Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think 80s parenting was often hands-off and unsupervised?

291 replies

N3wUs3rNam3Again · 27/03/2026 13:17

Is this familiar to anyone else ? I was born in the 80s, my Dad worked a physical job long hours, often away and seemed to mostly sleep when home. My Mum worked part time, mostly school hours, although not when we were little, but she wasn't really a present mum, definitely not child focussed. I don't remember her ever playing with us, although she did read and sing to us at night.

I am 1 of 3 children, so was lucky I had 2 siblings to play with and keep me occupied. In the summer we spent a lot of time outside playing with neighbouring kids, this was without adult supervision, kids ages would range from 5-12, we'd be booted out at 9am. Go in for lunch then back out until 5, we'd go on adventures, get chased by farmers, the big kids looked after the little kids. Were streets safer? There were definitely less cars and more kids, so safety in numbers perhaps.

At home we had a television and a commodore 64, although spent more time watching the commodore 64 load than we did playing it. But I watched Tele, loads of it, Lassie, black beauty, little house on the prairie, the Walton's , neighbours, home and away, blockbusters, why don't you, heart beat, grange hill, BykerGrove, button moon, playschool, T bag, Timmy Mallet, the list is endless and I watched it all without parent oversight.

My parents and their friends, mostly our mum's, drank a lot at weekends, I remember many gathering aged from 5-11 either at our house or friend's where our mum's would get drunk and in the summer we kids would roam outside. We didn't get in to trouble, though I think that's due to luck more than anything. In the winter we'd pile in to a bedroom playing hide and seek in the dark , telling ghost stories, calling up spirits, playing truth or dare and raps (card game).

Even at the beach the parents didn't seem to supervise us, all the kids would be in the sea, mums sunbathing / sleeping but the older kids looked after the younger ones. Again it was probably more luck than anything that we didn't get into trouble.

All sounds quite lovely really even with absent parents although my mum was definitely present if we misbehaved or made a fuss and would give us a smack across our legs for bad behaviour and from memory I think we must have been pretty bad and often!

I just wondered really if my childhood was so totally different to everyone else's as reading posts on here, it seems everyone used to do it so much better than the parents who are doing it today. Don't get me wrong I had a happy enough childhood and my basic needs were met but just because my parents didn't give me a handheld screen to watch doesn't mean they were present and doing it better than the parent today who does.

AIBU - that is not how it was in the 80s for you and your parents were way more present than parents are today.

OP posts:
PollyBell · 28/03/2026 02:18

Yes i loved it is wasn't micromanagement nor did my parents get hysterical if I ate a packet of crisps or didnt go to my school all guns blazing because I wasn't lead in the school play or interfer in friendship dramas

Parents back then just got on with things and dodnt have endless guilt or a need to control

canuckup · 28/03/2026 01:56

And somehow most of these children managed to become literate, independent adults!

There was just enough independence for their childhood to be interesting and stimulating, but enough adult involvement that they learnt to be responsible and independent

MyJollyMentor · 27/03/2026 22:56

Yep, that all sounds familiar (apart from the drinking).
Playing outside for hours - in rivers, streams etc. Going for bike rides as far as we could go.
They just didn't seem to worry about things like drowning.

KeepDancing1 · 27/03/2026 22:39

MotherofPufflings · 27/03/2026 13:51

Rates of mental illness in young people are soaring, so absolutely not convinced that modern parenting is an overall improvement.

I wonder, have rates of mental illness in young people really soared? Or do we just listen to young people now, take notice of their anxieties and problems, care how they feel, gather more data about them, and try our best to help/get help for them?

Autumngirl5 · 27/03/2026 22:30

My children were born in the 70s. I definitely didn’t drink alcohol but did have friends over for a cup of tea! My children didn’t go out to play either but would play in each others gardens (with us mums there). Food was much more limited and home cooked as ready made food was so much more expensive. It probably sounds boring now but didn’t feel like it at the time 😂.
They were happy days. I did not go to work and was able to stay at home with my children so was always around and I am sorry that so many mums today do not have that choice as finances are so much tighter now sadly.

N3wUs3rNam3Again · 27/03/2026 22:27

Really interesting thanks for posting

OP posts:
youalright · 27/03/2026 22:14

CoralOP · 27/03/2026 13:47

I think parents of the last 10-20 years have completely changed how parenting is done. I think generally they think they are doing it 'better' but I think it's still to be confirmed when these generations grow into adults, we really don't know how these kids will turn out.

