Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Student loan repayments are completely unfair

263 replies

Sammy900 · 13/03/2026 21:31

I've thought for ages that student loan repayments are a complete rip off. I'm so glad they are now all going under review.

They were mis-sold at the time as a minor "graduate tax" that you'll barely notice and there weren't any other options available to enable low income households fair access to higher education.

I didn't realise then that this would turn into a lifelong debt, with snowballing interest that makes it impossible to clear.

I'm on the original plan 1 which just goes on and on until I'm 65.

The next plan 1 deal after 2006 then decided that 25 years was a fair term (not 47 years!!). Such a huge difference in what will be paid back.

Any other standard loans have much shorter terms.

It was based on the assumption that you would continue to be a low earner for the rest of your life and not move up the career ladder.

I really think that the government / treasury should look into the fairness of the terms of the original plan 1 loans too not just Plan 2.

I think you can submit your case to your local MP and with the treasury committee if you feel that you are paying back a student loan on unfair terms and now is the time to do so.

I really hope this gains momentum and something can be done about it finally.

What are your thoughts?

OP posts:
Sammy900 · 23/03/2026 13:22

Mumofsend · 23/03/2026 12:07

The bit people didn't understand was the extent of the interest. It's not a small amount of interest, it's huge.

Exactly, it's not really the paying of the original loan back. I'm pretty sure most people accept that they have to do that (even though the fees are extortionate these days!).

There are other issues as previously raised (like fair access to further education and professional careers, change of terms, discrimination, etc), but mainly It's the way the compound interest is applied and the length of the term. Leading to perpetual debt over a life time for some.

Some people have it a lot worse off than others, I totally get that. I'm not suggesting that my situation is the worst by any means. Everyone has their own individual experiences.

My intention here was really to highlight and discuss all the unfair issues having really sat and thought about it, spurred on by the current review.

Personally, I have put up and shut up and made my repayments for over 20 years thinking that there was nothing I could really do about it, but not really getting anywhere with the debt. My original loan was 23k, with interest it went up to 35k. I'm still 20k in debt today, 26+ years after I started uni. Madness. So yes I am peeved about that. Again, not saying that mine is the worst case. I feel really bad for people who have other much worse off deals, on Plan 2 for example.

This is the first time "unfairness" has ever been looked into properly so am hopeful there will be a positive outcome.

OP posts:
Mumofsend · 23/03/2026 12:07

The bit people didn't understand was the extent of the interest. It's not a small amount of interest, it's huge.

Askingforafriendtoday · 23/03/2026 12:05

StevieNic · 23/03/2026 07:46

What annoys me about this conversation is (mostly older) peoples first response will be ‘do an apprenticeship/ don’t go to uni’ okay but I’m 34 I don’t have a Time Machine to go back to aged 17 and make a different decision. We are talking about hundreds of thousands of people who were told they would pay back an insignificant amount and that it was a fair system- lied to- and who are now struggling for life under a misssold loan. Our parents didn’t realise we would be burdened in this way, we didn’t.

The conversation at hand is about how to rectify these unfair loans NOW for the people struggling under them. Interest should be scrapped and refunded for those who have overpaid in my view.

Edited

Exactly...it is the Plan 2 loans that are the worst. There's a petition on the mn petitions site, worth a sign and share though I don't particularly like the elitist wording of it...it's the signatures that are important and at least whoever set it up had the ooomph t do so

StevieNic · 23/03/2026 11:34

@LiviaDrusillaAugusta my Mum wouldn’t have had a clue what the contract meant had she reviewed it for me. The teachers didn’t understand it.

Not to mention she was a very unwell woman (alcoholic bipolar) - not all young people have parents who are able to support them and university shouldn’t be out of reach for those from deprived backgrounds.

Sammy900 · 23/03/2026 11:23

Cleary there are issues with systemic unfairness. It's not all fine and dandy. People aren't just moaning for nothing.

That's why the treasury are reviewing it all and it's all being exposed. Lots of people are realising what a shit deal it was and want something done about it.

People are realising that they don't want the same financial burden for their own children, are considering other options for them.... options that weren't available back then.

OP posts:
Mackerelfillets · 23/03/2026 10:06

When I completed by daughters student loan application, to confirm my earnings, I was unaware just how unfair this 'loan' is. Its likely she will never pay it off. It was not made clear to her that whilst shes earning less than the minimum the very high interest (more than mortgage interest) continues to be added. Even when she is paying the interest is eye watering.

