Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Should a vaccination programme be roll out nationwide for Meningitis B for teens/young adults

79 replies

SSAW2026 · 21/03/2026 09:25

Watching the recent outbreak in Kent.

The rapid decline of young people with Meningitis B and the sad death of 2 in such a quick time after symptoms onset, makes ne wonder if a full vaccination programme is needed nationwide.

OP posts:
AStonedRose · 21/03/2026 15:51

TwoTierBbq · 21/03/2026 14:15

Yes without a doubt the whole confusion around this is a disgrace

The only confusion I've seen arises from people spreading information on social media. I'm in Kent and Facebook is rife with nonsense about unreported deaths, possible lockdowns etc.

The actual government and NHS messaging (which I've an eye on, having a child of the relevant age) has been really clear.

AStonedRose · 21/03/2026 15:49

busyd4y · 21/03/2026 14:05

Google isn't showing me any reliable numbers on how many people die each year from meningitis but it doesn't seem to be anywhere near 100s, the total number of UK cases appears only to be in 100s and the death rate appears to be 1 in 20.

Are you referring to worldwide deaths?

I'd be interested in being able to find some realible data on how deadly this is

There was a researcher on Radio 5 earlier today. Annual cases anywhere in the UK are in the few hundreds, and deaths are in the single figures. She described the illness as 'rare', and declining every year, as behaviours change (apparently fewer people smoking and therefore not sharing cigarettes is a factor).

With that in mind, however tragic individual deaths are, there's no good public health case for a widespread vaccination programme, costing billions of pounds.

TwoTierBbq · 21/03/2026 14:15

Yes without a doubt the whole confusion around this is a disgrace

busyd4y · 21/03/2026 14:05

youalright · 21/03/2026 11:53

Because we vaccinate against most other things they've added on to the baby jabs since 2015. And hundreds of people die unnecessarily every year from meningitis.

Google isn't showing me any reliable numbers on how many people die each year from meningitis but it doesn't seem to be anywhere near 100s, the total number of UK cases appears only to be in 100s and the death rate appears to be 1 in 20.

Are you referring to worldwide deaths?

I'd be interested in being able to find some realible data on how deadly this is

FruAashild · 21/03/2026 13:21

THE UK was the first country in the world to roll out this vaccine in infants. 24 countries in the world have infant vaccination programmes, 54 have approved the vaccine for use but don't have funded programmes so the majority of countries don't vaccinate at all (relatively new vaccine, relatively rare disease so not top priority for poorer countries). The only place I could find that has a school based programne to vaccinates teens is South Australia.

The UK has one of the most vaccinated populations in the world, we have a far smaller population of people who are anti vaccination and because of the NHS vaccination is good value and we have the right infrastructure to deliver mass vaccination programmes and monitor the spread of new strains.

The evidence so far is that this is a strain that has been circulating for a few years, so what needs looking at is what was unusual about what happened at the nightclub that resulted in this cluster of infections because this is very unusual for MenB. I suspect more people will vaccinate their university bound children this summer but the public advice will be around behaviour rather than vaccination unless there is very compelling data from South Australia about the benefits.

Ifeeltheneedtheneedforcoffee · 21/03/2026 12:09

I would leave it to the group of experts at JCVI who weigh up all the evidence including costs. They make the decision on all vaccines including as pp said about rev, flu for older people. Each vaccine and cohort is analysed with the evidence. Thats why sometimes things change like rsv being now offered to over 80s and we had changes with the flu group a few years ago.
It isn't "public health " or "ukhsa" who decide. Same as GPS they cant vaccinate outside of the advice/schedule no matter who is loudly shouting/demanding.
I think parents need to look at making sure all vaccines are up to date. It could easily been measles or mumps or men c that spread which do have vaccines but uptake has been falling

Youdontseehow · 21/03/2026 12:07

youalright · 21/03/2026 11:53

Because we vaccinate against most other things they've added on to the baby jabs since 2015. And hundreds of people die unnecessarily every year from meningitis.

No vaccine will ever prevent all deaths. There will always be individuals in which the bacteria/virus gains growth advantages that the person’s body, for whatever reason, is unable to cope with.

Hundreds of deaths, while tragic, in a populations of millions is low, bearing in mind it will never be zero.

Say we did vaccinate all teens for Men B and two teenagers took an anaphylactic reaction and died? We’d have an outcry that they died unnecessarily and that we shouldn’t be vaccinating everyone for an illness that usually causes nothing worse than a sore throat.

3678194b · 21/03/2026 12:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

No. I'm more than happy to vaccine privately.

You said scientists in 'every other country' say don't vaccinate. Just thought that was an interesting and bold claim.

But it doesn't matter, at the end of the day people can make their own minds up.

