Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to question school swimming progress when DD still can’t swim a width?

238 replies

Nenanena · 19/03/2026 11:55

Dd is 9. We go swimming as a family every few months and spend longer in the pool on holidays. She did a year of swimming lessons when she was 7 at the local leisure centre. Moved from Stage 1 to just beginning stage 3 but didn’t like the teacher and felt intimidated in the deeper water. Persisted for a bit despite not enjoying it and then got upset so we stopped lessons. About 6 months later started swimming in Y3 at school (at same leisure centre). Did 12 weeks. Initially got put in complete beginning group, when we flagged up she had been in stage 3 they moved her up. Currently halfway through another term of swimming in Y4. I got to see the lesson the other day as helped walk the kids to the centre.

Dd was in the ‘bottom’ group. They didn’t even have a width to swim in because of way pool was arranged. Some of the kids were mucking about so the teacher had to do quite a lot of behaviour management. They seemed to do loads on technique and isolating arms, legs etc and less focus on stamina and distance. She still can’t swim more than 6m unaided without putting feet down. Face always expected to be in water so think she isn’t breathing well. I’m shocked. We get no feedback about progress (was the same with private lessons). When I was at school we worked towards badges. You aimed for a width then a length etc and progress was fairly rapid. What’s the point on working on butterfly arms if you can’t even do a width of an easier stroke? Makes no sense to me.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
igelkott2026 · 03/04/2026 14:26

Growlybear83 · 31/03/2026 12:42

I took my daughter swimming about every second week when she was very young but she was reluctant to swim alone without any aids. I was concerned thst she still couldn’t swim by the time she was 5 so when she became desperate for a hamster, I told her she would get one the day she swam a length on her own. The next day she wanted to go swimming and immediately swam a width and then two lengths. The only problem was that it was a Sunday and we had to drive for a couple of hours before we found a pet shop that was open and which had hamsters in stock 🤣🤣

My mum used to pay me 2p every time I jumped into the pool. It's amazing how well such incentives work!

igelkott2026 · 03/04/2026 14:25

Nigglenaggle · 29/03/2026 20:02

So unreasonable. You are the person with primary responsibility for her education. You've delegated some to a school who have taught her the basics. School have other things to teach her, they can't do everything. Maybe take a bit of responsibility for the child you chose to bring into this world?

What a ridiculous comment. And not one you'd dare to make to the OP's face.

I assume you do know that swimming teachers do training and CPD to teach kids (and adults) to swim?

Growlybear83 · 31/03/2026 12:42

I took my daughter swimming about every second week when she was very young but she was reluctant to swim alone without any aids. I was concerned thst she still couldn’t swim by the time she was 5 so when she became desperate for a hamster, I told her she would get one the day she swam a length on her own. The next day she wanted to go swimming and immediately swam a width and then two lengths. The only problem was that it was a Sunday and we had to drive for a couple of hours before we found a pet shop that was open and which had hamsters in stock 🤣🤣

arethereanyleftatall · 31/03/2026 11:58

@Bunnycat101

the criteria is ambiguous.

stage 2 criteria is 5m.

then it’s the own swim school that decides how good that 5m should be.

you can get a swimmer holding their breath, kicking for 5m.

you can move them up if you like, but you’ve still got the approx one years work to do somewhere of breathing, kick and rotation.

Bunnycat101 · 31/03/2026 10:58

@arethereanyleftatall your post is interesting as it does sort of show what many have suspected for a long time that the stages are absolutely not comparable across different locations or teachers. From a parental perspective, I don’t really care what the actual stages are but want to understand what the goals are and whether my children are progressing and improving.

