Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Queen Elizabeth's legacy is going to be seriously harmed by this?

216 replies

Gymnopedie · 19/02/2026 18:45

I mean I doubt he bounded into the palace shouting 'you'll never guess what I did last week'. He will massively have played down the extent of his friendship with Epstein and may even at times have lied about where he was when he was away. It seems his protection officers have some serious questions to answer around this. I doubt anyone in the RF had anything like the full picture. But QE stood by him and I can't see her coming out of this well.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
ThankFuckTheSunIsHere · 25/02/2026 23:13

I mean, she’s dead OP so I’d guess she no longer gives a fuck.

Gallowayan · 25/02/2026 23:09

Catza · 19/02/2026 18:46

Woman's fault again then...

You are talking nonsense.

Monty27 · 25/02/2026 23:04

UnctuousUnicorns · 24/02/2026 15:06

You what now? The D of E is described on the official website as a full time working member of the RF. Well, someone's gotta do now Andy and Harry are off the scene. I'm guessing he just gets on with it. 🤷‍♀️

Sensible guy right? 💁‍♂️

RainbowBagels · 25/02/2026 17:56

Carla786 · 25/02/2026 17:09

Do we know Philip had lots of affairs? Susan Barrantes sounds likely definitely, as do some others.

Be aware, Lownie's planned next biography may be Prince Philip, he has said. But he'd also said it would be very hard as so many documents are hidden away

There have been many rumours. The thing with the sealing of wills etc is that people automatically assume it's for the reasons Royal wills were sealed in the first place-to hide away gifts to lovers and illegitimate children.

Carla786 · 25/02/2026 17:09

Katiesaidthat · 25/02/2026 09:05

The Queen wasn´t a mum like the rest of mums, who can be gaslighted into believing their sons are innocent. She had MI5 and MI6, perfectly capable of writing extensively juicy reports on his activities for her. She either didn´t read them or didn´t think it mattered. After all, uncle Dickie liked those young boys and her husband was shagging left right and centre with this aristocratic friends. So all normal. All men must have their toys.

Edited

Do we know Philip had lots of affairs? Susan Barrantes sounds likely definitely, as do some others.

Be aware, Lownie's planned next biography may be Prince Philip, he has said. But he'd also said it would be very hard as so many documents are hidden away

mbosnz · 25/02/2026 09:46

This is a part of her legacy - just as a part of all parents' legacies is how their kids turn out as a result of their upbringing. He was raised able to be comfortable in the belief that his wealth and position entitled him to do what he wanted to who he wanted, when he wanted, and where he wanted, and there would be no pushback, apparently even more so than the rest of the pack of leeches.

I'm sure she didn't intend this, and would be mortified by the consequences, but that doesn't change the outcome.

Ukisgaslit · 25/02/2026 09:39

@blossomtoes

Shameful remark

Virginia Guiffre will go down in history as a brave individual who ( hopefully ) helped expose a decades long coverup and showed us us who the Windsors really are.

Katiesaidthat · 25/02/2026 09:28

BIossomtoes · 24/02/2026 09:31

That isn’t the point. If he’s subject to the law for one crime, he’s equally subject to it for others. In any event Giuffre’s was a civil case. I thought much less of her when she allowed herself to be bought off.

Actually, I think she just couldn´t take it any more. Walk a few miles in her shoes, and tell us then.

RainbowBagels · 25/02/2026 09:12

Katiesaidthat · 25/02/2026 09:05

The Queen wasn´t a mum like the rest of mums, who can be gaslighted into believing their sons are innocent. She had MI5 and MI6, perfectly capable of writing extensively juicy reports on his activities for her. She either didn´t read them or didn´t think it mattered. After all, uncle Dickie liked those young boys and her husband was shagging left right and centre with this aristocratic friends. So all normal. All men must have their toys.

Edited

I think this is correct. She didnt know because she didnt want to know. All any of them are bothered about is the survival of the Monarchy. If anything risks that then its beyond the pale. Anything else, as long as no one finds out, do what you like.

Katiesaidthat · 25/02/2026 09:05

Snorlaxo · 19/02/2026 19:17

If it’s proven she knew it all then you’re right.

I suspect that she was fed a tiny portion of the truth and she believed it because she loved him and didn’t want to see how rotten he is. My experience of cheaters and liars is that they only admit to what you know and will change their story as more emerges.

I think that there will be more revelations about him and his ex.

Edited

The Queen wasn´t a mum like the rest of mums, who can be gaslighted into believing their sons are innocent. She had MI5 and MI6, perfectly capable of writing extensively juicy reports on his activities for her. She either didn´t read them or didn´t think it mattered. After all, uncle Dickie liked those young boys and her husband was shagging left right and centre with this aristocratic friends. So all normal. All men must have their toys.

JSMill · 25/02/2026 08:59

jessycake · 25/02/2026 08:40

I believe he is a Patsy , absolutely guilty but he is thick and of no use or influence so will take the heat off other very important and influential people .

I agree.

LizzieW1969 · 25/02/2026 08:58

Emotionalsupporttissue · 19/02/2026 22:48

I don't know how much the Queen knew , I'm very close to my family but only know what they choose to tell me about what they're doing. How many people live with their partners and have no idea that they are being cheated on?
But her paying VG off should have made her ask more questions.

