Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Lowe is going to wipe the floor with Farage?

238 replies

BlueJuniper94 · 15/02/2026 11:11

Just that. AIBU to think this is the end of Farage?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
ConcernedOfClapham · 15/02/2026 19:39

I don’t know. It all seems a bit People’s Front of Judea / Judean People’s Front to me. 😒

InOverMyHead84 · 15/02/2026 19:23

BlueJuniper94 · 15/02/2026 12:03

What happened

Administration, relegation. Nearly destroyed us.

Teanbiscuits33 · 15/02/2026 19:23

MightyDandelionEsq · 15/02/2026 19:10

And I cannot stress enough, there’s major money being made here from boat arrivals by companies too.

If people researched some of the companies providing the support, it’s in the billions (Serco and Clear Springs being an examples).

It wouldn’t shock me if current govt officials are shareholders or profiting in some way. Always seems to be the way unfortunately.

Edited

Clearsprings owner is Tory donor Graham King. Not sure about Serco but again - rich people profiteering from smuggling people.

And if stories like this are to be believed, there’s way more to this than meets the eye

https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/putin-illegal-migration-uk-border-defences-security-5HjcdpL_2/

Putin 'driving illegal migration to UK in bid to overwhelm border defences', sparking national security fears | LBC

Vladimir Putin is using hostile tactics to drive illegal migration to Britain in an attempt to overwhelm border defences and spark division in the UK, security insiders have claimed

https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/putin-illegal-migration-uk-border-defences-security-5HjcdpL_2/

Sillysop92 · 15/02/2026 19:21

Anything that splits the Far right vote is good news! Every cloud and all that. Lol!

MightyDandelionEsq · 15/02/2026 19:10

EasternStandard · 15/02/2026 18:55

Because the money is excellent and people get better at avoiding arrest. Up until recently people were even open about it, that BBC podcast with the man saying he ran the network.

It’s pretty much trying to clear up every person ready to earn millions from moving people, it’s probably even harder than drugs to stop because the people arriving are ok to do so.

And I cannot stress enough, there’s major money being made here from boat arrivals by companies too.

If people researched some of the companies providing the support, it’s in the billions (Serco and Clear Springs being an examples).

It wouldn’t shock me if current govt officials are shareholders or profiting in some way. Always seems to be the way unfortunately.

EasternStandard · 15/02/2026 18:55

Teanbiscuits33 · 15/02/2026 18:51

But surely the point is that the more people who get arrested and stopped, the less likely it is that others are going to take the risk. What else do you think should happen if not make an example of people?

It’s clearly a very complex issue. The full range of laws haven’t come in yet, they’re being staggered.

Because the money is excellent and people get better at avoiding arrest. Up until recently people were even open about it, that BBC podcast with the man saying he ran the network.

It’s pretty much trying to clear up every person ready to earn millions from moving people, it’s probably even harder than drugs to stop because the people arriving are ok to do so.

Bringemout · 15/02/2026 18:53

5128gap · 15/02/2026 18:41

And reducing the market doesn't mean they will increase.
There are many things a far right government can do to increase labour without the need for the wealthy to pay more for it.
Remove welfare support so even the old, disabled and ill will have to drag thenselves into some sort of work if they want to eat.
Remove employment rights so that those in jobs can be forced to work harder in poorer conditions and for less if they want to keep them.
Remove support for training and anything beyond a basic education for those who can't afford to pay for it, so the WC start grafting at 16.
I'm sure there's more.

Economically right wing employers are unlikely to want old and sick people working for them, less efficient.

Depends what rights, angela rayners madcap ideas are going to reduce hiring as employers are less likely to give someone a chance if the consequences of having ti dismiss someone is high.

People are already working harder for less because their housing and bills are expensive and there is more competition in the market.

what support for extra education, you are supposed to be in school til 18 yet our NEET numbers are increasing because the cost of employment is going up. AI is going to make it worse.

Teanbiscuits33 · 15/02/2026 18:51

EasternStandard · 15/02/2026 18:46

Sure but the issue is you can arrest people but the demand exists for someone else to step in easily once they’re gone. There’s been headlines on supposed ‘game changing’ impact but it’s up on last year.

There’s no shortage of people ready to earn a huge amount of money from moving people.

But surely the point is that the more people who get arrested and stopped, the less likely it is that others are going to take the risk. What else do you think should happen if not make an example of people?

It’s clearly a very complex issue. The full range of laws haven’t come in yet, they’re being staggered.