My youngest is now doing a learn to swim programme with a swimming club that doesn’t follow the asa stages at all and I prefer it. The teaching is much better and sounds more like your school 1 (lots of focus on breathing and technique early on). It’s really noticeable that even the little ones have beautiful front crawl.

arethereanyleftatall · 30/03/2026 10:01

as a swim teacher who teaches in 2 different swim schools who are on opposite ends of the interpretation, @Conflictavoidanti would say the blame for this lies entirely with parents demanding progression. And for them progression means moving through the stages as quickly as possible. Precisely what the op has done. Whereas if they left it to the teachers who know what they are doing to teach, actual progression would be made. The far superior swim school I teach in does not pass out of stage 2 until they are actually breathing front crawl properly, with rotation to the side; they can often kick easily 200m on their back by then, as that is needed to breathe fc properly. The other swim school I teach in, where the private owner basically does whatever a parent requests in order to keep their money with her, will pass out of stage 2 at a parents demand because their child can swim 5m. Utterly to the detriment of the child who may well end up in stage 7 still not rotating. The children who get taught breathing properly, and spend time isolating leg kick in stage 2, fly through 6/7/8 in weeks.

Conflictavoidant · 29/03/2026 23:57

Sorry for the slight derail from the ops thread. But a number of people have questioned how she can be stage 3 and not be able to swim 5m. It's something I've found often on swimming threads that people assume the way their child's swim school interprets the stages is the same as others. At the swim school both my Dd's went to (youngest still does and oldest swims for a club) the children had to be able to swim 10m without aids and be starting to do over arms strokes before they'd even pass them for stage 1. The descriptions on the certificate have always been a bit ridiculous and nowhere near met with there ability. Youngest Dd is now stage 6 and doing 200m just as a warm up (50m of each stroke). The lack of consistency between swim schools make the stages a bit meaningless really.

Nigglenaggle · 29/03/2026 20:02

So unreasonable. You are the person with primary responsibility for her education. You've delegated some to a school who have taught her the basics. School have other things to teach her, they can't do everything. Maybe take a bit of responsibility for the child you chose to bring into this world?

katedean · 23/03/2026 11:18

Nenanena · 19/03/2026 11:55

Dd is 9. We go swimming as a family every few months and spend longer in the pool on holidays. She did a year of swimming lessons when she was 7 at the local leisure centre. Moved from Stage 1 to just beginning stage 3 but didn’t like the teacher and felt intimidated in the deeper water. Persisted for a bit despite not enjoying it and then got upset so we stopped lessons. About 6 months later started swimming in Y3 at school (at same leisure centre). Did 12 weeks. Initially got put in complete beginning group, when we flagged up she had been in stage 3 they moved her up. Currently halfway through another term of swimming in Y4. I got to see the lesson the other day as helped walk the kids to the centre.

Dd was in the ‘bottom’ group. They didn’t even have a width to swim in because of way pool was arranged. Some of the kids were mucking about so the teacher had to do quite a lot of behaviour management. They seemed to do loads on technique and isolating arms, legs etc and less focus on stamina and distance. She still can’t swim more than 6m unaided without putting feet down. Face always expected to be in water so think she isn’t breathing well. I’m shocked. We get no feedback about progress (was the same with private lessons). When I was at school we worked towards badges. You aimed for a width then a length etc and progress was fairly rapid. What’s the point on working on butterfly arms if you can’t even do a width of an easier stroke? Makes no sense to me.

Take her for private lessons. I took my daughter every Sat morning from age 3. She went all the way through to stage 10 & then chose life guarding. She subsequently qualified as a pool life guard. Consistency is key. School swimming is pretty pointless!

WhimsicalObsidian · 22/03/2026 21:51

I'm not sure if be much chop at teaching water safety either. I'd be able to teach an awkward, energy using doggy paddle, but having seen the way that the swimming teachers teach kids to float by adjusting them subtly in the water, and how they get them to be efficient when they swim so they don't flail away all their energy in the first few minutes is beyond me and my (school & council lessons taught) ability to swim.

I can bob about in a pool on holiday, but I don't get any pleasure from swimming and I'd never do it for exercise. My DS, who has been in lessons since 6 months old, adores swimming and finds it a great joy. That in itself is worth the cost of lessons for me, setting him up to have an activity he can enjoy through his life.

igelkott2026 · 22/03/2026 20:07

Alip1965 · 21/03/2026 08:55

Its not the schools responsibility to teach your child to swim. Its yours.

Or more accurately, to facilitate that learning.

However, water safety is the life skill, not swimming. So water safety is the thing to concentrate on.

igelkott2026 · 22/03/2026 20:06

DeftGoldHedgehog · 22/03/2026 17:22

You can definitely outsource swimming. I wouldn't have a clue how to teach someone to swim.