I feel there will be a lot of positives from todays parenting but also a lot of negatives.

But we are seeing it a generation who can't cope with the real world

sharkstale · 27/03/2026 22:13

N3wUs3rNam3Again · 27/03/2026 22:11

I don't think it's the same , I don't think I've said that anywhere, I agree there is a massive difference and I don't think under 5s should have access at all and I'm sure I said as much in my previous post to you. I'm not talking toddler's strapped into a highchair and being given a tablet for 6 hours everyday to occupy themselves with no other interactions, that's obviously child neglect and maybe I'm naive but I'm assuming that's an extreme rather than the norm and generally it's more parents giving toddlers a device whilst they're cooking, cleaning, dealing with an older child, making a phone call, taking a shower. But, and now I'm talking 5 +, because I don't really remember much before then, our parents would sit us in front of the Tele, leave us to our own devices, which besides content available really is not much different to kids on devices, the parent in the 80s wasn't doing anything outstanding there from a parenting perspective, they were catching a break getting on with jobs nothing there helped my development, but it wasn't frowned upon. In addition our parents sent us outside all day, don't get me wrong we went went willingly, but my siblings and I, say aged 6, 8 and 11, even younger, would go off with neighbouring kids across fields on adventures, according to this thread seems we weren't alone, we'd climb on hay bale stacks, play in rivers, some kids went to the beach completely on their own, anything could have happened, yeah sure an older kid would have done their best to protect a younger one, ran for help if needed but at the end of the day we were all kids. If a parent today sent their 5 years old kid out for the day with their 10 year old sibling they'd be reported to social services, the police for child neglect. Parents today don't have the same options as parents did in the 80s. What our parents did in the 80s, today is called neglect.

You literally said that the parents of the 70s/80s were just as lazy as the parents of today. I massively disagree. I think giving kids ipads as a way of not having to deal with them is lazy. I think the way we were raised was healthy.

N3wUs3rNam3Again · 27/03/2026 22:11

sharkstale · 27/03/2026 21:02

Personally, I think there's a huge difference. Back then, they knew we were out having fun with our friends, bonding with our siblings, playing in nature, riding bikes, being creative building dens, laughing, socialising, developing independence. Parents who hand their kids a tablet and leave them to it are knowingly causing damage to their kids, turning them into zombies, hindering their development. There is a massive difference. I wouldn't put them anywhere near in the same class as "lazy".

I'm actually quite bemused tbh that you think it's the same.

Edited

I don't think it's the same , I don't think I've said that anywhere, I agree there is a massive difference and I don't think under 5s should have access at all and I'm sure I said as much in my previous post to you. I'm not talking toddler's strapped into a highchair and being given a tablet for 6 hours everyday to occupy themselves with no other interactions, that's obviously child neglect and maybe I'm naive but I'm assuming that's an extreme rather than the norm and generally it's more parents giving toddlers a device whilst they're cooking, cleaning, dealing with an older child, making a phone call, taking a shower. But, and now I'm talking 5 +, because I don't really remember much before then, our parents would sit us in front of the Tele, leave us to our own devices, which besides content available really is not much different to kids on devices, the parent in the 80s wasn't doing anything outstanding there from a parenting perspective, they were catching a break getting on with jobs nothing there helped my development, but it wasn't frowned upon. In addition our parents sent us outside all day, don't get me wrong we went went willingly, but my siblings and I, say aged 6, 8 and 11, even younger, would go off with neighbouring kids across fields on adventures, according to this thread seems we weren't alone, we'd climb on hay bale stacks, play in rivers, some kids went to the beach completely on their own, anything could have happened, yeah sure an older kid would have done their best to protect a younger one, ran for help if needed but at the end of the day we were all kids. If a parent today sent their 5 years old kid out for the day with their 10 year old sibling they'd be reported to social services, the police for child neglect. Parents today don't have the same options as parents did in the 80s. What our parents did in the 80s, today is called neglect.

OP posts:
MotherofPufflings · 27/03/2026 22:09

Goldenbear · 27/03/2026 20:57

But that's just because there isn't a stigma attached to it. It certainly isn't all young people.

