Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
11
Theda13 · 23/02/2026 17:53

Mandelson has just been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office. I wonder how this will turn out…

TheignT · 21/02/2026 12:47

ImPamDoove · 21/02/2026 12:41

I love that he was known as The Cunt. 😂 I’d love to know the nicknames for the rest of them.

Police officers are often disrespectful with dark humour much in evidence. It can sound bad if you aren't used to it. It doesn't necessarily mean much. I've known officers say similar about senior officers, it's almost expected.

ImPamDoove · 21/02/2026 12:41

I love that he was known as The Cunt. 😂 I’d love to know the nicknames for the rest of them.

DuncinToffee · 21/02/2026 11:26

Just listen to what Andrew’s nickname was amongst royal protection officers.

https://bsky.app/profile/eddieburfi.bsky.social/post/3mfdc3almmc2w

YourAmplePlumPoster · 21/02/2026 10:16

Randomuser2026 · 20/02/2026 12:28

I disagree, ultimately Andrew had contacts, but he has no money no power and no brains.
It’s the wealthy and powerful people I really want to see jailed and their assets confiscated.

Not gonna happen. Did any of the bankers who took us to the brink in 2008 go to jail? Nope. They walked away with their huge bonuses.

Randomuser2026 · 20/02/2026 12:28

randomchap · 20/02/2026 11:27

Going after AMW sends a message that no one is above the law. Hopefully Mandelson will be next and this is the first in many domino's to fall.

I disagree, ultimately Andrew had contacts, but he has no money no power and no brains.
It’s the wealthy and powerful people I really want to see jailed and their assets confiscated.

LizzieW1969 · 20/02/2026 12:21

cardibach · 20/02/2026 12:16

He’ll be arrested if and when the police and CPS agree there is a prosecutable case. These things sometimes take time. The government has no role in this. They don’t decide who gets arrested and when.
For clarity, I think he’s done a lot of very dodgy things and probably should (and will) be arrested - but there’s no benefit in moving before the evidence is solid and no grounds to blame the government either way.

Agreed, it wouldn’t even be up to the government whether Mandelson is arrested or not. I meant that they could be accused of coverup. Starmer is already on thin ice over the appointment of Mandelson as US Ambassador. The right wing press appear to find any excuse to put the blame on Starmer and the Labour government.

cardibach · 20/02/2026 12:16

LizzieW1969 · 20/02/2026 12:12

Absolutely. If Mandelson isn’t arrested, the Labour government will face accusations of coverup. If there’s enough evidence against Andrew for him to be arrested, there must surely be enough for Mandy to be arrested too. He was actually a government minister at the time.

He’ll be arrested if and when the police and CPS agree there is a prosecutable case. These things sometimes take time. The government has no role in this. They don’t decide who gets arrested and when.
For clarity, I think he’s done a lot of very dodgy things and probably should (and will) be arrested - but there’s no benefit in moving before the evidence is solid and no grounds to blame the government either way.

LizzieW1969 · 20/02/2026 12:12

randomchap · 20/02/2026 11:27

Going after AMW sends a message that no one is above the law. Hopefully Mandelson will be next and this is the first in many domino's to fall.

Absolutely. If Mandelson isn’t arrested, the Labour government will face accusations of coverup. If there’s enough evidence against Andrew for him to be arrested, there must surely be enough for Mandy to be arrested too. He was actually a government minister at the time.

randomchap · 20/02/2026 11:27

Dollymylove · 20/02/2026 11:17

Andrew hasnt been arrested for sex offences. He has been arrested for misconduct in public office , ie: leaking sensitive information
Also, there are 3 million pages in the Epstein files and yet only Andrews name seems to be being bandied about. Where are all the others?

Going after AMW sends a message that no one is above the law. Hopefully Mandelson will be next and this is the first in many domino's to fall.

loriat · 20/02/2026 11:21

I think it’s likely that the Palace knew that this was going to happen, without knowing the specifics of when. The Palace would want to protect the King from any accusations of interference in the investigation, and ignorance of the details would help with this.

Dollymylove · 20/02/2026 11:17

Happyjoe · 19/02/2026 10:11

Yes, finally, did take a while though.
I heard one of the victims (bbc news) when Andrew was stripped of title/chucked out that they wish American was treating it as serious as the UK.

Edited

Andrew hasnt been arrested for sex offences. He has been arrested for misconduct in public office , ie: leaking sensitive information
Also, there are 3 million pages in the Epstein files and yet only Andrews name seems to be being bandied about. Where are all the others?

TheignT · 20/02/2026 11:06

Puzzledandpissedoff · 19/02/2026 21:51

I agree none of us know this, which is why I wrote "if" and "whether", but I sincerely believe that today's actions have taken place with the full knowledge and coordination of the palace as a self protecting sop to the public who haven't allowed the issue to drop ... same as the removal of AMW's titles, only this time with the useful side effect of shackling the media on the pretence that there may be a trial

Seen from that POV there'd be no need to interfere further, and no need to worry about a trial which IMO will never be allowed to happen ... though that's an area where I'd love to be wrong

If I was Charles I'd say don't tell me. If anything goes wrong I wouldn't want fingers being pointed at me for letting the cat out of the bag. If my nieces were upset and blamed me for not letting him know I could hand on heart tell them I didn't know what was about to happen. So I can believe Charles didn't know.

