Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the most shocking thing about James VDB's death is...

257 replies

Hitthebestbooth · 12/02/2026 08:39

...that a famous actor, recognised worldwide for his role in Dawson's Creek (putting this in the first lines for the benefit of MNetters who love to comment 'who??' on these threads) struggled to pay for his cancer treatment? His death has left his family 'out of funds'.

Now, James Van der Beek had enough fame and affection from fans that a Go Fund Me has raised a lot to support his family already. But there must be countless families across America who are ruined by medical bills - if Dawson couldn't pay for his cancer treatment, how do non-famous people in ordinary jobs cope? What do their families do after they've been crippled by the costs and still lose their loved one along with their homes and security for their children?

As a millennial, I was so sad to read of James' death. I loved Dawson's Creek. But it makes me very afraid for a future where Farage gets his hands on the NHS and we find ourselves in this position too. I have plenty of bad experiences with our healthcare system and am not saying it's perfect. But if I or my husband are diagnosed with cancer tomorrow, we won't have to sell our possessions or ask friends and family for money or risk leaving our kids with no home after treatment costs. There are plenty of wealthy people out there eager to take the NHS apart and sell it off, and for all people say we'd get a European system and it would be improved, it seems far more likely that capitalist greed will win out and we'll actually get an American model.

James Van der Beek's death highlights just how ruinous that model is. He spent his illness selling off memorabilia and trying to raise money. He died knowing his family's finances were left decimated. And he was someone with more resources than most. It's a sobering indictment of how bad things can get, and I am truly afraid that a Reform government would put us all in that dystopian scenario.

There are all kinds of options I could put for a poll but I'm just trying to make it really simple.

YABU - US healthcare is fine
YANBU - US healthcare is a terrifying prospect

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
5
MrsSlocombesCat · 29/08/2026 14:42

It’s not just death. My ex husband has barely contributed to his son’s upbringing since we split up 25 years ago. As my son is autistic I still care for him at 35.

Hitthebestbooth · 13/02/2026 07:39

Dgll · 13/02/2026 07:29

There are other healthcare models in the world other than the US system and the NHS.

Yes I know. My fear is a Reform government who would adopt the US model.

OP posts:
Dgll · 13/02/2026 07:29

Hitthebestbooth · 13/02/2026 07:09

The American health insurance system is not a question of there not being enough money; it's run to generate obscene profits. It exists to enrich a small number of people beyond reason at the expense of everyone else.

There are other healthcare models in the world other than the US system and the NHS.

Hitthebestbooth · 13/02/2026 07:09

Dgll · 13/02/2026 07:00

Obviously, but they are an indication that there isn't enough money. A bit like rape trails taking 3 years to get to court, lack of policing, underfunded schools, limited national security etc. We take 'free' health care for granted because so far there have been just enough people willing and able to fund it whilst keeping the national debt at a reasonable level. However, it isn't sustainable and the cracks are beginning to show.

Edited

The American health insurance system is not a question of there not being enough money; it's run to generate obscene profits. It exists to enrich a small number of people beyond reason at the expense of everyone else.

OP posts:
Dgll · 13/02/2026 07:00

Blu3Shoes · 13/02/2026 06:44

Think I’d take pot holes over people not being able to access medical treatment any day.

Obviously, but they are an indication that there isn't enough money. A bit like rape trails taking 3 years to get to court, lack of policing, underfunded schools, limited national security etc. We take 'free' health care for granted because so far there have been just enough people willing and able to fund it whilst keeping the national debt at a reasonable level. However, it isn't sustainable and the cracks are beginning to show.

Blu3Shoes · 13/02/2026 06:44

Dgll · 13/02/2026 06:42

It happens all over the world. Most people can't afford expensive cancer treatment so they don't have it. This country can't afford for everyone to have expensive cancer treatment either. That is why we have a huge national debt and pot holes.

Think I’d take pot holes over people not being able to access medical treatment any day.