Are you saying that mental health in young people is no worse than it ever was, we're just recognising it more? I'm not sure that's generally accepted as being the main cause.

TempestTost · 27/03/2026 22:07

The thing I would say about access to tv in that period is that it did not include 24 hours a day of children's tv. You had some set times, early morning, a bit at lunch, Saturday. Daytime tv if you were sick from school was cooking shows and soap operas. Evenings had adult sit come and dramas.
So if you wanted to watch tv with your parents in the evening you learned to enjoy adult tv. But often kids did something else rather than get mesmerised by 24 hour kids tv.

TempestTost · 27/03/2026 21:50

ReadingCrimeFiction · 27/03/2026 15:10

I think it's sort of right, but there's a bigger picture you're missing.

So yes, we were out playing but a) we had boundaries and we knew what they were and wouldn't have DREAMED of going beyond them. In our case, our house was the last one in the estate we were allowed to go past - so anything "above" our house, fine. Anything "below" - get caught and it's a hiding.

Ditto, older siblings WERE expected to take on a certain supervisory role, but it wasn't that onerous. It was more about taking responsibility. At the same time, the "village" was 100% in operation - if we misbehaved elsewhere in the neighbourhood you can be damn sure that Mrs Jones would let us know about it, and there was a damn good chance she'd tell my mum and dad and we'd know even MORE about it then. Ditto - we wore certain clothes, greeted all adult guests whent hey came into the house, cleaned up after dinner, made those adult guests tea/coffee etc etc etc. We didn't dream of refusing or complaining.

Ditto, yes, during the day, we weren't being "entertained" by our parnets - they were working. But we were sitting down to dinner together every night. No exceptions. We were expected to do our own homework and if we got into trouble at school for not doing it - no sympathy from mom and dad. They DID support us by providing the tools and the environment to do it in. I remember the BIG DEAL trip Dad took me and my brother on to choose our first ever "proper" desks so we could do "proper" homework. This was an especially big deal because at the time, there was little to no spare money so we knew that they'd really made an effort to get these desks for us.

And as for other stuff, they were 100% there for extra curricular - we did sport through school and they turned up for matches, took their turn at doing the tea/coke/orange segments for during/after etc.

We also spent a lot of time with them just doing chores. Helping dad in the garden or mum with the cooking. So sure, fewer trips to the big waterpark (didn't exist) but plenty of time together including beach trips and walks with the dog, learnign to ride our bikes etc.

To be honest, I'm actually doing my best to replicate as much of this as possible. I'm not doing very well on insisting on chores. But the rest, largely is going okay.

This is a lot like my upbringing in the 80s. My parents looked out for us, provided a good environment, and we did some family things together, dinner every night, bike rides on some weekends, we had some extracurricular activities. We were ready to before bed and usually went to see a play once a year.
But to they didn't play with us, (why would they?) we were quite free to go wherever wanted on our bikes, generally expected to figure out our own problems and friendships, if we took the bus somewhere and lost our way we had to find out own way home.
Overall, I think it was much better for kids than it is now.

Bitbloweyoutthere · 27/03/2026 21:24

My mum was always busy. Busy decorating. Cooking. Sorting. Helping old people. Doing pt time work. Gardening.
We were encouraged to go out to play all the time, even though much of the time it was boring and the other kids were boring. But they were also more strict than other parents, so we weren't allowed as far as other kids- which made us he weird ones. Never saw my mum really drink. Rarely saw my dad at home after 7pm. I thought all dads preferred the pub. Blew my mind that other dads stayed in. I used to be very shy around them.

I think some of my parents' parenting was better than mine. I think some of mine is better than theirs.

Kids blame their parents for everything anyway.... until they become parents and grow up and realise that we can move on from our childhoods. Whatever mine did, they gave me the tools to become a competent and happy adult. If my kids manage that, I've done ok.

sharkstale · 27/03/2026 21:02

N3wUs3rNam3Again · 27/03/2026 20:17

Does it? No I had a happy enough childhood, I loved the adventures with my friends and siblings, late nights, messing about, jumping waves, playing in the dingy, we had a lot of fun and I lived in a nice house and was well provided for. I was just questioning if my childhood was familiar to others experiences due to so many posts about parents today not doing anything with their children and being neglectful by giving them handheld devices. I view my parents parenting style as laxed parenting, not saying it's bad just no different to those labelled as lazy today. Times have changed and it's done differently now but other than doing the basics it doesn't seem parents back then were doing anything extraordinary with their kids that parents aren't doing today.