OhDear111 · 23/03/2026 09:16

@StevieNic The amount you pay was ALWAYS linked to earnings. You earn more, you pay more. There was no lie. You just clearly didn’t understand. My DD is your age and paid hers off years ago. You had the £3,000 fees! What a huge advantage! No, there were not apprenticeships but if you are moaning about payments you must be doing well. They are insignificant if you earn £30,000. You obviously don’t. So well done and your degree has got you there.

StevieNic · 23/03/2026 07:46

What annoys me about this conversation is (mostly older) peoples first response will be ‘do an apprenticeship/ don’t go to uni’ okay but I’m 34 I don’t have a Time Machine to go back to aged 17 and make a different decision. We are talking about hundreds of thousands of people who were told they would pay back an insignificant amount and that it was a fair system- lied to- and who are now struggling for life under a misssold loan. Our parents didn’t realise we would be burdened in this way, we didn’t.

The conversation at hand is about how to rectify these unfair loans NOW for the people struggling under them. Interest should be scrapped and refunded for those who have overpaid in my view.

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 23/03/2026 02:21

I think it is interesting to actually nail down the following. Where does the Government get the money to pay out God knows how many millions of pounds in student loans?

I doubt if this money comes out of general taxation..So who is bankrolling this money?

Maybe the friend, the Bankers in the City of London? You know the people who really run the country.

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 22/03/2026 23:09

Perhaps it’s time for the thinking to swing the other way and for people not to expect to go to uni by default (or at least delay it/do it alongside a job). There are plenty of other options.

celticprincess · 22/03/2026 23:04

So I took student loans for 1995-1999. I had free tuition and the grant for living was based on parental income. Both worked so they were meant to contribute a certain amount b it couldn’t actually afford it. So I took out the loans. When I started work I was earning a teacher starting salary of around £15k annd then after a couple of years got the repayment amount so I ended up paying them back. It was a few years after graduating. I rented for a year and then bought a house. After another year sold my house to move in with partner and basically used my equity to pay off the loans. Housing market was great and it was a decent amount. Kind of regret this now as fast forward a few years, married, kids, part time wage, divorced, single parent on part time wage. Oh and we bought a house that we sold for pretty much the same as we paid due to relocating. Basically house sale profit went on fees and deposit for next house. However house prices crashed and we ended up in negative equity for quite a number of years. I did go back to uni whilst working part time as a single parent to do my masters and took out a post grad loan. That was 8 years ago. I’ve just not hit the wage for repaying £50 a month direct from my salary after going from part time to full time but hang also taken a pay cut on the FTE salary compared to previous job.

I do wonder if paying off that original loan was a good thing. Maybe it actually was.

My eldest is only a year off thinking about uni. It is worrying.

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 22/03/2026 23:04

Mumofsend · 22/03/2026 20:59

Most of those adults never went to uni or did so when it was free. They also got the same messaging as we did, just a small tax that is written off. The information on just how crazy the interest rate policy was was near on impossible to find. It was also the generation when the focus was on everyone going to uni. I do strongly recall the focus being in going to uni rather than having the audacity to ask questions about how the loans work.

You don’t have to have gone to uni to be able to look into things before you sign up. Lesson learnt, I guess (no pun intended).

Mumofsend · 22/03/2026 20:59

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 22/03/2026 20:51

If only they had adults in their lives who could have looked into it

Most of those adults never went to uni or did so when it was free. They also got the same messaging as we did, just a small tax that is written off. The information on just how crazy the interest rate policy was was near on impossible to find. It was also the generation when the focus was on everyone going to uni. I do strongly recall the focus being in going to uni rather than having the audacity to ask questions about how the loans work.

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 22/03/2026 20:51

Mumofsend · 22/03/2026 20:49

I do think young people were massively missold. It was so heavily downplayed as just a small tax that 17 and 18 year olds who absolutely didn't know better went into it without any understanding of it. It should have been a lot more transparent

If only they had adults in their lives who could have looked into it

Rosepalmaviolets · 22/03/2026 20:50

Op I agree .I'm so glad it's all coming out now !

