Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think levying additional charges on SUV owners in London is a bad idea?

394 replies

FirmNavyCat · 14/03/2026 10:51

Saw this article in the Guardian yesterday and it's been prominent in my mind since I read it. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/mar/13/suv-drivers-could-face-extra-charges-for-driving-in-london

Sadiq Khan is talking about levying further charges to SUV drivers due to the evidence that they pose a significantly increased risk of fatal injury to pedestrians in collisions, particularly children. While on the face of it this seems like a noble cause, my belief is that policymakers should be focused on beefing up existing laws. Speed limits should be reduced on roads that have the highest number of fatalities, and drivers who cause injury or death should face tougher sentencing by the courts. I know SUVs are popular on MN (and are popular with mums in urban areas generally). They feel so much safer to drive compared to smaller cars. Also, should the worst happen and you are involved in a collision, I would very strongly prefer to be in an SUV than a smaller car. I'd want my loved ones to be in an SUV as well if I had to choose.

SUV drivers could face extra charges for driving in London

TfL are also poised to increase 20mph zones and cut speed limits on the capital’s fastest roads later this year

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/mar/13/suv-drivers-could-face-extra-charges-for-driving-in-london

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Sddbdbd · 16/03/2026 19:43

TimmyMorton · 16/03/2026 18:35

SUVs are a social nuisance. Any levies/charges should be upped on a yearly basis, until these monster trucks are taxed out of existence.

Sounds like such jealousy. Of course SUVs should still exist. It's a big and growing market and people want them. If people want a big expensive car, let them have it.

ValidPistachio · 16/03/2026 19:02

Mijoed · 16/03/2026 18:08

From earlier years, the number I can find is 56% by car, 14% by HGV, 17% by bus and coach, 6% by motorcycle. Not sure about the missing 7%. Certainly some cyclists.
A large percentage of these were crossing on straight road. Surprisingly high percentages for professional drivers.

They're professional drivers, but they're driving vehicles with tall, cuboid frontal aspects, large blind spots, longer stopping distances and much greater mass than most vehicles. So, even very low-speed impacts with pedestrians or cyclists will impart devastating amounts of energy.

Mijoed · 16/03/2026 18:53

Somersetbaker · 16/03/2026 18:13

It's a shame that neither of your chosen oversize vehicles are appropriate for London, and even more of a shame that neither comes with indicators.

I’ve always managed to stay on my side of the road and park inside the white box. The vehicles are larger but only as large as the driver is careless. As for indicators, I drove Toyota Land Cruisers and Nissan Patrols for years so requested indicators on the BMW as a special option

TimmyMorton · 16/03/2026 18:35

SUVs are a social nuisance. Any levies/charges should be upped on a yearly basis, until these monster trucks are taxed out of existence.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 16/03/2026 18:25

I would certainly support extra tax on all the bloody enormous cars like tanks around here. They absolutely must cause more wear and tear on the roads, which goodness knows are potholed enough anyway, and they take up too much room in car parks!

Somersetbaker · 16/03/2026 18:13

Mijoed · 16/03/2026 11:59

Do you think 800,000 people in London are going to change their vehicle anytime soon? If forced into replacing my old X5 SUV, I’ll be buying a 5 series EV estate, which is actually longer, wider and heavier because of the batteries. On the plus side, it will be a whole 20cms lower and won’t be an SUV.

It's a shame that neither of your chosen oversize vehicles are appropriate for London, and even more of a shame that neither comes with indicators.

Mijoed · 16/03/2026 18:08

ValidPistachio · 16/03/2026 16:28

Buses and HGVs do not kill quite a few more pedestrians than cars do. Where are you getting that from? For a start, buses and HGVs are vastly outnumbered by cars, and are all driven by trained, professional drivers.

From earlier years, the number I can find is 56% by car, 14% by HGV, 17% by bus and coach, 6% by motorcycle. Not sure about the missing 7%. Certainly some cyclists.
A large percentage of these were crossing on straight road. Surprisingly high percentages for professional drivers.

snoopyfanaccountant · 16/03/2026 18:00

I drive a Skoda Karoq (basically a tall VW Golf - they share a floorpan) and my friend drives a Nissan Leaf. My car is lighter, shorter and narrower than hers, so I take up less space on the road and in parking spaces, and the weight of my car does less damage to the roads. I will concede that the height of my car is less pedestrian friendly than hers, although much of my driving is on motorways and dual carriageways where there are no pedestrians. Despite that, my car is demonised and hers is praised.

Youmeanyouvelostyourkey · 16/03/2026 17:44

I’ve just gone from a 18 year old Mazda 6 to a petrol hybrid suv It’s ulez compliant, unlike my old car, lighter on the road and actually smaller. So better all round. Hopefully, the new legislation will take the size and weight into account. I don’t live in London but near a city that hates vehicles of any sort so will be sure to follow.

ValidPistachio · 16/03/2026 17:40

MikeRafone · 16/03/2026 17:30

ValidPistachio

you seem to think that hgv drivers don't kill more than car drivers - if its London then where are your figures to back that up - there seems to be a lot of hgv opposition due to deaths

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/reported-road-casualties-great-britain-annual-report-2024/

See chart 9.

Reported road casualties Great Britain, annual report: 2024

Statistics on personal injury collisions on public roads in Great Britain for 2024.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/reported-road-casualties-great-britain-annual-report-2024

itsnotfairisit · 16/03/2026 17:37

Sddbdbd · 16/03/2026 17:20

Honestly sounds like jealousy to me. People can't have a nice big car?

