Most of these replies are bats. Chosen as representative: I believe the moment the generalisation starts, all argument, and discussion is out the window.
You couldn't navigate life without making generalisations. No business or government could function without generalisations.
On the topic in hand, do PPs deny that girls are trained from infancy to be softer, gentler, kinder, to 'serve', to notice the detail of what keeps life functioning well and to ensure it is done? Have you somehow missed the way boys are trained to be more assertive, decisive, self-important and to expect 'service' through life's daily details?
Perhaps more controversially, it's now widely understood that men's greater strength and propensity to violence, plus the constraints on women of pregnancy, birth and infant care, lead to circumstances where women are reasonably afraid of male opposition - and are guaranteed to meet it, varying only in frequency and intensity.
There's a power imbalance in favour of men. It advantages all men. The men who don't assault, rape or murder benefit from the background threat of those who do, even if they don't realise it. Most of the men who have learned everyday life skills will stop using them once they have a woman to do it; the few that carry on will be praised as no women are.
AMALT, some more than others!