Let me spell this out very clearly for the hard of thinking

It’s true though isn’t it, if a perpetrator hasn’t been named yet you can always safely assume it is a man. You might be wrong once in a while but that’s a rarity.

Women who murder babies (under 1 year) are often experiencing post partum psychosis

We been knew. However it's always worth repeating for the terminally stupid.

A woman can be charged with rape if she assists or encourages a man to commit rape, for example by holding the victim down or by egging on the man and filming the rape, or by luring the woman to an isolated spot in order for the man to rape her.

I'm calling TAAT here.

In the UK women represent just 4% of the prison population. Men are the other 96%.

There aren't nearly as many places in prisons for women because we don't need them, because vastly fewer women are committing the sort of crimes you are jailed for in the UK 👌

Presumed female was reported in the emergency alert due to witness reports: female in a dress with brown hair. But please, this is not the time to start using this unimaginably tragic event as a new statistic to fuel arguments about which demographic causes the most harm.

How many women have been imprisoned, executed (or died by suicide in the same event) for committing mass shootings?
It's overwhelmingly a 'male' crime, i.e. a crime committed by males.
Clearly women can and do kill, the victims tend to be members of their own families. So-called 'spree' shooters such as this, are nearly all male, as are serial killers. There are very, very few women serial killers or spree shooters,
And yes, Rose West and Myra Hindley -- we know their names precisely because they are so very rare.

Agree
What can we do about it 🤔
Most people in power are men.
And they are the worst.

One thing we can do about it i think, is make sure our son's are doing chores in the house, taking responsibility,and accountability from an early age.

Not letting them get away with things because they smiled sweetly and said sorry.
And getting boys active.
Inactive boys become aggressive and get up to all sorts.
I think they need a sense of belonging quite early, I recommend martial arts.
Do not give boys access to smart phones or PlayStations. If they have access to the Internet and games then they need to be supervised at all times.
let's make corn a taboo and ban it.

If a boy becomes aggressive, get help early.
Do not wait until he does damage saying but he's only 12.

l know all this applies to girls too but it feels like boys need things spelled out for them, they need to be taught empathy and sympathy, like girls they should be taught pro social behaviours.

No need for women to come up saying my son is an angel please
No one is an angel.

Anything else?
I have a 3 year old son and what I see in the world scares me.

Your response is comprehensive, intelligent, objective and reasonably worded, using facts and statistics to back up your arguements. It's very persuasive. Particularly the word "retard" which doesn't reflect on you at all.

Immigration figures, tax and spending promises being totally unrealistic, Brexit related claims, net zero. They’re total retards and so are the people who vote for them.

Soz...this wasn't meant to be under your comment, but can't seem to delete it!

Can you show me where anyone has said RW or LL should be released?

Grasping at rather pedantic straws with this.

The mumsnet jury has already exonerated Lucy letby just let her out already, poor rose west was just going along with that nasty man why is she in prison.

Baby murders (under 1 year) are committed by women more often than men. And for about 1/3 of the under-5s, last I checked.

It's all so hypocritical.
I know for a fact that any woman here walking down a dark alley alone would much rather ask a woman for help than a man.
But they just keep boring on about Myra Hindley.

It’s the patriarchy, innit? Also internalised misogyny.

🤣🤣🤣

Why the fuck is it that when a fact is stated about men, some people have to scrat about throwing in a few outlier women just to challenge that fact?
How are we ever going to do something about this serious and deeply concerning threat that women face if we prefer to live in la la land?
With the terrifyingly low conviction rates for rape, the many cases of police officers involved in criminal offences against women, and this lack of acknowledgement that there is even a problem, I despair.

Horrific school shooting in rural British Columbia, Canada (8 dead, 25 injured). Perpetrator was 18 year old biological male who started transitioning to female at age of 12. Widely reported in the media that the shooter was a woman.

They are the minority, but it can't be claimed "these are not women crimes" because that's untrue

Women have woken up to the fact they don't have to tolerate this shit any more.

We can also see dreadful stuff coming down the line with social media, porn, cultures in our own cities which routinely deny basic human rights to women, MtF anti female aggression (thankfully now under attack on all sides), and we dropped the social construct that the principal value of a woman is to continue the human race.

The party is over for violent men, but it's never going to end completely and the decline is going to be slower than we would want.

Women in more violent societies or communities tend to be more violent. But there levels of violence always track well below the levels of violence exhibited by men. It's not just nature that affects how someone will behave, nurture does as well. But even accounting for nurture there's a difference.

The point is that there are crimes being reported as though a woman committed them when it was actually a male person identifying as a woman.

In Canada some of the news outlets are still talking about the recent shooter using her and she pronouns.

My DH had only vaguely heard about the shooting from a radio report and fully assumed the shooter was a woman.