Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Queen Elizabeth's legacy is going to be seriously harmed by this?

216 replies

Gymnopedie · 19/02/2026 18:45

I mean I doubt he bounded into the palace shouting 'you'll never guess what I did last week'. He will massively have played down the extent of his friendship with Epstein and may even at times have lied about where he was when he was away. It seems his protection officers have some serious questions to answer around this. I doubt anyone in the RF had anything like the full picture. But QE stood by him and I can't see her coming out of this well.

OP posts:
PaperTyger · 19/02/2026 22:25

Yes , Liz and Phil .
But really we don't know what their values were.

Gymnopedie · 19/02/2026 22:24

Catza · 19/02/2026 21:56

Yes, actually, it is. I don't know how much more needs to be said. Here is an adult male (allegedly) committing a crime and instead of focusing on that, the poster choses to blame his mother.
It's absurd that we are even doing that. I don't know what else is to be said on the subject...

@Catza

If what you took from my OP was that I was blaming the Queen for what Andrew did, you read it wrong. That was all on him. My thread is about how she reacted to what he did and to what she knew of what he did. And if it turns out that she shielded him, that she knew what he was doing and had it hushed up, or was in any other way complicit, then yes that is her fault and yes I would blame her.

OP posts:
Cheese55 · 19/02/2026 22:23

havingoneofthosedays · 19/02/2026 22:19

So many mums on here who would protect their ‘little prince’ see it daily on MN

She was trying to keep up the illusion of propriety to keep their position and money safe. She was not that interested in her children

havingoneofthosedays · 19/02/2026 22:19

So many mums on here who would protect their ‘little prince’ see it daily on MN

Cheese55 · 19/02/2026 22:19

I dont think they operate like normal families. They only see each other by appointment and live in separate wings . Its not like they have dinner together and discuss their day.

Elizabethandfour · 19/02/2026 22:14

They are all like that. The ultimate nepo babies with no redeeming qualities. Andrew is the patsy because he got caught. It’s no coincidence that Charles was best friends with Jimmy Saville and his favourite uncle was also a horrific satanic child abuser. I just don’t get the pearl clutching for this horrible, evil family. What more do they have to do? Diana tried in fairness. The only decent one of the entire, rotten lot.

Cheese55 · 19/02/2026 22:12

SnowyRock · 19/02/2026 22:05

I dont think she is to blame. I think its potentially another an interesting picture into the nature vs nurture aspect of a psychopath though.
In an upbringing intended and rigidly planned to teach morals and empathy, out of the 4 children it was the one most doted on who developed those traits.

I think she was largely indifferent towards her children. Had them as a duty. She kept him close because she thought that would make people look the other way when he started going 'to parties'.

sprigatito · 19/02/2026 22:11

BIossomtoes · 19/02/2026 22:00

I hope some of you don’t have kids who turn out to be wrong uns.

I hope not too - but if it happens, I solemnly swear not to pay £12m in hush money to the trafficked woman my son used and discarded 👍

Brefugee · 19/02/2026 22:08

nobody is saying she is to blame that her son is a bad 'un.
They are saying that when she knew - latest when she fronted the 12 million quid - she should have come clean and cut him and his family loose.

SnowyRock · 19/02/2026 22:05

I dont think she is to blame. I think its potentially another an interesting picture into the nature vs nurture aspect of a psychopath though.
In an upbringing intended and rigidly planned to teach morals and empathy, out of the 4 children it was the one most doted on who developed those traits.

Cheese55 · 19/02/2026 22:01

Ihatethistimeline · 19/02/2026 20:53

Do people really think Her Majesty had access to less information than those who worked in Her Majesty’s Secret Service?!!

They didn't actually have team meetings with her.

BIossomtoes · 19/02/2026 22:00

I hope some of you don’t have kids who turn out to be wrong uns.

Catza · 19/02/2026 21:56

YourGreenCat · 19/02/2026 20:32

it's that the best you could find, really?

Yes, actually, it is. I don't know how much more needs to be said. Here is an adult male (allegedly) committing a crime and instead of focusing on that, the poster choses to blame his mother.
It's absurd that we are even doing that. I don't know what else is to be said on the subject...

Brefugee · 19/02/2026 21:46

ElizaMulvil · 19/02/2026 21:28

Dad Philip and Andrew? You can see the problem. Whoever thought it a good idea marrying Princess Elizabeth into a family of Nazi sympathisers ie Philip's Aunt (member of the Nazi party, his sisters married to officers in the German Nazi army.) Mind you her Uncle, the brief King, was politically little better I guess.

