Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be confused by 'high earners' complaining about taxes?

981 replies

tutuland · 10/02/2026 18:25

So high earners pay lots of tax. The top 20% pay for 70% or whatever the numbers are.

But (beyond printing more money) isn't the money there high income people make just coming from the paying public? No matter who you work for, your company's profit is just an accumulation of normal people paying for things.

So ultimately, isn't it all our money anyway? Just beacuse the game is rigged and you get paid 400K for management whatever, it doesn't mean you're more deserving of that money than anyone.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
modernfairies · 12/02/2026 18:21

Mishmosher · 12/02/2026 16:51

Don’t you think the European model, where workers get higher benefits when they for whatever reason cannot work (redundancy, sickness) to reflect the tax that they have paid in is a much better system than the current one where they get the same as the workshy? How about we motivate people to work by incentivising it? Showing that it pays off? Because we’re certainly not managing to incentivise people to work with our current strategy.

This is a proposal expressly supported by Torsten Bell currently PS in the Treasury. The government knows it’s unfair but they can’t politically give any improvements to high earners. It’s more politically acceptable to kill productivity, reduce employment and encourage people to drop hours and retire early than it is to recognise tax traps and benefit failures for higher earners.

Soberinthecity · 12/02/2026 17:25

MNLurker1345 · 12/02/2026 10:58

@Soberinthecity, I can’t believe you call it freebies. It’s universal healthcare. So shocking! But anyone that questions the welfare bill is accused of benefits bashing. High income tax
payers are considered with contempt, by the likes of you if they dare to use the NHS, that we contribute to.

What you appear to want is a NHS that is a charity donated to low income earners, by high income earners. Would that sort out low productivity? High income taxpayers should then piss off and pay for their healthcare privately.

My DH and I paid £75K income tax this year. We are high income earners, we are self employed. We use both private healthcare and the NHS. I hope that really increases the bad smell in your nose!

Calm down

Soberinthecity · 12/02/2026 17:23

OhDear111 · 12/02/2026 10:07

@Soberinthecity Me and dh are retired. We pay a lot for health insurance because we want any health need attended to. Quickly. We are well aware that’s queue jumping. Yes, let others have the nhs and be number 6,000,001 in the queue . So generous of your dad to remove himself and pretend it’s altruistic!

same Thing different viewpoint 😉 No one said he wasn’t well aware of the queue jumping. In an ideal world excellent free Healthcare would be available to all, but we don’t live in that world.

lanyarty · 12/02/2026 17:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

NorthXNorthWest · 12/02/2026 17:04

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 12/02/2026 15:59

I never said they pay more tax overall, I’ve been explaining that they pay more proportionally. Perhaps you were misreading my comments which explains why we’ve been going around in circles.

Your original comment was “I have to pay more than double the amount proportionally that lower income workers pay?”

That’s what I’ve been arguing against. I’m glad to see that you’re no longer claiming this.

Edited

I have to pay more than double the amount proportionally that lower income workers pay?

Where did I say that?

Eddiestrangerthings · 12/02/2026 16:56

why should the elite pay any taxes or the super wealthy ?

tutuland · 12/02/2026 16:54

Mishmosher · 12/02/2026 16:51

Don’t you think the European model, where workers get higher benefits when they for whatever reason cannot work (redundancy, sickness) to reflect the tax that they have paid in is a much better system than the current one where they get the same as the workshy? How about we motivate people to work by incentivising it? Showing that it pays off? Because we’re certainly not managing to incentivise people to work with our current strategy.

It's interesting how mainland Europe has experimented with their models, and come up with these variations. I would assume it would take a while to establish, and the current climate would only make this harder.

OP posts:
tutuland · 12/02/2026 16:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Mishmosher · 12/02/2026 16:51

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 12/02/2026 16:17

Yes and the irony is that posters on this thread who have been arguing this have simultaneously been arguing that they as high earners should be entitled to benefits. So simultaneously complaining about taxation whilst calling for far greater expenditure on benefits.They don’t want people poorer than them to be propped up. But they would like high earners to be propped up.

Edited

Don’t you think the European model, where workers get higher benefits when they for whatever reason cannot work (redundancy, sickness) to reflect the tax that they have paid in is a much better system than the current one where they get the same as the workshy? How about we motivate people to work by incentivising it? Showing that it pays off? Because we’re certainly not managing to incentivise people to work with our current strategy.

nomas · 12/02/2026 16:50

tutuland · 12/02/2026 16:47

You're really starting to get obsessed with me and this post. And you're becoming creepy. It's fine to have an opinion, this is a discussion forum, but this kind of aggressive bullying is disgusting.

The irony of calling posters stupid and then accusing them of bullying you seems to escape you.

You also think it's fine for you to have a tax haven but still judge others for not wanting to pay ever increasing tax. Your views are harmful and need to be called out.

tutuland · 12/02/2026 16:47

nomas · 12/02/2026 16:45

I don't think you run a fin tech start up anywhere except in your imagination.

You're really starting to get obsessed with me and this post. And you're becoming creepy. It's fine to have an opinion, this is a discussion forum, but this kind of aggressive bullying is disgusting.

OP posts:
tutuland · 12/02/2026 16:45

glitterpaperchain · 12/02/2026 16:41

Calm down, I'm not 'afraid' of AI

I think it is appropriate for identifying trends in large data, for example. However I don't think it's a good source for learning information, for example summarising articles. It doesn't use logic; it's a language prediction algorithm, so often inaccurate. I prefer to use my own brain. Especially when trying to argue a point to someone.