Personally, I think there's a huge difference. Back then, they knew we were out having fun with our friends, bonding with our siblings, playing in nature, riding bikes, being creative building dens, laughing, socialising, developing independence. Parents who hand their kids a tablet and leave them to it are knowingly causing damage to their kids, turning them into zombies, hindering their development. There is a massive difference. I wouldn't put them anywhere near in the same class as "lazy".

I'm actually quite bemused tbh that you think it's the same.

Goldenbear · 27/03/2026 20:57

MotherofPufflings · 27/03/2026 13:51

Rates of mental illness in young people are soaring, so absolutely not convinced that modern parenting is an overall improvement.

But that's just because there isn't a stigma attached to it. It certainly isn't all young people.

SouthernNights59 · 27/03/2026 20:51

N3wUs3rNam3Again · 27/03/2026 18:12

I agree I had lots of fun growing up and wouldn't necessarily change it. I posted as I was inspired by a thread about screen time and some of the comments on there. Personally I don't think it's great for kids under 5 to have unsupervised screen time but some of the comments were saying "it's lazy parenting", "parents give their kids a screen so they don't have to do anything with their kids". I was reflecting on my childhood and whilst I wasn't given a handheld device I was given free access to the television to keep me occupied and out from under mum's feet on cold wet days and encouraged out on warm dry days. Very few posters here recall their parents playing or doing much with them and whilst I appreciate the massive differences in unlimited/ unsupervised access of handheld screens for under 5s and going out playing with siblings and neighbours it seems from posts on this thread parents in the 60s, 70s and 80s were possibly just as lazy as the parents of today are. Apart from of course the helicopter parents who everyone judges for being far too involved.

I'm a 60s child and my mother spent a lot of time doing things with me. I was an only child and would play outside a lot with my friends, but our parents always knew where we were, we didn't just wander off whenever we liked as children. We didn't have a TV for several years of my childhood, I remember watching it at my grandmother's house but not very much. I don't believe my parents, or my friends' parents, were lazy. They encouraged us to amuse ourselves, but also did things with us. I used to go to the library with my mother, and we would go for walks, visit her friends, go shopping together. My parents weren't drinkers though. I spent a lot of time with my grandmother, which I loved to do.

ouyy · 27/03/2026 20:37

Sounds like my childhood and I was born in 96 lol

N3wUs3rNam3Again · 27/03/2026 20:28

Sartre · 27/03/2026 19:44

I was born later, in the early 90s and this was my childhood too. No idea if this stemmed from the thread about screen time or not but I said something similar on there anyway. My brother and I watched lots of TV, he also had consoles so played on those a lot and when I was older we got a PC so I’d be on that constantly. On long car journeys we had personal TV/DVD things when they were invented. At the weekend my Mum went to the pub and we were forced to socialise with the other kids there. We never went to museums, art galleries, on walks, to the cinema, theatre, library etc. I was like Matilda and took myself to the library as soon as I could. The only time I went anywhere remotely cultured was with school. I didn’t go to an art gallery till I was an adult. I also did play out a lot, yes and my Mum had no idea where I was (nor did she care to be frank).

So my DC spend more time than ideal on screens but at least I know they are, they’re safe and they regularly go to museums and art galleries!

Yes I was absolutely inspired by the thread about screen time and from this thread it seems like parents have always been lazy at parenting, just it used to be easier because they could smack us and put the fear of god in to making us behave.

OP posts:
Quine0nline · 27/03/2026 20:28

Pretty much the same. Born in 1967 so it was the 70s, but the experience sounds similar.

Both parents worked, so I spent a lot of time especially holidays with my gran. There was a burn or small river by her house so I spent a lot of time playing there. Rock pooling making dams, falling in.

Children at school always seem to have had stookies or plasters from fractures - we all wrote and cartoons on them. Scraped knees and bruises.

On holidays dad would take me fishing in his 12 foot boat - great fun.

Bicycle rides, tearing down the hill down to where we lived. Brakes aaaaasaaagh. A brother who enlisted my sindys into the parachute regiment with handkerchief parachutes. Mary Queen of Scots Barbie - remove head!