Yes - swimming teachers do courses on how to teach - they don't just rock up and tell a child to swim down the pool.

DeftGoldHedgehog · 22/03/2026 17:22

PullingOutHair123 · 19/03/2026 12:06

Take her yourself.

When my DD was making zero progress I was in the water with her for a few sessions, to work out what the problem was. Once we worked on that, she flew in her swimming lessons.

Some things you cannot outsource!

You can definitely outsource swimming. I wouldn't have a clue how to teach someone to swim.

Banannanana · 22/03/2026 17:19

Why haven’t you had her in regular swimming lessons or taught her yourself (regularly) if you’ve noticed she can’t really swim? This is down to you as parents, not the school alone. School swimming lessons are notoriously rubbish. Sorry but this is a parenting failure on your part here. Stop relying on everyone else and help your child fffs.

SpiritOfEcstasy · 22/03/2026 11:27

I felt similar about my DDs. They had swimming lessons almost from birth … but age 6 & 7 they still couldn’t swim unaided by floats, wings, rings etc 🤷🏼‍♀️ I did take them frequently. They were completely confident in the water. It literally baffled me. We were on holiday in the Summer and I said whomever could swim a width of our pool unaided first was getting the latest, coveted Barbie doll. DD2 swam straight across the pool! DD1 watched her, obviously thought fuck that and immediately followed her 😂 I think perhaps it just needed to be more incentivised…bribery isn’t always a bad thing. I hated taking them to swimming lessons 😂

tranquillsea · 22/03/2026 10:45

I do understand the frustration with lessons putting a focus on less useful strokes. My son did lessons for a few years but stalled for several terms in the third from the top category because he couldn't get the breaststroke kick properly. He was good at front and back crawl, but wasn't getting to progress at those entirely because he couldn't get a weird froggy kick exactly right. What he really needed was more time spent building up his breathing stamina in front crawl, but he wasn't getting it.

After the third time he failed to pass up, I didn't renew the lessons and got a gym membership instead so he could just go swimming regularly. Within a few weeks he was doing multiple lengths with tumble turns in between (which he learned from youtube). In the summer I might book a few one-to-ones at the gym to help him improve his technique, but more than anything he needed lung stamina. I don't know if he'll ever learn proper froggy kick, if he wants to eventually, he can work on it. But stalling his progress on the more useful swimming stroke, just felt so pointless.

Jukeboxjulie69 · 22/03/2026 10:32

Nenanena · 19/03/2026 11:55

Dd is 9. We go swimming as a family every few months and spend longer in the pool on holidays. She did a year of swimming lessons when she was 7 at the local leisure centre. Moved from Stage 1 to just beginning stage 3 but didn’t like the teacher and felt intimidated in the deeper water. Persisted for a bit despite not enjoying it and then got upset so we stopped lessons. About 6 months later started swimming in Y3 at school (at same leisure centre). Did 12 weeks. Initially got put in complete beginning group, when we flagged up she had been in stage 3 they moved her up. Currently halfway through another term of swimming in Y4. I got to see the lesson the other day as helped walk the kids to the centre.

Dd was in the ‘bottom’ group. They didn’t even have a width to swim in because of way pool was arranged. Some of the kids were mucking about so the teacher had to do quite a lot of behaviour management. They seemed to do loads on technique and isolating arms, legs etc and less focus on stamina and distance. She still can’t swim more than 6m unaided without putting feet down. Face always expected to be in water so think she isn’t breathing well. I’m shocked. We get no feedback about progress (was the same with private lessons). When I was at school we worked towards badges. You aimed for a width then a length etc and progress was fairly rapid. What’s the point on working on butterfly arms if you can’t even do a width of an easier stroke? Makes no sense to me.

Can other kids in the class swim a width? If they can, it’s your kids inability not the schools

Bigearringsbigsmile · 22/03/2026 09:54

marmaladejam1 · 22/03/2026 04:24

This is just a way for swim centres to make money!. Nobody learns to swim as a baby.

