Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Are other full-time working families finding there is nothing left?

936 replies

fatface001 · 31/03/2026 08:40

Alarm went off at 5:30 this morning, then an hour stood on a packed train into London for the commute. We are a normal family: one child and two full-time jobs. I’ve always enjoyed working and have always worked hard, and I don’t mind that at all — but I do expect that full-time work should still mean there’s something left at the end of the month for a normal life.

But that really doesn’t feel like the case anymore.

There’s nothing left at the end of the month. Everything has been stripped back, all non-essentials have gone, and even basic things around the house are being put off or done ourselves because there isn’t spare money for trades. It’s just constant cutting back.

What’s hard is that we’re both working really long hours and doing everything we’re “supposed” to do, but it still feels like we’re going backwards rather than getting ahead.

When I hear talk about “those with the broadest shoulders” contributing more, I honestly don’t recognise it anymore in real life. It doesn’t feel like anyone in our position has anything left to give — it feels like the pressure is entirely on ordinary working households just to stand still.

I’m not looking for luxuries — just the sense that working still gives you a bit of breathing room. Right now it doesn’t feel like that at all.

Is anyone else feeling the same?

OP posts:
Octavia64 · 31/03/2026 12:32

I think so much of this is down to housing costs and childcare costs all of which are so much higher than they used to be.

i am fortunate in that although I am disabled and medically retired I own my own home and my kids are well out of the childcare years.

in this situation the col increases are copable with.

I’m sorry to hear so many are struggling and I really hope things don’t get worse.

80smonster · 31/03/2026 12:31

MidnightMeltdown · 31/03/2026 09:32

It’s not just the increase in food costs etc. It’s because the tax thresholds have been frozen for years, so we are spending more and more of our incomes on tax. Other taxes are also rising faster than wages. Council tax for example, up around 5% this year, but not many people have had that much pay rise. It’s outrageous. They shouldn’t be allowed to raise council tax by more than the average wage.

I completely agree. Taxing the shit out of anything you can point at (to ridiculous levels) has become Labour’s calling card. I’d like to know how the treasury plans to use the additional 20 million a day it’s coining from various oil/gas levies and taxes, due to the Iran war. Surely they should be looking to relieve the frankly overburdened and underpaid UK workforce? But they won’t, they’ll spank it on benefits claimants - to keep their core voters happy.

witheringrowan · 31/03/2026 12:30

LookUpnotDown · 31/03/2026 12:25

Or we could tax the super rich ….

60% of income tax comes from the top 10% of earns. 30% comes from the top 1%. You might want to look up the Laffer Curve.

Bluegreenbird · 31/03/2026 12:28

In the interest of balance. No I am doing fine. Never felt so well off. My secret to success is being born 60 years ago.
I really feel for young families. Something is very broken. We just don’t support hard working parents enough.

LookUpnotDown · 31/03/2026 12:25

Lameelephant · 31/03/2026 12:15

Why? Because quite obviously we need people to work. Taxes on work and every other little thing Labour attempt to slip in need to come down dramatically and immediately, funded by reductions in benefits.

Or we could tax the super rich ….

Kirbert2 · 31/03/2026 12:22

Lameelephant · 31/03/2026 12:15

Why? Because quite obviously we need people to work. Taxes on work and every other little thing Labour attempt to slip in need to come down dramatically and immediately, funded by reductions in benefits.

If benefits were reduced, I wouldn't be able to afford to eat or pay my bills. It's a struggle enough as it is.

Redskye · 31/03/2026 12:20

angelos02 · 31/03/2026 12:04

Absolutely this. Otherwise, why bother. There should be a huge difference in lifestyle between working a minimum wage job and not working. At least a holiday abroad once a year and not having to think about how to afford a meal out regularly. Not much to ask for giving up 40 years of your life to work.

Thats not even something we have being on double the minimum wage, people’s expectations are sky high. In my experience if you’ve got children then it doesn’t really matter what you are on, seem to end up with a similar amount each month whether not working or on double the minimum wage as we are now (the extra just makes you ineligible for extra top ups) probably just end up having a bit more choice in life though and save a shed load of time in benefits admin at leat And better off in long run in terms of home ownership and pensions etc

Uptightmumma · 31/03/2026 12:19

Yep. We run our own business. Both work in it full time. 2 kids. Priced up a day out next week £55 to get in, plus petrol, packed lunch snacks etc. the kids are off for 2 weeks how is this sustainable. Paid £85 for 5 (2 adults 3 kids) to go to an event yesterday was there 2 hours and again had to pay petrol and parking!! Trip to the cinema £40 - we take our own snacks now otherwise that’s another £40.

£200 in a weekly shop, nothing major in there was about 5 bags of food ridiculous cost

New England kits £135 - no wonder people buying them off blag sites who can afford this?

