Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be confused by 'high earners' complaining about taxes?

981 replies

tutuland · 10/02/2026 18:25

So high earners pay lots of tax. The top 20% pay for 70% or whatever the numbers are.

But (beyond printing more money) isn't the money there high income people make just coming from the paying public? No matter who you work for, your company's profit is just an accumulation of normal people paying for things.

So ultimately, isn't it all our money anyway? Just beacuse the game is rigged and you get paid 400K for management whatever, it doesn't mean you're more deserving of that money than anyone.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
WunTooThree · 11/02/2026 00:09

5128gap · 10/02/2026 23:59

So if everyone takes your advice and uses 'the UC or whatever' to improve their lot, who is going to be making the products, delivering the parcels and taking your Grandma to the toilet? Will we have a rota?

I am not sure PP is genuine. Seems very naïve.
Come on, like Jeff Bezos employs people because he is a charity and wants to give people a purpose.
PP on pin money for a admin job that would need a UC top up in the real world anyway. She would also be replaced in a heartbeat.

DeftWasp · 11/02/2026 00:08

tutuland · 10/02/2026 18:25

So high earners pay lots of tax. The top 20% pay for 70% or whatever the numbers are.

But (beyond printing more money) isn't the money there high income people make just coming from the paying public? No matter who you work for, your company's profit is just an accumulation of normal people paying for things.

So ultimately, isn't it all our money anyway? Just beacuse the game is rigged and you get paid 400K for management whatever, it doesn't mean you're more deserving of that money than anyone.

Yes, but that's not how it should work in a healthy economy - we need (and don't have) growth, growth only cones by selling someone in a different economy something, the resulting profit is then taxed in various ways, people become richer, the country becomes richer.

If its just circular, Joe buys x from Fred, government taxes Fred and Joe, eventually, you run out of other peoples money.

Our economy is largely service based, and has become somewhat circular, our tax rates are too high for service businesses to moor up here tax wise, so we miss out.

Linning · 11/02/2026 00:06

tutuland · 10/02/2026 23:49

But it's not even your tax burden you're trying to rationalise here!

What will you do if your husband leaves to work in a 0% tax country? No maintenance enforcement. I assume you'd need some sort social funding.

Edited

I am not sure why you are hammering down on that specific poster, OP, but most people who are from a high income household usually have their finances set up.

Will this poster lose up financially if she breaks up and her husband moves to Dubai and refuses to pay maintenance? Probably but is she likely to have at least one property of high value to sell + healthy bank accounts and other investments to take dividends from if her marriage was to break down? Also very likely.

Most people with higher finances do fine despite divorce (better than those on lower income anyway).

You know what’s unlikely? Someone earning 200k+ moving to a different country where he doesn’t have a job nor friends nor family just so he doesn’t have to pay maintenance (and never see his kids again?) when he’s been happy to pay taxes and the cost of living for his whole family in the UK so far. It’s completely illogical.

Also it’s honestly bizarre you seem to enjoy thinking about this poster’s marriage imploding? You seem massively bitter at higher earners and your thread is starting to sound more and more like « everyone should earn the same wage and anything else is unfair irrelevant of the skills required, context nor job » and less and less about the title of your thread.

tutuland · 11/02/2026 00:05

ANON20241 · 11/02/2026 00:01

Life is way too short. It is not " I don't want to think about other people and their needs". Its - i work hard and I want to prioritise my own family. Not saying other people don't work hard. And i've said before, do admire people who can put 'society' ahead of their family but that's just not me. We moved to low tax country and we are able to offer our kids a better lifestyle and save properly for retirement. You only live once and I chose less stress and to be able to do more with my family. And yes, that means hiring help is easier here too.
And btw I dont know which country domestic helpers you're talking about but in Asia, they are not treated as slaves at all. Domestic helpers save more than the average person in the UK. Retire way earlier and return home and live like kings. It is again a choice they make to give their family a better life.

https://www.khaleejtimes.com/uae/minimum-salary-for-filipina-maids-confirmed $400 a month sound reasonable to you?

But fair enough on the points you made before justifying modern slavery

OP posts:
TestingDaily · 11/02/2026 00:04

KTheGrey · 10/02/2026 23:55

You just called someone you never met “sweetie” while speculating on how her marriage will implode and her husband go off to a 0% tax regime where he won’t have a job.

My husband loves me and our DC. Whatever happens next is something we are discussing as a family. Always supported each other and the kids.

We're off to holiday soon (just the 2 of us) and we'll be having a swell time.

tutuland · 11/02/2026 00:03

KTheGrey · 10/02/2026 23:55

You just called someone you never met “sweetie” while speculating on how her marriage will implode and her husband go off to a 0% tax regime where he won’t have a job.

