Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Mortgage cheaper than rent?

708 replies

limeandwater · 23/03/2026 10:12

On this forum and plenty of other social media sites to be fair - there are a number of people who state that a mortgage is often cheaper than the rent.

It's not true is it? In fact it is quite a long way from being true.

OP posts:
limeandwater · 23/03/2026 13:12

ForeverTheOptomist · 23/03/2026 13:09

Dead money

I don't think so.

OP posts:
MrsJeanLuc · 23/03/2026 13:11

limeandwater · 23/03/2026 10:22

Exactly.

You're still not making a fair comparison.

You would need to know the cost of an interest only mortgage. And then take into account the value of the increase in the equity in the house ... how do you plan to do that?

Most people would be on a repayment mortgage so they are repaying a loan and also investing in an asset that will continue to grow.

Phonicshaskilledmeoff · 23/03/2026 13:11

In my area mortgages are cheaper. Don’t forget that rent will always increase with the value of the home, whilst will be static with a mortgage. Therefore even 5 years after a purchase even if they were both the same to start off with, the rent will likely have increased by 10-20% whilst the mortgage is the same plus some equity built.

Driftingawaynow · 23/03/2026 13:10

FeyreArcheron · 23/03/2026 10:20

well in most cases rent will be fairly significantly more than the landlords mortgage otherwise they would be making a loss in renting out the house and so wouldn't bother. The landlord has to pay tax on the rental income so generally rent will be at least the mortgage plus the tax and agents fees

The landlord would not be making a loss because the Tenent is paying for the landlords set which they will own at the end of the mortgage. It is essentially like the tenant putting money in a savings account for the landlord every month.

NorthernJim · 23/03/2026 13:09

Yes. No. Maybe. It really depends on the circumstances, mainly location. Rents are fairly inelastic compared to house values. They're generally very focussed on number of bedrooms, whereas purchase prices vary more. So you can have a 3 bed house worth £200k that earns X rent, but a relatively short distance away (next town perhaps), there could be another 3 bed house worth 350k that only achieves the same X rent.

I suppose you could argue that you should compare the interest part of the mortgage to rental costs, since the repayment is buying equity. The big advantage comes once there mortgage is paid off, whereas a renter is going to have to keep on paying.

People also tend to overlook the other costs associated with home ownership i.e. maintenance. When you rent, all that stuff is included - boiler servicing/replacement windows, flooring, roofing and external maintenance etc, etc. That all adds up, probably averages around 1k to 2k a year over the longer term?

ForeverTheOptomist · 23/03/2026 13:09

Dead money

limeandwater · 23/03/2026 13:09

Ninerainbows · 23/03/2026 12:47

Yes, but why are you saying it? What difference does it make? Whether you think mortgages being cheaper is misinformation or not, you'll always have tenants because so many cannot raise a deposit or don't want to settle in one place.

Of course you will always have tennants, I haven't suggested otherwise.

OP posts:
Honeypizza · 23/03/2026 13:07

Mortgages used to be cheaper than renting, but it's definitely the other way around now where I am. We currently rent and we're having to prepare for our monthly housing cost to double when switch to a mortgage.

ThisZanyPinkSquid · 23/03/2026 13:06

In Scotland it absolutely is.

atleast half of what I would pay for renting

Womanofcustard · 23/03/2026 13:05

I gave my daughter money for the deposit. She’s now saving £400 a month paying mortgage rather than rent!

Twooclockrock · 23/03/2026 13:04

It depends on your mortgage rates, deposit size and the property prices in the area, demand for rental properties in the area, loads of factors.

Climbingrosexx · 23/03/2026 13:02

Surely that would depend on the area and the property. I know people who rent and I've never paid that much for a mortgage

FarmGirl78 · 23/03/2026 13:02

limeandwater · 23/03/2026 10:25

Again not a fair comparison.

He has purchased 30% of the property upfront.

Surely if you're making this about fair comparisons and want to include deposit then you need to factor in the years and years of rent that tenants will continue to pay after their owner pays off their mortgage and fully owns their home?

CitizenofMoronia · 23/03/2026 13:02

not only can it be cheaper, but you eventurally pay it off and dont have to pay anymore

OooPourUsACupLove · 23/03/2026 13:01

PropertyD · 23/03/2026 12:36

So the landlords I know have sold last year. My colleague at work has just sold her flat. The last tenant didnt leave it in a good state. He then moved abroad so there was no real chance she could pursue him through the courts for the damage he had caused.