MightyDandelionEsq · 15/02/2026 18:51

5128gap · 15/02/2026 18:41

And reducing the market doesn't mean they will increase.
There are many things a far right government can do to increase labour without the need for the wealthy to pay more for it.
Remove welfare support so even the old, disabled and ill will have to drag thenselves into some sort of work if they want to eat.
Remove employment rights so that those in jobs can be forced to work harder in poorer conditions and for less if they want to keep them.
Remove support for training and anything beyond a basic education for those who can't afford to pay for it, so the WC start grafting at 16.
I'm sure there's more.

As someone rightly pointed out above, keeping immigration low to give workers more rights and negotiating power used to be a left leaning principle. Sadly it’s been lost and replaced with never ending supply of low income workers meaning any current worker has very little rights anyway.

At the minute you’re just speculating on what could happen as from what I’ve seen, Reform have barely any policies except those written on a fag paper and keep flip flopping on the populist opinion of the day. Labour very nearly reduced the welfare budget and ended up with an Internal dispute as they can’t balance the books either.

Currently the Greens seem to be topping the polls so I’d be more concerned about their policies which again, seem to actually be very few. I’m very depressed at all of the offerings available to us to be fair.

Edit: I also wouldn’t call Reform far right considering they’re mostly tories. That phrase gets brandished far too liberally.

fiorentina · 15/02/2026 18:49

Having worked for a company Rupert Lowe also worked for, he is an awful, repulsive man. He and Farage are as bad as one another.

EasternStandard · 15/02/2026 18:46

Sure but the issue is you can arrest people but the demand exists for someone else to step in easily once they’re gone. There’s been headlines on supposed ‘game changing’ impact but it’s up on last year.

There’s no shortage of people ready to earn a huge amount of money from moving people.

5128gap · 15/02/2026 18:41

MightyDandelionEsq · 15/02/2026 18:19

Did I say Farage would?

No I didn’t. But I stand by my point that over saturating the markets will keep wages suppressed.

And reducing the market doesn't mean they will increase.
There are many things a far right government can do to increase labour without the need for the wealthy to pay more for it.
Remove welfare support so even the old, disabled and ill will have to drag thenselves into some sort of work if they want to eat.
Remove employment rights so that those in jobs can be forced to work harder in poorer conditions and for less if they want to keep them.
Remove support for training and anything beyond a basic education for those who can't afford to pay for it, so the WC start grafting at 16.
I'm sure there's more.

persephonia · 15/02/2026 18:30

Teanbiscuits33 · 15/02/2026 18:20

Disabled people. They have already started demonising those and planting seeds but it hasn’t quite got off the ground at break neck speed yet while they can still concentrate on immigration. Then it will be all benefit claimants, single mothers, LGBTQ.

The trick is to do it at the same time..so you say "British people are fed up of being colonised and suffering in poverty while money goes on new arrivals.... Also as a high earner I am sick on of paying tax to support the feckless poor". It links the issues in people's mind and means you can step from one to t'other gracefully. And noone notices that the victims in the first sentence (unsupported British poor) are the demons in the second.

Croakymccroakyvoice · 15/02/2026 18:28

BeGentleMentor · 15/02/2026 16:20

Are you going to comment on my posts that proved from the government itself that there is a definite problem with CSA gangs of Asian heritage and your assertion that most of the gangs are white has not been proven?

Apart from Epstein which really isn't the sort of offender we're talking about in regards to grooming gangs operating in the UK by non-British offenders.

Your 2nd link was a gang who abused one victim, not systematic grooming and abuse of many.

And your 3rd and 4th links were okay, white but not white British but Albanian and Romanian criminal gangs who'd taken adv

Edited

You think Epstein didn't operate in the UK?

EasternStandard · 15/02/2026 18:27

Croakymccroakyvoice · 15/02/2026 18:25

Labour mostly have been doing what they said to be fair. You wouldn't know it from the press but this is a good resource...

https://fullfact.org/government-tracker/

The biggest things they campaigned on pre GE were fully funded, fully costed, smash the gangs and growth not job losses.

That’s why they’re struggling.

persephonia · 15/02/2026 18:27

5128gap · 15/02/2026 12:42

If you're so concerned about the way working class people are viewed on MN perhaps you'd like to practice what you preach and stop linking being WC with support for racism? Because as a WC person, I'm sick to death of being told that anti immigration rhetoric and support for racist politicians are 'the concerns of the WC'.
In my WC opinion, Reform are 'vile' and I'd take being thought stupid any day of the week over being lumped in with their supporters.
Many of us WC people live quite happily in diverse communities and care far less about immigrants than we do about wealthy white people exploiting us as they have for centuries.

Oh some of the most racist people I have ever met had very well paid jobs and a lovely home in the Cotswolds.

