Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel annoyed my 8-hour role is becoming 21 hours for only £2pw more?

60 replies

MunterJobHunter · 13/03/2026 19:58

I’ve been doing 8 hours sessional/contractor work a week and getting paid very well for it for almost 18 months now. I’m physically struggling with the 8 hours due to disability /illness but it means not having to rely on the state benefits and all the woes that go with claiming. 8hours also allows me to attend hospital up to three times a week for my appointments which is not negotiable.

The place I’m working are changing the role in May time, making it permanent staff and 21 hours a week but the pay will only be £2more a week than my current 8 hour role. I’ll have to interview for the job alongside others and while it will be highly sought after and loads of people would be happy with the ‘new’ wage and hours, I can’t help but feel hard done by. For me to apply means accepting essentially a pay cut of around £30 a hour to close to minimum wage. The job as it is now has been as a contractor for 25 years with a couple of people doing it in that time before me.

The new job will be almost 3 times the amount work for exactly the same pay doing exactly the same thing. Putting aside my physical struggles with the new amount of work which essentially will rule me out of the new job, Aibu to be a bit pissed off that they’re doing this?

I really thought I’d found a nice job that would see me to complete disability or retirement (whatever came first) and it took me ages to land this one. I’m gutted. No one wants disabled 50something year old women

OP posts:
Mosman2020 · 13/03/2026 20:27

Are you part of the union?
For awhile, contractors have had the same rights as full-time employees after a certain period of time

MunterJobHunter · 13/03/2026 20:22

Blushingm · 13/03/2026 20:20

Contractor and substantive is completely different.

Think AL, sickness, security, pension etc etc

That’s very true but taking almost 75% of the current wage is far more than employers costs will be.

OP posts:
MunterJobHunter · 13/03/2026 20:21

CactusSwoonedEnding · 13/03/2026 20:18

Don't apply. Play hardball. They may appoint someone who is less capable than you and regret it after 6 months and come back to you.

It is reasonable to pay permanent staff a little less than contractor staff as there are extra costs of employment and the employee has a lot more security in an actual job rather than as a contractor.

But your minimum threshold for the 21hr role should be 21x no less than 75% of your 8hr hourly rate and you should absolutely let them know that you wouldn't consider doing 21hrs for any less than that

I think you’re right. Employers costs taken into consideration still don’t account for the wage drop but they know plenty of young people will jump at the chance of this job and accept the lower wage.

OP posts:
Blushingm · 13/03/2026 20:20

Contractor and substantive is completely different.

Think AL, sickness, security, pension etc etc

MunterJobHunter · 13/03/2026 20:20

MayaPinion · 13/03/2026 20:12

It sounds like you’ve had a good run. Is that the going rate for the job or could you get a similar job/contract elsewhere for the same money?

It’s unlikely I could find a similar rate of pay these days because people are willing to do the same job for much less such is the state
of the jobs market. I certainly couldn’t find the same amount of hours.,

OP posts:
CactusSwoonedEnding · 13/03/2026 20:18

Don't apply. Play hardball. They may appoint someone who is less capable than you and regret it after 6 months and come back to you.

It is reasonable to pay permanent staff a little less than contractor staff as there are extra costs of employment and the employee has a lot more security in an actual job rather than as a contractor.

But your minimum threshold for the 21hr role should be 21x no less than 75% of your 8hr hourly rate and you should absolutely let them know that you wouldn't consider doing 21hrs for any less than that

MayaPinion · 13/03/2026 20:12

It sounds like you’ve had a good run. Is that the going rate for the job or could you get a similar job/contract elsewhere for the same money?

GreyfriarsJobbies · 13/03/2026 20:12

But this is just how it is for contractors as you must have known. You get paid a much better headline rate than if you were employed but have bugger all fringe benefits or security, and it is often the case that contractor roles don't last all that long - christ knows why they've had this one for 25 years.

BlonderThanYou · 13/03/2026 20:09

That’s the risk of being a contractor. The instability of the job is reason you're paid more. Start looking for other work.

keepingitcoolagain · 13/03/2026 20:04

Doesn’t sound like your comparing apples and pears because if the role is employed they’ll be paying your tax and NI, holiday pay, pension etc.

Even after that you’ll be worse off financially but till have more security. It’s just the way the cookie crumbles (I work 3 days per week and 2 days contract btw, and it’s the employed role that helped me buy my home and sleep without anxiety about an unstable income at night).