Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Cristopher Colombia in primary school curriculum

212 replies

Donotfitin · 24/02/2026 17:24

So the school just sent the curriculum
for my DS year (Y1). They called him a “significant explorer”. I immediately queried it, because as a Latin American he’s seen as a very divisive figure who brought rape, disease, and genocide. In my country (Mexico) we’ve completely removed that date from
our calendar, and the statues, etc… have now been removed.

I‘m not against it, but I just want a nuanced approach. So AIBU?

OP posts:
Shitmonger · 24/02/2026 19:13

Cherrysoup · 24/02/2026 17:29

Yanbu. He was geographically incompetent, claimed he had landed in India when he was in South America, had slaves and treated them extremely poorly. I don’t get the (north) American obsession with him.

What will be taught about him? I would not be happy with him being seen as a ‘significant’ explorer when there were other far more competent explorers at the time.

What North American obsession? American children are taught that he was a horrible coloniser that spread disease and destruction in his path. In fact for decades now the curriculum in the US has focused on the horrors of colonialism against the indigenous people. My American cousins talked about it when they were in school.

Freeasparagus · 24/02/2026 19:10

They should teach them about him honestly, a kid friendly level obviously, but they can’t ignore that he existed.

Coffeeandbooks88 · 24/02/2026 19:10

Appleday11 · 24/02/2026 19:03

History books are all corrupt. Several countries change and whitewash history to make themselves look better. As they say, history books are usually written by people to hide what happened and make themselves look better

I mean the UK invading Ireland was a HUGE part of recent history, but if I ask people in England about it, most people arent even aware of what happened. Because its been whitewashed out of history classes.

I see a Palestinian youtuber talk to Israelis on tiktok about the conflict there. Every single young Israeli that he talks to has a completely wrong idea of what happened. They are taught at a young age that Israel is completely innocent and Palestinians are the wrong ones. Its a lot more nuances than that

Edited

You mean the Normans? The UK didn't exist at that point.

NoSoupForU · 24/02/2026 19:09

But he was a significant explorer. That doesn't mean he was a good person or wasn't controversial. It also doesn't mean that his exploration and discoveries were all positive.

Edited because I wanted to add that you can ask to see curriculum content and can give your opinion on how it is presented, especially if how it is presented is disrespectful towards your son's heritage.

Coffeeandbooks88 · 24/02/2026 19:08

loislovesstewie · 24/02/2026 18:56

Actually they probably weren't wiped out. Various peoples might have suffered from the effects of the climate changes or illness, but some would have probably survived. The Beaker People came from Europe but the British Isles weren't empty. The population was very small in any case and interbreeding would have been quite normal. A dig near Swindon found Neanderthal DNA in bones found there which showed that they weren't wiped out but probably interbred with the new peoples who arrived.

Edited

I read somewhere that when the Beaker people came they bought disease and almost wiped out the Neolithic population of Britain through disease and probably warfare. We are all mainly descended from the Beaker people than populations before that.

Duejuly26 · 24/02/2026 19:08

We taught about Christopher Columbus in y3 and it actually encouraged some of the best debates I’ve seen in a y3 classroom. We taught about all aspects of Christopher Columbus and ended with a debate of ‘Was he a hero or a villain?’
I think with all aspects of history it’s important to look at everyone’s perspectives!

JHound · 24/02/2026 19:06

Donotfitin · 24/02/2026 17:24

So the school just sent the curriculum
for my DS year (Y1). They called him a “significant explorer”. I immediately queried it, because as a Latin American he’s seen as a very divisive figure who brought rape, disease, and genocide. In my country (Mexico) we’ve completely removed that date from
our calendar, and the statues, etc… have now been removed.

I‘m not against it, but I just want a nuanced approach. So AIBU?

Yes - I support you saying they should teach about him, warts and all or not at all.

The European conquest of the Americas can be described as one of the biggest genocides in human history and he was instrumental in that. They will likely sanitise it though.

Donotfitin · 24/02/2026 19:05

ThisDandyWriter · 24/02/2026 18:47

When the education department set out the U.K. curriculum, they probably didn’t realise your son would be in a classroom somewhere in England.

do you honestly think your school should change the whole syllabus just because your son attends the school? How entitled.

