Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think male nursery workers should be banned for safety reasons?

433 replies

Carla786 · 13/02/2026 18:47

I KNOW most men who work in them are fine but sexual abuse in nurseries is overwhelmingly committed by men. No more men, much less abuse risk.
Yes we need more CCTV etc to watch bad women but it cuts SA risk immeasurably.

We can still have male primary teachers etc kids are old enough to speak up then.

And yes, you can ban on the basis of sex for safety reasons. In women's refuges, eg.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Passingthrough123 · 13/02/2026 21:55

CypressGrove · 13/02/2026 21:50

This post is depressing to read because you are reading it with an emotional lens. Nobody is saying that all men are drawn to working with young children because they are perverts. And most posters are supportive of male teachers in primary and secondary schools - the discussion is about nursery. And if your husband doesn't understand that men as a sex class pose a greater risk to children in terms of sexual assaults then I hope he isn't teaching later level primary school maths which covers stats and probability.

Nobody is saying that all men are drawn to working with young children because they are perverts.

A few posters have said exactly that.

CypressGrove · 13/02/2026 21:55

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 13/02/2026 21:51

Is paedophilia the only form of abuse that children can be subjected to in nurseries?

No, but it's an easy one to reduce the risk of by removing male carers. We should also stamp out all forms of abuse. If someone shows me that women are proportional more likely to neglect children in nurseries then we'll have to start weighing that up - but i've not seen any evidence to suggest that at all.

Dying without a seatbelt on is not the only way to die in a car crash, doesn't mean we all remove our seat belts though.

titdttlhm · 13/02/2026 21:54

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:52

You literally queried whether men are more likely to be paedophiles, which means that you think women might actually be more likely to be paedophiles. No one but no one thinks that is true. It is laughable.

And no one thinks that women pose even approaching an equivalent level of risk to a child, even though of course there are women who do evil things.

Your solution was not to use childcare (fwiw I didn’t use a nursery either) but for the millions who need to, this is a good way of reducing risk (not eliminating it).

In my experience 'need' is usually 'want'. And no, that wasn't what I was saying at all. I don't consider leaving my child with a stranger safe, no matter who it is. So I didn't do it.

SpiritAdder · 13/02/2026 21:54

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:53

No but it is the one we are talking about. Men are more likely to commit all forms of abuse against children than women in any event.

Got any proof of that?

SpiritAdder · 13/02/2026 21:54

Dogs are probably as much of a threat as pedophiles. 1,600 children hospitalised annually due to dog bites.

Maybe we should ban families with children from having dogs.

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:53

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 13/02/2026 21:51

Is paedophilia the only form of abuse that children can be subjected to in nurseries?

No but it is the one we are talking about. Men are more likely to commit all forms of abuse against children than women in any event.

steff13 · 13/02/2026 21:52

Wouldn't this open the door for banning women from doing jobs if someone decided they weren't suitable? It's discrimination, and I would imagine it's illegal. Better safeguarding is what's needed.

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:52

titdttlhm · 13/02/2026 21:32

Not in greater numbers, but they exist. I don't trust a strange man with my children. I don't trust a strange woman with my children.

You literally queried whether men are more likely to be paedophiles, which means that you think women might actually be more likely to be paedophiles. No one but no one thinks that is true. It is laughable.

And no one thinks that women pose even approaching an equivalent level of risk to a child, even though of course there are women who do evil things.

Your solution was not to use childcare (fwiw I didn’t use a nursery either) but for the millions who need to, this is a good way of reducing risk (not eliminating it).

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 13/02/2026 21:51

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:30

Oh ffs of course men are more likely to be paedophiles…that is batshit.

You really think in this sexist misogynistic patriarchal society that there are female paedo rings going undetected in greater numbers than men?!

Is paedophilia the only form of abuse that children can be subjected to in nurseries?

CypressGrove · 13/02/2026 21:50

Passingthrough123 · 13/02/2026 21:23

Another sensible post, backed up by stats. Thank you.

