Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How did people leave home at 15…

291 replies

Holdinguphalfthesky · 18/02/2026 11:44

… move to London and start working as a music PR? Just reading an interview with Mariella Frostrup and it says that’s what she did. Even back in the 70s, how would someone have done that? I seem to remember in Caitlin Moran’s book How to be a Woman, she also walked into a job in music journalism at a very young age.

Is it unreasonable of me to ask how they did it? What’s being glossed over in the retelling?

How did people leave home at 15…
OP posts:
viques · 18/02/2026 19:34

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 18/02/2026 19:06

Fascinating thread. On the subject of gentrification, I remember in 1980 hearing a woman talking about a house she'd been to look at in what she'd been told was a rapidly up and coming area, but she had her doubts about it as it all seemed very grotty. She and her husband and children were in a small but decent terrraced house in West London and looking for somewhere bigger. I often wonder if they took the risk, because if they did they would have cleaned up.

It was Islington.

I lived in Islington in a basement flat in the seventies. Two doors down the house was owned by a notorious landlord who was so abusive to the tenants that the council bought him out. They offered the house ( four story Georgian house in a garden square) for £15,000 to a couple who were living there but they turned it down as they didn’t want to take on a mortgage. The houses in that square go for £4 million plus. I do wonder if the young couple ever think “if only”.

TheBewleySisters · 18/02/2026 19:12

I left home at 17 in 1971 and moved to London. Spent one night at my sister's house in Battersea, and then rented a bedsit close by in Clapham. Got a job as a runner in the film business in Soho. Great days. My friends soon followed. They worked retail in the big department stores like Barkers in Ken High Street, Dickens and Jones and so on. You could literally walk out of a job on the Friday and walk into a new one on the Monday.

StedSarandos · 18/02/2026 19:10

Being on the dole as a young person or in the university holidays would probably have worked as a univeral basic income?

Work experience was much easier to come by too. These days most schools put a week aside for the year 10's but lots of pupils don't get a place. Schools don't help organised it, local councils and large employers don't have a scheme to support it in out town.

CaptainMyCaptain · 18/02/2026 19:10

DeftWasp · 18/02/2026 18:12

Absolutely, if you watch the film "!0 Rillington Place" about serial killer John Christie, it was filmed in Notting Hill, just before a large demolition programme in the 1970s

Rillington place, demolished in '72 was a typical street in Notting Hill of 3 storey victorian terraced houses, let and sub let as slums, there were large factory premises that were by that period derelict.

I grew up in London in the 80s, and as a kid we played in derelict warehouses that are now prime location real estate. Its changed a lot!!

I knew people in Islington and Stoke Newington in the late 70s. They lived in big houses that were squats or bed sits. They'll be millionaires' houses now.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 18/02/2026 19:06

Fascinating thread. On the subject of gentrification, I remember in 1980 hearing a woman talking about a house she'd been to look at in what she'd been told was a rapidly up and coming area, but she had her doubts about it as it all seemed very grotty. She and her husband and children were in a small but decent terrraced house in West London and looking for somewhere bigger. I often wonder if they took the risk, because if they did they would have cleaned up.

It was Islington.

GeorgeMichaelsCat · 18/02/2026 18:57

Also, I grew up in an age where children were seen and not heard. You were desperate to be an adult to have some autonomy.

DeftWasp · 18/02/2026 18:12

LemonTT · 18/02/2026 12:05

Also worth remembering that although London has always been a wealthy city, it wasn’t always a desirable place to live. The property boom that resulted in ever increasing gentrification of what would have been fairly undesirable parts of London really didn’t start till the 80’s.

places like Notting Hill were considered working class if not slums at that time. There was lots of very basic accommodation, bedsits and hostels. There were no credit checks and rent was collected on a weekly basis.

Basically the 70’s were not a good time for inner cities and there was a lot of middle class flight from outter zones to the suburbs.

I know SM portrays life for boomers in the 70’s as some utopia where everyone had a car and detached house funded by a job in Woolworths but it isn’t true.

Absolutely, if you watch the film "!0 Rillington Place" about serial killer John Christie, it was filmed in Notting Hill, just before a large demolition programme in the 1970s

Rillington place, demolished in '72 was a typical street in Notting Hill of 3 storey victorian terraced houses, let and sub let as slums, there were large factory premises that were by that period derelict.

I grew up in London in the 80s, and as a kid we played in derelict warehouses that are now prime location real estate. Its changed a lot!!

PigletJohn · 18/02/2026 17:25

Dollymylove · 18/02/2026 13:31

Its true that youngsters these days seem more mollycoddled than back in the 70s. No being ferried around in parents cars, we walked or got the bus. Going into pubs at 15, as long as you looked old enough and gave a convincing date of birth you were in. Most of us had holiday/weekend jobs so had money to spend.
I will say though that the country was safer back then, very few cars, no maniacs speeding on the roads. Drugs were rarely heard of, apart from the occasional unfortunate who had died of an overdose.
People generally obeyed the law, the incentive to do that was the threat of Borstal, and few were crazy enough to end up in there. On the other side though, was lack of safeguarding children, any adult could give you a slap around the face if they decided you needed one, tell your parents and they would shrug and tell you that you probably deserved it...
So it was good and bad in equal measure, I would say

Rose-tinted spectacles, I fear.

