Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Would you class £32,000 as a good salary?

279 replies

Poshpuppy · 17/02/2026 10:36

I know there are so many variables. For a 21 year old living at home it's probably a very good salary!
For a single parent who owns a home maybe not.

For me, I'm 35 and I don't feel this is a good salary for me. I'm in the Civil Service, I have a degree and master's, it's my own fault for possibly doing qualifications that haven't led to anything higher paid/more specific.
I'm an EO/Executive Officer grade which is junior. There are not many HEO/Higher Officer grades that don't require very niche experience or line management, there are also few fewer HEOs than AOs or EOs so competition is tough.

I'm looking outwards at the local council, third sector and private sector. I know money isn't everything but when you have things to pay for and any chance of saving then it does help. I think I'd feel comfortable on closer to 40k, whether this will happen is another matter.

Of course there will be people on under 30k who manage perfectly fine, it's all relative. Just wondered what anyone thought!

OP posts:
LondonPapa · 18/02/2026 10:51

Villanellesproudmum · 17/02/2026 10:39

That’s not bad for a EO role

Is it not actually good? OP must be in Ops (DWP OR HMRC?) as I swear the EOs in my dept. earn slightly less as deskbased policy work.

Manthide · 18/02/2026 10:37

Also ds has a clear idea of how he'd like his career to progress so he expects to go up to the next grade in the next 3 to 5 years. There aren't many of that grade where he works but he will move if there isn't a position. (He gets extra as his skills are deemed scarce)

Manthide · 18/02/2026 10:23

Well I'd be happy with that - currently on a zero hours minimum wage contract- but if you're not you need to look around. Ds22 graduated with a Masters in July last year and is now a civil servant. He is earning £40,500 a year (not in London) with no one under him. I think he's a HEO but not sure.

j78hj76 · 18/02/2026 08:39

Just to add it’s not the civil service that’s the issue here, £32K for an EO grade is not a bad salary, it is an entry level grade, the issue is you are staying in an entry level grade. You need to work your way up, that doesn’t happen automatically in the civil service, you have to plan for it and do it.

j78hj76 · 18/02/2026 08:36

”Maybe I will get to HEO one day”

Not likely with that passive attitude. I entered the civil service at aged 30 as an SEO and was a G6 3 years later, promotion in the civil service is a proactive activity, it’s not just something that happens. You have to be strategic; you need to look at your skillset, the job market, training, work shadowing, I did mentoring as well. You also need to be flexible, I took on a role I wasn’t too keen on but knew it was a good step, and I was flexible with location, you have to be willing to move around organisations as it can get quite stagnant within organisations depending on profession and size.

But no I don’t think £32,000 is a good salary for someone who has higher education and over 10 years in the work place. I had children in my 20s spending time part time and I still managed to exceed £32k 10 years ago in the public sector before I was 30.

If you want more, you need to plan for it, not just expect it to happen. You haven’t got children so what’s stopping you?

Bluegreenbird · 18/02/2026 06:13

It’s the flexibility that keep me in my CS job. Hours are logged and I take off a couple of Fridays a month by working some longer days. That and the hybrid working (2 days WFH) and the 27% pension contribution.

But I am old and don’t have high housing costs. I see the younger ones desperate to get promotions so they can afford to live. A 22 year old G7?! My G7 has been in the job 30 years and has a massively complex and responsible role. Can’t imagine a 22 year old coping with it.

Do the line management if that’s what’s needed in your sector. People skills are what get you ahead. Am slightly baffled by those who reach the higher grades without LM experience. (Maybe I’m just jealous as I had to manage teams of up to 10 at HO grade).

Statsquestion2 · 18/02/2026 02:42

lilythepinkone · 17/02/2026 22:15

You say it's not true at all but how can that be correct when my personal experience shows otherwise?

My DP was on a much higher salary than that.

There is an expectation that you stay to see the work done that needs doing on that day, not leaving on the dot.

Private companies have share holders to satisfy and have to work efficiently.

