Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
ChrisMartinsKisskam · 19/02/2026 16:27

Differentforgirls · 19/02/2026 15:54

She raised them all. It’s not just Andrew. The King was buddies with Jimmy Saville and they all loved Lord Mountbatten.
They are a dysfunctional family who live off benefits.

They are scum
you can see it how the government come down so hard on people claiming UC
but the royal family are the biggest scammers there are

scalt · 19/02/2026 16:26

Meanwhile Boris Johnson, Paula Vennels and other criminals who need locking up hope that we forget about them.

LakieLady · 19/02/2026 16:24

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 19/02/2026 12:29

Apparently he was expecting a delivery from Pizza Express and was shocked to find the old bill when the butler answered the door.

I heard he thought the female police officer was a birthday strippergram.

ByLimeDuck · 19/02/2026 16:24

Oh and PS the Lownie book is brilliant. In hindsight it's like reading the Bible.

BeanQuisine · 19/02/2026 16:23

Differentforgirls · 19/02/2026 15:54

She raised them all. It’s not just Andrew. The King was buddies with Jimmy Saville and they all loved Lord Mountbatten.
They are a dysfunctional family who live off benefits.

Chucklehead was also a very close friend of paedophile bishop Peter Ball, who eventually ended up in prison.

Friendship with Prince Charles made paedophile bishop Peter Ball 'impregnable'

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/14/friendship-with-prince-charles-made-paedophile-bishop-peter-ball-impregnable

Friendship with Prince Charles made paedophile bishop Peter Ball 'impregnable'

BBC2 documentary shows how establishment figures rallied round cleric

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/14/friendship-with-prince-charles-made-paedophile-bishop-peter-ball-impregnable

LancashireButterPie · 19/02/2026 16:23

Good, just a shame that it is related to misconduct in public office and not the sexual abuse of young trafficked women.

Also while you are at it, Police officers, why not ask him about the murder of Alisa Dmitrieva, the young woman who's body was found on the Sandringham estate in 2012.

Happyjoe · 19/02/2026 16:23

nicepotoftea · 19/02/2026 16:18

Even just looking at the relationship between Charles and Diana, it was a transactional agreement that took advantage of a very young woman who wasn't in a position to understand what she was consenting to. Perhaps it was a different time, but it doesn't change the nature of what happened.

If Andrew didn't have the moral understanding that what he was doing was wrong, that was due to his upbringing - not because as he claimed he was used to living in a house with servants, but because he was used to other people being unimportant.

I wonder if this is the first time (over whole Epstein affair, not just today) that he's been told 'no'?

OP posts:
ByLimeDuck · 19/02/2026 16:22

LakieLady · 19/02/2026 16:20

I not only read it, but offered to lend it to my very pro-Royal MIL. She didn't want to read it, she said she thought it would be just a load of unfounded muck-raking.

I'm slightly tempted to give her a ring and see if she's still of the same opinion.

I love this. I also have a friend who is very pro monarchy and won't read anything to the contrary but has also never and flatly refuses to watch The Crown on Netflix. She wasn't very impressed with me of an evening when she asked me what I thought of the job the new king was doing and I told her I thought he was a dickhead.

sittingonabeach · 19/02/2026 16:22

Didn't Harry complain about some details in Lownie's book?

Simonjt · 19/02/2026 16:22

VikingLady · 19/02/2026 15:30

You could easily imagine a good lawyer getting him off sex charges by presenting him as an arrogant albeit unsavoury moron who genuinely believed every young woman wanted him because he was a prince, and that these very very clever bad men made up stories about him to set him up as a patsy/smokescreen/fall guy in case of need.

I should say that I don’t believe that, or only partially, but it’s a POV I’ve heard a few times.

So an average solicitor and your average jury in the UK then.

Differentforgirls · 19/02/2026 16:21

nicepotoftea · 19/02/2026 16:18

Even just looking at the relationship between Charles and Diana, it was a transactional agreement that took advantage of a very young woman who wasn't in a position to understand what she was consenting to. Perhaps it was a different time, but it doesn't change the nature of what happened.

If Andrew didn't have the moral understanding that what he was doing was wrong, that was due to his upbringing - not because as he claimed he was used to living in a house with servants, but because he was used to other people being unimportant.

Nutshell.