Dgll · 13/02/2026 06:42

Hitthebestbooth · 13/02/2026 06:20

Well the fact he didn't die suddenly is why they ran out of money - three years of cancer treatment in the US is devastatingly expensive. That's the entire point, which seems to have sailed over your head in your eagerness to berate a dead man about whose finances you can only speculate and assume. My point is that no one should be ruined by having to pay for cancer treatment. No one should lose their homes because of medical bills. But it happens every day in America - not because people are stupid or irresponsible but because a handful of greedy wealthy people want even more and are happy for countless others to suffer and die so that they can amass yet more and more and more. It's a monstrously cruel system.

It happens all over the world. Most people can't afford expensive cancer treatment so they don't have it. This country can't afford for everyone to have expensive cancer treatment either. That is why we have a huge national debt and pot holes.

Hitthebestbooth · 13/02/2026 06:20

SouthernNights59 · 12/02/2026 22:08

I don't agree. He didn't die suddenly, they could have moved the kids to different schools ages ago - something which people have been doing for financial reasons since the beginning of time. We all need to take some responsibility for our life choices and finances.

Surely someone would have had life insurance with six children?

Well the fact he didn't die suddenly is why they ran out of money - three years of cancer treatment in the US is devastatingly expensive. That's the entire point, which seems to have sailed over your head in your eagerness to berate a dead man about whose finances you can only speculate and assume. My point is that no one should be ruined by having to pay for cancer treatment. No one should lose their homes because of medical bills. But it happens every day in America - not because people are stupid or irresponsible but because a handful of greedy wealthy people want even more and are happy for countless others to suffer and die so that they can amass yet more and more and more. It's a monstrously cruel system.

OP posts:
SouthernNights59 · 12/02/2026 22:08

Bushmillsbabe · 12/02/2026 10:48

A mum who wants to keep her children in the same school with their friends and support, after watching their father fight and lose a terrible battle with cancer is not a grifter. She is a mum doing the best she can to support her children to maintain some stability. Do you think the best thing for those children right now is having to change schools? To be the new kid whose famous Dad died and have to answer a whole loaf of questions from people who don't even know them.

People are under no obligation to donate, it's totally their choice. If they can't afford to donate then they shouldn't.

I don't agree. He didn't die suddenly, they could have moved the kids to different schools ages ago - something which people have been doing for financial reasons since the beginning of time. We all need to take some responsibility for our life choices and finances.

Surely someone would have had life insurance with six children?

Kirbert2 · 12/02/2026 21:30

Fibrous · 12/02/2026 21:22

Yep absolutely. Since cancer incidence is 1 in 2 people these days, I'm hoping for a bog standard, age appropriate, well studied and treatable cancer if I'm in that 50%. Anything rare or too early for routine detection is generally a high way to a shit end.

Sorry to heart about your son, but glad it was treatable. Yeah a lot of chemo is nasty stuff so you want it when you're old enough for the long term side effects to just blend into all your old age side effects. Still, the treatments and outcomes are improving all the time. As are the diagnostics. Just gotta keep eating plants, exercising, getting lots of sleep and hope for the best.

Thanks.

It's actually amazing at how far treatments have come for some cancers. In the 80's, my son would've been terminal with no hope but I remember them telling me when he was first diagnosed that if your child has to have cancer, you want it to be this one.

Fibrous · 12/02/2026 21:22

Kirbert2 · 12/02/2026 20:32

Yep.

It really, really depends on the type of cancer.

My son's cancer was very treatable in the vast majority of cases as first line treatment is incredibly effective in 90% of cases which thankfully included him. If that first line treatment doesn't work? Prognosis is poor and unfortunately, there just isn't much they can do and reaching remission again is unlikely. There are some newer options offered via the NHS now such as CAR-T therapy which has had some great success but sadly isn't an option for every single type of cancer.

and an issue with childhood cancer specifically is that chemotherapy is made for adult bodies, not children so unfortunately, it also isn't unusual for the chemotherapy to work but it to also either permanently damage the child's body or sadly, cause the death of a child.

Edited

Yep absolutely. Since cancer incidence is 1 in 2 people these days, I'm hoping for a bog standard, age appropriate, well studied and treatable cancer if I'm in that 50%. Anything rare or too early for routine detection is generally a high way to a shit end.

