Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I am not a "person who menstruates"

211 replies

auserna · 01/03/2026 15:22

AIBU to think that terms such as "birthing person", "partner with eggs", "womb-carrier", "cervix haver", "people who menstruate", "chest-feeder" are not only insulting to women but downright hurtful to those who have any gynaecological and/or fertility issues, including DSDs?

Those terms may be considered inclusive to/by people whose gender identity doesn't match their sex (c.0.5% in the UK) but are exclusive to those with DSDs or gynaecological issues (c.12% in the UK).

NB My figures are rough, partly because the statistics relating to people with DSDs are very contentious and because "gynaecological issues" is a broad term, but they are clearly significantly higher for the latter group.

OP posts:
JulietteNichols · 01/03/2026 17:28

My adult daughter has learning disabilities and really struggles with reading. This would exclude her as she doesn't know she has a cervix. She knows she is a woman and can read that word.

It is so annoying when women with literacy problems are excluded including those whom English is not their first language. Outcomes for adults with learning disabilities are rarely considered.

auserna · 01/03/2026 17:25

TheBeaTgoeson1 · 01/03/2026 17:19

Can you share the video op?

I'm afraid I just came across it during some Sunday afternoon doom-scrolling and wouldn't know where to find it now. If I see it again I'll post it.

OP posts:
auserna · 01/03/2026 17:24

Birdsongisangry · 01/03/2026 17:00

Agreed. I have a good friend who found out as a teen that she had an intersex condition - her parents knew and hid this from her, it was back in the days that parents were just told to 'choose' if a baby was ambiguous at birth, and they got it very, very wrong, though that only became obvious at puberty. She is (and always has been in her mind) female but unable to carry a child, and finds this sort of thing pretty upsetting. Because her parents registered her as a boy she actually had to get a GRC, which according to many on Mumsnet, means she should use mens facilities.

To be fair, there are many extremely intelligent and well-informed women on the Feminism board, and I think they would tend to have the sense to understand that this is an entirely separate case.

OP posts:
Birdsongisangry · 01/03/2026 17:22

@Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g you might be reassured to know the NHS provide material in different formats including pictorial for those with learning disabilities or who aren't able to read. They're not being discriminated against by the NHS naming body parts.

TheBeaTgoeson1 · 01/03/2026 17:19

Can you share the video op?

Teresavonlichenstein · 01/03/2026 17:11

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 01/03/2026 15:46

One of the many problems I have with this nonsense is that when people are talking about issues that may affect women it's so much clearer and easier to join up the dots if you keep hearing the word 'woman'.

  • Men earn more than women.
  • Men commit almost all sexual offences, women hardly any.
  • Men commit 80%+ of violent offences, women under 20%.
  • Men are in and out of public toilets a lot quicker than women and need them for fewer things.
  • Men's careers are not affected by needing maternity leave, whereas most women's are at some point, and men are less likely to take parental leave or to be carers.

Or:

  • Womb havers earn less than prostate havers.
  • Most sexual offences are committed by cis males and people with a female gender identity but were born in the wrong body. Very few sexual offenders are people who identify as cis females or transmen.
  • Etc etc.

You forgot the huge impact of maternity leave or going part time on pension. I took a year with each child I wish I had fully understood the impact on my pension. Ex DH no impact on his pension.

I was volunteering at a new place today I honestly there were 20 people there and practically everyone has a pronoun badge and it made it want to scream - men clearly men wanting to be called her or she. Where is my right to have gender critical views / apparently not - everyone gets to be called whatever they want.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 01/03/2026 17:06

TheignT · 01/03/2026 16:00

I can't see a problem with that. I'm a person, I no longer have a cervix, I'm still a woman and I'm still a person. The sign seems perfectly clear to me.

Any poster or leaflet or other messaging about health has to be understood by the entire target group, which will include people who are barely literate and know next to nothing about how their bodies work. Cervix is a technical word. A significant percentage of women won't know they have one. The eyecatching message needs to be really simple. Something like 'The NHS provides free screening to all women aged 25 to 64 every five years to check for early signs of cervical cancer. Ask for details here.'

TheignT · 01/03/2026 17:05

Birdsongisangry · 01/03/2026 16:49

I just googled 'chest feeding' and the only NHS reference I can find is advice for trans people. Specifically, people who have had their breast tissue removed but may still be able to feed a baby. Which gives advice about what might be possible, or what complications there may be depending on the surgery they had. The advice wouldn't be relevant to women who hadn't had breast tissue removed, so it would be a bit strange to include it all under breastfeeding.
And theres advice about using both terms, so using the term in addition to breastfeeding, not instead of.

I have no idea why that undermines your identity as a woman OP.

That's interesting. I always think it sounds so odd but I won't now I understand so thank you.

Birdsongisangry · 01/03/2026 17:00

TheignT · 01/03/2026 16:43

Yes I get fed up with being told women menstruate, have a cervix, have a womb because I'm a woman without them, I also dont have ovaries so don't have eggs. I am still a woman.