SerendipityJane · 20/02/2026 10:55

Needacupofteaandcrackers · 20/02/2026 07:31

Mahatma Gandhi’s Seven Social Sins

  • Wealth without work
  • :
  • Acquiring wealth through speculation, gambling, or manipulation rather than honest labor
  • .
  • Pleasure without conscience: Pursuing enjoyment or indulgence without considering the moral consequences or the impact on others.
  • Knowledge without character: Being highly educated or intelligent but lacking moral integrity, using knowledge for selfish or harmful purposes.
  • Commerce without morality: Conducting business, trading, or seeking profit without ethical principles, often leading to exploitation.
  • Science without humanity: Advancing technology or scientific discovery without concern for its impact on human welfare, such as creating weapons of destruction.
  • Worship without sacrifice: Engaging in religious rituals or seeking spiritual benefits without genuine devotion or self-sacrifice for others.
  • Politics without principle: Engaging in political power games, seeking power for its own sake rather than serving the greater good.
Gandhi believed these sins, left unchecked, would destroy humanity and believed they must be understood "through the heart" to be avoided.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/m00268zt

BBC Sounds - Ahir Shah's Seven Blunders of the World - Available Episodes

Listen to the latest episodes of Ahir Shah's Seven Blunders of the World on BBC Sounds.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/m00268zt

RainbowBagels · 20/02/2026 10:53

JustAnotherWhinger · 20/02/2026 04:50

It was the Duchess of Kent’s funeral

She was treated pretty shabbily by the RF after she had her own MH problems. Hopefully she's laughing wherever she is at all the pictures of her funeral making them uncomfortable!

Needacupofteaandcrackers · 20/02/2026 07:31

Mahatma Gandhi’s Seven Social Sins

  • Wealth without work
  • :
  • Acquiring wealth through speculation, gambling, or manipulation rather than honest labor
  • .
  • Pleasure without conscience: Pursuing enjoyment or indulgence without considering the moral consequences or the impact on others.
  • Knowledge without character: Being highly educated or intelligent but lacking moral integrity, using knowledge for selfish or harmful purposes.
  • Commerce without morality: Conducting business, trading, or seeking profit without ethical principles, often leading to exploitation.
  • Science without humanity: Advancing technology or scientific discovery without concern for its impact on human welfare, such as creating weapons of destruction.
  • Worship without sacrifice: Engaging in religious rituals or seeking spiritual benefits without genuine devotion or self-sacrifice for others.
  • Politics without principle: Engaging in political power games, seeking power for its own sake rather than serving the greater good.
Gandhi believed these sins, left unchecked, would destroy humanity and believed they must be understood "through the heart" to be avoided.
sashh · 20/02/2026 07:17

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 19/02/2026 16:18

You do know that this has absolutely nothing to do with him and any girls that may/not have been involved????

This is purely about sharing privileged market and financial information.

Surprised Mandy is still wandering around. Is his birthday coming up soon??

It's not about that YET.

They will be looking at what he did and where he did it.

JustAnotherWhinger · 20/02/2026 04:50

SnugglyJumpersMakeItBetter · 20/02/2026 00:16

What's this video footage from please, does anyone know? Hanging around in a church with various family members. It's not been shot today has it?

It was the Duchess of Kent’s funeral

SnugglyJumpersMakeItBetter · 20/02/2026 00:16

What's this video footage from please, does anyone know? Hanging around in a church with various family members. It's not been shot today has it?

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sKGQvjWWUk

TaffetaPhrases · 19/02/2026 22:14

@ShakyBake daily Mail is now reporting that some Saudi sheikh is hanging out in Dorset on his Superyacht:…. I found that interesting given your potential sighting this morning?!

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15574885/Billionaire-Saudi-princes-superyacht-spotted-Devon-coast.html

Puzzledandpissedoff · 19/02/2026 21:51

SomedayIllBeSaturdayNight · 19/02/2026 20:32

From everything we know, the palace had no advanced warning.

But if they did, they certainly didn't do anything to interfere with the police operation, so it made absolutely no difference to anything.

I agree none of us know this, which is why I wrote "if" and "whether", but I sincerely believe that today's actions have taken place with the full knowledge and coordination of the palace as a self protecting sop to the public who haven't allowed the issue to drop ... same as the removal of AMW's titles, only this time with the useful side effect of shackling the media on the pretence that there may be a trial

Seen from that POV there'd be no need to interfere further, and no need to worry about a trial which IMO will never be allowed to happen ... though that's an area where I'd love to be wrong

BeanQuisine · 19/02/2026 21:30

Puzzledandpissedoff · 19/02/2026 20:17

Aylsham police station? So that's where he was ...

In other news the BBC are reporting that the Home Office were informed of the arrest before it took place - and we're still expected to believe nobody picked up the phone to Charles or his staff?

I don't think that's much of a big deal really. They may have waited until the police had been there for a while, as it was quite early in the morning.

Charlie would have known there were investigations underway and that it could happen at any time.

SomedayIllBeSaturdayNight · 19/02/2026 21:22

Shitshowpolitics · 19/02/2026 21:02

Are you that naive of course they knew. The removal of his title was all planned because they knew what was coming.

The point the poster I was replying to made was that the palace had been told in advance he would be arrested today. Absolutely no comment on the wider situation.

Gagaandgag · 19/02/2026 21:19

randomchap · 19/02/2026 10:16

I bet he's sweating now

😂😂😂

TheMorgenmuffel · 19/02/2026 21:10

Shitshowpolitics · 19/02/2026 21:02

Are you that naive of course they knew. The removal of his title was all planned because they knew what was coming.

Absolutely. There is no way an institution as powerful as the monarchy doesnt know all the 'secrets'.
As do the British intelligence services and doubtless top brass in most countries.
A lot of people are involved and a lot more know who's involved in what.
The general public will never know the full extent of it all.
That has always been the case and will always be the case. People are fooling themselves if they think that will ever be sny different.

Whatever we are learning about now I guarantee it barely scratches the surface.

Swipe left for the next trending thread