Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think John Davidson and BAFTA owe an apology

907 replies

notaurewhatusername · 23/02/2026 20:10

I have sympathy for anyone with Tourette’s. I genuinely do. It’s a difficult condition and I’m not for one second suggesting John Davidson is a bad person or that he chose to say what he said. But sympathy for a condition doesn’t mean the impact on others gets ignored.

Intent matters but so does impact. If I accidentally stand on someone’s foot I still say sorry, even though I didn’t mean to do it. “I didn’t mean it” and “I acknowledge I hurt you” are not mutually exclusive. I wouldn’t get annoyed at the suggestion of apologising simply because I didn’t mean it, so why is this different? Especially as it was a public stage in front of millions. I don’t expect John to apologise every day in normal interactions, but at such a public forum - he should. Michael B Jordan looked visibly devastated. It was so sad.

When he saw two Black men and the n-word came out — not H**ky at the white hosts for example, not some other neutral word, the n-word directed at Black people in the room — that caused real harm to real people. Tourette’s tics are shaped by what the brain reaches for as most “forbidden” in a given moment, and what it reached for when he saw two Black men was a racial slur aimed at them. That raises really uncomfortable questions about unconscious bias that most people would rather sidestep entirely.

It doesn’t make him a conscious racist. But it does make it a conversation worth having, because our unconscious associations don’t come from nowhere — they’re shaped by everything we’ve absorbed over a lifetime. That connotation being the first place his brain went is something that deserves acknowledgement, not just a pass because of the diagnosis. And as a POC, I have to be honest — this is heartbreaking. Not just the incident itself but what it represents.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve tried to explain to white friends and colleagues that certain spaces feel uncomfortable, that you notice the stares, that you carry this constant low level awareness of how you might be being perceived. And so often the response is “you’re imagining it” or “you’re being too sensitive.” You get gaslit into doubting your own lived experience. Well — moments like this are exactly why it isn’t in our heads. This is the reality POC navigate every single day. Always on alert. Always doing that mental calculation of whether someone is judging you for the colour of your skin. That emotional labour is exhausting and largely invisible to people who’ve never had to carry it.

John thanking the audience for their “understanding” puts the burden entirely on those who were hurt to just get over it. That’s not the same as acknowledging the pain caused. AIBU to think a bit more than “thanks for understanding” was needed here — from both of them?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
SlipperStar · 25/02/2026 11:52

Gloriia · 25/02/2026 11:47

There was a family at school with a dc with sen, they had very loud but not offensive tics. They didn't take them to school shows, not because anyone complained but out of consideration for other people who were watching.

They took their dc to sports days, fayres, school trips so they're weren't isolated or excluded but when there are performances or speeches it is absolutely not rocket science for anyone with verbal tics to sit it out.

No

They kept them away from bigots like you who would have tutted and made comments and told them they weren't welcome

That's not the same

Gloriia · 25/02/2026 11:51

SlipperStar · 25/02/2026 11:47

"Hide the disabled people"

That's what you are saying

People can take offence at anything without intent

That's not the fault of the person who said it

Abuse also requires intent

I have a disabled relative. We don't hide them.

Abuse does not require Intent. People are allowed to be upset and offended even if the person can't help it. All feelings are valid.

mollypuss1 · 25/02/2026 11:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You want people with ‘Alzheimers, those with schizophrenia, personality disorders etc.’ to ‘demonstrate awareness’? What a ridiculous thing to say.

I don’t believe, from your post above, that you are ‘all for inclusivity’, what you are for is inclusivity as long as it doesn’t affect you or make you uncomfortable. So let’s just include the less ‘troublesome’ disabled people and then you can pat yourself on the back and tell yourself what a good person you are while those with more socially inappropriate disabilities are excluded as they should know their limitations.

John doesn’t need to integrate in the community, he is a part of the community no matter how uncomfortable that may make you. Your choice to be offended by a word does not trump his right to exist in the community.

RonniePickering · 25/02/2026 11:51

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:49

Yes. It's apparently inclusive and serves as a great teaching moment.

My God 😞

IHateWasps · 25/02/2026 11:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It is staggeringly ignorant and breathtakingly offensive to suggest that John should not have attended an awards ceremony because of his disability especially when one of the films being celebrated was about his own life and was intended to raise awareness of Tourettes.

He absolutely deserved to be there and yes it might be appropriate, if it wouldn’t cause great distress to them, for someone with dementia to be present.

John lives with this condition every day. If he had to completely avoid any possibility of causing offence he’d literally be unable to leave the house. Do you really expect him to be hidden away for the rest of his life or is it just Hollywood that he can’t offend?