I have heard a few ex landlords doing things under the counter and making the rent cheaper. Taking cash etc. Not great especially for the tenants but I guess there will always be a black market.

Who did the ones who sold sell to?

There's an assumption that LL selling up reduces available housing but I'm not sure that holds.

A LL pulling out either sells to an owner occupier, so one fewer rental property available but also one fewer rental property needed, or they sell to another LL so the property is still available to rent.

The only way the new rules actually reduce property available is if LLs keep hold of properies but leave them vacant, which seems not likely in the long term (but may happen in the short term eg if they want to sell but are holding out for a higher price than they can get, or are working out how/if they can meet the regs before reletting).

jackstini · 23/03/2026 12:57

Are you looking at costs of an interest only mortgage though, where you would walk away with no house at the end, same situation as renting

Or are you looking at costs of repayment mortgages where you would actually own a house at the end?

Qikiqtarjuaq · 23/03/2026 12:57

NemesisInferior · 23/03/2026 12:22

The point being it's not the norm, by far, for rental properties to be making a loss which was the original question being asked.

The vast majority of rental housing stock is on BTL, owned by people who have 1 single additional property to rent out and for whom covering the mortgage is the bare minimum they need to do.

What you are describing is the preserve of large property companies who can cover and are prepared to accept the risks of making a loss on rental income.

I agree with you about the balance of individual v multiple property owning landlords.

But I was responding to your generalisation to the OP (who I suspect rents out a number of properties):

NemesisInferior · Today 11:14
I'm sorry, what?
What landlords in any sort of sane mind are there that are happy to make a loss on renting out property?

There are plenty of circumstances where a short term loss is a sane decision. Nowhere has the OP argued that a long term overall loss is a sound business plan.

Berriesandcucumbers1 · 23/03/2026 12:56

Isanyonereallyanonymous · 23/03/2026 12:53

I'd say there's a £50 difference between my mortgage and what I'd get in rent for my house.
That £50 doesn't mean much when I'm also responsible for all upkeep and repairs and had to put a deposit down first.

When did you buy though, because eventually your mortgage payment and general maintenance will work out cheaper than renting the same house
12/13 years ago I would have been paying about the same in mortgage repayments as renting similar house, now rent for a similar house would be 2.5x what I pay in mortgage repayments which means even with additional maintenance still works out cheaper for me to have bought rather than rent

FredaMountfitchet · 23/03/2026 12:56

My DS was paying £1600 a month rent for 1 bedroomed flat .
Hes recently bought a two bedroomed flat and mortgage is around £950 . Small deposit .

PepsiBook · 23/03/2026 12:56

Absolutely for me.
The house next door is being rented out for more than double my mortgage.

Worriedaboutrayvon · 23/03/2026 12:56

cestlavielife · 23/03/2026 12:52

But how much was your deposit?
What is your ltv?

When did you buy it?

Our deposit was £9000 our house was £180,000. We did a 5% deposit. Yes it’s more affordable than some areas but the house prices where I live haven’t gone up massively.

We have lived there for 8 years now.

PrincessofWells · 23/03/2026 12:55

A £260000 flat costs £1450 a month to rent in my area.

If I bought it the mortgage would be around £1250 with a 25k deposit. It is more expensive to buy undoubtedly.

The service charges and ground rent cost a further £275 a month then you need to factor in maintenance.

However after five years or so it becomes cheaper to buy as inflation increases the rents and the value of your money depletes, and salaries increase.

If a landlord factors in a full refurbishment every 15 to 20 years there is very little profit depending upon increases of property prices and yields etc.

Isanyonereallyanonymous · 23/03/2026 12:53

I'd say there's a £50 difference between my mortgage and what I'd get in rent for my house.
That £50 doesn't mean much when I'm also responsible for all upkeep and repairs and had to put a deposit down first.

TwilightAb · 23/03/2026 12:52

A 3 bed semi in my area is around £1000 per month. My mortgage for a very similar house in same area is £700.

cestlavielife · 23/03/2026 12:52

Worriedaboutrayvon · 23/03/2026 12:49

We pay £500 a month mortgage. The house next to us rents for £1300. Absolutely no difference, both modernised to a similar standard. Same garden space. Same parking.

So they effectively pay three times what we pay to live in exactly the same space.

But how much was your deposit?
What is your ltv?

When did you buy it?