Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

This country is doomed

964 replies

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 08:29

While the vote in Gorton and Denton may be described as a 'protest' vote the strength of both the Greens and Reform performance is something to worry all of us not just Labour.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
FairKoala · 03/03/2026 13:56

HappyFace2025 · 03/03/2026 13:40

It rather depends on where these homes are. There is nothing in the southeast for example that costs £25k AFAIK.

Know someone in the South East who has traded their way up from a £10,000 flat in the far north. They bought did up and rented out for a while then mortgaged it and did the same again and again. Then sold all of them and bought a place in the South East

I think you are mistaken about EA only selling to landlords. They are supposed to market the property to get the best price not keep things secret and only sell to a small set of people.

scottishgirl69 · 03/03/2026 13:53

FairKoala · 03/03/2026 13:32

Then why don’t they buy. I don’t get this “priced out by landlords”

The price will be the going asking price.

I have seen places going for under £25,000
I know someone who bought at £10,000

Just how cheap do they need places to be.

I bought my flat for 7.5k and that was because I got a 70 percent discount because I was a council tenant and had been there a long time . It had to be demolished and sold and I got the market rate. (26k) I live in the West of Scotland and there probably are places in the UK that are cheaper than here but I would think in many areas a flat for 10k would need a lot of work doing to it

A two bedroomed flat that my brother bought two years ago was 100k although he paid slightly more as it was more or less furnished as the seller wanted a quick sale

Lots of people are priced out of the housing market. If I hadn't bought my council flat I wouldn't have been able to buy at all on a single person on my wage. I know lots of people who live in private rented accommodation because they can't afford to buy - even if they have good jobs

My mum bought her council house for 26k 30 years ago. Houses in her street are selling for over 100k now. This is a very ordinary row of terraced houses with two bedrooms. This is part of the issue - as the value of property goes up - some people are priced out - they can't afford to buy so they have to rent privately or get social housing

Prices are increasing year on year as well. In Glasgow a landlord can get four students in a flat for 600-1k per room - they aren't under any pressure to sell. They know people are desperate for housing.

HappyFace2025 · 03/03/2026 13:40

FairKoala · 03/03/2026 13:32

Then why don’t they buy. I don’t get this “priced out by landlords”

The price will be the going asking price.

I have seen places going for under £25,000
I know someone who bought at £10,000

Just how cheap do they need places to be.

It rather depends on where these homes are. There is nothing in the southeast for example that costs £25k AFAIK.

OP posts:
Badbadbunny · 03/03/2026 13:37

FairKoala · 03/03/2026 13:32

Then why don’t they buy. I don’t get this “priced out by landlords”

The price will be the going asking price.

I have seen places going for under £25,000
I know someone who bought at £10,000

Just how cheap do they need places to be.

They don't get the chance to put in offers! The estate agents "know" the multiple landlords and give them first dibs. Multiple landlords are also often "cash buyers" (from re-mortgaging other BTLs) and that makes them attractive to sellers who don't have to wait longer and don't have the risk of a FTB not getting a mortgage or having to wait several weeks for the mortgage to come through. Lots of the cheaper end houses are also not mortgageable due to many factors, i.e. water/power cut off, no kitchen, leaking roof, unsafe, fire damaged, built over mineshafts, etc so again FTBs can't buy as they need a mortgage. See it a lot on Homes Under the Hammer - gone to auction because not mortgageable and bought in cash by a multiple landlord.

FairKoala · 03/03/2026 13:32

Badbadbunny · 03/03/2026 11:05

Those homes still exist. Lots of people want to buy but can't afford to, as they're often priced out by landlords, many of whom only buy "bargain basement" properties which would otherwise be bought by people who end up having to rent.

Of course, there's always a "market" for renters, i.e. those who don't want to buy, can't afford to buy, temporarily living in a different town for work, Uni, etc., but a lot of the 12 million renting don't actually want to rent, they want to buy. Fewer landlords hoovering up all the cheaper properties will mean that more people who want to buy to live in them, will be able to do so.