No I asked to query it and offered to help teach a much more nuanced approach.

OP posts:
Createausername1970 · 24/02/2026 19:03

TheGoddessAthena · 24/02/2026 17:26

Maybe they'll teach the kids to spell his name?

🤣🤣🤣🤣👍

Appleday11 · 24/02/2026 19:03

History books are all corrupt. Several countries change and whitewash history to make themselves look better. As they say, history books are usually written by people to hide what happened and make themselves look better

I mean the UK invading Ireland was a HUGE part of recent history, but if I ask people in England about it, most people arent even aware of what happened. Because its been whitewashed out of history classes.

I see a Palestinian youtuber talk to Israelis on tiktok about the conflict there. Every single young Israeli that he talks to has a completely wrong idea of what happened. They are taught at a young age that Israel is completely innocent and Palestinians are the wrong ones. Its a lot more nuances than that

MadKeepsake · 24/02/2026 18:59

Dollymylove · 24/02/2026 17:58

I think there is enough virtue signalling in schools already. Sanitising everything so nobody gets offended.
No wonder the country is in such a mess!!

Read your post through again, and blush.

You’re not in the least unreasonable, OP. I was very clear with DS and his teachers that the version of Oliver Cromwell he encountered in the English school system wouldn’t be the one who was responsible for the massacre of thousands of civilians in Drogheda and Wexford, a war criminal who ran a campaign of ethnic cleansing.

PinkyFlamingo · 24/02/2026 18:59

Moreteanow · 24/02/2026 17:31

So unnecessary 🙄

But funny 😂

Squirrelsnut · 24/02/2026 18:58

I've taught history for many years. The 'civilising white Europeans' version hasn't been predominant for decades.

grammargran · 24/02/2026 18:58

AWedgeOfLemonAndASmartAnswerForEverything · 24/02/2026 17:36

Yes he is, but when we learned about him and the other conquistadors, other than a tossed-in reference to small pox, the teaching was very biased in favour of them being heroic explorers. Colonialism is a very, very complex subject.

And very unlikely they are going to be talking about rape and genocide to Y1s. OP I think you are right to query this.

Moonmelodies · 24/02/2026 18:57

Everydayimhuffling · 24/02/2026 18:02

He was a child rapist and slaver. You are absolutely not being unreasonable. The thing is, they can't talk about what he did with nuance with that age group, so he shouldn't be taught about to that age group.

Same with Muhammad?

loislovesstewie · 24/02/2026 18:56

Coffeeandbooks88 · 24/02/2026 18:30

They were wiped out before the Romans and probably before the Celts. People seem to forget the Celts were immigrants/invaders.

Edited

Actually they probably weren't wiped out. Various peoples might have suffered from the effects of the climate changes or illness, but some would have probably survived. The Beaker People came from Europe but the British Isles weren't empty. The population was very small in any case and interbreeding would have been quite normal. A dig near Swindon found Neanderthal DNA in bones found there which showed that they weren't wiped out but probably interbred with the new peoples who arrived.

SophieJo · 24/02/2026 18:56

MushMonster · 24/02/2026 17:36

He was an explorer. The colinising came just behind him.
I get that you do not celebrate the date and of course I agree that colinisation and empires were a horrible thing that has left us with a world to fix.
But I would not be tempted to go into a school in another country telling them how to tell a part of history. Neither I would accept someone just attempting to change the curriculum to present it their way. As it stands today, they are likely to speak about the facts of it and talk about the social consequences of it, from all angles. So the suffering you refer to will be covered. It is likely to be very nuanced, as this is how our society sees it today.

Totally agree, great comment.

Smartiepants79 · 24/02/2026 18:55

ExtraOnions · 24/02/2026 18:46

Don’t forget to mention Human Sacrifice, Slavery, Ritual Cannibalism, Ritual Skinning, Stoning adulterers, and burning people alive.

All practiced by the Aztecs

Edited

Obviously it would have to be age appropriate 🤨🙄. But a wider understanding of the world is always a good thing. Children can learn that bad things happened on the past. You just have to teach it in the right way.

