Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think male nursery workers should be banned for safety reasons?

433 replies

Carla786 · 13/02/2026 18:47

I KNOW most men who work in them are fine but sexual abuse in nurseries is overwhelmingly committed by men. No more men, much less abuse risk.
Yes we need more CCTV etc to watch bad women but it cuts SA risk immeasurably.

We can still have male primary teachers etc kids are old enough to speak up then.

And yes, you can ban on the basis of sex for safety reasons. In women's refuges, eg.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
AmandineChamallow · 14/02/2026 21:00

If you wanted to compare male and female abuse in childcare settings. (Which is a reasonable thing to do. No point ignoring it.) You'd need to compare the proportion of male and female childcare workers carrying it out. Since far more women work in nurseries than men.

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 21:00

Sirzy · 14/02/2026 20:55

So how many children have died in nursery at the hands of men?

downplaying incidents involving women doesn’t help anyone

I haven't downplayed anything.
If anything, those supporting men working in nurseries are the ones downplaying things.

Sirzy · 14/02/2026 20:55

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 20:52

That makes me feel sick to read, and not knowing whether or not your baby is treated well in these settings is my primary reason for not putting my 12 month old in nursery.

The only difference between this example and male pedophiles working in nurseries is that this is a rare, shocking incident committed by one woman.
Society always find reports this like extremely shocking when these acts are committed by a woman, reason being, it's not as typical for a woman to want to hurt a child.
Unfortunately, pedophilia is less rare, and these men seek out children to abuse.

So how many children have died in nursery at the hands of men?

downplaying incidents involving women doesn’t help anyone

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 20:52

Sirzy · 14/02/2026 20:31

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-69026072.amp

this tragic case has been widely reported. Focusing on one kind of abuse doesn’t protect children it just feeds stereotypes

That makes me feel sick to read, and not knowing whether or not your baby is treated well in these settings is my primary reason for not putting my 12 month old in nursery.

The only difference between this example and male pedophiles working in nurseries is that this is a rare, shocking incident committed by one woman.
Society always find reports this like extremely shocking when these acts are committed by a woman, reason being, it's not as typical for a woman to want to hurt a child.
Unfortunately, pedophilia is less rare, and these men seek out children to abuse.

titdttlhm · 14/02/2026 20:39

MyLimeGuide · 14/02/2026 07:50

Women are more likely to be bullies in the workplace should women be banned from working? They can all stay at home with their children protecting them from the males (potential kiddy fiddlers)

You'll get crickets around here as soon as you suggest someone stays home with the children for a few small years.

Sirzy · 14/02/2026 20:31

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 20:28

Tbh I don't know the statistics for how many women tie down and suffocate the babies in their care but I don't think it happens as regularly as pedophilia. If it was as common, I should think we'd be wary of that too.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-69026072.amp

this tragic case has been widely reported. Focusing on one kind of abuse doesn’t protect children it just feeds stereotypes

Genevieve Meehan

Stockport nursery worker guilty of baby's manslaughter - BBC News

Kate Roughley strapped nine-month-old baby Genevieve Meehan to a beanbag and left her for 90 minutes.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-69026072.amp

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 20:28

Sirzy · 14/02/2026 19:17

But as awful as sexual abuse is why are we just focusing on that? There is other awful abuse that sadly can happen is protocol isn’t right.

A baby shouldn’t have been allowed to die because they were left tied down and suffocated. That was at the hands of a female staff member so your ban wouldn’t stop that. Should we ban all women too?

Tbh I don't know the statistics for how many women tie down and suffocate the babies in their care but I don't think it happens as regularly as pedophilia. If it was as common, I should think we'd be wary of that too.

IdaGlossop · 14/02/2026 19:36

I would not ban men from working in nurseries. There are several reasons for my having this view. The first is that the risk of a small child being abused by a male nursery worker is very small. Most people don't refuse to fly because occasionally aeroplanes crash. Second, it's important for children of both sexes to see men as well as women as carers. Third, it weakens the argument for women breaking into traditionally male areas of work if we restrict what men are able to do.

Raisedinthe90sperhaps · 14/02/2026 19:22

In all honesty, I wouldn’t send my child to a nursery where there was a male nursery worker. Wouldn’t employ a male nanny or childminder. People can be as offended as they like but I agree with you OP.

Sirzy · 14/02/2026 19:17

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 19:15

Okay but are you not just skirting around the fact that less children would be sexually abused if men didn't work in nurseries?

But as awful as sexual abuse is why are we just focusing on that? There is other awful abuse that sadly can happen is protocol isn’t right.

A baby shouldn’t have been allowed to die because they were left tied down and suffocated. That was at the hands of a female staff member so your ban wouldn’t stop that. Should we ban all women too?

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 19:15

SouthLondonMum22 · 14/02/2026 18:59

Yes. It still doesn't change the fact that nurseries aren't comparable and it would be highly unlikely that the law will change to deem nurseries as women only spaces.

Or how other types of abuse exist and will be allowed to continue if safeguarding policies aren't robust and it isn't funded well.

Okay but are you not just skirting around the fact that less children would be sexually abused if men didn't work in nurseries?

Sirzy · 14/02/2026 19:11

Focusing in on just one (awful) form of abuse isn’t the answer because it doesn’t prevent the other abuse that can happen if there aren’t proper safeguarding protocols in place.

If the government really cared they would be reducing (not increasing) the safe ratios and properly funding ‘free’ hours. But even so settings can and should be ensuring basics happen even if it is tricky. We would never dream of changing a child without at least one other adult in line of sight - if that means other children having to be moved to a different activity to make it practical then so be it.

we also need for a lot of people to grow up and stop thinking that raising concerns about something you have seen is “snitching” or in some way negative. Better to raise concerns and be shown wrong than ignore and be shown right.