Is that not a genuine risk though?

The poster is defending something that is not even theirs, with no guarantee it would remain theirs. They ‘threatened’ that they'd go off and pay no more tax.

I am just pointing out that it's not their money...

OP posts:
ANON20241 · 11/02/2026 00:01

tutuland · 10/02/2026 21:33

How is that fair? Employers get their cash from the paying public generally. Sure this is the current model of civilisation we have to live within- but how on earth is that fair.

I'd respect you lot if you said "I've learned to play the capitalism game really well and I want to enjoy my money. I don't want to think about other people and their needs".

It's the pretending that unpalatable.

Life is way too short. It is not " I don't want to think about other people and their needs". Its - i work hard and I want to prioritise my own family. Not saying other people don't work hard. And i've said before, do admire people who can put 'society' ahead of their family but that's just not me. We moved to low tax country and we are able to offer our kids a better lifestyle and save properly for retirement. You only live once and I chose less stress and to be able to do more with my family. And yes, that means hiring help is easier here too.
And btw I dont know which country domestic helpers you're talking about but in Asia, they are not treated as slaves at all. Domestic helpers save more than the average person in the UK. Retire way earlier and return home and live like kings. It is again a choice they make to give their family a better life.

WunTooThree · 11/02/2026 00:00

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 23:33

I actually read that only 15% of the care home workforce are on UC. Which means 85% manage their expenses? I believe social care funding is restricted by what the government allocates anyway.

So you're against people owning businesses. What about those who are employees and just get paid a lot for the good work they do?

Maybe those care workers have a high earning DH 😉

tutuland · 10/02/2026 23:59

blueshoes · 10/02/2026 23:52

OP, who pissed on your chips? I am afraid you are now beginning to sound spiteful which detracts from the, erm, message if you can call it that.

I think you may be reading critique as a spiteful attack.

I think it is fair to be critical of how women are taught to defend the privileges men gain from a capitalist system, while doing a lot of the work to keep it running.

If you want to join in, maybe engage with the actual point.

OP posts:
5128gap · 10/02/2026 23:59

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 23:39

My belief is that if you're not disabled, and not caring for disabled people that you should be the driving force in improving your situation.

I don't mind UC a last resort stop gap when things are though. When life's really hit you. But use the UC and whatever to try and improve your own situation.

So if everyone takes your advice and uses 'the UC or whatever' to improve their lot, who is going to be making the products, delivering the parcels and taking your Grandma to the toilet? Will we have a rota?

TheMerryJoker · 10/02/2026 23:57

NorthXNorthWest · 10/02/2026 23:56

For natural monopolies such as utilities, transport, and healthcare (access/ funding) state ownership should be the first choice. For most other sectors, competition (including first to market advantages) tempered by reasonable regulation is what drives innovation and protects consumers from higher prices, reduced choice (barring beneficial standardisation) etc

At least that is what should happen in principal. In practice...

yes in practice, but in reality cheap labour etc

WunTooThree · 10/02/2026 23:57

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 23:39

My belief is that if you're not disabled, and not caring for disabled people that you should be the driving force in improving your situation.

I don't mind UC a last resort stop gap when things are though. When life's really hit you. But use the UC and whatever to try and improve your own situation.

Why are you not more than mere admin at a GP surgery?

NorthXNorthWest · 10/02/2026 23:56

IDontHateRainbows · 10/02/2026 23:31

Businesses are designed to kill competition, its how they grow.

Agreee with you on the tax thing.

For natural monopolies such as utilities, transport, and healthcare (access/ funding) state ownership should be the first choice. For most other sectors, competition (including first to market advantages) tempered by reasonable regulation is what drives innovation and protects consumers from higher prices, reduced choice (barring beneficial standardisation) etc

At least that is what should happen in principal. In practice...

KTheGrey · 10/02/2026 23:55

tutuland · 10/02/2026 23:30

Saying he knows python and java is not as special as you think. In a few years, he'll be completely replaced by a software.

You're defending something that's not even yours.

If your marriage ever breaks up, he takes his successful salary with him. He could decided to relocate to 0% tax land without you. They cant even force him to pay maintenance from out there sweetie. Then no money for you.

I think your role working admin at a GP's office is just as valuable to society as your husband who knows how to code.

You just called someone you never met “sweetie” while speculating on how her marriage will implode and her husband go off to a 0% tax regime where he won’t have a job.