TheAmusedQuail · 31/03/2026 12:17

Lameelephant · 31/03/2026 12:15

Why? Because quite obviously we need people to work. Taxes on work and every other little thing Labour attempt to slip in need to come down dramatically and immediately, funded by reductions in benefits.

Sorry. Genuinely not being snippy. Can you explain a bit more what you mean please? I thought we WERE talking about people who are working full time?

Summerhut2025 · 31/03/2026 12:17

Onadark · 31/03/2026 09:54

lol, yeah they ususally "forget" about the other £30k worth of benefits they get in the form of housing benefit, universal credit, free school meals, free prescriptions, free dental care, PIP, child benefit, child support, council tax reduction yada yada yada I could go on.

85% off their child care costs too.

Lameelephant · 31/03/2026 12:15

TheAmusedQuail · 31/03/2026 12:10

Why? Because if we look at the world, the majority of the population would envy just that? I'm happy to have a secure roof over my head. I'm happy not to worry about paying my bills. Many on this thread can't. My parents couldn't. I know that is a luxury.

Since when has having an expensive car, a pricey holiday, £150 hair & £40 nails or a ridiculously over priced coffee been the standard to aim for? It sounds like conspicuous consumption to me, AKA a waste of money. 1 or 2 on that list occasionally is great. But expecting a full-time job (unless you're a lawyer or a stockbroker) to pay for all that has more or less always been unrealistic.

Why? Because quite obviously we need people to work. Taxes on work and every other little thing Labour attempt to slip in need to come down dramatically and immediately, funded by reductions in benefits.

TheAmusedQuail · 31/03/2026 12:10

MidnightMeltdown · 31/03/2026 12:01

I think it’s completely unreasonable to expect that someone working full time should be happy just to afford the absolute basics of life.

Why? Because if we look at the world, the majority of the population would envy just that? I'm happy to have a secure roof over my head. I'm happy not to worry about paying my bills. Many on this thread can't. My parents couldn't. I know that is a luxury.

Since when has having an expensive car, a pricey holiday, £150 hair & £40 nails or a ridiculously over priced coffee been the standard to aim for? It sounds like conspicuous consumption to me, AKA a waste of money. 1 or 2 on that list occasionally is great. But expecting a full-time job (unless you're a lawyer or a stockbroker) to pay for all that has more or less always been unrealistic.

askmenow · 31/03/2026 12:09

Mightneedencouraged · 31/03/2026 09:23

Aaaaaa people like you are the reason your kids will be poor. The "green taxes" do absolutely nothing of value. But you've been socialised to think it would be better to set yourself on fire than have a rethink (or that it amounts to the same thing).

If you think bank profiteering is bad you should see how much money green finance people rake in.

Yep the “green levies” we’re all paying have made the billionaires MNetters are all sneering at!
And how are the green levy punishments going to pay down ££££trillions of debt I ask?

Your children are going to be paying that if someone doesn’t figure out a way to get out of this doomloop. The IMF beckons.

Educated adults , your children are going to be getting out of this country, they’re not going to accept this failed State a moment longer than they have to.

We need radical change.

A clearing out of the civil service so they do as they’re told.
And a Government with fiscal prudence to run the country, not the unelected back room boys sitting securely in their WFH offices dispensing socialist policies.

CherryBlossom321 · 31/03/2026 12:08

We have an average household income for where we live. We have a fairly comfortable life in terms of a nice home, and a good reliable car. However, we are at a life stage where I would have expected we would go on holiday every year and have savings. We don’t, which is disappointing (much of our disposable money is now taken up by the mortgage interest rate hikes and food price increases). We live frugally on what we have left. I do feel privileged in comparison to the situation many are in, but I also feel disappointed that our lifestyle and financial security isn’t better than it is.

Jaq27 · 31/03/2026 12:08

I agree with so much on here.
Life is a drudge without any sparkle.

No money to eat out. No money for nails. No money for hair. No new clothes. No theatre. No concerts. No drinks out. No fancy ingredients (love cooking). No 'little luxuries' like nice handwash. No holidays. No treats. No takeaways.

No wonder so many people spend ££s trying to win the Lottery. It feels like the only way off the treadmill.

angelos02 · 31/03/2026 12:04

MidnightMeltdown · 31/03/2026 12:01

I think it’s completely unreasonable to expect that someone working full time should be happy just to afford the absolute basics of life.

Absolutely this. Otherwise, why bother. There should be a huge difference in lifestyle between working a minimum wage job and not working. At least a holiday abroad once a year and not having to think about how to afford a meal out regularly. Not much to ask for giving up 40 years of your life to work.

Julen7 · 31/03/2026 12:02

youalright · 31/03/2026 11:58

Yeah its funny how people are still managing to afford that

Yup.

MidnightMeltdown · 31/03/2026 12:01

TheAmusedQuail · 31/03/2026 11:23

I think the issue lies in your expectations.

I work full-time. Self-employed. Only earn around 40K but no mortgage.

