Let me spell this out very clearly for the hard of thinking

Women don’t commit violent crime, on the whole. Women are in prison for lesser crimes.

I’ve clearly failed to explain this in simple enough terms. Still.

I don't think you should post a thread about rape that has a title that doesn't make it clear what it's going to be about

Ah, i see.

well, what she's saying is that when a man commits a crime, it should not be recorded or reported as committed by a woman.

She's also pointing out that the vast majority of violent or sexual crimes are committed by biological men.

She's started this thread prompted by the latest school shooter that is being reported as female when they are in reality a male.

She is saying that a crime committed by a man should not be recorded as committed by a woman.

And the other way, obviously, except its not as much of an issue since biological women hardly ever carry out mass shootings and rapes.

Maybe we should fill the women's prisons with men then? Seeing as they're just sat there empty.

It's there in black and white.

Yes they do, honestly please stop with the gaslighting. Men rape, men shoot, men commit violent crime.

Do you genuinely believe the op is saying that crimes committed by biological women should be recorded as having been committed by biological men?

Its 98% rapes actually. And this is those prosecuted. So those who feel able to come forward. Statistically men who are assaulted by women are less likely to report due to feelings of shame etc.

Also if these werent "female" crimes the statistics would be 100% of these crimes committed by men. To state that women are in prison for "lesser crimes" is ridiculous and untrue

Crimes don't have a sex but criminals do.

Maybe we should fill the women's prisons with men then? Seeing as they're just sat there empty.

Do you genuinely believe the op is saying that crimes committed by biological women should be recorded as having been committed by biological men?

You mean presumed, not assumed.
Also, crimes don’t have a sex.

It can safely be assumed in any of the above circumstances that a male person was the perpetrator.

No it can't. There's a strong likelihood that the perpetrator was male but it's not a forgone conclusion.

There was a case a couple(?) of years ago of a particularly brutal murder (I think the body was dismembered) and there was a thread of people waiting for the announcement that the perpetrator was a transwoman. Which never came, because the killer was in fact a woman.

First report I heard describing the attacker was of a female with long brown hair wearing a dress.
When we got the full description, my exact words were "I fucking knew it."

Men commit 99% of all rapes and sexual assaults.

Men (and young men) commit 95-98% of school shootings.

Men commit 90% of all violent crime in the UK.

These are not female crimes, and should never, ever be reported - or recorded - as such. It can safely be assumed in any of the above circumstances that a male person was the perpetrator.

immediately in the aftermath people were warned to lock their doors against ‘a woman in a dress’. That person was still being described that way by news organisations a day later.

So if a female shoots up a school, which they have done in the past, it shouldn't be reported as a female perpetrator?

Women don't sexually assault? Tell that to my brother in law who's ex wife sexually assaulted him and is in prison for it.

I get what you are saying but to say that they should never be recorded as females committing those crimes, even if they do commit them is a bit of a reach don't you think?

Not sure my BIL would appreciate it if his wife was recorded as a male perpetrator.

immediately in the aftermath people were warned to lock their doors against ‘a woman in a dress’. That person was still being described that way by news organisations a day later.

OP didn't say any of that.

But we all know this? It's not a revelation.

The report I heard on the shooting described the perpetrator as wearing a woman's dress. That's not the same as saying they were a woman. I was very surprised that they might be.