My DP is a primary school teacher and this thread is so depressing to read. He chose to teach primary over secondary because a headteacher whose advice he sought – a woman – told him that primaries were woefully lacking male teachers and that it was good for children with absent fathers to have male role models, so he could make a positive contribution. Decades on, he has done exactly that. But according to this thread, he must've been drawn to working with younger kids because he's a pervert with a secret agenda, purely because he's a man. 😡

This post is depressing to read because you are reading it with an emotional lens. Nobody is saying that all men are drawn to working with young children because they are perverts. And most posters are supportive of male teachers in primary and secondary schools - the discussion is about nursery. And if your husband doesn't understand that men as a sex class pose a greater risk to children in terms of sexual assaults then I hope he isn't teaching later level primary school maths which covers stats and probability.

SouthLondonMum22 · 13/02/2026 21:44

SpiritAdder · 13/02/2026 21:34

Exactly.

titdttlhm · 13/02/2026 21:37

sharkstale · 13/02/2026 21:33

My daughter was in nursery from age 3 with women only. I would never put / have put my children in a nursery with men.

That is entirely your choice. Three is the minimum age I'd consider it too. Those women were still strangers and I've seen some pretty horrible emotional and mental abuse from women in authority over children in my time.

SpiritAdder · 13/02/2026 21:34

SouthLondonMum22 · 13/02/2026 21:27

Then why minimise it?

We need to protect children from all types of neglect and abuse including SA but not only SA. We also absolutely can't be complacent and assume that women never neglect or abuse children because that is how some of them who have done it got away with it for so long.

Safeguarding needs to be reviewed and changed and funded correctly to protect our children.

Banning men is too simplistic and doesn't properly address the major safeguarding issues which if not changed can and will lead to other kinds of abuse.

Cruelty and neglect has killed children in nurseries. It is just as serious.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9wgpdpdedqo
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/uk-news/toddler-allergies-died-after-being-36042789

sharkstale · 13/02/2026 21:33

titdttlhm · 13/02/2026 21:29

Surely you would also not leave your child with a woman you don't know?

My daughter was in nursery from age 3 with women only. I would never put / have put my children in a nursery with men.

titdttlhm · 13/02/2026 21:32

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:30

Oh ffs of course men are more likely to be paedophiles…that is batshit.

You really think in this sexist misogynistic patriarchal society that there are female paedo rings going undetected in greater numbers than men?!

Not in greater numbers, but they exist. I don't trust a strange man with my children. I don't trust a strange woman with my children.

nevernotmaybe · 13/02/2026 21:31

So when crimes are committed mostly by black communities, you agree they should be profiled?

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:30

titdttlhm · 13/02/2026 21:28

Are they more likely to be paedophiles or more likely to be caught? Is there still a bias that makes it less likely for women to be identified? We do hear about more women paedophiles these days, so it seems it's coming more out into the open. I suspect it's more common than we know.

Even if not SA, there are other types of abuse that can do just as much damage to children. Hence why I made it a point to find a way to stay home with my own children. I didn't trust anyone with them so young.

Oh ffs of course men are more likely to be paedophiles…that is batshit.

You really think in this sexist misogynistic patriarchal society that there are female paedo rings going undetected in greater numbers than men?!

titdttlhm · 13/02/2026 21:29

sharkstale · 13/02/2026 21:23

I have a son and I completely agree with the OP.

I would never, ever leave my children with a man I don't know. Men are statistically proven to be more of a danger to both women and children than women are.
It's so idealistic and frankly disgusting that many on this thread would rather have a "male role model" in the nursery (when it's factual that many pedophiles seek out these settings to offend, so how can you be sure you're looking at a good 'male role model') than want to protect their baby/toddler against the risks.

Surely you would also not leave your child with a woman you don't know?

Mapletreeleaf · 13/02/2026 21:29

Whilst I do understand the concerns I don’t think a male ban is the solution.

As someone mentioned previously what about teenagers. Should male secondary school teachers be banned as well? Do we need to ban men as sports coaches as well? There have been plenty examples of abuse in these situations. What about banning men in healthcare roles? Again plenty examples of abuse. I feel like every day I’m reading another story about a policeman abusing his position of power to abuse someone. Should men be banned from the police?

I don’t know what the solution should be but I suspect it is far more complex than just an outright ban of men. Better safeguards (like nurseries being designed without places that children can be alone with staff 1-1, better staffing levels, etc) would help protect all children from all adults and not just men.