I do think that it should have been handled better by the BAFTAs and BBC. Microphones should have been kept away from John, there should have been a more detailed briefing for all attendees and the offensive words should have been edited out and someone from the BAFTAs should have talked with Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lincoln afterwards. Other precautions could possibly have also been taken but the man cannot hide away for the rest of his life ir even “just” when others feel it is appropriate and yes I do think that intent matters even while acknowledging how hurtful and indeed devastating it can be to hear the N word regardless of context.

SpaceRaccoon · 25/02/2026 11:50

Having read John's interview, it seems that he assumed there would be no live microphones near him, and that people on stage would definitely not have heard his tics - it was seeing them react that then made him realise that wasn't the case, and leave the room.

He's been so let down by that - something as simple as not having a microphone near him. I can't imagine how utterly awful he would have felt realising that his tics were so audible.

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:49

RonniePickering · 25/02/2026 11:47

Are people actually arguing that the slur should have been left in the broadcast?!
That is bizarre. Obviously JD couldn't help it due to his condition, but why upset people further by leaving it in?

Yes. It's apparently inclusive and serves as a great teaching moment.

RonniePickering · 25/02/2026 11:47

Are people actually arguing that the slur should have been left in the broadcast?!
That is bizarre. Obviously JD couldn't help it due to his condition, but why upset people further by leaving it in?

Gloriia · 25/02/2026 11:47

There was a family at school with a dc with sen, they had very loud but not offensive tics. They didn't take them to school shows, not because anyone complained but out of consideration for other people who were watching.

They took their dc to sports days, fayres, school trips so they're weren't isolated or excluded but when there are performances or speeches it is absolutely not rocket science for anyone with verbal tics to sit it out.

SlipperStar · 25/02/2026 11:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

"Hide the disabled people"

That's what you are saying

People can take offence at anything without intent

That's not the fault of the person who said it

Abuse also requires intent

SpaceRaccoon · 25/02/2026 11:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Hear that? Know your limitations, anyone suffering from a neurological condition. Stay home lest you offend anyone. Even if an event is partially about a film about your life, you have no place there. The reality of your condition is too gross and offensive.

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:46

SlipperStar · 25/02/2026 11:45

And you've had at least one comment hidden now...

Yes, I have just noticed. I will be pursuing it.

SlipperStar · 25/02/2026 11:45

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:14

Exactly why you should report me. We all know how anti-racist MN is 😅

And you've had at least one comment hidden now...

SlipperStar · 25/02/2026 11:45

mollypuss1 · 25/02/2026 11:16

“Report me because I won’t stop being racist” is an unusual stance to take.

I honestly don't know what their point is any more

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:43

Oh, my response sharing what a Black Tourette's sufferer has to say has been hidden, maybe because of my "reverse racism" in only listening to PoC on this. To summarise, she shares my views on editing the slurs out, but not attacking JD. Maybe she be racist.

@MN care to explain why? I will be fighting this all the way.

Ukefluke · 25/02/2026 11:42

I await apologies from those driving a hate campaign against a disbled man.

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:37

This reply has been hidden

This reply has been hidden until the MNHQ team can have a look at it.

Gloriia · 25/02/2026 11:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Auroraloves · 25/02/2026 11:31

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:24

Saw two. They said the slur should be edited out and JD not attacked or made to apologise any further. Exactly what I have said. Anything different?

The main theme was that they realise that the word did not come from a place of hatred, I wish people like Jamie Foxx could have taken this common sense, well informed view before absolutely ruining this poor man

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:24

Auroraloves · 25/02/2026 11:22

Indeed, I’ve watched a couple of videos from Tourette’s sufferers who were also black. They spoke very sensibly on the topic

Saw two. They said the slur should be edited out and JD not attacked or made to apologise any further. Exactly what I have said. Anything different?

Auroraloves · 25/02/2026 11:22

mollypuss1 · 25/02/2026 11:09

You are not an ‘us’

You do not get to decide how all POC feel

You only get to decide how you feel, no one else

POC do not all feel the same way

Indeed, I’ve watched a couple of videos from Tourette’s sufferers who were also black. They spoke very sensibly on the topic

mollypuss1 · 25/02/2026 11:19

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:16

Wrong. @DotAndCarryOne2 has told me I am being deeply uninclusive if I edit any future slurs.

That’s her opinion.

Where did she tell you that you couldn’t do that? That would be telling you how to run your events

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:18

mollypuss1 · 25/02/2026 11:16

“Report me because I won’t stop being racist” is an unusual stance to take.

Perhaps. I won't though.

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:16

mollypuss1 · 25/02/2026 11:13

And no one has.

Wrong. @DotAndCarryOne2 has told me I am being deeply uninclusive if I edit any future slurs.

mollypuss1 · 25/02/2026 11:16

CharlotteRumpling · 25/02/2026 11:14

Exactly why you should report me. We all know how anti-racist MN is 😅

“Report me because I won’t stop being racist” is an unusual stance to take.