I don't think it is trans people that say these things.

Agreed. I have a good friend who found out as a teen that she had an intersex condition - her parents knew and hid this from her, it was back in the days that parents were just told to 'choose' if a baby was ambiguous at birth, and they got it very, very wrong, though that only became obvious at puberty. She is (and always has been in her mind) female but unable to carry a child, and finds this sort of thing pretty upsetting. Because her parents registered her as a boy she actually had to get a GRC, which according to many on Mumsnet, means she should use mens facilities.

Birdsongisangry · 01/03/2026 16:49

I just googled 'chest feeding' and the only NHS reference I can find is advice for trans people. Specifically, people who have had their breast tissue removed but may still be able to feed a baby. Which gives advice about what might be possible, or what complications there may be depending on the surgery they had. The advice wouldn't be relevant to women who hadn't had breast tissue removed, so it would be a bit strange to include it all under breastfeeding.
And theres advice about using both terms, so using the term in addition to breastfeeding, not instead of.

I have no idea why that undermines your identity as a woman OP.

MrsHaroldWilson · 01/03/2026 16:47

It depends on context. I'm post-hysterectomy so I don't menstruate or have a cervix. If the discussion is specific to those things, e.g. talking about smear tests, it's not relevant to me. If it's supposed to be some kind of 'tactful' way of referring to biological women as a whole, without using the word 'women' then it's a huge fail.

TheignT · 01/03/2026 16:43

Birdsongisangry · 01/03/2026 16:17

I don't think you're making sense OP.
If a poster for smear tests said all women should have them, it isn't particularly inclusive of women who have gynae issues, eg those who have had hysterectomies, and the same if it were referring to periods and those who were most menopausal. It isn't implying those people aren't women. If anything, you suggesting the word woman should be used in those contexts implies that some women aren't women if they aren't capable of making babies.
Referring to the person who gave birth makes sense for lesbian couples, as they're both mothers, but the advice would be to one but not both.
The other terms I've honestly never seen or heard outside of Mumsnet. I do wonder where some of you hang out that it's so common.

Yes I get fed up with being told women menstruate, have a cervix, have a womb because I'm a woman without them, I also dont have ovaries so don't have eggs. I am still a woman.

I don't think it is trans people that say these things.

Lemondrizzle4A · 01/03/2026 16:27

auserna · 01/03/2026 15:22

AIBU to think that terms such as "birthing person", "partner with eggs", "womb-carrier", "cervix haver", "people who menstruate", "chest-feeder" are not only insulting to women but downright hurtful to those who have any gynaecological and/or fertility issues, including DSDs?

Those terms may be considered inclusive to/by people whose gender identity doesn't match their sex (c.0.5% in the UK) but are exclusive to those with DSDs or gynaecological issues (c.12% in the UK).

NB My figures are rough, partly because the statistics relating to people with DSDs are very contentious and because "gynaecological issues" is a broad term, but they are clearly significantly higher for the latter group.

I must go around with my head in the clouds cos never heard of them.

Birdsongisangry · 01/03/2026 16:17

I don't think you're making sense OP.
If a poster for smear tests said all women should have them, it isn't particularly inclusive of women who have gynae issues, eg those who have had hysterectomies, and the same if it were referring to periods and those who were most menopausal. It isn't implying those people aren't women. If anything, you suggesting the word woman should be used in those contexts implies that some women aren't women if they aren't capable of making babies.
Referring to the person who gave birth makes sense for lesbian couples, as they're both mothers, but the advice would be to one but not both.
The other terms I've honestly never seen or heard outside of Mumsnet. I do wonder where some of you hang out that it's so common.

Middlechild3 · 01/03/2026 16:12

auserna · 01/03/2026 15:22

AIBU to think that terms such as "birthing person", "partner with eggs", "womb-carrier", "cervix haver", "people who menstruate", "chest-feeder" are not only insulting to women but downright hurtful to those who have any gynaecological and/or fertility issues, including DSDs?

Those terms may be considered inclusive to/by people whose gender identity doesn't match their sex (c.0.5% in the UK) but are exclusive to those with DSDs or gynaecological issues (c.12% in the UK).

NB My figures are rough, partly because the statistics relating to people with DSDs are very contentious and because "gynaecological issues" is a broad term, but they are clearly significantly higher for the latter group.

Its all so a few men who want to wear dresses and pretend to be women don't get offended.

LlynTegid · 01/03/2026 16:11

Let's say you live to be 80, which is probably about the average life expectancy for a woman of 18. Now do the maths- of the 62 years, on average at least the last 30 are without menstruation, then add an average of those with gynaecological issues, those not having periods because of their contraceptive choices.

