Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To think Labour is not the party of the working people.

719 replies

pinkpalmleaves · 24/03/2026 17:57

I voted for Labour as I believed their election pledge of being a party for the working people but genuinely I can’t think of one thing, since they’ve been in power, that they’ve done to help me (a single working mother on around £42k a year)! I get zero help from UC, these mystical breakfast clubs don’t exist, people aren’t employing people due to their ridiculous NI implications, they aren’t building affordable housing, energy prices are insanely high and all they talk about is grants (which won’t affect me as I live in a flat)! Genuinely I can’t think of one thing that they’ve done to help working people in the middle. Why are Labour sticking their heads in the sand? Why do they refuse to help the squeezed working class? They are stopping this economy from thriving - as
nobody can afford to spend anything extra (treats, holidays, meals out etc etc)!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Chaffinch78 · 25/03/2026 08:41

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

BIossomtoes · 25/03/2026 08:41

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

They may well have because it’s something they believe in. It was astonishing how many people suddenly felt so sorry for the pensioners they’d been criticising the previous week. The hypocrisy was staggering.

PandoraSocks · 25/03/2026 08:40

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

This thread had been going quite well with people of differing views having a fairly decent discussion. There is no need to belittle posters or make snide remarks.

Chaffinch78 · 25/03/2026 08:38

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Bist · 25/03/2026 08:38

Universal WFA is a daft policy. My parents put it towards the deposit on their next cruise. The problem Labour have is that when people are used to getting something it’s electorally difficult to take it away even though it’s the blindingly obvious thing to do. The triple lock is an excellent case in point. It was only ever meant to be a temporary measure, for a few years to catch up pensions to a reasonable level. It has more than done this and is going to go way beyond ‘reasonable’ but no one wants to stop it. It’s a runaway train.

BIossomtoes · 25/03/2026 08:38

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I don’t think the people who did that had ever been supporters of private education.

Chaffinch78 · 25/03/2026 08:38

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Chaffinch78 · 25/03/2026 08:37

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

BIossomtoes · 25/03/2026 08:37

Bist · 25/03/2026 08:35

Free childcare is a policy that raises more money than it costs. Surely you understand that! Not only does it get mothers out to work and paying taxes NOW but it helps them build a FUTURE carer with higher earnings and higher tax take. It’s a policy that more than pays for itself. Taking it away from people earning over £100k is especially stupid. Childcare is so expensive if you self fund someone on £101k has no option but to cut their hours (and their tax take) or go part time and permanently harm their future earnings (and future tax take).

Have you got a link to the figures that support that?

PandoraSocks · 25/03/2026 08:37

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Edited as quoted wrong post!

Bist · 25/03/2026 08:35

Alexandra2001 · 25/03/2026 08:29

Where did you apparently read this? the Express or the Mail?

Welfare Reform has escaped all Govt's.... but it always makes me laugh when this comes up, poster moan about the benefits bill, whilst moaning that SENDs is a mess, they want more FREE childcare and still want wealthy pensioners to get WFA... & Triple Lock....

Many of the right (and on here) complained non stop about Labours Welfare reforms, saying things like "first pensioners, now the disabled..."

Free childcare is a policy that raises more money than it costs. Surely you understand that! Not only does it get mothers out to work and paying taxes NOW but it helps them build a FUTURE carer with higher earnings and higher tax take. It’s a policy that more than pays for itself. Taking it away from people earning over £100k is especially stupid. Childcare is so expensive if you self fund someone on £101k has no option but to cut their hours (and their tax take) or go part time and permanently harm their future earnings (and future tax take).

BIossomtoes · 25/03/2026 08:34

Alexandra2001 · 25/03/2026 08:29

Where did you apparently read this? the Express or the Mail?

Welfare Reform has escaped all Govt's.... but it always makes me laugh when this comes up, poster moan about the benefits bill, whilst moaning that SENDs is a mess, they want more FREE childcare and still want wealthy pensioners to get WFA... & Triple Lock....

Many of the right (and on here) complained non stop about Labours Welfare reforms, saying things like "first pensioners, now the disabled..."

It was amusing to see the political weaponising of pensioners over WFA by people who had hitherto despised them.

Alexandra2001 · 25/03/2026 08:29

Bist · 25/03/2026 08:17

This! Apparently when the welfare bill failed one of the Labour backbenchers was heard saying ‘I don’t know why we can’t just borrow some more money’. I mean most of the electorate could tell you that ever increasing borrowing is a bad idea, but borrowing to cover recurring expenditure is madness.

Where did you apparently read this? the Express or the Mail?

Welfare Reform has escaped all Govt's.... but it always makes me laugh when this comes up, poster moan about the benefits bill, whilst moaning that SENDs is a mess, they want more FREE childcare and still want wealthy pensioners to get WFA... & Triple Lock....

Many of the right (and on here) complained non stop about Labours Welfare reforms, saying things like "first pensioners, now the disabled..."

Bist · 25/03/2026 08:28

ProudAmberTurtle · 25/03/2026 07:38

Our taxes are too "low"?!?!?!

Forgive me as I spend the day picking my jaw up off the floor

Our taxes are indeed to low. The higher rates of income tax are roughly on a par with the rest of Europe but their basic rate is 30%+ and ours is 20%. And our NICs are much lower and nil rate band is much higher. And yet we somehow expect similar public services!