HoskinsChoice · 21/03/2026 12:01

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Youdontseehow · 21/03/2026 12:00

Solaire18381 · 21/03/2026 11:37

Yes, absolutely!

The NHS can afford £1 billion every year to vaccinate only over 65's for several diseases, as they are at the highest risk.

I assume vaccinating, say 18-21's, would cost less than this (and then when caught up, say vaccinate at age 18, or whatever).

The types of vaccines given to the older age groups are often done to change the course of the illness/disease once the virus/bacteria has been picked up. For example, to avoid the need for antibiotics and hospitalisation (and death).

There is no point in vaccinating someone if it doesn’t change the course of the illness - hence we are no longer vaccinating immunocompetent younger people against Covid because if they pick up the virus, they are unlikely to become unwell as their own immune systems are able to deal with it.

The human immune system starts to weaken significantly with age, around 65, hence “older” adults need a bit more help. Even if they don’t die, the costs of treating them and the impact on health services is so significant that it makes the cost/benefits analysis worthwhile. You don’t want your cancer surgery postponed because the surgical unit is having to board older medical patients with pneumonia.

The costs and potential vaccine-related side effects (although very small) of vaccinating a whole population of young people against Men B when the biggest majority of them will get no more than a sore throat, are simply not warranted. It doesn’t give lifetime protection - only a couple of years - and young people are likely to live a much longer time. A 75 year old getting the RSV vaccine to keep them out of hospital is unlikely to live for a huge amount of time longer, so waning protection becomes less of an issue.

We’ve got much bigger issues in Public Health such as measles and potentially TB owing to low uptake rates for MMR and mass migration (with TB) now that we no longer vaccinate babies out with high risk communities - the same high risk communities who are more likely to not engage with vaccination programmes.

For TB;

“England is on the brink of exceeding the WHO threshold of 10 cases per 100,000, driven by infections in cities and higher rates among vulnerable, underserved communities”.

https://www.bmj.com/content/392/bmj.s471#:~:text=Once%20considered%20a%20disease%20consigned,would%20want%20them%20to%20be.%E2%80%9D

If I had younger DC and lived in a UK city with a high migrant population, I’d seriously consider getting them vaccinated as protection lasts for decades.

BoudiccaRuled · 21/03/2026 11:57

GinandGingerBeer · 21/03/2026 10:01

I think they should vaccinate the 11-16 year olds who haven’t had it and uni students. I doubt they will though as Ive read it only gives 2-3 years protection if you have it when you’re older. So it’s not cost effective. I’d have paid for my kids to have it going into halls if I’d realised they weren’t protected. Think I just assume that the meningitis vaccine they’d already had covered them.

I'll be paying for mine to have it before university. I hadn't realised it was possible until this recent outbreak. My heart goes out to the families and friends of the affected.

youalright · 21/03/2026 11:53

busyd4y · 21/03/2026 10:44

Why can't you believe it?

Are you medically qualified in this field?

The doctors I've heard talking on the news don't even seem to think it's necessary in the local area never mind universally

Because we vaccinate against most other things they've added on to the baby jabs since 2015. And hundreds of people die unnecessarily every year from meningitis.

3678194b · 21/03/2026 11:51

Youdontseehow · 21/03/2026 11:43

I really feel for this family - it’s dreadful they have lost their daughter. (And I’m not sure who you are referring to when you say “many others who have lost their child”?). The loss of a child to anything is a parent’s worst nightmare.

The family calling for mass vaccination is not unlike movie stars etc. who come down with some dreadful illness or disease - suddenly they think that illness/disease/condition should be researched/cured/treated. They didn’t even think about the illness before but now they think it should be everyone’s priority. But it doesn’t work like that.

An organisation as big as Public Health cannot make decisions based on emotion or unsound evidence. Increased risk is not enough - there has to be proven increased harm as evidenced by increased hospitalisation, increased morbidity, increased health care associated costs and increased deaths - people dying whilst tragic, is only part of the picture.

If there was strong evidence that the vaccine would prevent “the worst outcomes” for a statistically significant number of people, it would be given. We saw that with Covid yet we’ve still got many, many people believing it was some form of government control.

Yes, sadly Alfie and Matthew, I don't want to say their full names on here, as well as the student's family yesterday, spring to mind.

So tragic for these families x

AStonedRose · 21/03/2026 11:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Youdontseehow · 21/03/2026 11:43

3678194b · 21/03/2026 10:53

Yes. The family of the student who has died is now asking for all students to be vaccinated, as have many others who have lost their child.

It's all very well saying it's rare. Until it happens to your family or a cluster happens in your area.

If there is a vaccine that prevents the worse outcomes, it should be available to those at risk which I have read for this is 0-5 and 15-20.