N3wUs3rNam3Again · 27/03/2026 20:17

sharkstale · 27/03/2026 19:42

The way your op describes it, it doesn't sound like you were very happy, almost comes across to me that you think your parents were a bit neglectful? Sorry if I've interpreted it wrong. I think kids and parents alike were happier in the old ways of upbringing. Nobody is happy anymore. Parents are stressed, teenagers are anxious and depressed, young kid glued to ipads.

Does it? No I had a happy enough childhood, I loved the adventures with my friends and siblings, late nights, messing about, jumping waves, playing in the dingy, we had a lot of fun and I lived in a nice house and was well provided for. I was just questioning if my childhood was familiar to others experiences due to so many posts about parents today not doing anything with their children and being neglectful by giving them handheld devices. I view my parents parenting style as laxed parenting, not saying it's bad just no different to those labelled as lazy today. Times have changed and it's done differently now but other than doing the basics it doesn't seem parents back then were doing anything extraordinary with their kids that parents aren't doing today.

OP posts:
herbalteabag · 27/03/2026 20:10

I was 7 in 1980 and this sounds a lot like my childhood, except my parents weren't big drinkers and going outside was a choice. My mum read lots of stories and we went to the library every week - I grew up with a great love of books. I don't remember her reading to me once I could read myself, but I didn't want that anyway.
My mum was very present around us, but not usually playing with us. She'd be gardening or lying on a sunbed reading while we roamed around in the garden and the streets nearby. She spent longer doing household chores than I do, but we would often follow her about and chat to her. I didn't expect her to play - I had my sister for that, and the neighbourhood kids, and I was quite creative. We did play board games as a family though, and I loved that.
We spent a lot of time watching TV - there were no restrictions on that in our house. It could be quite bonding as a family because the whole family would watch the same evening shows at the time they were broadcast. We definitely spent more time in close proximity than my family today.
I liked the way my childhood was, with the 'benign neglect', and I always encouraged my children to go and play outside. Unfortunately the lure of computer games etc. meant that they were often desperate to come back inside though and so they ended up with less freedom than I gave them!

LunaTheCat · 27/03/2026 20:09

To put in perspective.. I was fortunate to be in Africa recently and the very knowledgeable guide told me that when they got home from school village mothers would kick them out and they would go and track lions !

Sartre · 27/03/2026 19:44

I was born later, in the early 90s and this was my childhood too. No idea if this stemmed from the thread about screen time or not but I said something similar on there anyway. My brother and I watched lots of TV, he also had consoles so played on those a lot and when I was older we got a PC so I’d be on that constantly. On long car journeys we had personal TV/DVD things when they were invented. At the weekend my Mum went to the pub and we were forced to socialise with the other kids there. We never went to museums, art galleries, on walks, to the cinema, theatre, library etc. I was like Matilda and took myself to the library as soon as I could. The only time I went anywhere remotely cultured was with school. I didn’t go to an art gallery till I was an adult. I also did play out a lot, yes and my Mum had no idea where I was (nor did she care to be frank).

So my DC spend more time than ideal on screens but at least I know they are, they’re safe and they regularly go to museums and art galleries!

sharkstale · 27/03/2026 19:42

N3wUs3rNam3Again · 27/03/2026 18:12

I agree I had lots of fun growing up and wouldn't necessarily change it. I posted as I was inspired by a thread about screen time and some of the comments on there. Personally I don't think it's great for kids under 5 to have unsupervised screen time but some of the comments were saying "it's lazy parenting", "parents give their kids a screen so they don't have to do anything with their kids". I was reflecting on my childhood and whilst I wasn't given a handheld device I was given free access to the television to keep me occupied and out from under mum's feet on cold wet days and encouraged out on warm dry days. Very few posters here recall their parents playing or doing much with them and whilst I appreciate the massive differences in unlimited/ unsupervised access of handheld screens for under 5s and going out playing with siblings and neighbours it seems from posts on this thread parents in the 60s, 70s and 80s were possibly just as lazy as the parents of today are. Apart from of course the helicopter parents who everyone judges for being far too involved.

The way your op describes it, it doesn't sound like you were very happy, almost comes across to me that you think your parents were a bit neglectful? Sorry if I've interpreted it wrong. I think kids and parents alike were happier in the old ways of upbringing. Nobody is happy anymore. Parents are stressed, teenagers are anxious and depressed, young kid glued to ipads.