Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Sons Sporting Ambition Thwarted?

254 replies

GatheringAllTheMoss · 08/03/2026 23:42

My son has dreamt of becoming an England player in his team sport (not football) for many years. He's reached county level which is fantastic but he's unlikely to go further. Not through lack of talent but more through the lack of opportunities and the advantages that others have. Out of 40 children at county level the overwhelming majority are at private schools. 10 from one school. You can count the number of state school boys on one hand and one is my son.

Private schools start this sport in year 3, state pupils are lucky to get the chance to play, those that do start in year 7. Private schools play at a higher level e.g. private school will field their B team against sons state school A team. The coaches and facilities are at a higher level too.

At club level my son plays with the men's team not with his age group and there is no development route. I can move him to another club but the chances are high that it will be dominated by the private school boys so my son won't be chosen for the team.

I always appreciated that talent would only take him so far and I was willing to do whatever was needed to get him to that point. Just devastated by the reality of what he faces to succeed and that I never really appreciated this.

OP posts:
PrettyBigThings · 09/03/2026 08:47

Honestly it is incredibly depressing that this could be any one of a number of sports - cricket, rugby and hockey all immediately spring to mind. The only sport where private school doesn’t seem to give an immediate advantage is football because it’s so ubiquitous.

There is such a gulf for children in state schools and I don’t think the clubs realise how incredibly well the state school kids are doing. Sadly I’ve seen first hand how the clubs are an extension of the private school - the teachers also coach at the clubs and it’s all about extra practice for the school team.

In many ways it’s a first world problem but given the state of some of these national sports, it’s incredibly sad the governing bodies are not stepping in.

sesquipedalian · 09/03/2026 08:45

OP, if it’s rugby, the competition is fierce and ruthless. A family member who was very good got into a national team under seventeens - but that’s as far as he got, and there are many many who, despite playing from an early age, and being keen as mustard, don’t get anything like as far. There are only so many places, and those who make it to the top just have the edge and the drive over their fellow players who are left by the wayside. Whatever sport it is, you are absolutely right when you say he needs ti be playing with his age group and enjoying the sport for its own sake - I would not be happy about my teenage sin playing with the men’s team. My son was good enough to make the first fifteen at school, and enjoyed rugby at university and plays casually now - you really don’t have to be a professional athlete to love and enjoy your sport. A friend’s nephew plays cricket at county level, and all I can say is that they live and breathe cricket, to an extent that might be considered unhealthy. You really do need to be utterly single minded, and if you do that and it’s still it quite enough, it can be heartbreaking.

waterrat · 09/03/2026 08:44

btw there are some private schools which on their own as institutions dominate certain olympic sports.

waterrat · 09/03/2026 08:44

There are some really ignorant comments here.

This is not 'fair' because the other boys have earnt it by working hard. It's privilege in action.

I can see this in my local area with sports like hockey - only played at private schools - the local open to all club is mostly private school chidlren, it would be incredibly difficult for a state school child to get anywhere near the amount of hours of play.

my son is very sporty - football - and I despair at the poor level of provision at his secondary even with football which should be easy for them!

Compared to private schools - there are literally less hours in the day given to sport, fewer pitches, less coaches to organise matches - my son has played competitive football for his school a handful of times in 3 years - private schools play weekly around the county at a very high level and inter county as well. My son has only ever played other schools.

People really are very ignorant about how privilege works.

Franjipanl8r · 09/03/2026 08:42

Ionlymakejokestodistractmyself · 09/03/2026 08:40

It could also be hockey? That is rarely played at state school.

Hockey is played at every state school in my area in the UK and the non-school clubs are very inclusive and accessible. Do you mean ice hockey?

Ionlymakejokestodistractmyself · 09/03/2026 08:40

It could also be hockey? That is rarely played at state school.

Franjipanl8r · 09/03/2026 08:40

In the grand scheme of things does it really matter? Is a life of elite sport really what you want for your child? It wouldn’t be mine.

I’d much rather my kids were just good at a sport that they enjoyed and played a lot rather than dedicated their whole lives to it. Professional sports comes with a lot of sacrifices.

Discofiasco · 09/03/2026 08:40

Is this cricket, OP? I know a few kids who play at county level - and you are right, there are a lot of private school kids, as not many state schools do cricket.

That said, I know a lot of clubs offer bursaries for high level training, and our local club always says that income shouldn't be a barrier. Definitely try every route you can - but kindly, do also remember it's pretty tough/competitive to progress from county level to a professional sporting career. For the vast majority of kids who might be brilliant at their sport, county is 'where it ends' in the course of their lives.