So what of the 51% of the population does that leave?

auserna · 01/03/2026 16:08

NoSoupForU · 01/03/2026 16:00

Right, so a minority. In the UK there are about a quarter of a million trans people. You hear the sensationalist stories on social media and in the gutter press about a handful of them. So called trans activists are campaigning primarily for inclusiveness are they not? And it isn't entirely beyond the realms of possible for people to be able to coexist quite peacefully, just minding their own business.

Very very few sex crimes are committed by trans people. They are predominantly committed by men, as we know. But some sex crimes are committed by women, yet I don't hear all the hysteria of how a female pervert could be lurking in the toilets or changing rooms. It's like people have lost all ability to assess a situation and risk for themselves now.

Something isn't automatically rendered acceptable just because it only affects, or is only carried out by, a minority.

I don't want to be called a bigot by anyone just because I don't happen to believe that men can become women, thank you.

OP posts:
FlirtsWithRhinos · 01/03/2026 16:08

ilovesooty · 01/03/2026 15:57

I suppose it depends on the articles and videos you choose to read and watch then.

In my experience, it's pieces written by trans identifying people themselves and in the comments to them.

If you've not seen this, Medium is a good place to start. Thoughtful, long form and self published.

Coconutter24 · 01/03/2026 16:07

NoSoupForU · 01/03/2026 15:51

But do they? Or are people making assumptions based on the voices of a tiny minority and the probably well intended approach some organisations have taken to try to avoid inadvertently discriminating against protected groups?

So do you think a trans woman wouldn’t expect you to address them as a woman?

auserna · 01/03/2026 16:06

TheChirpyReader · 01/03/2026 16:00

Right, so someone said it on Facebook?

But where were they saying it came from?

UK Government? the NHS? UK Councils?

People say all kinds of shit on SM. Usually about other things they've seen on SM.

If it's on an official document the fine, address it. But if it's just 'someone said on Facebook they saw it somewhere else' then you'll just have to accept people say all kinds of shit on an unregulated internet, much of it designed to inflame and get clicks and likes and people frothing about something.

I could easily say 'just saw a post on MN saying experts have said WW3 has started' and it'd be true that the post exists but not true that it's official evidence that we all need to worry about.

I knew you'd say that. I'm not trying to use it as proof in a court of law or an academic article, but the person making a video showed a copy of the document to camera - and it's hardly unbelievable, is it? We know such terms have been used in an official context, such as by the NHS.

Are you saying you think all these terms are a good thing?

OP posts:
FlirtsWithRhinos · 01/03/2026 16:05

TranscendThis · 01/03/2026 15:28

I used to be so accepting of this.

I saw a trans gentleman with hair and badge of a female yesterday serving me. Now, I get annoyed, I try be as polite as possible but really think, you're a threat to me in many ways as a woman. I have no time for this nonsense anymore.

Yeah, once upon a time when a trans identifying male popped up on a zoom call or in a meeting I would genuinely have thought "wow, it's great that people born in the wrong body are starting to feel they can be themselves".

These days I have the same reaction I would to someone turning up wearing a t shirt with a sexist slogan or sexist joke on - it's someone making a public display of their reductive beliefs about women.

I get that lot of the young ones are just not that aware of the basic sexism underpinning the concept of gender identities and are probably lovely if naive people, but as a women it's still depressing and demoralising that my employer considers it acceptable to have such sexist views openly performed in the workplace.

auserna · 01/03/2026 16:03

Shrinkhole · 01/03/2026 15:48

But are they using it in a context about menstruation? I mean I am a post menopausal woman so still very definitely a woman but no longer a ‘person who menstruates’

I am no longer particularly interested in tampon ads or Moon Cups or discussions about heavy or painful periods so if this is used to direct a discussion towards ‘people who menstruate’ who are more interested in those issues then I guess that’s OK. People who menstruate will be a subset of women. Less so if it’s just a poor attempt at a euphemism for woman.

No, not that context, but it is just a poor attempt at a euphemism for women - that's the problem.

You're no longer a "person who menstruates", but you're not no longer a woman. And if you were female but didn't have a uterus so had never menstruated you'd still be a woman.

OP posts:
TheignT · 01/03/2026 16:02

OchonAgusOchonOh · 01/03/2026 15:58

Chest feeding makes absolutely no sense. Men also have breasts, as is evidenced by the fact they can get breast cancer. I would expect a healthcare organisation to at least be familiar with basic biology.

Yes it makes no sense.

NoSoupForU · 01/03/2026 16:01

OchonAgusOchonOh · 01/03/2026 15:58

Chest feeding makes absolutely no sense. Men also have breasts, as is evidenced by the fact they can get breast cancer. I would expect a healthcare organisation to at least be familiar with basic biology.

Or, the more likely scenario is that they're trying to improve the uptake of it so they're trying different approaches to appeal to as many people as possible.

Mumofteenandtween · 01/03/2026 16:00

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 01/03/2026 15:49

"partners with eggs".

Mrs Easter Bunny has one of those!

I also do. A husband in fact. Got back from taking ds swimming and there he was - poaching them so we could have them for our lunch!