Pinklightning · 24/02/2026 18:53

Is there any country that doesn’t have a terrible past? I think humanity is ultimately a power hunting shitshow of greed. Always has been and always will be.

SixteenFortyeight · 24/02/2026 18:51

Talipesmum · 24/02/2026 17:59

Here’s the transcript from the bbc bitesize ks1 history video on Christopher Columbus:
***

Today we know what the world looks like. We've taken pictures of it from space!
^^
We know there are many countries, some far away, and that there are lots of different people. But for thousands of years people didn’t know this.
It was only when explorers travelled to new places that they met each other.
^^
One of the most famous explorers was Christopher Columbus. He lived over 500 years ago.
Columbus wanted to travel to China and India, countries known as ‘The Indies’ which were full of wealth.

The Indies were in the east, but Columbus thought it would be quicker to go west, around the world.
It was a journey into the unknown and would cost a lot of money.

The King of Spain paid for three ships. The Pinta, the Niña and the Santa Maria.

In 1492, Columbus set sail. A few months later, the crew spotted land. Columbus thought he had reached the Indies. But he was wrong! He'd found a part of the world new to Europeans.

Columbus became famous as the man who discovered new lands called the Americas.
The King of Spain was happy, but the discovery was bad for people already living there.
**
Spain sent soldiers to take over these new lands. They took the people's treasures, like gold. Spain became very rich.
**
The locals were treated cruelly, some taken as slaves. Many died because of diseases brought from Spain.
**
Today people disagree about Columbus. Some say he was a brave hero. Others say his discovery caused misery for the people where he travelled.
One thing we can say for certain is that finding the continent of America was a huge event for Europeans, and that is down to Christopher Columbus.

Thank you for posting this. We teach John Cabot as an explorer along a similar narrative. It is possible to talk openly about injustice and colonialism with young children.

ThisDandyWriter · 24/02/2026 18:47

Donotfitin · 24/02/2026 17:55

No, I’m not saying they should not teach about that time in history, just that it should be a nuanced one from all angles. Especially when it’s the heritage of one of their students.

When the education department set out the U.K. curriculum, they probably didn’t realise your son would be in a classroom somewhere in England.

do you honestly think your school should change the whole syllabus just because your son attends the school? How entitled.

ExtraOnions · 24/02/2026 18:46

Smartiepants79 · 24/02/2026 18:40

You could offer to go into school and speak to the class about how he impacted your home country and teach them bait how life in Mexico was before he arrived while your at it. My school would welcome this. It would help present the more nuanced and rounded view that would be much better.

Don’t forget to mention Human Sacrifice, Slavery, Ritual Cannibalism, Ritual Skinning, Stoning adulterers, and burning people alive.

All practiced by the Aztecs

Smartiepants79 · 24/02/2026 18:40

You could offer to go into school and speak to the class about how he impacted your home country and teach them bait how life in Mexico was before he arrived while your at it. My school would welcome this. It would help present the more nuanced and rounded view that would be much better.

AlastheDaffodils · 24/02/2026 18:40

Sskka · 24/02/2026 18:19

Are there indigenous people here though?

Edited

I find the attitude that “other countries had indigenous people but European countries surely never did” odd and I’m really curious to know why people think it.

Is it because we’re used to seeing Europeans as oppressors? Or because we want to emphasise the “our country has always been a melting pot of different immigrant groups” angle?

Of course there were indigenous people in Britain. That doesn’t mean they were in the “original” people. There is no one indigenous group, it just means the group who were here before the next wave of arrivals.

Different waves of people have reached Britain at different times and until the early modern period they mostly tried to massacre large parts of the existing population when they did so. The Saxons were just as oppressed by the Normans as the Maya were by the Spanish (with the possible exception of the smallpox angle).

If you have any British heritage you are almost certainly descended from both oppressors and victims, over multiple waves of invasion and violence. The same is true of just about every country on earth.

Hiptothisjive · 24/02/2026 18:37

Just to pile on - the song Swing Low is a slave song and talks about slave suffering. It is offensive that it is the song for English Rugby. Every time I hear it here I cringe - it works both ways.

Swipe left for the next trending thread