Mumofsend · 22/03/2026 20:49

I do think young people were massively missold. It was so heavily downplayed as just a small tax that 17 and 18 year olds who absolutely didn't know better went into it without any understanding of it. It should have been a lot more transparent

Sammy900 · 22/03/2026 20:46

OhDear111 · 22/03/2026 20:23

@Sammy900Oh yes! Apprenticeships! Have you heard of them?

There’s an apprenticeship levy paid by companies who train young people and employ them.

DH was an employer before retirement. There’s high NI and lots of costs associated with employing people. In his business, a degree was required but young people earned well. They were trained to become chartered engineers at no cost to them but MEng is a requirement . It’s long been the case that professions need degree level people - a bit like doctors need degrees. There are many jobs asking for degrees where no post grad qualifications are offered or needed. This is where there should be flexibility on qualifications but don’t expect employers to cough up for sociology or history degrees as well as post degree training.

Never said I expect employers to pay for the degrees you mentioned, only whatever they deem necessary for the post, they can make the rules up can't they then if they are paying for it.

Obviously apprenticeships aren't a new concept, there aren't enough of them though.

The onus is still largely on the individual to pay for a degree deemed necessary for a future profession they aren't yet sure if they are going to end up working in.

Just throwing my thoughts out there anyway seen as you asked, like I said I haven't got all the answers. My suggestions aren't mind blowing original revolutionary ideas. 😂

My main issue currently is that the student loan repayment terms are unfair and we have been shafted for years.

OP posts:
Psychologymam · 22/03/2026 20:42

han6729 · 22/03/2026 13:38

@Psychologymam I don’t necessarily disagree with a lot of what you said, but let’s be realistic, we can’t (won’t) even fund primary and secondary education appropriately in this country, look at the SEN bin fire, I think before we get into universal higher education we have got to fix what’s happening in state education under 18/19. But I cynically agree with you it’s not in the interests of those who really control the country.

Edited

Totally appreciate your point - I think it’s a can’t rather than won’t though. I think because so many people are able to opt out of state education, the incentive to improve it just isn’t there. Financially, looking at where money goes in terms of contracts feels like it could be a good place to start. I’m more familiar with the NHS but I assume education system is similar - lots of money to pay some Tory mate baroness for non existent PPE, but not enough to pay nurses an appropriate (in my mind) salary. I really feel for parents of children with SEN, it’s such a struggle.

OhDear111 · 22/03/2026 20:23

@Sammy900Oh yes! Apprenticeships! Have you heard of them?

There’s an apprenticeship levy paid by companies who train young people and employ them.

DH was an employer before retirement. There’s high NI and lots of costs associated with employing people. In his business, a degree was required but young people earned well. They were trained to become chartered engineers at no cost to them but MEng is a requirement . It’s long been the case that professions need degree level people - a bit like doctors need degrees. There are many jobs asking for degrees where no post grad qualifications are offered or needed. This is where there should be flexibility on qualifications but don’t expect employers to cough up for sociology or history degrees as well as post degree training.

tommyhoundmum · 22/03/2026 20:20

Sammy900 · 22/03/2026 20:08

I forgot to add that it would also be a good idea for employers who make a degree an essential requirement for the post should also offer trainee "earn while you learn" options and look at how they can subsidise that rather than placing the whole burden on the individual to have already achieved this beforehand.

As the Met Police do.

Sammy900 · 22/03/2026 20:08

OhDear111 · 22/03/2026 18:30

@Sammy900 So how do you think our vast number of universities should get money? If grads won’t pay (and it’s obviously a tax based on salary!) then who does? Do we want 37% of young people to go? Should we cull universities and places? Jobs ask for degrees because they can. It’s often not a need. For decades there was no need but we increased university provision and invented the need. Now we cannot afford it and grads don’t want to pay but they do earn more! It’s a good thing to evaluate if a degree is necessary but jobs are so difficult for every young person now we need a reset on employing young people, not the bank balances of better off grads!

I forgot to add that it would also be a good idea for employers who make a degree an essential requirement for the post should also offer trainee "earn while you learn" options and look at how they can subsidise that rather than placing the whole burden on the individual to have already achieved this beforehand.

OP posts:
Askingforafriendtoday · 22/03/2026 19:38

Sammy900 · 13/03/2026 21:31

I've thought for ages that student loan repayments are a complete rip off. I'm so glad they are now all going under review.