Plus it was all round Fleet Street at the time of the Christine Keeler, Mandy R D scandal that Philip was involved but no one was to mention it. I expect the fact that his Will is to remain secret ( for 100 years is it? after his death), tells us there's lots of unsavoury business we've not to know about.

well clearly Philip wasn't his sisters was he? and he served in the British navy during the war so clearly he wasn't a huge fan of the Nazis.

MidWayThruJanuary · 19/02/2026 21:40

In fact Charles thought so highly of van der Post that he is one of William’s godfathers.

WaryHiker · 19/02/2026 21:39

BlueJuniper94 · 19/02/2026 19:10

As much as I was to see these disgusting men locked away for life - I don't want to see it used as a reason to get rid of the monarchy as head of state. Who else could do it? Have an elected one and you'll have Nigel Farage or Rupert Lowe before you can blink.

Had Charles suffered a scuba diving accident, you'd have had Andrew. That's no kind of argument at all.

FiatLuxAdAstra · 19/02/2026 21:37

TheMorgenmuffel · 19/02/2026 21:24

Theres absolutely no way the palace was not and is not fully aware of everything that goes on.

The country's got intelligence services, spies and all sorts and we're supposed to believe they don't know everything that's happening?

Yes but how much would “the palace” tell a doddering 82 yr old?

RainbowBagels · 19/02/2026 21:37

MrsLizzieDarcy · 19/02/2026 21:37

In terms of damaging the RF reputation, yes Harry is little better.

Harry and Andrew have both bitten the hand that feeds them.

Oh come on! 😂

MrsLizzieDarcy · 19/02/2026 21:37

In terms of damaging the RF reputation, yes Harry is little better.

Harry and Andrew have both bitten the hand that feeds them.

MidWayThruJanuary · 19/02/2026 21:33

@MrsLizzieDarcy
Do you really think what Harry has done equates to what Andrew has done?
What are your thoughts on that revered father figure - Louis Mountbatten, the serial child rapist? Or Charles defending the paedophile bishop Peter Ball? Or his relationship with Laurens van der Post - who fathered a child with a 14 year old?
Do you not think that Charles should be bounced into the stratosphere too?

ElizaMulvil · 19/02/2026 21:28

Dad Philip and Andrew? You can see the problem. Whoever thought it a good idea marrying Princess Elizabeth into a family of Nazi sympathisers ie Philip's Aunt (member of the Nazi party, his sisters married to officers in the German Nazi army.) Mind you her Uncle, the brief King, was politically little better I guess.

Plus it was all round Fleet Street at the time of the Christine Keeler, Mandy R D scandal that Philip was involved but no one was to mention it. I expect the fact that his Will is to remain secret ( for 100 years is it? after his death), tells us there's lots of unsavoury business we've not to know about.

TheMorgenmuffel · 19/02/2026 21:24

Theres absolutely no way the palace was not and is not fully aware of everything that goes on.

The country's got intelligence services, spies and all sorts and we're supposed to believe they don't know everything that's happening?

MrsLizzieDarcy · 19/02/2026 21:21

It's incredibly naive to think that the late Queen didn't know what he was up to. These people are followed 24/7 with security detail. There would have been tabs on him at all times.

I don't think that the RF have really cottoned on to how damaging all this is to them. You've got 2 spares who have behaved appalling but are still in the line of succession. The only way that Charles/William stand a prayer of protecting the Monarchy is to bounce these two entitled prats into the stratosphere and remove them publicly from any relationship with the RF. And fast.

FiatLuxAdAstra · 19/02/2026 21:15

Ihatethistimeline · 19/02/2026 20:53

Do people really think Her Majesty had access to less information than those who worked in Her Majesty’s Secret Service?!!

Yes absolutely. There is not a cats chance in hell that she could know everything that the entire secret service knew.

RainbowBagels · 19/02/2026 21:14

MoFadaCromulent · 19/02/2026 20:00

That's fair enough tbf and I'd be the same, but I'd know the price was my reputation and moral principles, which is a price I'd happily pay for my kid, but it's absolutely fair game for the criticism to follow particularly when you're part of the ruling elite who's family talk of service to the country and have been gifted a life of luxury from their subjects.

Well quite. She was a mother but also head of state. She had a duty to the country to at least make sure her kids were accountable. She didn't. She made sure Andrew didn't have to be accountable for anything he did. She was also Charles' mother, knew he would have to take over and has left him in the shit.

Swipe left for the next trending thread