You are being incredibly disingenuous.
The overwhelming majority of Ukrainian refugees were women and children; the overwhelming majority of immigrants arriving by boat and other means from Calais are men. Men who, whether you like it or not, do go on to commit violent and sexual crimes against women and children.
It is not in any way comparable.
The refugees from Ukraine were welcomed into people’s homes purely because they were women and children; not because they were white. Do you think it would be reasonable (or indeed safe) for the young, most likely damaged, men arriving by boat, with zero identification, to be welcomed into people’s homes? Would you take in one of these men?
It is really odd for you to frame people offering up their homes to white women and children and not back and brown men, as being about racism, rather than risk.
Am I really having to explain to (who I presume to be another women) that men pose a far greater risk to women than women and children do? Is this for real?
I am genuinely curious as to what you consider is comparable in these situations?