Road deaths were much higher, including children and pedestrians.

Child abuse was rife, and was brushed under the carpet.

The Flying Squad was corrupt, and cosily in bed with organised crime. Racist violence was common, even in green buses carrying groups of cops.

In the 1970's it was possible, and "normal" for a young couple on average earnings to buy a house, though, and for a bright school leaver to get a "job for life" in a decent company with a pension and the probability of long term promotion.

LindorDoubleChoc · 18/02/2026 16:50

Her birthday is in November, so my point still stands if she was in the UK - which she apparently wasn't.

Ramblethroughthebrambles · 18/02/2026 16:34

LeedsLoiner · 18/02/2026 16:07

When I attended university in the early 1980's during the vacations I could claim unemployment benefit and housing benefit to cover the rent on my student house.

Me too. I worked for some holidays but no need to rely on parents.

PurpleCoo · 18/02/2026 16:34

My mum moved to London from a small village at 15 as an apprentice in a niche industry for a high end business. Bespoke/in magazines/known service provider to the queen. Indeed mum worked on something for the queen. This was in the 60s. It was just how things were then I think.

notanoccultexpert · 18/02/2026 16:31

I did this. My mum had a 'once you're 16, you're out' rule, and my sister had already gone to London (we're from near Hull), and was living in a grotty flatshare in Crouch End, so when I was 15, I moved in with her and her boyfriend. Got an interview within a few days, and worked full time in a supermarket near Baker Street tube station. This was 1985. For the next few years it was super easy to find jobs. I remember working in Tesco in Hounslow in 1989, having an argument with the manager, walking out, down the street, and found another job within the hour!

MargoLivebetter · 18/02/2026 16:29

@LeedsLoiner I'd forgotten that people could do that. I had friends who claimed unemployment during the holidays. I worked in a pub during the holidays and remember telling my father that I'd probably be better off claiming unemployment and he went berserk!!! Had completely forgotten that. And so many think that benefits are too generous nowadays!!!!! 😂

MabelAnderson · 18/02/2026 16:24

Sali Hughes also did this, moved to London at 15, and managed to get a job assisting a makeup artist. I think she initially slept on a friend’s floor ? Not sure though.

NotYoCheese · 18/02/2026 16:24

LindorDoubleChoc · 18/02/2026 13:05

Mariella Frostrup was born in the same year as me and was one of the older ones in her school year. She would have started secondary school in September 1974 and the earliest she could have left legally would be June 1979. By which time she would be approaching 17. No one was allowed to leave school (unless expelled) before they had completed 5 years of secondary school.

Perhaps she went to private school and bunked off? Whatever, it's hardly something to be proud of.

DH was born in '62 and left school aged 15 in '77. He wasn't expelled.

MF lived in Ireland, where 15 was the legal age to leave school, and moved to London when her dad died early. Maybe she was at private school, and had to leave and get a job when he died? She's done well for herself regardless and I think she should be proud of that!

CaptainMyCaptain · 18/02/2026 16:17

LeedsLoiner · 18/02/2026 16:07

When I attended university in the early 1980's during the vacations I could claim unemployment benefit and housing benefit to cover the rent on my student house.

That rule changed half way through my course.

CaptainMyCaptain · 18/02/2026 16:16

Thechaseison71 · 18/02/2026 14:15

Yeah was 16 unless you aug 31st birthday like me and could leave at easter . You'd still be 15 for another few months

Yes. My sister had an August birthday and left at 15 in 1973.

LeedsLoiner · 18/02/2026 16:12

Itsmetheflamingo · 18/02/2026 15:55

My mum worked in a bank and had so many stories like this. The manager would come back from lunch completely wasted and they’d have to barricade his office to keep him away from customers.

however, she did get a staff discount on her mortgage 😱

it’s like the brink mat gold being laundered through a random bank branch in Swindon or wherever because bank staff had no responsibility for finding out where your money came from (I don’t think they noticed in until he’d paid in £10m or something 😭)

A friend of mine worked "in the City" and the staff mortgage rate was 1/2% (half a percent) they used it as a way of keeping staff tied to the company.

CautiousLurker2 · 18/02/2026 16:09

You were allowed to leave school at the start of the term in which you turned 16 in the early/mid 80’s. Several girls in my year did that - I could never fathom why they left literally weeks before their O Level exams, but I remember our Head Girl did - was pregnant and getting married that summer too. 🤯

LeedsLoiner · 18/02/2026 16:07

Ramblethroughthebrambles · 18/02/2026 15:53

Interesting thread. Another important difference is that 16-18s could access unemployment benefits until 1988 and these were higher thro 70s & 80s relative to COL. So there was a better financial safety net for young people leaving home because they weren't considered their parents' responsibility. I was born early 60s and remember a culture during 80s of people who wanted to be in a band, or 'opt out', living in squats on benefits. The flip side of this though was much higher unemployment levels (double digits) in the 80s and real hopelessness about the future for working class youngsters in areas where industry was decimated during the Thatcher years.

