Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How did people leave home at 15…

291 replies

Holdinguphalfthesky · 18/02/2026 11:44

… move to London and start working as a music PR? Just reading an interview with Mariella Frostrup and it says that’s what she did. Even back in the 70s, how would someone have done that? I seem to remember in Caitlin Moran’s book How to be a Woman, she also walked into a job in music journalism at a very young age.

Is it unreasonable of me to ask how they did it? What’s being glossed over in the retelling?

How did people leave home at 15…
OP posts:
EveryKneeShallBow · 18/02/2026 12:45

I left home at 17. I’d been working alongside school for about four years and then full time at 16. A friend of mine at secondary school worked in a club at 16, and got a job as a backing singer for a band and moved to London. She had a brief career as a punk singer in her own right and then I lost touch with her.

CoolFineDoneWicked · 18/02/2026 12:44

Even not that long ago you could do this. I moved out before I went to university, because I wanted the independence. I took a year out and worked at a hotel that had staff digs - I lived in a dingy old farmhouse with a load of travelling Aussies and Kiwis. It had 70s wallpaper, single-glazed windows and an ancient Aga for cooking on. That was in 2001 / 2002.

BoudiccaRuled · 18/02/2026 12:43

Nowadays you'd need a degree and work experience. I know a former Saatchi&Saatchi creative director started working there as a tea boy in the 60s/70s and worked his way up.

Itsmetheflamingo · 18/02/2026 12:43

ElevensesKing · 18/02/2026 12:38

Parental connections, very much played down like unpaid internships were 10/15 yrs ago. Kids from wealthy families could afford to work for free in certain sectors which were closed to others from marginalised backgrounds. So those industries became full of identikit rich kids and not very diverse; very much a closed shop.

Now internships have to be paid but before they were only accessible to rich kids whose parents could afford to fund them.

Also very location dependant- my Hs friends and family were in the paper trade (newspapers) lived in Kent and commuted to docklands. If a dad or uncle worked there they got you in.very much the same in the city of London- and I’m not talking elites, I’m talking working class school leavers who would join as admin and work their way up. Technology has taken many of those jobs.

People didn’t move around the country for jobs- if you were lucky enough to live near a high employment area that was that.

Ilovegermany · 18/02/2026 12:42

I left home at 17 in 1991. My first job paid £300 a month until I was 18. Then it was £500 once I was 18. Bought a flat with my fiancé. Found another job that gave me a bit more. Life was much easier then. Moved abroad at 22 and have a much better salary than I would ever have had in the UK but I’m 51 now and deemed too old for my team.

Ithinkofawittyusernamethenforgetit · 18/02/2026 12:41

Hopefulsalmon · 18/02/2026 12:24

All of that. I also think that most jobs recruited quickly and being paid weekly in cash and having a cash based society made it easier to be move around and try things out. In many ways it was better but in some ways worse.

One time, I went clubbing with my sister and had an interview next morning in a (rubbish) design studio in Covent Garden. Decided there was no point getting a few hours sleep so sat in Bar Italia and went straight to the interview. He offered me the job and I started there and then! I did the one day but the toilet was so gross I decided not to go back, got another job just after. I feel exhausted just thinking about that now, in my late 50s.
Incidentally, my sister was at ballet school and lived at YWCA opposite British Museum. Quite grim. I used to sleep on her floor.

Holdinguphalfthesky · 18/02/2026 12:41

I’d sort of been aware of that, but my dad didn’t move out (as far as I know) until he moved in with my mum. Or maybe he did but just didn’t talk about it. He left school after O levels and started work the following Monday. He grew up in a council house but maybe because his older sister joined the army, there was a bit more at home? My mother went to uni and my parents got married before she finished., and moved in together when they were 20, 21.

So anyway, the people I knew of that generation hadn’t moved out until they got married, went to uni, or moved in with someone. And I can only imagine my mother’s horror if I had mentioned doing something like that! I was born in the 1970s but she would have pissed all over my chips if I had talked about leaving home at 16 and living in London to find a job. (Even though she had married before she was 22 and liked to talk about how independent and capable she had been while young. Maybe she just had a low opinion of me!)

OP posts:
EmeraldRoulette · 18/02/2026 12:40

BerryTwister · 18/02/2026 12:25

Young people had very low expectations of comfort back then. I'm always astounded at what people think is a baseline these days - Starbucks coffees, paying someone to paint their nails and do their eyebrows, designer clothes, botox , fancy phones etc. As a teen in the 80s these were things that only rich people could afford. Normal people could live in a squat, wear jumble sale clothes, work cash-in-hand jobs, and get by OK.

Edited

Me too! I'm going to be considered a bad lady before I hit 50 😂

And I'm the generation that had to be super smartly dressed at work! But I cannot get my head around spending money on this stuff.