Mine were swimming by 2. They had such confidence from their baby classes

marmaladejam1 · 22/03/2026 04:24

Hedgehogbrown · 20/03/2026 19:16

The classes do sound bad but that one class isn't going to help her if she only started getting lessons at age 7 and if you rarely take her to practice. They have to have their head in the water or their body will be at the wrong angle and they will sink. They should be teaching her how to manage breathing though.

Where I live the kids start lessons as babies and definitely if they start at age 4 they have a lot of catching up to do. Age seven is very old. It would be like waiting for someone to be that age before teaching them to read. You wouldn't do that.

Edited

This is just a way for swim centres to make money!. Nobody learns to swim as a baby.

JoB1kenobi · 21/03/2026 10:36

So you do nothing with her, she goes once a week for a few months a year and what are you expecting? Do better.
schools have to take kids swimming as part of the national curriculum but it’s getting worse year on year as the entitlement of parents think schools can fix everything. When you’ve got a class of 33 and 20 non-swimmers, the miracles of progress that happen are astounding, yet they barely swim more than 10m after a course if they’ve worked hard.
‘I don’t like the instructor’ is your mentality rubbing off on her - excuses and more excuses.
Book swimming lessons if you can afford to and stop the excuses and get her swimming! Lessons are cheaper than paying for a family to swim weekly so find £5-7 a week - that’s all they cost!

arethereanyleftatall · 21/03/2026 10:29

It's completely pointless for children who are already strong swimmers.

this isn’t true. We teach at school swimming all sorts of survival stuff not taught anywhere else - HELP position, side stroke, beach flags, huddle position, survival stroke, go through all sorts of self rescue scenarios etc and also for many strong swimmers, who aren’t good at everything at school, it’s a lovely confidence booster to be top of the class.

Etiennethemad · 21/03/2026 10:05

Both my DS started by earning badges in splash classes. They both ended up swimming for their county. Swimming sessions should be regular, frequent and with properly qualified teachers. I, myself, was a competition referee. Be very cautious with the butterfly. At a young age it can cause severe damage to the joints and muscles if pushed too hard.

Peachie31 · 21/03/2026 10:02

arethereanyleftatall · 21/03/2026 07:18

As a swim teacher - ‘self-rescue’ is spot on @Witknit.
i teach both school swimming and the stages, and for many of the things posters are talking about - wanting their kids to simply survive in water - the school swimming curriculum is far superior to Swim England stages.
I am surprised so many parents have such strong views and opinions of the quality of the lessons, when they’re surely not there to see the majority.
I think the curriculum makes absolute sense
25m anything
float on back
tread water 30 sec
climb out deep end
submerge no goggles
and that’s far more important than 10m butterfly or breaststroke with perfect technique.

in fact if I was in charge of swim England, after stage 3, I’d offer 2 pathways. The current SE one, and a ‘survival and stamina’ one which would be a bit like the school swimming curriculum, doing increasing distances and times of treading.

This is a good point

I replied to another comment earlier in the thread and IMO butterfly should be added at a higher stage than it is currently. Most people are never going to do fly if they're not in competitive swimming

Peachie31 · 21/03/2026 09:59

Brainstorm23 · 19/03/2026 23:12

School swimming lessons are utterly pointless. The ones who can't swim don't actually learn and the ones who can just bumble about doing nothing much. My 8 year old can swim 1000m and swims with her club 3 times a week and they won't even let her into the deep end in school swimming. I understand why as they have to cater to everyone but she gets nothing out of it at all.

She learned to swim through a mix of leisure centre lessons and a weekly 1-1. It was expensive but neither of us can swim at all so we were never going to able to teach her.

I stopped my oldest child doing the school swimming when he joined a Swim Club because 1) he absolutely hated going and was getting extremely dostressed by the sessions and 2) he could clearly already swim to a good standard. They tried arguing that the cirriculum states they need to be able to swim 25m, I pointed out that he trained twice a week and had swam both 50m and 100m races at this point, so he had clearly far exceeded it anyway.

It's completely pointless for children who are already strong swimmers.

Atsocta · 21/03/2026 09:22

I taught my four all grown now myself, the younger the better, as they got older three went on to be really good swimmers one can swim but doesn’t enjoy it as much. It needs to be enjoyable like most things they learn.

Swipe left for the next trending thread