As for the wider societal issue, I have no idea how we fix this.

titdttlhm · 13/02/2026 21:28

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:21

Yes, impossible in other words.

Except that we do know that men are vastly more likely to be paedophiles than women, and that paedophiles seek out opportunities to work with children, and that only a tiny % of nursery workers are men.

If you eliminated all males from working in nurseries statistically speaking some of those will be paedophiles, and there would be a negligible impact on the workforce overall.

Are they more likely to be paedophiles or more likely to be caught? Is there still a bias that makes it less likely for women to be identified? We do hear about more women paedophiles these days, so it seems it's coming more out into the open. I suspect it's more common than we know.

Even if not SA, there are other types of abuse that can do just as much damage to children. Hence why I made it a point to find a way to stay home with my own children. I didn't trust anyone with them so young.

SouthLondonMum22 · 13/02/2026 21:27

Midnights68 · 13/02/2026 21:22

Here are a couple of possibly uncomfortable questions. I don’t intend to minimise cruelty and neglect towards children. It’s disgusting and those women truly deserve what they get.

But firstly, women make up the vast majority of early years workers, and you’ve identified three female early years workers convicted of abuse and neglect. Men make up a tiny proportion of early years workers yet I think, since Christmas, I’ve read about three different convictions of men for sex abuse in nurseries. Certainly two.

Secondly, is cruelty and neglect as serious as rape and sexual abuse? Are they crimes of equivalent magnitude?

Then why minimise it?

We need to protect children from all types of neglect and abuse including SA but not only SA. We also absolutely can't be complacent and assume that women never neglect or abuse children because that is how some of them who have done it got away with it for so long.

Safeguarding needs to be reviewed and changed and funded correctly to protect our children.

Banning men is too simplistic and doesn't properly address the major safeguarding issues which if not changed can and will lead to other kinds of abuse.

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:27

Passingthrough123 · 13/02/2026 21:23

Another sensible post, backed up by stats. Thank you.

My DP is a primary school teacher and this thread is so depressing to read. He chose to teach primary over secondary because a headteacher whose advice he sought – a woman – told him that primaries were woefully lacking male teachers and that it was good for children with absent fathers to have male role models, so he could make a positive contribution. Decades on, he has done exactly that. But according to this thread, he must've been drawn to working with younger kids because he's a pervert with a secret agenda, purely because he's a man. 😡

Not at all. It’s about where it is safe to draw a line, balancing risks.

Primary school teachers are not presented with non verbal children’s naked genitalia throughout the day. It’s very different.

Great that your DH wants to be a positive role model for kids. I’m sure he wouldn’t minimise valid safety concerns either.

SpiritAdder · 13/02/2026 21:27

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:23

What percentage of female carers are abusive vs what percentage of male carers? Pointing at the relatively tiny numbers of bad women doesn’t change the fact that there are very high numbers of bad men.

I can’t find stats covering all forms of abuse broken down by sex.
The only abuse where it is broken down is CSA. Which is only 8% of all child abuse.

It doesn’t necessarily follow that the other 92% of child abuse, and all disabled and elder abuse would show the exact same pattern of offending as CSA.

Passingthrough123 · 13/02/2026 21:24

Midnights68 · 13/02/2026 21:22

Here are a couple of possibly uncomfortable questions. I don’t intend to minimise cruelty and neglect towards children. It’s disgusting and those women truly deserve what they get.

But firstly, women make up the vast majority of early years workers, and you’ve identified three female early years workers convicted of abuse and neglect. Men make up a tiny proportion of early years workers yet I think, since Christmas, I’ve read about three different convictions of men for sex abuse in nurseries. Certainly two.

Secondly, is cruelty and neglect as serious as rape and sexual abuse? Are they crimes of equivalent magnitude?

You're missing my point. Crimes against children are committed in nursery settings by both sexes. The answer isn't bans, it's better safeguarding.

harrietm87 · 13/02/2026 21:23

SouthLondonMum22 · 13/02/2026 21:14

Of course not.

Just like there isn't an easy way to spot the difference between young women who just loves kids and those young women who end up physically abusing them which we've also had far, far too many cases of lately.

What percentage of female carers are abusive vs what percentage of male carers? Pointing at the relatively tiny numbers of bad women doesn’t change the fact that there are very high numbers of bad men.