I can say it’s not true because we both work in a private company…so my experience is the opposite! We get overtime for all time over 39hours, we also have flexi time. If I have to leave at 4:30…then I’m leaving at 4:30. I also know plenty of people on higher salaries that get overtime and flexi time as we do.

lilythepinkone · 17/02/2026 22:15

Statsquestion2 · 17/02/2026 17:14

Not true at all I earn 50k salary and get overtime, my dh is a mid manager and on 71k and also gets overtime.

You say it's not true at all but how can that be correct when my personal experience shows otherwise?

My DP was on a much higher salary than that.

There is an expectation that you stay to see the work done that needs doing on that day, not leaving on the dot.

Private companies have share holders to satisfy and have to work efficiently.

Pinkladyapplepie · 17/02/2026 22:02

Poshpuppy · 17/02/2026 10:43

I'm in the North West so not a massive cost of living but still.

The North West is crap for pay in general. A lot of jobs probably.pay around that and a lot of ppl have to manage with it, however even here, like you say, it would be a basic standard of living. I have no suggestions unfortunately, trades ppl who work for themselves are the only ppl with money that I know.

JannaManna · 17/02/2026 21:57

Wolmando · 17/02/2026 21:56

A lot of salaries are not much more than minimum wage nowadays

A good reason to have some skills

Wolmando · 17/02/2026 21:56

A lot of salaries are not much more than minimum wage nowadays

MidnightMeltdown · 17/02/2026 21:50

BringBackCatsEyes · 17/02/2026 21:01

I’m 55 with a mortgage and a lot less income that £65K. I have a good life thanks.

Well exactly. Older people don’t need as high an income as they aren’t saving deposits, buying houses, paying childcare and raising young families.

Emmz1510 · 17/02/2026 21:48

No not really, considering the qualifications you have

Coco4dogs · 17/02/2026 21:32

I don't think you are being unreasonable, that does seem like a low salary for someone with your qualifications. That said how long have you been in the role? Do you have a lot of experience?

I would not be too quick to jump ship for an extra 8k, civil service pension is so much better than you will ever get in private sector. Can you apply for other role in civil service??

Good luck!

BringBackCatsEyes · 17/02/2026 21:01

MidnightMeltdown · 17/02/2026 18:00

Depends on which generation you were born into. For older generations who bought cheap property and have little or no mortgage, £65k is decent. For younger generations with high rent/mortgage, not so much.

I’m 55 with a mortgage and a lot less income that £65K. I have a good life thanks.

EricTheGardener · 17/02/2026 20:58

OP, I haven't read the thread past the first few responses, but would it be worth looking at other government depts that have a much higher ratio of HEO/SEO roles? If you scroll down on this page to the diagram called 'Grades of civil servant by department' you can see that depts like the MOJ, DWP, HMRC Home Office, etc, have a much higher quantity of AOs and EOs because they operate a lot of public-facing services, whereas depts like DEFRA, Culture and Education have more HEO/SEO/Grade 6 & 7 roles. Maybe there would be more opportunities for progression that way? Who knows. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/civil-service-grades

By the way, I'm a grade 7 and I don't line manage anyone (yet - I will be soon, but only one person).

Also could you get a mentor? My dept has a mentoring scheme exactly for this sort of thing.

tokennamechange · 17/02/2026 20:58

lilythepinkone · 17/02/2026 16:58

It's unbelievable because in the private sector, once you are above an entry pay-grade, you are expected to work overtime until the work is done. And no, flexi time doesn't exist everywhere.

My partner stopped getting overtime in his early 40s when he was a snr manager(overtime had been paid for working after 5pm and sometimes with big projects he would be at work till 9pm.)

In a snr role, you are expected to stay until the work is done, not clock off at precisely 5pm.

One of my kids often works a 12 hr day and that's in the private sector.

In investment banking, people the same age as the OP can work 18 hr days if there is something important going on - and no 'weekends off in lieu'.

Edited

....and?

literally none of that makes it unbelievable! It just makes some of the 40million working people in the UK have different jobs than those of your immediate family!

Between you and the poster who doesn't understand the word literally I think a few people on this thread need to buy a dictionary.

Besides which you clearly don't understand what flexitime is or how it works - the whole point is that it compensates for extra time worked. Think about it logically - if everyone in the civil service/private sector 'clocked off at 5pm' (i.e. the second their working hours finished) instead of carrying on 'until the job was done' they wouldn't accrue toil/flexi in the first place, would they?

Doone22 · 17/02/2026 20:47

It's fine if you're outside London and in civil service. The pensions and benefits are not anywhere close to as good in private sector.

SurreyisSunny · 17/02/2026 20:30

It doesn’t sound a lot for your education but I guess also depends where you live. I’m in Surrey yet friends of mine are in the north where a similar home is a quarter of the price

also so you get the fanastic civil service pension? If so that’s worth another £10k

sadly for EAs there little progression. Could you consider a career change?

Bluedenimdoglover · 17/02/2026 20:20

If other EOs in your office are able to get and pay a mortgage, run a home, go on holiday etc. then it depends what else you want from life. If you are permanent staff, you are also building up a pension.

MummyWillow1 · 17/02/2026 20:04

Only you can change your situation. If you don’t make yourself niche or adapt to line management then you will continue where you are. EO level you need to have a USP to progress, no one will hand it to you.

If your department isn’t offering you what you need then start researching places that do.

pinetree22 · 17/02/2026 19:26

No, not a good salary for me. However, I'm on a different industry (private sector). A junior associate out of uni would probably be on more than that. I'm 45 and nearly on £200k

Whooo · 17/02/2026 18:53

tokennamechange · 17/02/2026 14:15

you do understand that "you" isn't the same as "everyone?" It's quite concerning that "a senior civil servant" understands neither that concept nor the meaning of the word "literally."

Yes if you compare like for like, perhaps some lawyers or IT technicians or HR officers in some private firms might earn a third of someone doing a broadly comparable job in, say, their local council
(although again most people don't take into account all the benefits of the public sector that might mean the overall difference is less than what it seems when you just look at the headline salary)
but there are also a lot of solicitors and IT staff and HR officers in the private sector earning the same or less than their public sector counterparts.

Either way it doesn't mean that all jobs in the private sector are better paid than all jobs in the public sector or that the public sector is "literally" the worse paid career.

If you added up all the salaries of every public sector employee you'd be including a comparatively large number of people who are fairly well paid even if they could (as individuals) possible earn more in the private sector - chief execs, chief legal officers, CFOs, doctors, headteachers, etc. Many more white collar roles, including teachers, nurses, etc who, while their salaries are hardly big bucks are still higher than the average full time wage. All of which would bring the average pay per employee up.

Whereas if you considered, say, the private care or retail sector, a huge majority of staff would be on minimum wage, or close to it.

Edited

If you have no qualifications, then you might be paid a pittance in both public and private sector. Retail is not the only job to exist, Christ.

Most professionals, whether they are legal, medical, mathematicians, software engineers or whatever do earn more in private sector. That is common sense amongst those circles. If the only people you associate are those in retail or civil service you’re going to have a race to the bottom mindset.

Frankly, only people with no discernible skill or career, would see public sector as well paid. It is not intended to be well paid, it’s the bare minimum to keep the country running. The public isn’t paying for you to have a “good” life, merely an average one.

pinkspeakers · 17/02/2026 18:46

Based on the experience of my very recently graduated DD and DS, that seems to be a pretty typical starting salary for a graduate. Maybe just a bit better than average. So for a graduate more than a few years in, it seems pretty poor and I would aim to do better.

SoSadandTired7 · 17/02/2026 18:38

So leave the civil service?

My DH is in the CS and the pay is abysmal (even in London). But the flexibility he has is unbeatable. I don't know anyone in the private sector, even in entry level or "just admin"/low responsibility roles who work as few hours as my DH and his colleagues.

The whole deal with the CS is that the pay is shit but the non-salary benefits much better than private sector.

Swipe left for the next trending thread