Smartiepants79 · 09/03/2026 08:37

Is it cricket??
I do understand and agree with what you’re saying. These boys have trained and worked hard and clearly have ability but they have also been lucky and have an advantage.
My DD plays county cricket. She is also from a private school and I’m well aware that this gives her and advantage as far as awareness and access goes. State schools don’t play cricket with their girls for the most part. She is also talented and works hard.
Find a better club is one thing but the county development pathway should offer him opportunities if he’s any good.

labradorservant · 09/03/2026 08:33

If it is rugby do look at sports colleges or the right uni that is open to new people and not those who are already on a pathway (DS is at Bath and most of the first are either at Bath already or a nearby school).
Also if it is rugby take a look at Lambs rugby as another route for those who are overlooked.
Interestingly for rugby the girls don’t have this same issue as it’s not a private school thing. They all head to rugby college at 16 instead.
Most England U18 rugby players don’t make the men’s squad. Some don’t even find the sport until senior level.
But also 1 bad injury can change everything whatever sport it is so don’t put all your eggs in 1 basket.

Piggywaspushed · 09/03/2026 08:32

I'd stake a bet on this being cricket.

RockyKeen · 09/03/2026 08:30

Rollercoaster1920 · 09/03/2026 00:43

What age? Kids mature at different rates, and sport seems to amplify it. Obviously early puberty and genetics can impact most sports, but the skills and techniques usually grow until 16s. Some kids swap sports and shoot through the rankings. A combinations of talent, drive, genetics and luck (in addition to access and money) is needed.

Do move to the other club with the private school kids. Having a higher level within the club will develop him further when they do internal competition. Also being amongst people into the same sport and at the same age is a positive thing for most kids.

If the sport is very school based, rather than club-based then it's harder. But I can't think of any sports in the UK where the school competition is above the club one. If your son is already at county level then a school might consider a scholarship.

Op the above ^makes sense and it’s what I’d do. Why give up ? Move him and let him have fun trying, and enjoying the sport he loves, you never know .

Owly11 · 09/03/2026 08:29

You need to help your son come to terms with it. It's not realistic for anyone to become an elite athlete - only in exceedingly rare cases. Even if he were at private school you don't know if he would make it. You need to quickly get over your own feelings so you can support your son get over his. Going down the 'it's not fair' route is not the way to go as it is an unhelpful attitude to take into life and will turn this into a bigger deal than it is. Life isn't fair and that's ok. It was probably a mistake to encourage his ambitions given the situation you describe.

MrsMitford3 · 09/03/2026 08:28

What sport is it @GatheringAllTheMoss ?

GatheringAllTheMoss · 09/03/2026 08:25

Thanks all for your very helpful comments. After I wrote this late last night I had a good long think. To me moving club is the answer
He needs to be playing with his age group and enjoying the sport for what it is. I do want this sport to be lifelong love for him, a place where he can make friends easily when he goes to uni etc. and be able to take it as far as he can.

Getting a scholarship is a good idea if (a) we could afford it and (b) the academics were equally as good as his state school. I know of a boy who transferred from private to his state school and is spending time trying to catch up.

I don't play either of the sports my children do so yes have suffered from the lack of understanding of pathways, the best clubs etc. For the eldest we swapped clubs so now have access to much better facilities but they're losing interest as they get older.

He did start at a young age but this club does not have the development pathway hence considering the move.

The reality bit hard yesterday.

OP posts:
Gert12 · 09/03/2026 08:24

If it’s rugby you should look at specialist sports colleges such as Hartpury. It’s an England and Wales rugby factory. He can study ALevels or Btecs alongside playing more rugby than he had ever imagined.

ThiagoJones · 09/03/2026 08:21

TheFuturesSoBright · 09/03/2026 08:17

My son plays for a football team outside school. It's blindingly obvious which kids are at private school. They're playing sport every day after school. I know because I talk to the parents! The state school kids get two hours a week which includes changing time and "kids messing around who hate PE" time.
There's just no comparison.

That’s interesting because I’d say football tends to be the one sport where state school children are generally better than the ones from independent schools. Football is my daughter’s sport, and the one that she’s on a sports scholarship for at independent secondary (from state primary). The majority of the kids she plays with in her academy are from state schools, and she’s better than the vast majority of those who came to the secondary from the private preps.

AllJoyAndNoFun · 09/03/2026 08:18

Catlady007007 · 09/03/2026 08:00

I think it’s easy to say that it’s primarily down to money. That isn’t true imo. IMO the kids who succeed are the ones who have parents who did/do the sport themselves and become their kids personal coach - putting in hours and hours of additional training at club level. These parents know the best clubs, they know people in the best clubs, they know how the system works, dates of competitions, the competitions most worth entering, the competitions their own kids have the best chance of winning which in turn boosts the kid’s confidence, they know loopholes for kids to transfer clubs, they know everything and they do everything to make sure their kid has the most advantages over other kids.

The parents I know who do this are state teachers. They think nothing of taking days off - leaving classrooms of kids with a sub teacher (or no teacher).

Do they do this because they are financially able? I don’t think so. They do this because they are very focussed on their kid’s success.

Yeah, I agree it's not about money but about a sort of "social capital" where they understand and are committed to the system. A lot of sports aren't expensive to play but parental commitment to excel has a big "time and opportunity" cost that not all parents are willing or able to pay and the unspoken truth is that even with massive parental input a lot of these kids won't "make it" so if you were doing it all under duress you'd feel like it was a massive waste of time.

