Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

In-laws talking to 6 year old about inheritance

406 replies

SpanishFork · 15/02/2026 14:59

Last summer my FiL’s very elderly uncle died; I had met him a handful of times. My husband and his brothers and cousins would often drive down to see him in his house where he lived independently. Husband’s aunt got a call from a neighbour to say he had died.

So yesterday my nearly 7 year old comes home babbling about saving plans etc. It turns out she is a beneficiary of his will and my husband knew this but didn’t tell me as I
have a ten year old from a previous marriage. She has no relationship whatsoever with her father’s family.

My husband who supports my eldest without question says I am always weird about stuff like this. He says his parents and one of his siblings have got every right to talk openly about money and this openness is what helps educate children about money.

There is no way I would have spoken to my youngest about this especially as my eldest won’t have such a good start.

I am so angry that my in-laws have done this. My husband says my daughter would have found out anyway through cousins etc.

OP posts:
Stompythedinosaur · 15/02/2026 15:56

Sorry, op, I think you're wrong. Hiding the truth from your dc is probably the worst thing you can do. Open conversation is what will stop the inevitable inequities of a blended family build into something toxic.

Why shouldn't dc understand what savings and investments they have? My own young teens understand enough of our finances to know what help they will get for things like uni and what they will have to expect to fund for themself. How would it be better to keep it a secret and spring it on them at the last moment?

Your in laws were telling the truth about a matter that directly affected your dc. They weren't breaching anyone's privacy.

When you hide information from dc, they will generally imagine something worse than reality.

Threewordsspecial · 15/02/2026 15:54

thepariscrimefiles · 15/02/2026 15:47

You've posted before about the very stark differences in the way your in-laws treat your younger daughter who is their biological grandchild and your elder DD who is not. They make it crystal clear to your elder daughter that they don't consider her to be part of their family.

I think a six year old is far too young to understand about inheritance, large sums of money and compound interest which makes me think that they are doing this on purpose to highlight once again how priviledged your younger daughter is/will be in comparison to her older sister. They may also be trying to drive a wedge between your two daughters.

Agreed with you until the last sentence.

naah, they are ensuring 6yo is NOT stolen by the mother who, given the chance, will use it for both kids. It’s their right to ensure thus guest happen.

6yo when say 21 and gets their money, it’s perfectly fine to gift/ treat sis out of own free will to a holiday, nice birthday present etc etc. it’s not up to mum to divide the money into half or 2/3!

i am NOT a horrible person. However, if we’re in laws, I would object to money being shared by the mother. Let owner of money decide what to do with it, when of age. They are just letting child know it exists.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 15/02/2026 15:53

JustAnotherWhinger · 15/02/2026 15:28

The younger children learn about money the better.

the younger children learn about differences between their situations the more they take it in their stride.

as someone with a DSS who inherited a lot when his mummy died, and as the only grandchild will inherit a lot, and two Dds who will inherit from grandparents but not loads, two younger children who will inherit only from DH and I, and a DN who lives with us who is well set up by his late Mum I can tell you that openness from a young age means children take things in their stride.

landing news of vast differences between siblings on teenagers is a terrible idea

A close friend of DB’s sadly lost both parents before or when he was about 10 and he and his elder brother were brought up by their grandparents. Both children inherited money from their parents house and whatever else there was. He went a bit mad spending money but kept enough to buy a house for himself. No idea if he was told about money or inheritance as a child. Probably not.

NewHere83 · 15/02/2026 15:52

I think it's totally out of order for your in-laws to decide when and how your child should be told about this. Knowing you're coming into money one day can impact your approach to money, your work ethic and learning. I'm not saying she shouldn't be told but it's a parent's job to manage this, not a grandparents. Huge overstep.

Newname29 · 15/02/2026 15:51

Hard to give a meaningful answer when you wort say the amount. Big difference between 5k and 50k

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 15/02/2026 15:50

6, even 10 is too young to talk to about inheritances simply because they don’t realise the value of money beyond pocket money. It’s also a bit silly to mention inheritances because again they don’t understand how this works and may think if they’re nice to x relative they’ll leave them some money, whereas that shouldn’t be the case at all.

Threewordsspecial · 15/02/2026 15:49

@Ophy83 genuine Q. How much involvement does your own family have with both your children? Do they treat them equally ? Do they also not see them? Where are they in all of this?

Happytaytos · 15/02/2026 15:49

The younger they know, the better. It's normalised then by the time they're adults. Otherwise you end up with huge resentment at 18. Your H is correct.

CarlaLemarchant · 15/02/2026 15:48

I agree OP and I would be angry too. It’s not so much the money although that seems age inappropriate aswell, it’s more the potential grenade it throws in the relationship between your children.

As their parent, you should have been left to manage how that information was handled. At 6 though, I think she’s young enough to forget about the detail, I would speak to them and ask them to leave the subject alone for x amount of years and you will deal with it with both your children at the right time.

thepariscrimefiles · 15/02/2026 15:47

SpanishFork · 15/02/2026 15:27

Yes she was told exactly how much she will have.

I agree about teaching financial literacy but this can be taught without knowing how much you have.

A young person going off to university or watching a half-sibling going can cope intellectually with the inequalities; a ten year old should not be confronted by the inequalities between them and someone so close to them.