Experiences of young people differed then as much as they do now according to class, religion, family, culture... and my memories are coloured by my own experiences, but I think teens were lower down the pecking order then than they are now. The Victorian 'seen and not heard' had gone but we were still expected to sort ourselves out rather than rely on parents or expect that they would always put our needs before theirs. It wasn't simply that we were expected to be adults, nor that parents were selfish. They partly saw their role as teaching us our place in the social order and indulging young adults was seen as not good for them or for society. My experience of independence was a funny mix of being expected to cross minor roads to run errands from reception age but then having a 10pm curfew when I had a boyfriend at 17. I'm not sure either was ideal preparation for adulthood, tho I enjoyed the first much more than the second.

When I attended university in the early 1980's during the vacations I could claim unemployment benefit and housing benefit to cover the rent on my student house.

TheignT · 18/02/2026 16:05

Rictasmorticia · 18/02/2026 12:01

There were masses of jobs in the 70s. Children were much more independent at a very young age. From primary and all through our teenage years my brother and I looked after ourselves during schoool holidays. Doing housework lighting fires, shopping and cooking.

When I left school in 1964, I was offered every job I applied for. I started work earning £10 a week. My Dad said he been at work years before he earned that much. 5 years later, having changed jobs s 4 times I was earning £22.

We got married, lived in rooms,paying £2 pew week rent from an joint I come of £40.

In 1978 there were 1.5 million unemployed. Schemes like yts and tops helped people into work. The 70s ended very differently to how it started and was different to 1964.

RunSlowTalkFast · 18/02/2026 15:58

grindergirl · 18/02/2026 15:55

Jobs in investment banks, 100k+ salaries and the London of today are not aspirations for everyone. Besides which, investment banks bleed an economy. They do not operate for the general good of the people

Yes, I was exaggerating for a mildly comic effect.

Itsmetheflamingo · 18/02/2026 15:55

ComtesseDeSpair · 18/02/2026 15:46

And the world of work was tough, even if it was easier to find a job. This thread reminds me that I was talking to my mum on the phone recently, just telling her about my work etc and something I said about a colleague who was being dismissed made her recall when she was in her late teens and working as a bank cashier (a very good job, back then, for a young woman from a working class family) and the bank manager was King. He’d come in with a hangover, or feeling angry, and berate employees who just had to meekly take it unless they wanted to be looking for a new job the next day. He fired one of her young colleagues on the spot because he thought her dress was too tight and told her she looked like a prostitute and he wouldn’t have that in his bank. Totally normal. No ACAS, no tribunals, you just collected your coat and left quietly.

Edited

My mum worked in a bank and had so many stories like this. The manager would come back from lunch completely wasted and they’d have to barricade his office to keep him away from customers.

however, she did get a staff discount on her mortgage 😱

it’s like the brink mat gold being laundered through a random bank branch in Swindon or wherever because bank staff had no responsibility for finding out where your money came from (I don’t think they noticed in until he’d paid in £10m or something 😭)

grindergirl · 18/02/2026 15:55

RunSlowTalkFast · 18/02/2026 15:34

But you appreciate it's different now? You can't finish school at 16 with a couple of GCSEs, find a flat in London for 2p a week and an entry level office job in a investment bank via a card in the newsagents window which will allow you to work your way up to a 6 figure salary by 40 with no A Levels, never mind a degree.

Jobs in investment banks, 100k+ salaries and the London of today are not aspirations for everyone. Besides which, investment banks bleed an economy. They do not operate for the general good of the people

Ramblethroughthebrambles · 18/02/2026 15:53

Interesting thread. Another important difference is that 16-18s could access unemployment benefits until 1988 and these were higher thro 70s & 80s relative to COL. So there was a better financial safety net for young people leaving home because they weren't considered their parents' responsibility. I was born early 60s and remember a culture during 80s of people who wanted to be in a band, or 'opt out', living in squats on benefits. The flip side of this though was much higher unemployment levels (double digits) in the 80s and real hopelessness about the future for working class youngsters in areas where industry was decimated during the Thatcher years.

Experiences of young people differed then as much as they do now according to class, religion, family, culture... and my memories are coloured by my own experiences, but I think teens were lower down the pecking order then than they are now. The Victorian 'seen and not heard' had gone but we were still expected to sort ourselves out rather than rely on parents or expect that they would always put our needs before theirs. It wasn't simply that we were expected to be adults, nor that parents were selfish. They partly saw their role as teaching us our place in the social order and indulging young adults was seen as not good for them or for society. My experience of independence was a funny mix of being expected to cross minor roads to run errands from reception age but then having a 10pm curfew when I had a boyfriend at 17. I'm not sure either was ideal preparation for adulthood, tho I enjoyed the first much more than the second.