. It’s an absolute joke.

It's £4.35 per £250 or part thereof. So £1000 over the limit is £17.40 per month. Nearing £16,000 savings they'd be down £174 a month. Bearing in mind for a single person basic UC is only around £400 a month.

Anyway, the point is they are expected to top up from their savings which is fair enough.

But most claimants have nothing like 16k savings! It's not really possible to save like that on benefits. So this really applies to people who were working (thus able to save) but through some misfortune lost their job. They are already likely to have costs not covered by benefits (eg. mortgages or subscriptions/bills that can just be instantly cancelled) so will need to use their savings alongside any UC they are entitled to whilst they get back on their feet.

I hope this happens to you so you can get a full understanding of how it works.

safetyfreak · 31/03/2026 11:36

It feels like the middle keeps getting hit while people on benefits and pensions keep getting more support and increases. It doesn’t feel fair.

My nan was a working-class woman, a shop worker, and she jokes about how much money she has and all the extra payments she gets (warm house discount, etc)

Benefits needs to be means-tested more...I know the middle will be hit again to pay for this energy crisis.

givemesteel · 31/03/2026 11:36

Coffeeandbooks88 · 31/03/2026 11:07

You are better off working than giving it up and going on UC.

I am not sure whether I will be as when qualified I a only on a band 5 nhs salary. With other costs I am not sure if it will be worth it. I will see what the situation is when I am finished.

But plat the moment putting my 3 kids in to holiday clubs costs more than what I earn after tax. I wouldn't have these costs if I wasn't working.

x2boys · 31/03/2026 11:33

givemesteel · 31/03/2026 10:43

I have found my people here. We both work full time, 3 kids, 5 years ago were far better off than we are now, despite me upping my hours.

I think people who are on UC don't understand about the difference with people working FT is we are knackered at the end of day having worked probably more hours than we're paid, plus commuted and so you need to pay more for things that cost, eg a cleaner or takeaway etc.

If you're not working you have time to clean your house, cook meals for yourself. You can go out on a nice sunny day to the park for free, whereas if you're working you're looking out the window on those days then it's inevitably overcast and spitting by the time it's the weekend.

There has to feel like there is something more in return for working. If you work full time you should be able to afford some treats otherwise what's the point. Just cut your hours and go on UC as a top up.

Do you think peoole on universal credit hsve never worked?
Some work full time and still need the top up.
I dont work now becsuse my son is severely autistic,hes 16 in may but functions at around 2/3 years
Im not exactly living the dream.

Julen7 · 31/03/2026 11:31

Summerhut2025 · 31/03/2026 11:29

Yes I agree.

It's the fact that they allow people to have to up to 16k in savings and then collect benefits from the tax payer when they have more than enough to fund themselves, is what I have the issue with. I have no issues with people claiming benefits who need it, if they have even a quarter of 16k, they still aren't poor.

And yet you get people saying 16K is not enough.

Summerhut2025 · 31/03/2026 11:31

PinkKimono · 31/03/2026 11:25

Well, even Thatcher's government recognised the need to allow people to have a certain amount of savings. In 1980 the limit was set at £2000 (£8,695.32 in today's money) with no deductions off benefit.

A certain amount, yes. Up to 16k is absolutely crazy.

womendeserveequalhumanrights · 31/03/2026 11:30

When people are struggling despite doing everything they're supposed to do - work hard, behave honestly, pay their bills - what's the temptation?

E.g. the council here has imposed a lot of hurdles to jump through and arguably non-GDPR compliant requests for personal info to go to the tip and dump waste, which some of the most vulnerable (e.g. my parents, who can't use a computer) can't do. Result, lots more flytipping. To be clear, my parents haven't flytipped. However their house is full of junk they can't get rid of. Eventually I'll do it but I don't have the time right now and they live very far away.

tangobravo · 31/03/2026 11:29

BudgetBuster · 31/03/2026 11:24

💯
We didn't have kids for a long time because we wanted to pay off our cars, have a (mortgaged) home rather than the worry of renting, we had savings and both work FT. After having our kids the COL erupted at great speed, our fixed rate mortgage ended and the rates had gone way up, we ended up in debt due to medical / household repairs. All unforseen things that happened in a very short timeframe. We planned, we worked, we had a buffer but it all crashed at the same time.

Exactly! Christ all these posters talking about how it's our fault for planning our lives badly and feeling entitled to holidays - our mortgage literally went up by £500 per month, our weekly shop has doubled since 2022, and our wages haven't kept up. Also the cost of doing work (basic!) on our house has sky rocketed too so keeping the house maintained sucks up any spare cash

Summerhut2025 · 31/03/2026 11:29

Coffeeandbooks88 · 31/03/2026 11:22

And when I need to pay for something similar I will be using the UC. What is the difference? Savings for emergencys is a good thing. Even the government encourages it with the help to save accounts. Might start using that soon.

Yes I agree.

It's the fact that they allow people to have to up to 16k in savings and then collect benefits from the tax payer when they have more than enough to fund themselves, is what I have the issue with. I have no issues with people claiming benefits who need it, if they have even a quarter of 16k, they still aren't poor.

SurvivalInstinctsOfABakedPotato · 31/03/2026 11:28

hattie43 · 31/03/2026 09:16

That’s as may be financially but you don’t have the stress of putting food on the table , worrying about how to fund yet more council tax etc or losing your income / job . I’m not saying it’s an easy life but it doesn’t have the unpredictability of paying for yourself.

Actually it does. I only earn about 550 a month due to a disability so get benefits. I can't afford food and the council tax has become unaffordable. I think people have a skewed view of how much most people get in benefits. I get 1200 a month. Rent is 700 and council tax is 200. Once my gas and water and electric has come out of that I'm about - 50. That's before I've bought any food, paid for anything for my son, phone bill, Internet, sewerage rates, travel for work etc. I am literally drowning every month so not sure why people think being on benefits means you don't have to worry about bills. We still have to pay them!!!!

tangobravo · 31/03/2026 11:26

Coffeeandbooks88 · 31/03/2026 11:20

Well to be frankly honest I would have thought having two kids and nursery would mean it wouldn't come as a shock that you are struggling?

I'm literally responding to the OP about how we have nothing spare at the end of the month. I'm not stupid, I understand where our £ is going every month, it's obviously not a surprise. This is an online forum and I'm responding to an OP with my experience, I'm not sure why you're so obsessed with explaining my own situation back to me?

Summerhut2025 · 31/03/2026 11:25

cadburyegg · 31/03/2026 11:21

It’s actually none of your business what people spend their money on, whether it’s from the taxpayer or not. I am sure the poster you quoted doesn’t have 16k in savings.

Like another poster said you are misguided and short sighted. Lower income families going into debt is not the answer. I am not sure you really understand the basics of economics - qualifying for a mortgage doesn’t mean you can afford to take on another big debt.

I'm not saying it's my business what people spend their money on nor am I saying that the poster has 16k.

I'm saying that it's wrong that people are allowed up to 16k in savings, if they have even a quarter of that money, they are not poor and shouldn't be getting topped up by the tax payer. End of.

Swipe left for the next trending thread