I agree with you. I wonder whether QEII only saw what she wanted to see, and believed her son’s denials that he’d done anything wrong? In this, she’d hardly be unusual; some mothers really do have a blind spot where their precious sons are concerned.

It’s also possible that she was kept in the dark about a lot of it. AMW is quite clearly a consummate liar, like a lot of abusers. (My DM had no idea that my F was sexually abusing my DSis and me.)

However, her actions in paying that money to GF (whether £12m or not) appear to suggest that she didn’t really care whether AMW was guilty or not. She intended to protect him and the Monarchy regardless.

Yes it has very much tarnished her reputation and rightly so. And I think the Monarchy is fatally damaged IMO. I suspect it will be abolished eventually.

BIossomtoes · 25/02/2026 08:50

damsela · 25/02/2026 08:50

She was the Matriarch of a Mafia type family IMV, albeit scented with titles and deference instead of bullets and murders to stay top dog.

Cover up and secrecy is their biggest sin now. That will cost them dearly when the floodgates open. Hopefully Parliament will insist on a democracy knowing about the machinations of its Head of State at last.

😂

damsela · 25/02/2026 08:50

She was the Matriarch of a Mafia type family IMV, albeit scented with titles and deference instead of bullets and murders to stay top dog.

Cover up and secrecy is their biggest sin now. That will cost them dearly when the floodgates open. Hopefully Parliament will insist on a democracy knowing about the machinations of its Head of State at last.

greywildocean · 25/02/2026 08:42

KvotheTheBloodless · 25/02/2026 08:09

First rule of misogyny: women are responsible for what men do.

FFS.

She helped cover it up and pay for it!

jessycake · 25/02/2026 08:40

I believe he is a Patsy , absolutely guilty but he is thick and of no use or influence so will take the heat off other very important and influential people .

PeopleLikeColdplayYouCantTrustPeopleJez · 25/02/2026 08:31

Let’s be clear, only Andrew is responsible for all of the terrible things Andrew did. It doesn’t take away from the fact that lady Victoria Pervy is defending him all over the place and insisting that if you’re not mentioned in the Epstein files at all you’re a “loser”. Which is quite the take.

SpottyPott · 25/02/2026 08:20

KvotheTheBloodless · 25/02/2026 08:09

First rule of misogyny: women are responsible for what men do.

FFS.

If you enable them, then yes, you’ve chosen to involve yourself in their BS.

KvotheTheBloodless · 25/02/2026 08:09

First rule of misogyny: women are responsible for what men do.

FFS.

PeopleLikeColdplayYouCantTrustPeopleJez · 25/02/2026 08:09

I think her legacy should be tarnished by this. The rest of the RF can fuck right off. I’ve never been a royalist but at this point chuck the lot of them in the tower as I believe that it wasn’t only the queen who was complicit. Not necessarily in the illegal sense but definitely distracting or attempting to distract everyone else from discussing it.

WhaAMess · 25/02/2026 08:08

BIossomtoes · 25/02/2026 07:52

It was a case in the US Federal Court where the UK legal system was irrelevant. The US legal system that had already successfully prosecuted Epstein and would have welcomed Andrew as the fall guy to take the heat off some American politicians. I can’t respect people whose principles are for sale.

There are certain people with certain views who no one wants the respect of. Yours is one of them. No-one (at least no one with good morals) cares about what you think.

I have the utmost respect for Virginia for speaking out. She had a truly awful childhood and was taken advantage of by many disgusting older men, and at least one woman. After everything she had been through, to have the strength to speak out and try to tell the world about these awful people, she was so brave. Virginia is a key person in bringing all of this to light and I’ll always respect her for that. I only wish she was here to see it.

greywildocean · 25/02/2026 08:04

Pumpkinmagic · 25/02/2026 08:02

Don’t be so absolutely ridiculous. She didn’t permit anything and I’m sure would be horrified at what has come out of she were still alive. His behaviour is inexcusable but he hasn’t been accused of rape or paedophilia. The late Queen Elizabeth wouldn’t have known what he was getting up to.

She helped him pay off his victims with £12 million. She absolutely knew.

Pumpkinmagic · 25/02/2026 08:02

Sparklybutold · 19/02/2026 19:02

Of course she knew, as did the rest of the RF. Queen Elizabeth would have been privy to everything including her son’s paedophilia and rapey tendencies. She would have permitted it because they of course are above everyone else.

Don’t be so absolutely ridiculous. She didn’t permit anything and I’m sure would be horrified at what has come out of she were still alive. His behaviour is inexcusable but he hasn’t been accused of rape or paedophilia. The late Queen Elizabeth wouldn’t have known what he was getting up to.

OwlBeThere · 25/02/2026 07:53

Catza · 19/02/2026 18:46

Woman's fault again then...

It’s her fault she paid off the woman he raped when she was a child, yes.

BIossomtoes · 25/02/2026 07:52

MidWayThruJanuary · 24/02/2026 15:41

@Blossomtoes
How did you expect her to ‘hold out for justice’?! With the entire weight of the legal system of the royal family against her?! The lies, the smears, the corruption- she stood no chance.

It was a case in the US Federal Court where the UK legal system was irrelevant. The US legal system that had already successfully prosecuted Epstein and would have welcomed Andrew as the fall guy to take the heat off some American politicians. I can’t respect people whose principles are for sale.