Moomintrolleys · 25/03/2026 08:27

Stnam · 25/03/2026 07:30

I think waiting lists are falling because more people are going private. My GP advised me to go to a private dermatologist because the NHS waiting list was too long to avoid scarring. My daughter's consultant told us to get private physio because she would benefit from having it sooner. My mother just got her hip replacement and cataracts done privately because she wants to be independent and mobile for as long as possible as otherwise other health issues will kick in sooner. I don't have a problem with more people paying for healthcare, but it is hardly good labour stuff. They'll probably slap VAT on it soon to punish people for paying for their own healthcare.

Agree with this. I know 3 people who rececently had operations...2 privately because they couldn't wait. The other was an emergency.

BIossomtoes · 25/03/2026 08:22

dinbin · 25/03/2026 07:48

As I said the biggest immediate change would be to scrap the triple lock and put that money into R&D, infrastructure etc.

Care in the home needs to be paid for too as opposed to just care out of the home (see how that went for Theresa May). Maybe the cap should be a % as opposed to an amount.

I already said upthread I believe child benefit and the “free” hours should be universal to not penalise high earners.

Build far more social housing and don’t sell it off - again I’ve already said.

Then there would have to be further changes to healthcare & welfare but I would start with the above.

Care in the home is already paid for by anyone with savings above £23.5k. May wanted to make a house taken into consideration so a charge would be levied on it to be repaid after death if the savings ran out. That’s fair enough when someone is in residential care because they don’t need the house any more but not for in home care.

I’m with you all the way on social housing. That would be the single measure that would improve life dramatically for young people. Especially if it included the 700k empty homes that could be put into use. A new tax on the owners of those properties would go a long way.

Chaffinch78 · 25/03/2026 08:21

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Bist · 25/03/2026 08:17

Kateluvscats1 · 25/03/2026 06:10

It's all very well saying we need the 'working class' and the 'salt of the earth' types to run the country but we also need people who understand economics. It's not enough to be nice and 'with the people' if you don't understand how to grow an economy.

This! Apparently when the welfare bill failed one of the Labour backbenchers was heard saying ‘I don’t know why we can’t just borrow some more money’. I mean most of the electorate could tell you that ever increasing borrowing is a bad idea, but borrowing to cover recurring expenditure is madness.

Seymour5 · 25/03/2026 08:13

Lukilols · 25/03/2026 00:03

It really feels as though it is a two tier benefit system - insanely generous to some and piteous to others - mainly those who have paid in.
In Germany people who lose their jobs get a significant proportion of their salary for a time but the benefits are less lavish for life style claimants
@runningpram

I agree with this model and it would assist and incentivise people into work . I was shocked to find out that even Americans get a higher rate of unemployment benefit than I would be entitled to here in the UK - at least as a single woman with no kids. Over there it would only be paid for a time limited period as well.

I’d prefer that though. 6 months of a decent monthly payment rather than paying people a pittance that will barely cover rent and council tax over a longer period.

Unemployment benefit used to be wage related for a period here in the UK. I think it was withdrawn in the early 1980s. The current system often seems unfair to people who have tried to improve their situation, ie, homeowners, most of whom are average wage earners. Stay in rented, get all or most rent paid if out of work, but potentially lose your home if you have a mortgage.

Serenity75 · 25/03/2026 08:08

So it sounds like the solutions are to reduced taxes whilst increasing services (and presumably paying off the ever increasing debt at the same time). Should be easy then.

tanstaafl · 25/03/2026 08:06

Don’t forget the ‘raid’ on the tax free pension payment coming in 2027.

EasternStandard · 25/03/2026 08:04

dinbin · 25/03/2026 07:57

What is with the comprehension?

Factually low & middle earners pay less vs other European countries. Higher earners are in line.

Stating the above is not a judgement of what I think we should be doing.

What’s with the comprehension? It was a question.

Yes or no would do it.

Alexandra2001 · 25/03/2026 07:58

pinkpalmleaves · 24/03/2026 22:40

@HeBeaverandSheBeaverthis is the crap that pisses me off haha! Him bleating on about helping working families with breakfast clubs when it simply isn’t true!

Our primary has a breakfast club.... do you have any idea how many schools there are in the UK ?

However, after 14 years of Austerity, Covid, Ukraine and the running down of public services... why do you think 18months is long enough to turn things around?

Personally, i don't think any Govt can turn things around atm, we have become a benefits country.... i don't mean UC i mean the clamour to have "Energy Support" "Cut fuel duty" "i want cheap heating oil, other tax payers can pay for it"

No one says "i'll turn the heating down" i'll drive less/slower"

People on 80k or 90k claiming childcare... why? if you cannot afford kids on that salary, don't fucking have them.

Its all "what can i get from the state"

I'm pretty left wing, but this take take take attitude is destroying the country & not what the Welfare state was set up to do & i didn't support the lifting of the 2 cap limit either.

Hopefully Reeves saying any support will be targeted on the poor might start to change things.

dinbin · 25/03/2026 07:57

What is with the comprehension?

Factually low & middle earners pay less vs other European countries. Higher earners are in line.

Stating the above is not a judgement of what I think we should be doing.

EasternStandard · 25/03/2026 07:52

dinbin · 25/03/2026 07:41

@Chaffinch78 lower & middle earners are taxed lower than other similar countries but people want similar public services.

So do you want low and middle earners to pay more tax?