No. We own our Volvo and electric VW outright thanks. Never had to lease.
I genuinely think large SUVs on congested city streets look daft and are a menace to pedestrians

Benvenuto · 16/03/2026 17:37

Mijoed · 16/03/2026 15:38

Does anyone have real statistics for child pedestrians killed by vehicles in london, broken down by vehicle type. Trying to search for this information returns multiple comments about the higher potential for SUVs to cause death but no actual data. Busses and HGVs apparently kill quite a few more pedestrians than cars do but we don’t have any outcry about them. Additionally, vans like a fort transit or Mercedes sprinter are large, potentially heavy, and with high fronts to them. How do they figure in the statistics.

London has had measures for some time now to improve the visibility of HGVs - I think this is a permit scheme. I don’t know much about it but there have been pictures for a while of London HGVs with much improved visibility - I think this was a response to collisions too. It’s another road safety issue where London is leading.

canklesmctacotits · 16/03/2026 17:36

Sddbdbd · 16/03/2026 17:20

Honestly sounds like jealousy to me. People can't have a nice big car?

People CAN have a "nice big car" (although imo big is the opposite of nice when it comes to cars). They just have to pay a penalty. Do you see the difference?

MikeRafone · 16/03/2026 17:32

Honestly sounds like jealousy to me. People can't have a nice big car?

lease hire is easy peasy anyone can have a brand-new car without outlaying £20k first, renting a car is why there are so many SUVs on the roads and it keeps the car manufactures going

MikeRafone · 16/03/2026 17:30

ValidPistachio · 16/03/2026 17:00

You’re replying to the wrong poster.

ValidPistachio

you seem to think that hgv drivers don't kill more than car drivers - if its London then where are your figures to back that up - there seems to be a lot of hgv opposition due to deaths

Benvenuto · 16/03/2026 17:28

CasperGutman · 16/03/2026 16:52

The article just talks about "SUVs" but lots of people on this thread are talking about "giant" and "huge" SUVs. Does anyone know how SUVs will be defined for the purposes of this policy? As far as I'm aware the V11C doesn't record whether a vehicle is an SUV anywhere, it's just a marketing descriptor.

We have a large estate car and a smaller, lighter "compact SUV". We chose it because it was the best electric vehicle available from a local dealer within our budget for a second hand car when we were looking. It would seem odd for us to be charged extra to take the smaller, lighter and less polluting vehicle into London!

Edited

That is part of what Sadiq Khan is aiming to do with this - to create an SUV definition. Some of the media reports suggest that smaller ones won’t be affected.

This is something that I’ve really started to notice since the increased media coverage on this - some smaller SUVs have a higher front compared to a normal car, but it’s considerably lower than the really high supersize ones.

Sddbdbd · 16/03/2026 17:20

canklesmctacotits · 16/03/2026 16:05

Sure, they can have them. And they can pay the extra taxes and extra parking charges and extra emissions fees etc etc etc. They can also suffer social opprobrium (but people like this tend not to hear it, or if they do they just shout back louder about their freedoms and blahblahblah).

There's no relationship between taxation and child safety unless the taxes are prohibitively high. SUVs in London are a manifestation of the "I will because I can and fuck the lot of you" mentality, which deserves all it gets and more.

Honestly sounds like jealousy to me. People can't have a nice big car?

ThatJadeLion · 16/03/2026 17:19

They shouldn't stop at London. Absolutely sick of them dominating roads up north, parked up on pavements and it's suddenly everyone else problem where they park.

Holdonforsummer · 16/03/2026 17:18

There are so many giant SUVs where I live - towering over everyone, taking up 1.5 parking spaces. They are ostentatious and ridiculous. The hardly fit up some smaller, older roads. We need to be encouraging people away from them. Have you seen an old mini recently ? Helps remind you what size cars used to be.

RedToothBrush · 16/03/2026 17:16

Sddbdbd · 16/03/2026 17:14

Not a tank dear. It's a car.

SUV = tanks.

Hth.

Sddbdbd · 16/03/2026 17:15

BananaPeels · 16/03/2026 15:59

Yes but this specific issue in London happens because we have very narrow roads not designed for wide cars. I have a tiny car and 2 of my size car can pass each other pretty easily on the streets around me. Whenever an suv comes down the road everyone has to awkwardly pull in and sometimes even reverse all the way back down the road to accommodate it. A while ago there was a road closure and a local man had to come in and unblock the cars and everyone got stuck because 2 cars couldn’t pass each other. It causes a huge amount of issues around my neck of the woods.

Edited

Okay and? Deal with it and pull in.

Sddbdbd · 16/03/2026 17:14

RedToothBrush · 16/03/2026 16:11

If you want an SUV buy one and pay the additional taxes associated with driving a tank.

Not a tank dear. It's a car.

ValidPistachio · 16/03/2026 17:00

You’re replying to the wrong poster.

bridgetreilly · 16/03/2026 16:59

I would install maximum width limits in car parks and clamp every single SUV owner who broke the rule. Suspect that would make city-dwellers think twice about getting one.

MikeRafone · 16/03/2026 16:57

CasperGutman · 16/03/2026 16:52

The article just talks about "SUVs" but lots of people on this thread are talking about "giant" and "huge" SUVs. Does anyone know how SUVs will be defined for the purposes of this policy? As far as I'm aware the V11C doesn't record whether a vehicle is an SUV anywhere, it's just a marketing descriptor.

We have a large estate car and a smaller, lighter "compact SUV". We chose it because it was the best electric vehicle available from a local dealer within our budget for a second hand car when we were looking. It would seem odd for us to be charged extra to take the smaller, lighter and less polluting vehicle into London!

Edited

possibly a combination of all or some - weight, chassis structure, and off-road capability