Let me spell this out very clearly for the hard of thinking

In the UK a woman can and has been convicted of rape as a joint enterprise

Scotland has a special section to allow a female with cosmetic alterations to be charged as if she were male and had a penis.

I am sorry, but I do not see the point of your post?

It is possible, but amazingly rare, for a woman to be prosecuted for rape.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/mar/17/sarahhall

Women occasionally commit these crimes - but at a way lower rate to point it is new worthy as so unusal.

Women usually have very different patterns of behavior with crime - different crimes and motivations- and having accurate stats helps us understand what's driving the behavior and how to prevent going forward.

Also accuracy helps keep the general population safer and non accuracy breeds distrust in media and news outlets.

What tipped me off was the many news reports coyness around sex language of latest perpetrator rather then the balance of probablity of the sex of the perpetrator.

This made me laugh. m'lud 😂

Posters on this very thread have claimed women are just as violent.

Quite.
I love my husband and our sons to death. My grandad was one of the best, most honourable men I've ever known. My brother in law is a thoroughly decent chap...
None of that means the truth isnt "not all men but almost always men"
Having genuinely great men in my life doesn't make me want to deny the truth of male violence.

You’re wasting your time. They probably vote reform too as they also don’t seem to be able to understand statistics, facts and evidence.

LOL, this is so true! Men would never dare to defend us like we do for them. We can be our worse enemies.

Only ten per cent of the entire prison population is female.

Of these women, only ten per cent have been convicted of violent crimes.

I'm a man, also an armchair criminologist, yes you are correct, there has always been a higher number of male criminals than female. And male criminals vastly outnumber female in certain categories or methods of crime.

But I'm curious as to why you are making this point, which everyone with even a cursory interest in crime and its causes has known pretty much forever?

You know there are non violent crimes? Also what 99% means? Also that many women are in prison directly and indirectly as a result of men’s behaviour.

The point of the post is that there’s been yet ANOTHER violent crime been committed by a bloke, and it’s been reported all over the world for two days as being committed by “a female in a dress”

Oh yes, drag out the holy trilogy of Myra Hindley, Rose West and Aileen Wuornos again to claim women are as violent as men. So few women serial killers we remember their names.
Can't recall a single woman shooter, but am sure the NAMALTERS will find one after much combing.

Men (and young men) commit 95-98% of school shootings

I don't know of any school shooting in the UK or Ireland since Dunblane, 30 years ago. Maybe there are more but none that I know of and I have a quick Google to confirm. The perpetrator was a man in his 40s, so statistically speaking you could say men in their 40s commit 100% of school shootings in the UK in the past 30 years. One could also argue that men called Thomas are responsible for 100% of school shootings since the internet became mainstream.

Please explain OP, are you basing this on worldwide stats? Are you looking at US stats? Why then post on this site without context. For a thread that's supposed to spell things out very clearly, this is particularly obtuse.

Stand outside some the pubs at kicking out time might give you a different view 🤣🤣

I don't think OP's post is perfectly written, but I guess she is frustrated- as am I- by the immense level of NAMALTING on a largely women's site.
Every time a horrific crime is committed- Epstein Files, the nursery worker abuse, BC shooting- a flood of posters will rush forth to say how nice their Nigel is.
I bet no one on DadsNet is rushing forth to say how nice their Nigella is!

And before Rosemary West came along, the one name people came up with was Myra Hindley

The fart I did yesterday morning was definitely male. I think it had a beard.

I would argue that her point was clearly understood and what's actually going on is nothing to do with not understanding what she meant.

Just because you remember a case when a woman committed a violent crime does not take away from the high % of men being the perpetrators. It's not being said it's 100% male.

Why is it so frightening to accept that the majority of sexual crimes and extremely violent crimes are committed by men?

Well yes because OP has failed to make her point clearly.

Is the word more important than the point?

But you can only commit the legal definition of rape if you have a penis. So 100% of rapes are committed by men not 98%. What's the other 2%?

And the reason everyone knows those names is because it is so rare that women do it, we remember each and every one.