5128gap · 10/02/2026 23:53

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 23:33

I actually read that only 15% of the care home workforce are on UC. Which means 85% manage their expenses? I believe social care funding is restricted by what the government allocates anyway.

So you're against people owning businesses. What about those who are employees and just get paid a lot for the good work they do?

Not claiming UC and being able to manage finances are not the same. Not everyone on NNW is entitled to UC. Some will have visa restrictions that prevent entitlement. Others will have low housing costs due to house share or living with parents. Others will be part of a couple and their joint income takes them over the threshold.
None of that changes the fact that Joe pays them the lowest rate he legally can in order to live comfortably off their income.
And please don't do that thing of extrapolating from what I've said something I've not.
I haven't said I'm 'against business' at all. I've merely explained to you how the labour of the low paid makes profit for the highly paid, which is what you asked me.

blueshoes · 10/02/2026 23:53

tutuland · 10/02/2026 23:49

But it's not even your tax burden you're trying to rationalise here!

What will you do if your husband leaves to work in a 0% tax country? No maintenance enforcement. I assume you'd need some sort social funding.

Edited

What's that got to do with the price of fish?

blueshoes · 10/02/2026 23:52

tutuland · 10/02/2026 23:30

Saying he knows python and java is not as special as you think. In a few years, he'll be completely replaced by a software.

You're defending something that's not even yours.

If your marriage ever breaks up, he takes his successful salary with him. He could decided to relocate to 0% tax land without you. They cant even force him to pay maintenance from out there sweetie. Then no money for you.

I think your role working admin at a GP's office is just as valuable to society as your husband who knows how to code.

OP, who pissed on your chips? I am afraid you are now beginning to sound spiteful which detracts from the, erm, message if you can call it that.

tutuland · 10/02/2026 23:49

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 23:41

All rational individuals seek to minimise their tax burden.

But it's not even your tax burden you're trying to rationalise here!

What will you do if your husband leaves to work in a 0% tax country? No maintenance enforcement. I assume you'd need some sort social funding.

OP posts:
Hulabalu · 10/02/2026 23:45

cassgate · 10/02/2026 18:34

Well when you pay 75k in tax a year and can’t get a gp appointment and are forced to go private and your mum waits 22 hours for an ambulance while laying on the floor with a fractured pelvis, then yes I think that is something you complain about.

And when your elderly parents can’t get an NHS dentist with waiting lists of years. When your property is stolen but the police won’t investigate even though there’s cctv evidence ( that they won’t watch ) because theft happens constantly and they don’t have the resources. When there is no mental health support available for ordinary working people or homeless unless you have private healthcare. I could go on but suffice to say the state this country is in is a disgrace. Caused by the neglect of consecutive governments.
I still love this country but it’s a crying shame that the powers that be let it go to rack and ruin. The rich poor devide grows, general standard of living declines. How is that progress? I fear for the future and the young & future generations

TheMerryJoker · 10/02/2026 23:45

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 23:41

All rational individuals seek to minimise their tax burden.

yes and after watching billions i agree, but at the same time you and i know its not for the greater good of society all it is is wealth extraction and then leaves society as a corpse

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 23:41

TheMerryJoker · 10/02/2026 23:37

out of how much they avoided etc

All rational individuals seek to minimise their tax burden.

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 23:39

NorthXNorthWest · 10/02/2026 23:31

Why don't people on lower wages just get higher paid jobs instead of moaning about those on higher wages?

My belief is that if you're not disabled, and not caring for disabled people that you should be the driving force in improving your situation.

I don't mind UC a last resort stop gap when things are though. When life's really hit you. But use the UC and whatever to try and improve your own situation.

TheMerryJoker · 10/02/2026 23:37

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 23:36

Not sure about Jeff in particular.

Amazon say they paid nearly £6bn in 2024

www.aboutamazon.co.uk/news/company-news/amazon-economic-impact-uk-tax-contributions-investments

out of how much they avoided etc

5128gap · 10/02/2026 23:37

NorthXNorthWest · 10/02/2026 23:31

Why don't people on lower wages just get higher paid jobs instead of moaning about those on higher wages?

Because there not enough of them to go round, obviously. The system is a pyramid with far more required at the base producing the product than up top.

TestingDaily · 10/02/2026 23:36

NorthXNorthWest · 10/02/2026 23:25

How much tax does Jeff evade in the UK? They make excessive profit and leave the UK employees and UK tax payers to pick up the tab, in addition to killing competition.

Not sure about Jeff in particular.

Amazon say they paid nearly £6bn in 2024

www.aboutamazon.co.uk/news/company-news/amazon-economic-impact-uk-tax-contributions-investments

Swipe left for the next trending thread