They were mis-sold at the time as a minor "graduate tax" that you'll barely notice and there weren't any other options available to enable low income households fair access to higher education.

I didn't realise then that this would turn into a lifelong debt, with snowballing interest that makes it impossible to clear.

I'm on the original plan 1 which just goes on and on until I'm 65.

The next plan 1 deal after 2006 then decided that 25 years was a fair term (not 47 years!!). Such a huge difference in what will be paid back.

Any other standard loans have much shorter terms.

It was based on the assumption that you would continue to be a low earner for the rest of your life and not move up the career ladder.

I really think that the government / treasury should look into the fairness of the terms of the original plan 1 loans too not just Plan 2.

I think you can submit your case to your local MP and with the treasury committee if you feel that you are paying back a student loan on unfair terms and now is the time to do so.

I really hope this gains momentum and something can be done about it finally.

What are your thoughts?

Also meant to say that I don't particularly like the wording in the petition, which is on the mn petitions site, but at least he had the ooomphh to set it up

Sammy900 · 22/03/2026 19:18

OhDear111 · 22/03/2026 18:30

@Sammy900 So how do you think our vast number of universities should get money? If grads won’t pay (and it’s obviously a tax based on salary!) then who does? Do we want 37% of young people to go? Should we cull universities and places? Jobs ask for degrees because they can. It’s often not a need. For decades there was no need but we increased university provision and invented the need. Now we cannot afford it and grads don’t want to pay but they do earn more! It’s a good thing to evaluate if a degree is necessary but jobs are so difficult for every young person now we need a reset on employing young people, not the bank balances of better off grads!

Grads do pay but the student loan system, the interest accrued and terms are unfair (see all the above raised points).

I'm sure most graduates (like me) are quite willing to pay back a loan they have received in order to study, just like anyone else should pay a loan back they've received, student or commercial. Whether or not the terms and interest are fair is exactly what is in question.

I'm afraid I don't have all the answers as to how to resolve this. It's just been brought to my attention that the loans specifically seem very unfair.

I agree that the whole access to higher education and subsequent careers, how universities are funded, etc all needs a massive overhaul as it's currently not working as it is.

Why push young students in schools to achieve grades and have "career options" as if it's something realistic to aim for, encourage them to go to Uni without making them aware of the financial consequences and the reality of the debt they will be left with? Why say there is "fair access" to education for lower income households and individuals when this is simply untrue? Why is it necessary to have a degree and get in huge amounts of debt to then go and work in essential public roles and have a life long financial forfeit for this?

I feel that more apprenticeships and opportunities to learn while you work would be a good step forward for essential public service roles. More government money funding these and other vocational degrees for a work force trainee pay-off.

Then better financial education in schools and realistic opportunities made clear so that prospective students could weigh up the cost and benefit of paying for their chosen degrees and what this means / future mapping.

How this would impact on universities, I don't know? It might lead to less non-vocational degrees saving other studies for people who can afford to pay for it. Again, not sure how fair that would be either as there would present another dilemma, what about your incredible young artists that can't afford a degree? etc

Do you have any ideas?

OP posts:
StevieNic · 22/03/2026 18:51

I agree. I’m on plan 1, I will be paying £200pcm + for my entire working life which is a significant burden. Far more than I borrowed. It’s also unfair that women’s interest debt increases whilst they are on maternity leave.

MellersSmellers · 22/03/2026 18:49

@disappearingfish Thank you for putting people right.
I still think Martin Lewis is right to tell us to think of it as a 30-year graduate tax rather than a debt because that is just how it operates. But psychologically seeing that repayments are not making any inroads, and in fact that the outstanding sum is growing, causes a lot of anxiety and the freezing of the thresholds means that the marginal tax burden is growing.
I don't expect my DD to pay her Plan 2 loan off before the 30 years is up, DS maybe will, but it's very hard to gauge. Only half of students currently pay their loan off.
The students who have been really stiffed are those from poorer households who had to take out larger maintenance loans. How progressive is that!
We thought we understood the terms but didn't appreciate that the Govt can change those retrospectively. The fixed threshold will be the killer.
As PPs have said, the interest is extortionate but as it doesn't impact the rate of paying back or the term I think it's immaterial, no?

Swipe left for the next trending thread