Have you seen any of the congressional hearing in America this week? They think they're being quick witted, but they cant even see how remarkably stupid they come across.

I've learned some compelling things from some posters who've disagreed with me on this thread, but not this poster...

OP posts:
nomas · 12/02/2026 16:45

glitterpaperchain · 12/02/2026 16:41

Calm down, I'm not 'afraid' of AI

I think it is appropriate for identifying trends in large data, for example. However I don't think it's a good source for learning information, for example summarising articles. It doesn't use logic; it's a language prediction algorithm, so often inaccurate. I prefer to use my own brain. Especially when trying to argue a point to someone.

It's clear you have zero clue how tech businesses are run.

nomas · 12/02/2026 16:45

tutuland · 12/02/2026 16:42

This trump gotcha way of speaking is not a substitute for a lucid thought. Neither is AI.

I don't think you run a fin tech start up anywhere except in your imagination.

tutuland · 12/02/2026 16:42

nomas · 12/02/2026 16:34

So using Google Gemini to bullet point an article is wrong? Why are you so afraid of software that is used in every tax-paying company up and down the country?

This trump gotcha way of speaking is not a substitute for a lucid thought. Neither is AI.

OP posts:
glitterpaperchain · 12/02/2026 16:41

nomas · 12/02/2026 16:34

So using Google Gemini to bullet point an article is wrong? Why are you so afraid of software that is used in every tax-paying company up and down the country?

Calm down, I'm not 'afraid' of AI

I think it is appropriate for identifying trends in large data, for example. However I don't think it's a good source for learning information, for example summarising articles. It doesn't use logic; it's a language prediction algorithm, so often inaccurate. I prefer to use my own brain. Especially when trying to argue a point to someone.

nomas · 12/02/2026 16:34

glitterpaperchain · 12/02/2026 16:21

No, the AI summary was AI

So using Google Gemini to bullet point an article is wrong? Why are you so afraid of software that is used in every tax-paying company up and down the country?

glitterpaperchain · 12/02/2026 16:21

nomas · 12/02/2026 15:57

So an article from London and Partners is AI?

No, the AI summary was AI

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 12/02/2026 16:17

angelos02 · 12/02/2026 15:06

The older I get and the way things seem to be going, I'm sure some people seem to think that those that work hard at school, graft and get a good job, shouldn't expect to have a lifestyle vastly different to those that don't. It should be worlds apart but it is getting less and less so. Be a lazy so and so but don't worry, those that work will prop your lifestyle up. I wish we could scrap the word 'free'. Someone, somewhere is paying for it - be it breakfast clubs, school meals etc.

Yes and the irony is that posters on this thread who have been arguing this have simultaneously been arguing that they as high earners should be entitled to benefits. So simultaneously complaining about taxation whilst calling for far greater expenditure on benefits.They don’t want people poorer than them to be propped up. But they would like high earners to be propped up.

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 12/02/2026 15:59

NorthXNorthWest · 12/02/2026 08:38

VAT is one part of the system. Income tax and National Insurance raise significantly more revenue. Ignoring them while claiming to discuss the ‘big picture’ is disingenuous.

The top 10% of income tax payers contribute around 60% of all income tax. The proportion of indirect tax a low earners pays is higher relative to their salary but they do not pay not pay more tax overall.

I never said they pay more tax overall, I’ve been explaining that they pay more proportionally. Perhaps you were misreading my comments which explains why we’ve been going around in circles.

Your original comment was “I have to pay more than double the amount proportionally that lower income workers pay?”

That’s what I’ve been arguing against. I’m glad to see that you’re no longer claiming this.

nomas · 12/02/2026 15:58

tutuland · 12/02/2026 15:22

Oh no, I'm not enraged at all. I was finding you amusing but now its getting tedious if anything. I just don't want to help you understand difficult things by answering your questions. I'm sure you can find the answers you need on the internet xxx

You don't even understand how to run your own business so why would anyone expect you to explain anything?

You can't even answer basic questions about your business.

nomas · 12/02/2026 15:57

glitterpaperchain · 12/02/2026 15:37

Still watching this thread, that comment was nonsense. I think you DO know about AI and that's exactly why you didn't trust it! Honestly I despair at some people who are so loudly wrong

So an article from London and Partners is AI?

nomas · 12/02/2026 15:56

tutuland · 12/02/2026 15:28

They're all LLM and use the same mechanisms.

So you googled a response to what I said, and then pasted the AI response for me to read? You couldn't even condense your cheat sheet- so you presented me with a wall of text.

If you cant be bothered to think your own thoughts and structure them into sentences I don't want to engage with you.

Why do you keep ignoring the linked article?

I've also summarised the contents in bullets for you but you clearly are unwilling to answer anything, which makes me think the fin tech start up doesn't actually exist.

tutuland · 12/02/2026 15:45

glitterpaperchain · 12/02/2026 15:37

Still watching this thread, that comment was nonsense. I think you DO know about AI and that's exactly why you didn't trust it! Honestly I despair at some people who are so loudly wrong

Thanks! 😂
Honestly the fact that poster thought they were being clever is shocking. Not a modicum of critical self awareness...

OP posts:
glitterpaperchain · 12/02/2026 15:37

tutuland · 12/02/2026 15:28

They're all LLM and use the same mechanisms.

So you googled a response to what I said, and then pasted the AI response for me to read? You couldn't even condense your cheat sheet- so you presented me with a wall of text.

If you cant be bothered to think your own thoughts and structure them into sentences I don't want to engage with you.

Still watching this thread, that comment was nonsense. I think you DO know about AI and that's exactly why you didn't trust it! Honestly I despair at some people who are so loudly wrong