Then why don’t they buy. I don’t get this “priced out by landlords”

The price will be the going asking price.

I have seen places going for under £25,000
I know someone who bought at £10,000

Just how cheap do they need places to be.

FairKoala · 03/03/2026 13:21

hulahoopingtoday · 01/03/2026 19:29

I'm not saying private landlords should entirely not exist. But there should be caps and more regulation around rents, number of properties they can own and so on.

What do you think would happen if there was less landlords than now
Every landlord I know hasn’t sold any properties. They have just changed them to short term rentals.

The whole point is that with every restriction aimed at reducing the number of landlords
we have ended up with less rental properties.

The slum landlords (the ones who all these regulations were going to guard against) are thriving because they take no notice of all the rules and regulations

hulahoopingtoday · 03/03/2026 12:50

let's not forget as well that lots of US corporations and other corporate companies are hoovering up our rental properties as investments. this kind of corporate takeover should be banned. it's not fair, it drives up rental cost, drives down available property to buy, drives up property prices in general, takes money away from the UK, and it makes me so cross!

Badbadbunny · 03/03/2026 11:05

charliehungerford · 01/03/2026 12:44

Totally agree,12 million people live in private rentals. They are going to have to build or somehow acquire over five million homes.

Those homes still exist. Lots of people want to buy but can't afford to, as they're often priced out by landlords, many of whom only buy "bargain basement" properties which would otherwise be bought by people who end up having to rent.

Of course, there's always a "market" for renters, i.e. those who don't want to buy, can't afford to buy, temporarily living in a different town for work, Uni, etc., but a lot of the 12 million renting don't actually want to rent, they want to buy. Fewer landlords hoovering up all the cheaper properties will mean that more people who want to buy to live in them, will be able to do so.

1dayatatime · 03/03/2026 10:52

hulahoopingtoday · 01/03/2026 19:29

I'm not saying private landlords should entirely not exist. But there should be caps and more regulation around rents, number of properties they can own and so on.

Rather than price caps and government controls on rents, how about sticking to basic economics and increase the supply of housing.

Its been shown that rent controls just encourage people to stay put as long as possible, passing the rental contract through to their children.

In Eastern Europe under communism where prices on items were controlled by Government, demand was managed by the ability to queue and wait rather than the ability to afford it.

hulahoopingtoday · 01/03/2026 19:29

Ohyeahitsme · 01/03/2026 18:36

But that doesn't remove the need for private landlords. Buying takes time - where do people live in the interim? You move to a new city for work, how do you know what area you want to buy in? You're doing a significant renovation, where do you live? You need a deposit to buy, where do you live whilst saving up? You need to be in your job for 3+ months before you can get a mortgage, where do you live?

I'm not saying private landlords should entirely not exist. But there should be caps and more regulation around rents, number of properties they can own and so on.

TheDaysAreGettingLongerAtLast · 01/03/2026 19:19

Some of us lived through the boom times created by Reagan and Thatcher which were created by deregulation and privatization. This drove inflation sky-high but drove a temporary rise in living standards and wealth for those who were already on or able to get on the property ladder. Now the elite are squeezing everyone for as much as they can get out of us on everything we buy: food prices are all up significantly, property and rental prices are off the scale, the health service is becoming more and more like the American one with people getting medically unnecessary surgeries ahead of people waiting for life-saving surgery.

All predictable and preventable but no government left or right did right by the public.

Ohyeahitsme · 01/03/2026 18:36

hulahoopingtoday · 01/03/2026 18:29

Part of the reason many people can't afford a home is due to private landlords. It makes it impossible to save up a deposit for many people. The price you pay for rent is often higher than a mortgage, giving people on a low income next to no chance. Add in all the landlords that have multiple properties, taking those away from the market and its a recipe for disaster.