I come from poverty and my current standard of living is OK. Not lavish. Nothing like most on here expect. Slightly larger than average terraced house. Old car, no finance. Don't have annual holidays. I could afford one if I wanted but I've been there, done that and they're frequently not good, money pissed up the wall in fact. I'm not particularly driven by new clothes. Could have them if I wanted.

No judgement from me about those wanting a more lavish life. More power to you. But I think the expectation of a 'better' life and not being able to afford is it the key here. I have a worse life (I'm sure that would be the general perception) but to me, being able to afford my bills, not struggling financially, is good.

I think it’s completely unreasonable to expect that someone working full time should be happy just to afford the absolute basics of life.

angelos02 · 31/03/2026 12:00

goldingoose · 31/03/2026 11:51

You are angry at billionaires? Please explain in what way they are "making mugs of all of us". @Ilovemsrachel

I'd imagine it is because tax payers are paying for a proportion of their payroll - via working tax credits. Just a guess. Not paying inheritance tax. Spending their money on paying a tiny proportion of tax on the money generated for them by others. We are going back in time. The poor are staying poor and the middle are getting poorer in real terms. If you can't see what is being done to us, I give up.

Redskye · 31/03/2026 12:00

Having been a single parent on benefits and now a higher earning income household, I do think I see it from both sides and where people miss the point is how comfortably off a family is depends very much on their individual circumstances rather than whether they are a UC claimant or higher earner. I have friends who have a low mortgage on a a lovely house, minimal commuting costs, family that give cash gifts towards holiday and home improvements. They are sensible and frugal with their money but manage a fairly modestly comfortable standard of living and afford a lot of things we can’t afford like holidays. I have another friend who has shared care of children but due to shift work cannot have 50/50 care and earns a good salary but after high rent on substandard housing near to children , child maintenance payments, high commuting costs is on a huge deficit each month and spiralling into debt despite doing deliveroo work after a full days work just to have enough money to try and
feed children when they are with him. We’re a higher income earning household but with being a blended family so needing a large house, child maintenance costs etc then we are just about managing, definitely had a higher disposable income as a single parent but then suppose didn’t have the long term investment of being home owners and did have to move at one point due to landlord wanting to move back into house. I worked hard as single parent but also work hard now. I’m glad we have a welfare state but people do massively overestimate how much better off people not on benefits are (my DH was shocked when he first me as expected I’d be really poor but had a more expensive car than him) but at the same time most people on benefits have lives just as hard as those who are working

youalright · 31/03/2026 11:58

Theolittle · 31/03/2026 10:29

This might also be the mounjaro effect!

Yeah its funny how people are still managing to afford that

Violese · 31/03/2026 11:58

goldingoose · 31/03/2026 11:51

You are angry at billionaires? Please explain in what way they are "making mugs of all of us". @Ilovemsrachel

What have billionaires done wrong? On the whole they’ve founded businesses that employ lots of people and pay all due taxes. Whats the issue? You want them to pay more than 45% of their income in taxes? That’s a decision the government could make but they have no doubt been advised by their economists that doing so is unlikely lead to a higher level of tax take due to people deciding to leave the country.

Take a deep breath and stop being so angry.

CoralOP · 31/03/2026 11:57

Also wanted to add. I might be doing OK now but my son is nearly a teen, I've been there paying the nursery bills.
I've been through some horrendous times financially where I would be crying in a heap on the kitchen floor with another bill I couldn't pay.
But people's lives change over time. You are never going yo have a lot of money with nursery bills. I see my parents feeling quite comfortable these days but I know they used to borrow tins of beans from family to feed the kids for the day.
Lives changes, sometimes your up, sometimes your down x

Lameelephant · 31/03/2026 11:53

Absolutely, for the simple reason that you are being taxed extremely heavily to fund non working/low earning families.

goldingoose · 31/03/2026 11:51

Ilovemsrachel · 31/03/2026 09:20

I feel really angry at billionaires a lot of the time. Also landlords. I do not feel angry at people on benefits. It is worth remembering that most recipients are in work.

We rent, and so I think we have a bit more left over than a lot of people (rent is fairly reasonable for the area that we are in). We do try to save for a mortgage and have been for years but the large deposits required do not feel achievable and for various reasons moving is very difficult. So I suppose we do spend a bit of what we could save on eating out or going to the cinema because life is short.

I do not work full-time, though, I work 2.5 days a week earning £50ishk. If I worked full time I could earn a lot more than that. I don’t really understand how someone on a six-figure salary has nothing left at the end of the month unless they have an absolutely ginormous mortgage or have chosen private education. I find the articles in newspapers of families on six figure salaries complaining about the cost of living quite distasteful, but not as distasteful as I find the billionaires making mugs of all of us.

You are angry at billionaires? Please explain in what way they are "making mugs of all of us". @Ilovemsrachel

Swipe left for the next trending thread