That said..... I think some parents could be more involved but CBA - there are a lot of non coaching roles like helping with match food, doing the socials, doing the bar etc. People say "I don't have time" like the coaches dont also have jobs, other kids and other stuff going on. It's kind of the "if you want something doing, ask a busy person" mantra.

TheFuturesSoBright · 09/03/2026 08:17

My son plays for a football team outside school. It's blindingly obvious which kids are at private school. They're playing sport every day after school. I know because I talk to the parents! The state school kids get two hours a week which includes changing time and "kids messing around who hate PE" time.
There's just no comparison.

DotAndCarryOne2 · 09/03/2026 08:17

saltinesandcoffeecups · 09/03/2026 00:09

So the other boys have spent more years, longer hours, and practiced against higher caliber opponents.

They’ve likely worked longer and have more hours in than your son.

What am I missing?

The fact that these other boys have had their opportunities through privilege, and not necessarily superior ability.

OneNewLeader · 09/03/2026 08:16

With the exception of football, look at English sports teams and look at the schools they go to. It’s a thing.

GnomeDePlume · 09/03/2026 08:06

To add another thought on the advantage private school brings: the opportunity to try a number of similar sports at a good level.

There are a number of sports where a small, hard ball is going to come whistling past your ears. In a sports oriented private school you will get to try them all and be funnelled towards the one you have a particular aptitude for.

In a state school you are much less likely to get that opportunity. That can mean that a state school student could, say, be good at hockey but never know they would have been amazing at lacross.

ShakeNCake · 09/03/2026 08:03

saltinesandcoffeecups · 09/03/2026 00:09

So the other boys have spent more years, longer hours, and practiced against higher caliber opponents.

They’ve likely worked longer and have more hours in than your son.

What am I missing?

This was only possible because they had rich parents, meaning kids with talent from other backgrounds don't have a look in. That's what you're missing.

Catlady007007 · 09/03/2026 08:00

Randomuser2026 · 09/03/2026 06:59

The fact that the ability to start earlier, have more coaching hours and the opportunity to play against higher calibre opponents is due to their parents financial resources.

I don’t think you actually missed it, but either way it shows a deep failing in your personality.

I think it’s easy to say that it’s primarily down to money. That isn’t true imo. IMO the kids who succeed are the ones who have parents who did/do the sport themselves and become their kids personal coach - putting in hours and hours of additional training at club level. These parents know the best clubs, they know people in the best clubs, they know how the system works, dates of competitions, the competitions most worth entering, the competitions their own kids have the best chance of winning which in turn boosts the kid’s confidence, they know loopholes for kids to transfer clubs, they know everything and they do everything to make sure their kid has the most advantages over other kids.

The parents I know who do this are state teachers. They think nothing of taking days off - leaving classrooms of kids with a sub teacher (or no teacher).

Do they do this because they are financially able? I don’t think so. They do this because they are very focussed on their kid’s success.

Whyherewego · 09/03/2026 07:56

AllJoyAndNoFun · 09/03/2026 06:57

Reflecting on this, because it's something that's close to my heart as a team manager in grassroots sports, there are just so many factors other than talent and "hard work/ commitment/ determination" by the player that determine how far they will get and it's pretty hard to level the playing field (no pun intended). We try but we can only do so much in reality. In no particular order for the sport I'm involved in but most likely to be more widely applicable

Parental time and commitment: Only child with parent who loves the sport and is happy to spend every Sunday driving around the county for matches/ gets involved with the club and understands the system, has an advantage over a child with multiple siblings with limited or no access to a car / works shifts who can only really commit to home matches and often misses training.

Parents ability to feedback/ coach: Obvious multi-generation link - some might be genetic but obviously a massive help if your parent has also played the sport at a high level and can constructively coach/ feedback/ practice with you.

Club Choice: Again, the kid who has the luxury of choosing the "best" club for development which is 10 miles away and not on public transport over the kid who just has to go to the conveniently located one. Also, just how the years pan out. The coaches are volunteers and usually parents of children in that year. Some coaches are just better than others and we can only use who we have.

Geographic Location: For team sports, living somewhere with reasonably high density of population for match opportunities and squad size - less likely to have to play in a team with big skill differentials (i.e. county and new players in same team). Also how organised/ equitable the county/ club architecture for development is. They are not all equal by any stretch.

Flukey years - Sometimes you are a great player in a brilliant year and dont make the cut for "the next level up". Sometimes you're a slightly less great player in a mediocre / small cohort and you do and then you're able to capitalise on it.

Being one of the oldest in the year- yes it's a thing, plus just variations in how you develop- reaching adult height at 12 vs 16.

Injuries at key times/ missing seasons

There's more but honestly, there is a lot of circumstance involved.

This is really on the money. My DS was spotted for rugby even though he plays for a fairly low level club and asked to attend a developing player programme. It was over an hour travel each way in a weekday evening. I tried to encourage him but I don't drive a car so couldn't help with logistics and even sharing lifts wasnt that helpful. He just dropped out I the end because it was too much hassle. Had we lived nearer or had it been just easier to get to, maybe he'd have stuck it out. There's so much talent gets you, but logistics, parental involvement etc is also ao important