Happyjoe · 19/02/2026 16:20

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 19/02/2026 16:18

You do know that this has absolutely nothing to do with him and any girls that may/not have been involved????

This is purely about sharing privileged market and financial information.

Surprised Mandy is still wandering around. Is his birthday coming up soon??

Yes, of course I know, I can read!
If you'd read other posts by me, you can also see where I said that while I would rather it was all investigated, I am happy for now with this. Better than nothing.

OP posts:
sittingonabeach · 19/02/2026 16:20

@nicepotoftea Diana's family were as complicit as RF.

LakieLady · 19/02/2026 16:20

MenoMenace · 19/02/2026 12:00

Did anyone read the Andrew Lownie book Entitled? Defo worth a read to understand the awful nature of both Andrew & Fergie. Looks like he might have loads more fodder for a second book now!

I not only read it, but offered to lend it to my very pro-Royal MIL. She didn't want to read it, she said she thought it would be just a load of unfounded muck-raking.

I'm slightly tempted to give her a ring and see if she's still of the same opinion.

Differentforgirls · 19/02/2026 16:19

ByLimeDuck · 19/02/2026 16:18

Agreed. I will never understand why people hate Meghan and Harry so much for escaping from them. It's almost as if they cannot bear the thought of anyone in the royal family doing anything wrong.

Same!

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 19/02/2026 16:18

Happyjoe · 19/02/2026 10:11

Yes, finally, did take a while though.
I heard one of the victims (bbc news) when Andrew was stripped of title/chucked out that they wish American was treating it as serious as the UK.

Edited

You do know that this has absolutely nothing to do with him and any girls that may/not have been involved????

This is purely about sharing privileged market and financial information.

Surprised Mandy is still wandering around. Is his birthday coming up soon??

nicepotoftea · 19/02/2026 16:18

Differentforgirls · 19/02/2026 15:54

She raised them all. It’s not just Andrew. The King was buddies with Jimmy Saville and they all loved Lord Mountbatten.
They are a dysfunctional family who live off benefits.

Even just looking at the relationship between Charles and Diana, it was a transactional agreement that took advantage of a very young woman who wasn't in a position to understand what she was consenting to. Perhaps it was a different time, but it doesn't change the nature of what happened.

If Andrew didn't have the moral understanding that what he was doing was wrong, that was due to his upbringing - not because as he claimed he was used to living in a house with servants, but because he was used to other people being unimportant.

ByLimeDuck · 19/02/2026 16:18

Differentforgirls · 19/02/2026 16:16

Remember years ago when he was called “Randy Andy”? People thought it was hilarious. Not so funny now is it? His family are parasites imo and I will never understand the worship of a very dysfunctional family.

Agreed. I will never understand why people hate Meghan and Harry so much for escaping from them. It's almost as if they cannot bear the thought of anyone in the royal family doing anything wrong.

Differentforgirls · 19/02/2026 16:16

Remember years ago when he was called “Randy Andy”? People thought it was hilarious. Not so funny now is it? His family are parasites imo and I will never understand the worship of a very dysfunctional family.

SerendipityJane · 19/02/2026 16:14

Lifeomars · 19/02/2026 16:10

I used to work in a custody suite (drugs worker, not police) and am very familiar with the booking in and subsequent processes and it is amusing me to think of Andrew at the desk; He's been there a fair while so will no doubt have been offered a mircowaved meal and a few machine brewed hot drinks. Hot chocolate was always popular with detainees. It would make a fab episode of 24 hours in Police Custody

Fingerprints and DNA taken too.

aquashiv · 19/02/2026 16:14

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TheGander · 19/02/2026 16:13

Cross post with Lifeomars!

Allseeingallknowing · 19/02/2026 16:13

girliepop · 19/02/2026 15:13

In my mind it went down like this:

”get down on the fucking floor!!! 🔫 Taser taser taser!!!!!!” ⚡️

To which Andrew replied Taser-Sir!

Differentforgirls · 19/02/2026 16:12

SerendipityJane · 19/02/2026 16:09

They are a dysfunctional family who live off benefits.

Odd. I'm sure they'd have more than £16,000 in their accounts.

Still benefits.

TheGander · 19/02/2026 16:12

Shame he wasn’t arrested in Bedfordshire. It would have made an interesting episode of 24 hours in police custody.

Swipe left for the next trending thread