There's a lot of bait and switch re immigration and small boats. One moment they will be talking about overall migration figures and how the UK is being "colonised". When you bring up footballers suddenly it's " they didn't come over in small boats". Ok but neither did most of the immigrants previously listed as a problem.

It's very very hard now to apply for asylum in the UK while abroad. It's also harder than before to come into the UK via regular methods (airplane etc) and then apply for asylum once here because the UK is careful not to give travel visas to people who might have an asylum case. But the harder you make getting to the UK, the greater the proportion of people who make it will be young adult men. The same way that the majority of people capable of completing a difficult obstacle course will be young men.
Basically - its a symptom of the UKs "success" in cracking down on other forms of asylum migration that so many (although not all) that make it are young men. That doesn't mean they aren't deserving. And in order to process their applications you need to house and feed them. The people pushing these narratives in the telegraph will be completely aware of this even if the people getting upset about it aren't. It's deliberate dishonesty.

And that's not even mentioning the ones who were allowed into the UK because they helped us in Afghanistan and the government accidentally leaked their details putting them at risk of Taliban reprisals. A fuck up for sure. But not a colonisation.

Croakymccroakyvoice · 15/02/2026 18:25

Bringemout · 15/02/2026 17:47

Tbh as a brown person, I don’t really care at this point what his motives are, what happened to those girls is appalling. I’m getting increasingly pissed off with the attitude of “we need to care more about whether we like the person exposing injustice than the actual injustice itself”. For whatever reason, in this particular thing he’s doing gods work, anyone who’s read anything these women have said about the abuse and torture they suffered would have a bit more sympathy for them rather than the smug, self congratulatory tone we see here.

The behaviour around the match in Birmingham indicates people are still tiptoeing around racial sensitivities. The best way to have a society that is cohesive is if everyone is policed exactly the same. We aren’t there and Labours ridiculous Islamaphobia laws will just make this worse.

I wouldn’t be voting either reform (they initially wanted to remove the 2 child tax credit cap, fundamentally disagree with more welfare expansion) or for respect but I think some of the reactions to either of those parties is hysterical.

Also the way we fund the NHS meeds massive reforms, thats just a fact, the current system is sucking up money and not delivering. Something has to change there.

People keep saying WC people are being suckered by reform yet Labour has broken many a manifesto promise or sprung stuff that wasn’t in the manifesto. If anyones a sucker here it’s anyone who voted for Labour…right?

Labour mostly have been doing what they said to be fair. You wouldn't know it from the press but this is a good resource...

https://fullfact.org/government-tracker/

Government Tracker – Full Fact

Full Fact is monitoring the government’s delivery on its promises

https://fullfact.org/government-tracker/

Teanbiscuits33 · 15/02/2026 18:20

5128gap · 15/02/2026 18:18

I'm fairly confident that Farage and his mates aren't going to do anything that stops billionaires exploiting people. If the pool of immigrants to exploit dries up another pool be found to replace them. And guess who's going to be in it?

Disabled people. They have already started demonising those and planting seeds but it hasn’t quite got off the ground at break neck speed yet while they can still concentrate on immigration. Then it will be all benefit claimants, single mothers, LGBTQ.

MightyDandelionEsq · 15/02/2026 18:19

5128gap · 15/02/2026 18:18

I'm fairly confident that Farage and his mates aren't going to do anything that stops billionaires exploiting people. If the pool of immigrants to exploit dries up another pool be found to replace them. And guess who's going to be in it?

Did I say Farage would?

No I didn’t. But I stand by my point that over saturating the markets will keep wages suppressed.

Croakymccroakyvoice · 15/02/2026 18:18

BeGentleMentor · 15/02/2026 16:20

Are you going to comment on my posts that proved from the government itself that there is a definite problem with CSA gangs of Asian heritage and your assertion that most of the gangs are white has not been proven?

Apart from Epstein which really isn't the sort of offender we're talking about in regards to grooming gangs operating in the UK by non-British offenders.

Your 2nd link was a gang who abused one victim, not systematic grooming and abuse of many.

And your 3rd and 4th links were okay, white but not white British but Albanian and Romanian criminal gangs who'd taken adv

Edited

Both things can be true at the same time. There could be an issue with Asian gangs being particularly well organised but, bearing in mind they are only 7% of the population, it could also be true that they do not make up the majority of grooming gangs, given the figures that I shared. Possibly, if you have a very specific definition of grooming gangs that is different from the definition used for the figures I had, that may skew towards a higher percentage of Pakistani gangs. That’s not the same thing as Pakistani gangs outnumbering other gangs though. Unless you have some actual data to show otherwise.

