I can't find the threads the OP's describing.
I looked for threads that are
- hate-filled
- full of diatribes
- have zero thoughts for the victims
- extremist
- harassing
and have come up with nothing.
I have found several threads that engage in quite strongly felt discussion about the ethics and societal implications of issuing potentially misleading witness reports, misreporting on male and female perpetrators, and recording inaccurate crime statistics. The focus of each of these areas is largely concern for public, and particularly women's, safety. Posters acknowledge some very difficult statistical realities about offending patterns in predominantly calm analysis of potential implications of and learning points from this, and include empathy for the victims. There are also expressions of concern for trans youth. There are some posts I find distasteful in them, I don't like the title of one, and I can also see the argument that the whole subject should be avoided at this time, although I personally disagree with this - I think the issue is too important.
The point is, though, I can't find anything that's as the OP describes.
If anything, of all my skimming in the past few minutes, the post that was most vitriolic (such a popular word on here, and so rarely accurately applied) and, as such, that came closest to demonising a whole demographic was, well... the OP's own.
I've also skimmed a bit further into this thread, and most replies supporting the approach of discussing the issues above openly seem very measured and respectful. In the proportionately few responses across the opening pages that support the OP, in contrast, I've seen the suggestion that such people are lying ("faux concern"), "gleeful" in their responses the crime (that's just unpleasant, frankly, and highly unlikely thank goodness) - and the similarly unpleasant description of some people as just being irrevocably "ugly inside" (I mean, wow...)
OP (and others), you're not going to convince the fence-sitters by misrepresenting what's happening here so obviously - and doing so in language that's, ironically, far closer to what you're accusing other posters of, than most of their own posts actually use.
Whether these issues should be discussed is an interesting debate, but it seems to be going on without you. In fact, I just fast-forwarded to read your last, and in the midst of more fairly chunky analysis and debate, see from yourself yet another few lines with the words "your rush to whip up hate" and "awful persecution of a vulnerable group". (Apologies for not having checked if you were referring to a particular post/er directly before your own that really fits this description - we do sometimes see them - but based on my reading so far, it seems unlikely).