SouthLondonMum22 · 14/02/2026 18:59

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 18:14

So do you agree that women's 'safe' spaces are such because no men are allowed?

Yes. It still doesn't change the fact that nurseries aren't comparable and it would be highly unlikely that the law will change to deem nurseries as women only spaces.

Or how other types of abuse exist and will be allowed to continue if safeguarding policies aren't robust and it isn't funded well.

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 18:14

SouthLondonMum22 · 14/02/2026 14:44

Women's toilets aren't work places and are generally seen as safe spaces for women.

Nurseries aren't comparable.

So do you agree that women's 'safe' spaces are such because no men are allowed?

SouthLondonMum22 · 14/02/2026 17:48

harrietm87 · 14/02/2026 17:41

Robust safeguarding should already be in place. Unfortunately, paedophiles (overwhelmingly male) are still able to abuse kids. Yes, in a perfect world, all nurseries would have perfect safeguarding measures in place and able to stick to them, but it’s not a perfect world, they are overstretched and underfunded and children are being abused as a result.

and that is what needs to change. Robust safeguarding, better funding etc and harsh consequences if not stuck to because even if men were banned, children would still be at risk of cruelty, neglect and abuse as things currently stand.

harrietm87 · 14/02/2026 17:41

SouthLondonMum22 · 14/02/2026 17:30

Of course it does.

Robust safeguarding changes would protect children from ALL types of abuse and there wouldn't be any need to challenge gender equality and discrimination laws in the work place and open it up to also target women in the work place.

Robust safeguarding should already be in place. Unfortunately, paedophiles (overwhelmingly male) are still able to abuse kids. Yes, in a perfect world, all nurseries would have perfect safeguarding measures in place and able to stick to them, but it’s not a perfect world, they are overstretched and underfunded and children are being abused as a result.

SouthLondonMum22 · 14/02/2026 17:30

harrietm87 · 14/02/2026 17:19

It doesn’t stereotype childcare as women’s work. If anything it stereotypes men who want to work in nurseries as paedophiles, but I’m ok with that if it protects children, which it would.

Of course it does.

Robust safeguarding changes would protect children from ALL types of abuse and there wouldn't be any need to challenge gender equality and discrimination laws in the work place and open it up to also target women in the work place.

harrietm87 · 14/02/2026 17:19

SouthLondonMum22 · 14/02/2026 14:43

It legally enforces the stereotype. Of course it would make a difference.

It doesn’t stereotype childcare as women’s work. If anything it stereotypes men who want to work in nurseries as paedophiles, but I’m ok with that if it protects children, which it would.

SouthLondonMum22 · 14/02/2026 14:44

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 07:41

Not "because they are men". Because they pose a greater risk.

You're phrasing it wrong.

If women posed an increased risk in certain areas of the workplace, it should be acceptable to stop them also. It's about risk. Similar to the argument re trans in womens toilets. Most women don't feel safe with a biological man in their spaces. Why are so many women okay to impose this on their vulnerable children when they're not accepting of it for their own safety?

Women's toilets aren't work places and are generally seen as safe spaces for women.

Nurseries aren't comparable.

SouthLondonMum22 · 14/02/2026 14:43

FourCheese · 14/02/2026 08:09

If there is a stereotype of caring being women’s work, does this mean we need to recruit more men in nurseries?

But childcare is already seen as women’s work, then removing the very small number of male staff would make very little difference, right?

It legally enforces the stereotype. Of course it would make a difference.

Gonnahavetofaceit · 14/02/2026 08:58

Men are statistically more of a risk but the common denominator across all these incidents of SA in early years is lack of robust safeguarding. Better safeguarding including appropriate cctv and the other suggestions on this thread would have reduced the likelihood of these males and females offending. You would think by now all nurseries would have these things in place but obviously not all do. (Also shocking that concerns were raised about this man and were ignored).

Given that most SA happens outside nurseries banning men wouldn’t significantly reduce it overall and would cause more problems for society, but implementing better safeguarding would reduce most of the risk in nurseries.

ScaryM0nster · 14/02/2026 08:30

AmateurDad · 13/02/2026 23:40

Father...?

For a significant number of children, not involved in the child’s life at all.

FourCheese · 14/02/2026 08:09

SouthLondonMum22 · 14/02/2026 00:48

It would send the message that caring for babies = women's work which is already an issue in society.

Not to mention the issues surrounding equality laws in the work place and the can of worms it could very well open. If we can decide that men can't do a job because they are men, the same thing will absolutely happen to women in the work place because it would become more acceptable.

Edited

If there is a stereotype of caring being women’s work, does this mean we need to recruit more men in nurseries?

But childcare is already seen as women’s work, then removing the very small number of male staff would make very little difference, right?

FourCheese · 14/02/2026 08:03

ffsnewusername · 14/02/2026 00:39

Yes 100%. I also think all nurseries should have full cctv which parents can access via an app.

I refuse to send my DC to nursery or have a childminder. I come from a village where one of the nursery nurses/sons adult son abused half of my brother class. Dozens of lives ruined. I keep men as far away from my DC as I can.

The CCTV should be available on request line an SAR

App is an overreach. And not sure how it work (live-streaming from a dozen different cameras or having multiple TB of footage per day)? Other people’s children would also be visible.

MyLimeGuide · 14/02/2026 08:02

sharkstale · 14/02/2026 07:57

I'm referring more to being physically violent, which is what SA and rape are, towards other people. In which case, yes. If women were frequently in the news for SA other members of staff then yes, it should be acceptable. As it happens, it's men that are frequently reported for sexual harassment in the workplace.

See the recurring theme here. Men.

Im just not down with discrimination.