@Octavia64 my mum taught me to type when I was 15 I think. So useful! Proper touch typing. Good speed and accuracy got me all the temp jobs I needed.

I also can't really imagine a 17-year-old now going into an office to do cover for a secretary who's off sick and just answering the phone and it could be anybody! That seems to freak people out. I do know a couple of people who are getting their kids to work in family businesses at that age, which is great.

Octavia64 · 18/02/2026 12:40

The government (both Labour and Tory) have encouraged more education for teens and young adults.

in general the belief is that as a country we need a better educated workforce than in the 1970s.

so for example my mum went to a vocational school at 11 and learnt typing and shorthand. She learnt reading writing and maths at primary but has literally never studied any science, never learnt a foreign language etc.

this isn’t allowed now. The government view is that as a country we need people who have learnt some basic science, history, about the world we live in and once that minimum is achieved then they can do vocational learning.

no writing people off at age 11 with the 11+.

Rictasmorticia · 18/02/2026 12:39

Holdinguphalfthesky · 18/02/2026 12:09

Interesting. What was it that changed would you say? Legislation, social attitudes, something else? I mean, I can’t imagine any opportunities being available for a 16 year old now to move out an live independently, there’s few enough for 18 year olds.

Do you think we’ve more lost something or more gained something?

3 things changed which had the same impact as the Industrial Revolution.

Firstly the war had devastated the work force. People got used to women working in the previous 6 years and to an extent this carried on. People were encouraged to immigrate here as we were so short of men. Mostly these were unskilled men and women working on the railways, NHS and in factories.

Secondly, The young people leaving school and University in the 60s were better educated than previous generations. They could easily fit into the new technology age, using phones, computers, accounting machines and the like. There was a huge demand for young people. Youth unemployment was mostly u heard off.

The last thing was the birth control pill. Employers were much more willing to recruit married women. The previous generation to mine, meant women automatically left work as soon as they were married.

People were very willing to living substandard accommodation. No inside bathrooms or running hot water. Lots of people sharing houses and rooms

Birdsongisangry · 18/02/2026 12:39

HoskinsChoice · 18/02/2026 12:32

Maybe both. I certainly think that kids have lost the resilience, the maturity and the independence they had in those days. We baby kids far more now than we did in the past. I think there probably aren't the opportunities for a 15 year old now but even if there was, I doubt many would be capable.

Not so sure about this, my mum was a teen in the 60s and she went through loads of jobs because she couldn't stick at them and knew she could walk from one to the other. And like all the other working class girls her age, her only goal was to find a husband who could look after her, so she could stay at home and raise children. Appreciate that wasn't much of a choice because at the time she wouldn't have been allowed to stay in work after marriage, but she was most annoyed when the goalposts moved and she had to go back to work PT when we were a bit older!

Itsmetheflamingo · 18/02/2026 12:39

Neurodiversitydoctor · 18/02/2026 12:38

It was like this well into the '90s, my husband's 1st job he got my walking into the office. I had multiple jobs like this, you were paid out of the till at the end of the day. My first job that needed bank details was in '93 until then all cash in hand.

My first job in the 90s was a receptionist in a plc. “Office angels” the employment agency said “we sent you because you’re pretty” 😭

ElevensesKing · 18/02/2026 12:38

Parental connections, very much played down like unpaid internships were 10/15 yrs ago. Kids from wealthy families could afford to work for free in certain sectors which were closed to others from marginalised backgrounds. So those industries became full of identikit rich kids and not very diverse; very much a closed shop.

Now internships have to be paid but before they were only accessible to rich kids whose parents could afford to fund them.

Nofeckingway · 18/02/2026 12:38

A lot of my friends in the 80s would go to London for the summer even if they were at uni . Pub jobs came with accomodation . Or go off to France picking grapes and very trendy to end up in a kibbutz in Israel .

All this accomplished with no phones or sat nav or online info . I think more was expected of young people and we rose to the expectations.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 18/02/2026 12:38

StrangewaysHereWeCome · 18/02/2026 12:16

I have a much older half sister who let home at 16 to work in London in the very early 80s. Jobs and accommodation were so much easier to come by. Often there weren't lengthy application processes or references for either. Jobs you'd walk into an agency or somewhere with a card in the window carrying your typed CV and your two precious letters of reference, and start the following day. And similarly rooms you'd just pay in cash at the end of the week when you got your pay packet. And as noted by a previous poster gentrification was still a long way off for a lot of now desirable places - my half sister most often lived in Clapham/Balham/Wandsworth which were considered very humdrum at the time.