5128gap · 15/02/2026 18:18

MightyDandelionEsq · 15/02/2026 18:08

But then billionaires are using immigrants to suppress wages and reduce the natives ability to negotiate better working pay. The govt literally prop up min wage with working credits which benefits the billionaires. If you look into the money being made by the companies profiteering off immigration (especially illegal crossings) it’s insanely eye watering.

So as always, I see both sides are as bad as each other for the average working person. It’s why I don’t attach myself to any particular party.

I'm fairly confident that Farage and his mates aren't going to do anything that stops billionaires exploiting people. If the pool of immigrants to exploit dries up another pool be found to replace them. And guess who's going to be in it?

MightyDandelionEsq · 15/02/2026 18:12

Bringemout · 15/02/2026 18:08

I don’t disagree, tbf I have seen Rupert Lowe actually say there are a bunch of people in the Uk who need to be shoved into a job.

I think the problem is you can have 1 earner in a household which then qualifies a family for a raft of welfare which far outstrips your financial contributions. I do think British people need to suck it up and just get a bloody job and stop thinking things are beneath them.

I think the thing that a lot of people miss is that high levels of immigration was very much a right wing economic thing for a long time. Right wingers like open flexible labour markets because of simple supply and demand. When you reduce labour availability wages go up. It’s become a left wing thing because of social justice sentiments but the old left wingers would have been able to correctly identify that labour market manipulation by massively increasing the supply of labour would only really benefit the wealthy. Lower wages and they would be insulted from the social costs of more competition from finite resources like school places, reasonably priced housing, healthcare etc.

It’s only recently people have started believing stupid things like “high immigration has no impact on wages and housing costs”.

I’m pro immigration but sensible and targeted immigration. There is nothing wrong with a surge of immigration when required if it is accompanied by an actual plan around school places, infrastructure etc.

100% agree.

MightyDandelionEsq · 15/02/2026 18:08

5128gap · 15/02/2026 17:59

The fears of the WC have always been sneered at by those favouring right wing politics.
If WC people have poor quality of life they're told they should "get off their arses, work harder and better themselves."
If they live in substandard overcrowded accommodation they should have "made better life choices".
If they are poor and need welfare support they are "scroungers".
When anyone states the blindingly obvious, that the policies that would help WC people involve investment of public money in the services they use, the improvement of their neighbourhoods, plus additional money in their pockets, they are "a drain on the hardworking high earning tax payer".
When anyone suggests any sort of levelling up, then they're being given unfair advantage over a middle class child.
The only issue on which right wing parties "listen to the WC" is when pockets of them are persuaded that the cause of their disadvantage is immigration, and they can engage them in call and response.

Edited

But then billionaires are using immigrants to suppress wages and reduce the natives ability to negotiate better working pay. The govt literally prop up min wage with working credits which benefits the billionaires. If you look into the money being made by the companies profiteering off immigration (especially illegal crossings) it’s insanely eye watering.

So as always, I see both sides are as bad as each other for the average working person. It’s why I don’t attach myself to any particular party.

Bringemout · 15/02/2026 18:08

SleeplessInWherever · 15/02/2026 17:54

Possibly, but my argument would be that many of the jobs that immigrants do, our own unemployed won’t.

I manage a recruitment business, which heavily focusses on health care assistants for some of our SENd jobs. We also employ school cleaners, lunchtime staff, catering assistants.

I would estimate we fill those roles with 90% overseas candidates - we advertise them to everyone. Jobs need filling, and if UK born UC claimants don’t want them, they’ll still have to be filled.

We also can’t complain about people coming and being a resource drain, and also complain about them working.

I don’t disagree, tbf I have seen Rupert Lowe actually say there are a bunch of people in the Uk who need to be shoved into a job.

I think the problem is you can have 1 earner in a household which then qualifies a family for a raft of welfare which far outstrips your financial contributions. I do think British people need to suck it up and just get a bloody job and stop thinking things are beneath them.

I think the thing that a lot of people miss is that high levels of immigration was very much a right wing economic thing for a long time. Right wingers like open flexible labour markets because of simple supply and demand. When you reduce labour availability wages go up. It’s become a left wing thing because of social justice sentiments but the old left wingers would have been able to correctly identify that labour market manipulation by massively increasing the supply of labour would only really benefit the wealthy. Lower wages and they would be insulted from the social costs of more competition from finite resources like school places, reasonably priced housing, healthcare etc.

It’s only recently people have started believing stupid things like “high immigration has no impact on wages and housing costs”.

I’m pro immigration but sensible and targeted immigration. There is nothing wrong with a surge of immigration when required if it is accompanied by an actual plan around school places, infrastructure etc.

Swipe left for the next trending thread