Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask for opinions on varicella vaccine vs natural immunity?

163 replies

Moopp · 16/02/2026 18:59

I am not an anti vaxxer - me and my kids have had every vaccine offered so far. My kids will be eligible for a single dose of vaccine in the next year on the NHS. They have not yet had chickenpox, as there's only been one outbreak locally and we missed it.

The varicella vaccine offers protection for 10-20 years, and many people may get lifelong immunity, but it's only been in use since the 90s so it's presumably actually an unknown.
Natural infection generally offers lifelong protection.

My options:

  • try to get the kids infected naturally before their vaccine appointment comes through. Very low risk of serious complications as they are both healthy, age 3 and nearly 5. They get lifelong protection.
  • get them a single dose of vaccine, which offers 95% protection for 10-20 years (maybe more). They might then contract chickenpox in adulthood and it is much nastier for adults.

I will not leave them both unvaccinated AND uninfected, as I want to contribute to herd immunity. That's not an option.

Obviously eventually we might as a country get to a point where so many people being vaccinated means there is so little chickenpox circulating that their chances of catching it as older adults is really small. But that relies on vaccine uptake (or natural immunity) being above 80% I believe, and I'm not sure I have that much faith in people's decision to choose to vaccinate anymore. It will be generally offered with MMR, and uptake for that is currently 84% and declining.

It's worth mentioning that both my kids are boys, so I don't have to worry about the additional risk of them getting chickenpox in pregnancy should their vaccine based immunity wear off in less than 40 years.

If anyone is really knowledgeable about long-term varicella vaccine immunity I'd really value your input. Also I'm just interested if anyone has a perspective I haven't thought of.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
BelleEpoque27 · 16/02/2026 19:50

It's not true that immunity only lasts 10-20 years. If that were the case there would be a booster programme. It's actually that we don't know how long immunity lasts - but as the earliest vaccinations are 25+ years ago and there's no sign of loss of immunity, we can probably assume it's lifelong.

My son had the vaccination in 2020 when he was 1, and we were told to consider getting him a booster before he goes to uni just to make sure he's covered. But that is just a back-up, they didn't really think it was necessary. He's been through numerous outbreaks at nursery and school without any sign of pox.

Incidentally, immunity from infection isn't foolproof - you can be infected again. I have a friend with an autoimmune condition who's had it three times (badly).

My US colleagues were absolutely horrified when they found out UK children still get chicken pox because we don't (at the time I spoke to them about it) vaccinate. To them it's an old-fashioned illness that no-one nowadays gets.

HollyTheHarrier · 16/02/2026 19:45

Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:20

I believe this is incorrect. Your chances of getting shingles after the vaccine are lower than if you have contracted the actual virus, but you can still get it.

Surely the fact that risk of shingles is lower is an excellent reason to get the vaccine? Shingles is horrific. I would (and will) 100% vaccinate. It’s safe and effective.

TheBestThingthatAlmostHappened · 16/02/2026 19:40

Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:33

This is exactly the kind of information I'd been hoping to find. I have read some studies on long term immunity, but haven't seen anything with this figure. Do you remember where you read it by any chance?

I can't remember where I read the 25 y figure but the govt website states that the effectiveness doesn't decline over time. https://ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2025/12/17/what-is-the-mmrv-vaccine-and-is-my-child-eligible/

How the MMRV protects against 4 potentially serious illnesses, including measles and chickenpox – UK Health Security Agency

This blog post was last checked and updated February 2026. Due to the introduction of a varicella (chickenpox) vaccination programme, the measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (MMRV) vaccine replaced the MMR vaccine in the routine childhood programme f...

https://ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2025/12/17/what-is-the-mmrv-vaccine-and-is-my-child-eligible

JustAnotherWhinger · 16/02/2026 19:39

Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:33

This is exactly the kind of information I'd been hoping to find. I have read some studies on long term immunity, but haven't seen anything with this figure. Do you remember where you read it by any chance?

Have you read what the JCVI said in the explanation of why they’ve now recommended it?

Basically they can only say it has been shown to have X amount of years of immunity because it’s only been in use those years, but they’ve said that the previous belief that it would wane in 10-20 years leading to a risk of CP in adults and also could lead to an increased risk of shingles have both been shown not to be the case.