I really feel for this family - it’s dreadful they have lost their daughter. (And I’m not sure who you are referring to when you say “many others who have lost their child”?). The loss of a child to anything is a parent’s worst nightmare.

The family calling for mass vaccination is not unlike movie stars etc. who come down with some dreadful illness or disease - suddenly they think that illness/disease/condition should be researched/cured/treated. They didn’t even think about the illness before but now they think it should be everyone’s priority. But it doesn’t work like that.

An organisation as big as Public Health cannot make decisions based on emotion or unsound evidence. Increased risk is not enough - there has to be proven increased harm as evidenced by increased hospitalisation, increased morbidity, increased health care associated costs and increased deaths - people dying whilst tragic, is only part of the picture.

If there was strong evidence that the vaccine would prevent “the worst outcomes” for a statistically significant number of people, it would be given. We saw that with Covid yet we’ve still got many, many people believing it was some form of government control.

3678194b · 21/03/2026 11:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Are you? Sorry to learn of that.

AStonedRose · 21/03/2026 11:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

3678194b · 21/03/2026 11:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I've got no desire to investigate any claims myself thanks. If someone is quoting me saying 'experts in this and Every other country' are saying don't vaccinate' they surely need to back that up with the evidence.

My minds already made up. I've already vaccinated mine with Men B and will have no hesitation in doing this privately

Solaire18381 · 21/03/2026 11:37

Yes, absolutely!

The NHS can afford £1 billion every year to vaccinate only over 65's for several diseases, as they are at the highest risk.

I assume vaccinating, say 18-21's, would cost less than this (and then when caught up, say vaccinate at age 18, or whatever).

AStonedRose · 21/03/2026 11:36

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Youdontseehow · 21/03/2026 11:33

EvelynBeatrice · 21/03/2026 11:07

Because - as well as the fools who are conspiracy theorists and unable to weigh up the value of what they read in one place against another - there are many people who are well travelled and read and who are able to see that the NHS underperforms compared to other western countries. Cost savings and politics sometimes predominate at the expense of patient welfare. Now that may not be the case in relation to vaccinations, but people can and should ask.

But it was UK scientists who actually produced the first Men B vaccine and the UK was the first to introduce it/include it in the childhood immunisation programme. So explain to me how we are underperforming in this area?

3678194b · 21/03/2026 11:30

HoskinsChoice · 21/03/2026 11:12

It is truly awful what has happened and arguably we shouldn't be discussing this in public in case the family and friends of those impacted are reading this. But the reality is that it would be totally impractical right now to do this. Look around the world, no country is blanket vaccinating as much as is being suggested on Mumsnet. Our doctors and scientists and those in every other country, don't currently think it's viable. Surely you can see that if the qualified people around the globe think we shouldn't that you, presumably not qualified, might be wrong?

This would be interesting to look at. Please could you link to what those scientists in both this country and every other country have said why it's not viable? It would be good to read.

Irrespective of anyone's personal opinion I've had mine vaccinated privately when it first came out and will do again when they go to sixth form.

HoskinsChoice · 21/03/2026 11:12

3678194b · 21/03/2026 10:53

Yes. The family of the student who has died is now asking for all students to be vaccinated, as have many others who have lost their child.

It's all very well saying it's rare. Until it happens to your family or a cluster happens in your area.

If there is a vaccine that prevents the worse outcomes, it should be available to those at risk which I have read for this is 0-5 and 15-20.

It is truly awful what has happened and arguably we shouldn't be discussing this in public in case the family and friends of those impacted are reading this. But the reality is that it would be totally impractical right now to do this. Look around the world, no country is blanket vaccinating as much as is being suggested on Mumsnet. Our doctors and scientists and those in every other country, don't currently think it's viable. Surely you can see that if the qualified people around the globe think we shouldn't that you, presumably not qualified, might be wrong?

Rachel2409 · 21/03/2026 11:08

Yes definitely

EvelynBeatrice · 21/03/2026 11:07

Youdontseehow · 21/03/2026 10:16

When these sorts of threads pop up it always amazes me how people with nothing to do with public health suddenly become experts on what we should be doing.

When there’s a car recall because of a potential problem, people don’t suddenly pipe up with expert mechanic opinions do they? They just accept the advice and take their car in if it’s affected.

So why do people think public health should “be doing something” just because they think they should?

Because - as well as the fools who are conspiracy theorists and unable to weigh up the value of what they read in one place against another - there are many people who are well travelled and read and who are able to see that the NHS underperforms compared to other western countries. Cost savings and politics sometimes predominate at the expense of patient welfare. Now that may not be the case in relation to vaccinations, but people can and should ask.

Swipe left for the next trending thread