But that doesn't remove the need for private landlords. Buying takes time - where do people live in the interim? You move to a new city for work, how do you know what area you want to buy in? You're doing a significant renovation, where do you live? You need a deposit to buy, where do you live whilst saving up? You need to be in your job for 3+ months before you can get a mortgage, where do you live?

hulahoopingtoday · 01/03/2026 18:29

charliehungerford · 01/03/2026 12:44

Totally agree,12 million people live in private rentals. They are going to have to build or somehow acquire over five million homes.

Part of the reason many people can't afford a home is due to private landlords. It makes it impossible to save up a deposit for many people. The price you pay for rent is often higher than a mortgage, giving people on a low income next to no chance. Add in all the landlords that have multiple properties, taking those away from the market and its a recipe for disaster.

charliehungerford · 01/03/2026 12:44

Ohyeahitsme · 01/03/2026 00:07

Not doesn't. Where on earth will people live? Especially people moving areas for new jobs etc, people leaning uni, starting over after divorce and all the miriad of situations where buying is neither desirable or practical and where they wouldn't be eligible for social housing/ social housing takes too long to access.

Private landlords fulfil a necessary role.

Totally agree,12 million people live in private rentals. They are going to have to build or somehow acquire over five million homes.

TheDaysAreGettingLongerAtLast · 01/03/2026 12:01

Pleasealexa · 28/02/2026 08:29

There are more Catholics than Muslims (including myself) and no one is up in arms about us, and beliefs are very similar to Islam

Can you explain?

Most Catholics in the country are Catholic in name only.

HappyFace2025 · 01/03/2026 10:16

TopPocketFind · 01/03/2026 10:13

You are though

You started a thread on it.

I suggest you re-read my OP then. It was about politics Inthe UK and not about race, as you appear to be implying.

OP posts:
HappyFace2025 · 01/03/2026 10:14

Leftieinthewild · 01/03/2026 09:37

And if they live in a party of Britain where English isn't spoken?

Where in Britain is English not spoken other than Wales where I have extended Welsh family who speak both languages.

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 01/03/2026 10:13

HappyFace2025 · 01/03/2026 10:11

For heavens sake. I am not pointing the finger at anyone in particular!

You are though

You started a thread on it.

HappyFace2025 · 01/03/2026 10:11

TopPocketFind · 01/03/2026 10:09

That is far fetched nonsense.

Tell us what you really mean with people who don't speak English

For heavens sake. I am not pointing the finger at anyone in particular!

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 01/03/2026 10:09

HappyFace2025 · 01/03/2026 09:49

But there is no English language test. In any case somebody else(who does speak/write in English) can fill in the form in behalf of an applicant e.g. when it's online.

That is far fetched nonsense.

Tell us what you really mean with people who don't speak English

Alternativelyviewed · 01/03/2026 09:50

When did those rules come in though

PrettyDamnCosmic · 01/03/2026 09:50

peanutbuttertoasty · 01/03/2026 09:45

I looked it up yesterday and to get British citizenship you apparently need to be able to demonstrate that you can speak English, so in theory you cannot vote if you cannot speak English (as it should be)

To acquire British citizenship by naturalisation you need to be able to demonstrate that you can read, write & speak English. If you are British by birth there is no such requirement.

HappyFace2025 · 01/03/2026 09:49

TopPocketFind · 01/03/2026 09:41

The British Citizen test is in English, so they will be speaking English.

Or is that not what you meant?

But there is no English language test. In any case somebody else(who does speak/write in English) can fill in the form in behalf of an applicant e.g. when it's online.

OP posts:
peanutbuttertoasty · 01/03/2026 09:45

I looked it up yesterday and to get British citizenship you apparently need to be able to demonstrate that you can speak English, so in theory you cannot vote if you cannot speak English (as it should be)

TopPocketFind · 01/03/2026 09:41

HappyFace2025 · 01/03/2026 09:31

Unlike France, for example where you do need to speak French. I personally think that anyone wishing to become a British citizen should be able to speak English.

The British Citizen test is in English, so they will be speaking English.

Or is that not what you meant?