Sorry to heart about your son, but glad it was treatable. Yeah a lot of chemo is nasty stuff so you want it when you're old enough for the long term side effects to just blend into all your old age side effects. Still, the treatments and outcomes are improving all the time. As are the diagnostics. Just gotta keep eating plants, exercising, getting lots of sleep and hope for the best.

frogpigdonkey · 12/02/2026 21:18

I voted YABU, not because I think the US system is desirable, but because I’m so tired of the bullshit trope that we have the NHS or US style healthcare. They are both extremes of the system, and almost every wealthy country in the world has something in the middle with a safety net but some element of insurance and personal responsibility in there. Neither the NHS or the US system are fit for purpose, we should be looking at Europe, Australia, Singapore for better models.

babyspicydorito · 12/02/2026 21:07

KellsBells7 · 12/02/2026 11:33

But some people don’t have holidays or meals out because they can’t afford those either!

Your insurance is also cheaper than it would be for many, if you have any health issues the premiums increase greatly. I pay more than you for a third of the cover, policy was taken out in my thirties.

Absolutely agree. My daughter is a nurse. She pays her extortionate rent along with her bills and food (cooked from scratch). She has no holidays. She doesn't go out unless it's part of a Christmas or birthday gift from me. I've cut her hair the last few times. She certainly doesn't get beauty treatments. It's frightening how people are so out of touch with how tough life can be for lower earners nowadays.

Hitthebestbooth · 12/02/2026 20:53

FasterMichelin · 12/02/2026 20:40

YANBU that US healthcare is shocking.

YABU to think most average families are struggling financially after a family death.

To be honest, I sympathised more with his situation before I found out him and his wife are antivaxxers. They spread dangerous information that could contribute towards the death of children and adults. My sympathy has run dry I’m afraid.

I do donate to local cancer charities each month to support those affected by cancer and the death of loved ones. A close family friend died early 40s, his wife and kids were left with debts. Unfortunately for them, then didn’t know lots of famous people, and didn’t have a huge house they could sell to release equity.

Your last paragraph was my point really - how bad is it for people without the resources the Van der Beeks had to fall back on? Presumably pretty dreadful.

OP posts:
user37597473785 · 12/02/2026 20:42

babyspicydorito · 12/02/2026 20:36

You're hugely naive. Many people can barely afford food - how will they afford medical insurance!

Then I would argue that if you can’t afford to feed yourself you shouldn’t have started a family in the first place!

lljkk · 12/02/2026 20:41

Most Americans dealing with chronic illness or needing paliative care are age 65+ and eligible for Medicare. Which is awfully similar to NHS. That's how they cope.

My foster sister (age late 50s, lives in California) has a life-limiting genetic health condition; she is on a kind of disabled persons health care package. She is a home-owner but her home is not an asset that gets considered.

FasterMichelin · 12/02/2026 20:40

YANBU that US healthcare is shocking.

YABU to think most average families are struggling financially after a family death.

To be honest, I sympathised more with his situation before I found out him and his wife are antivaxxers. They spread dangerous information that could contribute towards the death of children and adults. My sympathy has run dry I’m afraid.

I do donate to local cancer charities each month to support those affected by cancer and the death of loved ones. A close family friend died early 40s, his wife and kids were left with debts. Unfortunately for them, then didn’t know lots of famous people, and didn’t have a huge house they could sell to release equity.

babyspicydorito · 12/02/2026 20:36

user37597473785 · 12/02/2026 09:22

If I was in charge, I’d make life insurance compulsory for anyone with kids under 18. No one wants to consider the worst happening, but better safe than sorry. Our kids are grown up now, but during their childhood the school community’s we were part of for 17yrs or so lost two mums at primary school, and two dads and two mums during secondary school. Not huge schools either.

The NHS can’t carry on as it is, but wouldn't welcome an American system.

Poor Mrs VDB - I hope she’s got lots of family support.

You're hugely naive. Many people can barely afford food - how will they afford medical insurance!