It was like this well into the '90s, my husband's 1st job he got my walking into the office. I had multiple jobs like this, you were paid out of the till at the end of the day. My first job that needed bank details was in '93 until then all cash in hand.

EmeraldRoulette · 18/02/2026 12:37

I think we've lost something

I probably heard the expression "extended adolescence" about 25 years ago. It was worrying then. But I never dreamed we'd end up in a situation like the one we're in now - with 18-year-olds not being considered adults. (I know it's not all of them).

but as well as the economics of the situation, we are in very strange territory.

of course teenagers were targets and we all had to be careful - but we were having this conversation in the pub the other night - about a 16-year-old is like now compared to what we were like.

It's like another planet. I think everyone in that chat was late 40s, except one guy in his mid 50s with a teenage daughter. He was very quiet. I think he prefers the way things are now.

I wasn't living in a flat share at 16. 18 yes, the property was in a right state. The landlord was.... interesting. His heart was in the right place. He actually raised concerns about one person's heavy drinking. I suppose we just thought she was free to do it. She did wind up in hospital. But maybe she wasn't going to learn any other way?

I caused absolute chaos by saying we needed a TV licence 😂

Itsmetheflamingo · 18/02/2026 12:37

the difference is not just teenagers though is it?

take landlords. Landlord of the 70s if your tenant did a midnight flit, trashed the house, stole the entire contents of the house, used it as a crack den etc… you’d just have to shrug your shoulders and clear up. Often, you’d have some heavies who would violence to threaten or collect.

now, look at the landlords on MN for example, often hysterical because tenants don’t live the way the want them to. They can’t cope with non payments, damage, asb, anything.

that’s nothing to do with teenagers resilience

Thechaseison71 · 18/02/2026 12:36

Holdinguphalfthesky · 18/02/2026 12:09

Interesting. What was it that changed would you say? Legislation, social attitudes, something else? I mean, I can’t imagine any opportunities being available for a 16 year old now to move out an live independently, there’s few enough for 18 year olds.

Do you think we’ve more lost something or more gained something?

Far more people identifying as middle class and infantilising their kids

TheTwenties · 18/02/2026 12:36

DM left school after GCE/CSE’s at 15 as a summer born baby. She then had to wait until her 16th birthday to start work. The age of consent at the time was 21 so getting married required a parents signature as did emigrating, you couldn’t join a pension scheme etc. I’m not quite sure what that would mean from a living perspective trying to rent somewhere or if just being able to pay a deposit and a weeks rent up front was enough.

Mumblechum0 · 18/02/2026 12:33

This may be rose tinted glasses but I think young people of my generation (I'm early 60s now) had a hell of a lot more fun than this gen

BillieWiper · 18/02/2026 12:32

I think you could leave school at 14 in the 70s couldn't you? I'd have bloody loved that.

There was less paranoia about danger back then. Young people were rebelling against their wartime value parents and there was more of an attitude of 'let's go and do something exciting, let's make something fun happen'. That's how my mates from that era describe it. I think it would be been cool to be a yp back then in some ways.

HoskinsChoice · 18/02/2026 12:32

Holdinguphalfthesky · 18/02/2026 12:09

Interesting. What was it that changed would you say? Legislation, social attitudes, something else? I mean, I can’t imagine any opportunities being available for a 16 year old now to move out an live independently, there’s few enough for 18 year olds.

Do you think we’ve more lost something or more gained something?

Maybe both. I certainly think that kids have lost the resilience, the maturity and the independence they had in those days. We baby kids far more now than we did in the past. I think there probably aren't the opportunities for a 15 year old now but even if there was, I doubt many would be capable.

Mumblechum0 · 18/02/2026 12:32

Oh definitely re the landlord thing, I found a park home with a massive hole in the floor covered by carpet, it was £8 a week. I just gave the guy the money and he threw the key over at me. No checks either way.

It was brilliant

Itsmetheflamingo · 18/02/2026 12:31

Parsleyforme · 18/02/2026 12:30

I’m glad that teenagers generally don’t need to live in squats or slums anymore, but I feel like we must’ve lost the learning of life skills along the way. Most teenagers I know simply wouldn’t be able to look after themselves if they left home and got a full time job at 15. I wonder if that’s better because they have a longer childhood or worse because lots of people now don’t learn those skills until they get their first job after university

Don’t forget though- they’ll live longer at the other end. Maybe 10,15 years more life expectancy?! So they’re just changing the pattern / timing of things. Who wants to work another 10 years at the end of your life as well as the start?!

GlobalTravellerbutespeciallyBognor · 18/02/2026 12:31

Young people grew up faster in those days. Those 15 year olds in the early 70s, born around 1955/58, probably had parents born late 20s/30s who had lived through the war and rationing and possibly lost a father themselves. Very tough era.