You've posted before about the very stark differences in the way your in-laws treat your younger daughter who is their biological grandchild and your elder DD who is not. They make it crystal clear to your elder daughter that they don't consider her to be part of their family.

I think a six year old is far too young to understand about inheritance, large sums of money and compound interest which makes me think that they are doing this on purpose to highlight once again how priviledged your younger daughter is/will be in comparison to her older sister. They may also be trying to drive a wedge between your two daughters.

Whatonearth07957 · 15/02/2026 15:46

NewYearNewMee · 15/02/2026 15:11

YABU - financial literacy is learned from a young age, your DH is right. You have two children with different extended families - things are going to be different for them during their lives, you can’t stop this.

This all day long

Jugglingeggs · 15/02/2026 15:46

Children need to know about money , investments, financial planning , interest, savings etc , problem is not enough people bother , they let their kids drift on without drawing attention to this subject then suddenly they are young adults who have no idea , better to learn gradually from young and build a good foundation of knowledge about finance

InterIgnis · 15/02/2026 15:44

Meadowfinch · 15/02/2026 15:39

This. No six year old needs to know about an inheritance. Plenty of time for that when they discuss careers and university.

They don’t need to be denied the knowledge either.

6 is a fine age to start learning about finances, especially ones she has a vested interest in. Normalizing this is to her benefit.

NoSoapJustUseShowerGel · 15/02/2026 15:43

Yeah you’re definitely unreasonable. If you want everything fair you can’t have children with different fathers.

finechettie · 15/02/2026 15:40

especially as my eldest won’t have such a good start

😂🎻

Maybe you should have chosen a more wealthy dad for your dc1

You made your bed, you lie in it. You blended your family, you deal with it.

Your 2 dc are not the same and do not have the same families. You knew that, now you complain.

Meadowfinch · 15/02/2026 15:39

MidWayThruJanuary · 15/02/2026 15:06

@Octavia64
Because she is only 6?

This. No six year old needs to know about an inheritance. Plenty of time for that when they discuss careers and university.

Harvestmoons · 15/02/2026 15:39

Are you likely to have more children in the future OP as this could create further inequalities as they wouldn't inherit either presumably, despite having the same relationship to the deceased. Sorry if someone has posted this already

Thattimenow · 15/02/2026 15:38

SpanishFork · 15/02/2026 15:27

Yes she was told exactly how much she will have.

I agree about teaching financial literacy but this can be taught without knowing how much you have.

A young person going off to university or watching a half-sibling going can cope intellectually with the inequalities; a ten year old should not be confronted by the inequalities between them and someone so close to them.

And? Are we talking like £500? Or many multiples?

@SpanishFork you told your youngest not to allow any photos taken by your in-laws without your eldest in them too. Now that is messed up

TreesinthePark · 15/02/2026 15:38

Hmm deleted what I was typing because it felt outing but still want to say I sympathise.

You love your children equally but time to accept they will have different life experiences due to their different fathers.

SweeetFannyAdams · 15/02/2026 15:36

SpanishFork · 15/02/2026 15:17

I am angry that my in-laws thought it was appropriate to speak openly to a six year old NOT that my eldest was ‘sidelined’.

Nah, you're angry that your younger child is getting something your older child is not.

Otherwise you wouldn't even have mentioned the older child.

Ophy83 · 15/02/2026 15:35

I don't think the problem is her knowing about her inheritance, but the fact that you didn't know / that your dh kept it a secret - was he worried about what your reaction would be?

Threewordsspecial · 15/02/2026 15:35

Anyway, far more intriguing 6 yo rem era the amount. So how much? 100k/ 50k / 25k and compounded by how many years.

if your child is a normal 6 yo, she will forget about it by tea time tomorrow. Until cousins remind her.

Bigcat25 · 15/02/2026 15:35

CurlewKate · 15/02/2026 15:26

Why her consent? Isn’t the child’s father an equal parent?

Because both parents should have a say/plan about how and when important info is communicated to their children. It is up to op and her husband to handle, not her in-laws without her knowledge.

Would you like your in-laws to take the lead on teaching important or sensitive topics without your knowledge? That isn't a normal approach.

SweeetFannyAdams · 15/02/2026 15:35

SpanishFork · 15/02/2026 15:10

I have never lied to my children, they know that they are half-siblings and my eldest knows the situation with her bio family.

No child needs to know how much money they have until university applications, even full siblings.

No ten year old needs to know how much better off her sibling is.

No in-law should ever discuss something so private to a six year old.

Children can be taught about money without knowing exactly how much they have.

I am so angry.

But these are all YOUR made up rules.

It doesn't mean everyone else has to follow them.

Separate inheritance often comes with blended families and your kids will learn to accept that.

As soon as you do...

Threewordsspecial · 15/02/2026 15:33

SpanishFork · 15/02/2026 15:27

Yes she was told exactly how much she will have.

I agree about teaching financial literacy but this can be taught without knowing how much you have.

A young person going off to university or watching a half-sibling going can cope intellectually with the inequalities; a ten year old should not be confronted by the inequalities between them and someone so close to them.

But your 10 yo is fine to watch royal family being treated differently? Does she ask to go to Sandringham for Christmas? Is your house the biggest on your street or how do you tell your 10 yo why your house is different/ not the biggest?

you are imposing your prejudices and insecurity on your children and your DH has rightly called it.

by the way, one parent is enough for consent.