FMLGFastMovingLuxuryGoods · 12/02/2026 20:35

Having lived in the States, I can tell you this is something Americans want - they actually say “Why should my taxes pay for other people’s illnesses?”. They’ve been collectively brainwashed to think that the American Dream is have a non-existence work life balance and only being out for themselves healthcare-wise.

Kirbert2 · 12/02/2026 20:32

Fibrous · 12/02/2026 20:16

@BruFord sorry about your friend. Yes, unfortunately a lot of cancer treatment is still experimental (due to cancer being a broad term for a huge variety of disease under active research requiring different approaches). So anything new is going to be hideously expensive, unless you meet the niche criteria for clinical trials. The NHS can’t and won’t fund it all. I think especially in younger people, the cancer is quite aggressive so you need the latest treatments for a best shot at recovery. If you don’t have private insurance, even in the UK, you can find yourself trying to make difficult decisions like remortgaging your house, or just letting nature take its course.

I don’t have private health insurance but it’s certainly something I’m considering once my finances are in better shape. Seeing the ravaging and painful effects of cancer up close has made me clean up my lifestyle massive over the last few years.

Yep.

It really, really depends on the type of cancer.

My son's cancer was very treatable in the vast majority of cases as first line treatment is incredibly effective in 90% of cases which thankfully included him. If that first line treatment doesn't work? Prognosis is poor and unfortunately, there just isn't much they can do and reaching remission again is unlikely. There are some newer options offered via the NHS now such as CAR-T therapy which has had some great success but sadly isn't an option for every single type of cancer.

and an issue with childhood cancer specifically is that chemotherapy is made for adult bodies, not children so unfortunately, it also isn't unusual for the chemotherapy to work but it to also either permanently damage the child's body or sadly, cause the death of a child.

berlinbaby2025 · 12/02/2026 20:26

@Hitthebestbooth He wouldn’t have been the first self-employed person to have sold a big asset that year, in the context of a pandemic in which a relatively small amount of actors worked. Also, he was in a hit TV show for five years, made by Warner Brothers. We’re talking big bucks.

@EsmaCannonball I don’t entirely disagree, but when you’re on the bones of your arse, have six kids to feed, no assets, rent to pay then why not get money from a fan base and Hollywood associates? She may thinking of saving for college costs as well. You do what you need to do to keep a roof over your head.

pocketpairs · 12/02/2026 20:19

NooNooHead · 12/02/2026 20:15

Absolutely this. My DH has a colleague who always says (in response to the Brexit vote): "Never underestimate the power of stupid people..."

It follows that it could happen again with Farage but I truly hope it doesn't.

Agree. They need some sort of system where your vote is worth 2x if you have an undergraduate degree.

WaneyEdge · 12/02/2026 20:17

Ginmonkeyagain · 12/02/2026 08:47

It is shocking. One of my favourite things about Angela Landsbury is she used to create guest roles for older and out of work actors on Murder She Wrote so their medical insurance continued to be valid.

I didn’t know this, that’s so heartwarming.

Her grandfather was Leader of the Labour Party and social reformer so she obviously shared the same ideals. The Lansbury estate in Poplar is named after him.

Goldenbear · 12/02/2026 20:17

That's truly shocking. I was so sad to hear this news, big Dawson Creek fan back in the day as well!

Fibrous · 12/02/2026 20:16

@BruFord sorry about your friend. Yes, unfortunately a lot of cancer treatment is still experimental (due to cancer being a broad term for a huge variety of disease under active research requiring different approaches). So anything new is going to be hideously expensive, unless you meet the niche criteria for clinical trials. The NHS can’t and won’t fund it all. I think especially in younger people, the cancer is quite aggressive so you need the latest treatments for a best shot at recovery. If you don’t have private insurance, even in the UK, you can find yourself trying to make difficult decisions like remortgaging your house, or just letting nature take its course.

I don’t have private health insurance but it’s certainly something I’m considering once my finances are in better shape. Seeing the ravaging and painful effects of cancer up close has made me clean up my lifestyle massive over the last few years.