Theres no evidence of immunity waning, but they can’t say it’ll last for 40/50/60 years yet because it’s not been in use that long. They can say that the first groups to have it - which is decades ago now - have been shown to still have immunity and no increase in shingles risk (lowered in fact).

LameBorzoi · 16/02/2026 19:36

Even if it did wear off (which it shouldn't) they can just get a booster.

I remember getting chickenpox as a kid. I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.

Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:33

TheBestThingthatAlmostHappened · 16/02/2026 19:30

Testing had shown that the vaccine does not decline in effectiveness over 25 years. They haven't tested it after that but the assumption is if it hasn't changed in 25 years it probably lasts indefinitely.

This is exactly the kind of information I'd been hoping to find. I have read some studies on long term immunity, but haven't seen anything with this figure. Do you remember where you read it by any chance?

OP posts:
gototogo · 16/02/2026 19:33

My paediatrician said the reason for the vaccine was economic not for child welfare in his opinion. They had all other vaccines offered

NeverEnoughCake2 · 16/02/2026 19:31

Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:20

I believe this is incorrect. Your chances of getting shingles after the vaccine are lower than if you have contracted the actual virus, but you can still get it.

This isn't correct. Shingles is caused by a reactivation of the chicken pox virus that has laid dormant after a previous chicken pox infection.

Shingles can also cause long-term neuropathic pain. I got it as a teenager and still have an area of my back that feels like someone's sticking 100s of pins in it if my husband so much as gently strokes it. It's exactly where I had the worst blisters when I got shingles. So, you might want to factor that risk in when making a decision about the vaccine.

Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:31

DrJump · 16/02/2026 19:30

I'm in Australia in a relatively high vaccine accepting area. I do not know a child who has had chicken pox.

Thanks, this is helpful.

OP posts:
Cathmawr · 16/02/2026 19:31

Many countries have been vaccinating for decades and continue to do so, so I imagine the long term cost vs risk deems it worthwhile continuing to vaccinate. I recall reading a study that illustrated there was not a higher prevalence of chicken pox in adults in vaccinated countries vs unvaccinated, but I don't remember the details sorry.

My DD caught chicken pox when she was about 16 months, I had researched and wanted to get her jabbed privately but was waiting for a window of no colds or bugs (never ending in nursery!). Luckily there were no long term ill effects BUT she was so poorly. She was absolutely covered in them and so miserable. I felt so so guilty not to have organised a vaccine sooner and avoiding all that anguish for her. It also meant taking two weeks off work which had a financial impact.

OldGothsFadeToGrey · 16/02/2026 19:31

Averynicelady · 16/02/2026 19:14

I would regard catching Chickenpox (varicella zoster) as something to be avoided if at all possible.

Low risk of serious complications from varicella zoster infection isn’t no risk. The rare but serious / life threatening complications can occur in previously healthy children.

www.thetimes.com/article/9119df77-f3eb-4437-ad84-fffd4fb4ac7a?shareToken=27bd6ca7be041e2a9e2ef34eb81aba9d

There is also the risk of getting shingles as a consequence of childhood chickenpox infection. It’s an unpleasant condition at the best of times but can be more serious in immunosuppressed adults - for example those undergoing cancer treatment. We never know what is around the corner. People who have never had chickenpox can’t get shingles.

The chickenpox vaccination programme is, as you say, still evolving. If adulthood infections in previously vaccinated people turn out to be a problem, there’s always going to be the option of a booster vaccine.

I paid privately for DS3 to have a chickenpox vaccine on his first birthday, and I’m still convinced it was the right decision

My little boy caught chickenpox at nursery at 21 months old. It was awful.

Paid for DD to have the vaccine at Boots as soon as she was old enough. £150 for both doses. Chickenpox has done the rounds at her nursery about 5 times since, and most of the children in her room have had it. The parents I’ve spoken to thought it was pretty awful for their kids too.

No regrets.

DrJump · 16/02/2026 19:30

I'm in Australia in a relatively high vaccine accepting area. I do not know a child who has had chicken pox.

Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:30

Theoldwrinkley · 16/02/2026 19:22

chickenpox as an adult is nasty. Go for the vaccine.
I always thought I had 'natural immunity' as I'd top/tailed in a bed with my cousin who had CP badly,and I didn't get it (age 6). I got it when I was 18. Not recommended.

But chickenpox as an adult is exactly what I am trying to avoid for them! Perhaps my OP wasn't clear.
If I manage to get them CP as children, it's very very unlikely they'll get it again as adults. But if they'll get a vaccine, in theory that could wear off in 20 years and they could then get CP as adults.

OP posts:
TheBestThingthatAlmostHappened · 16/02/2026 19:30

Testing had shown that the vaccine does not decline in effectiveness over 25 years. They haven't tested it after that but the assumption is if it hasn't changed in 25 years it probably lasts indefinitely.

Daisypod · 16/02/2026 19:30

I had shingles recently and I have never felt so ill or been in so much pain, it was similar levels to being in labour! For that reason alone I would get the vaccine as natural immunity from getting cp means you are at much higher risk of shingles later in life

gototogo · 16/02/2026 19:29

I opted not to vaccinate 20 years ago (living in a country where they routinely vaccinated) because I was worried that they wouldn’t be able to access boosters in the U.K. when we moved back. They both caught chicken pox within 6 weeks of landing back here!

Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:28

I really appreciate those pointing out the possible severe side effects. I'm well aware that's a risk. But if the vaccine does NOT offer lifelong immunity, as may be the case, I am choosing between the risk of side effects in children, and the risk of side effects in adults (which tend to be more common and more severe)?

OP posts:
LakieLady · 16/02/2026 19:27

The vaccine wasn't a thing when I was a kid. For years, I thought I'd acquired immunity because I never got it, even though many of my school friends did.

I had chicken pox when I was 36, I think I caught it from my neighbour, who was 49. We were both really ill, and was off work for around 3 weeks. I had repeated attacks of shingles for 10 years or so afterwards.

If I hadn't had it, I'd definitely have the vaccine.

1990s · 16/02/2026 19:26

flatwhiteinabucket · 16/02/2026 19:16

My son has an auto-immune disease (Colitis), directly as a result of chickenpox when he was 8. He now has PSC liver as an extension of colitis. He will be looking at a liver transplant in the next 10 years. He is still only 19.

Chickenpox is a horrible, horrible disease.

Both my other children had it with no complications: I was naively expecting the same for child 3.

I’m so sorry, what an awful thing to happen. On this basis alone I’d get it. Really hope your son gets the transplant he needs and is well.

Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:26

Ikeameatballlunch · 16/02/2026 19:18

NHS weighs up risks v cost benefits so there must be an overall benefit

At a population level there definitely is in the future if vaccine uptake is high enough. Cases will be much lower as far less chickenpox will be circulating.

OP posts:
Theoldwrinkley · 16/02/2026 19:22

chickenpox as an adult is nasty. Go for the vaccine.
I always thought I had 'natural immunity' as I'd top/tailed in a bed with my cousin who had CP badly,and I didn't get it (age 6). I got it when I was 18. Not recommended.

Ikeameatballlunch · 16/02/2026 19:22

Just remembered that (I think) in NZ they get the CP before some other the others; I know someone who came back here and had to get catch up mmr etc for their toddler but he’d had the CP

bloodredfeaturewall · 16/02/2026 19:22

I couldn't afford to stay home with a week each (at least!) for each of mine.

also, our family is excema prone and it's strongly recommended.

plus it can be really nasty. one neighbour's dc had the pocks in the lung and this resulted in a really poorly child.

Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:21

Snoringboringbore · 16/02/2026 19:08

Are you an epidemiologist?

If I was I would not be asking!

OP posts:
Moopp · 16/02/2026 19:20

outerspacepotato · 16/02/2026 19:13

I'm in the US where we've been vaccinating since the 90s.

My kids haven't gotten chicken pox and thus won't be getting shingles. That's a big win.

I believe this is incorrect. Your chances of getting shingles after the vaccine are lower than if you have contracted the actual virus, but you can still get it.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread