Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be surprised at someone being pregnant at 44

515 replies

Onempretime7788 · 08/02/2026 00:16

I would have thought post 35 was rare

OP posts:
LightYearsAgo · 08/02/2026 13:52

Snowyowl99 · 08/02/2026 13:30

I know many...and it's not a time for teenagers. From first hand experience

So you actually mean not a time for you and presumably difficult teenagers.

You must realize that isn't a universal experience, are you meaning to speak for everyone?

TheIceBear · 08/02/2026 13:50

Snowyowl99 · 08/02/2026 12:36

Goodness, grandparents i know who are working also help out , but they are younger than 70 obviously. Retirement age is coming up to 67 now but only 8 per cent of 67 year olds are working . Young working people I know are aware of retirement age and making provision in their private pensions to retire much earlier. There is unlikely to b a state pension...will b means tested...so I'm sure majority will rely on earlier private pensions kicking in. .so govt dictated retirement will b irrelevant

Goodness , well i don’t really on grandparents to help out. Most adults have plans to manage without grandparents when they decide to have kids

Mumstheword1983 · 08/02/2026 13:49

MO0N · 08/02/2026 13:38

Of course it can happen at any age, but the likelihood increases as the age of the parents increases.

I always find that interesting as in 11 years of teaching additional needs I've barely come across any 'older parents'.

However I know what you are saying is correct. It just hasn't been my personal experience.

MO0N · 08/02/2026 13:38

Mumstheword1983 · 08/02/2026 13:27

This can happen at any age. My mum was 29 when she had her son with Downs Syndrome and my friend had a daughter with DS also in her twenties. I have taught many children with ASD with young parents.

Of course it can happen at any age, but the likelihood increases as the age of the parents increases.

Snowyowl99 · 08/02/2026 13:35

Thatcannotberight · 08/02/2026 12:32

I was born when my mother was 32. I had no grandparents because they had remarried and had their children ( my parents) later. What you've never had, you never miss.

Oh you are so wrong when you see others who have loving grandparents. Little girl next door has one very elderly grandparents who is bed bound. She asks her mum why she can't have a gran, it's such a shame. Sees her friends going to grandparents for sleepovers etc

Justgorgeous · 08/02/2026 13:32

Snowyowl99 · 08/02/2026 12:02

Yes..but it's not necessarily a good thing. Teenagers at 60 and beyond. Believe me that is not good!

Unless you have experienced it, how do you know it’s not good ?

Snowyowl99 · 08/02/2026 13:30

LightYearsAgo · 08/02/2026 12:51

Not good in what way?

Do you know many 60 year olds? It's not the 19th century, they aren't somehow decripit

I know many...and it's not a time for teenagers. From first hand experience

This2shallpas · 08/02/2026 13:27

NonArtArseHouse · 08/02/2026 13:21

I agree with you, but the smug, judgemental comments works both ways.

‘well, in more educated circles women have children older’ (or ‘in London…’)

’I was too busy travelling the world in my 20s and becoming CEO in my 30s for children’

As if only thick, boring brood mares from oop Norf would be stupid enough to have children before 35.

Yeah I have to say my close friend who has 3 kids had her first aged 24, she bought her house and married the same year and is now a 6 figure earner in law. She also has traveled abroad with me and other friends, and I know she travels solo, and with her family. She is also London based!

She married a great guy and has a supportive family on both sides which has obviously helped her to “have it all” but yeah there’s nothing wrong with having kids in your 20s.

Mumstheword1983 · 08/02/2026 13:27

sittingonabeach · 08/02/2026 12:01

@BoleynMemories13 how many of the DC in your class have a diagnosis or are showing the possibility of a diagnosis of special needs, as that can be impacted by older parents?

This can happen at any age. My mum was 29 when she had her son with Downs Syndrome and my friend had a daughter with DS also in her twenties. I have taught many children with ASD with young parents.

NonArtArseHouse · 08/02/2026 13:27

This topic is clearly gold on MN. Always illicits hundreds of replies and turns into a bit of a bun fight.

Most reasonable people would
a) not be surprised by a 44 yr old woman having a baby
b) acknowledge it is quite an old age to have a baby

On an anonymous forum, people will also go into detail with their thoughts and judgement, which in reality you might spend a few moments thinking privately and then move on.

katseyes7 · 08/02/2026 13:27

Seriously?
I got pregnant at 52.
How, l have no idea (well, l do, but....) I was perimenopausal and he'd had chemo for testicular cancer.
I miscarried, not surprisingly, but of course it's possible if you're still having periods.

This2shallpas · 08/02/2026 13:23

I didn’t really think about the age aspect at the time, but when I was 10 I had a friend whose mum was 40+ when she had his little sister.

I had a vague awareness that she was considered an older mum but wasn’t astonished by it or anything and knew it happened like that .

So I’m wondering why I knew this from age 10 and yet an adult doesn’t know this.

Again this does make me think it’s a man if it’s not a wind up.

NonArtArseHouse · 08/02/2026 13:21

PersephonePomegranate · 08/02/2026 12:06

People seem to forget that women historically kept having children until they stopped getting pregnant and delivering live babies!

It's so depressing to see so many handmaidens that seem to think they've won some kind of race by having children younger than others and using it as a cudgel to knick other women and their choices

Just to be clear - I'm not bashing the choice to have children younger, just those vocal and vitriolic about it.

Of course, fertility declines and that is a real issue, but it's not the only issue. Some people (women and men) are infertile or struggle with low fertility, whether they are 19, 29 or 39. That's just a fact of life!

There is always an element of nastiness in these debates that smacks if pure misogyny.

I agree with you, but the smug, judgemental comments works both ways.

‘well, in more educated circles women have children older’ (or ‘in London…’)

’I was too busy travelling the world in my 20s and becoming CEO in my 30s for children’

As if only thick, boring brood mares from oop Norf would be stupid enough to have children before 35.

This2shallpas · 08/02/2026 13:18

Maybe Op is a man?

Some men seem to be genuinely clueless about women and pregnancy. They either seem to think we can’t have kids past early 30s - and some of that is due to the influence of red pill rhetoric about women expiring at 25 - or the other extreme, where they don’t think about the biological clock at all.

And they also don’t seem to realise the impact of ageing on their own sperm.

Oldglasses · 08/02/2026 13:15

My mum had me at 42 in the 70s. I did have my DCs before 35 but a lot of my friends had their firsts later or had a third at 40-ish. In my NCT class I was the youngest at 30!!

Shellythesnail2333 · 08/02/2026 13:11

TwistedWonder · 08/02/2026 12:37

Had to be a wind up thread or someone who barely lives outside their own head.

A relative of mine gave birth at 49 - and she’s still here at 90

Course it’s a wind up thread. Of course OP will be very smug they got 14 pages of replies! 😬

VeganStar · 08/02/2026 13:08

Strawberrryfields · 08/02/2026 10:24

Obviously it’s completely your daughter’s choice but I wouldn’t let her be led by your experience without at least a conversation. I’m 100% behind women making their own choices but think it’s important they’re armed with the stats/information to do that in an informed way.

Your own fertility doesn’t necessarily indicate what her experience will be - my own mother got pregnant at the drop of a hat - I didn’t. Does she know you also had a history of loss? That you felt it would never happen? That statistically it was rare?

I definitely plan to discuss fertility with my children as think there is a huge lack of education around it. On this thread there are some big gaps in understanding and over reliance on anecdotal evidence. Often people don’t learn this stuff until they’re on their own fertility journey and for some it’s too late to do much about it at that point. Age is the single biggest factor in fertility and having a healthy live birth. There will always be outliers but it’s just the reality.

I think being honest about this is a positive thing and should be the norm rather than being classed as being a naysayer or against women. The ‘only as young as you feel’ ‘age doesn’t matter’ narrative can actually harm women’s choices as it can give a false sense or reality and choice. For the record men also experience fertility decline and male factor issues and should be taught all of this too.

Edited

We’ve definitely had a conversation about it and of course she knows all about my miscarriage history.
For years she’s told me that she never wants children and despite me telling her her that she’d maybe change her mind one day when she meets someone special she was always adamant that she never wanted any. Guess what, she’s met that someone special and children are being talked about by them both. Before you say anything about her being coerced into having children by either me or her boyfriend I can tell you that isn’t the case. My DD isn’t one to be coerced or pushed into anything that she doesn’t want to do and can make up her mind by herself quite independently of others.
She wants to have a life before settling down and has said if there are any fertility issues then so be it.
She is single minded and has her own ideas and take on things so much so that if I had said that I’d had her at say 16, she wouldn’t have wanted to follow my example there.
She looks aghast at girls her age that were in school with her who have children some of them are on their second or third child.
She says wow that’s so young to settle down. I think she may have inherited my free spirit.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 08/02/2026 13:08

44 is not unusual. It’s not ideal.
30 is ideal.
20 to 24 is peak time.
38 onwards is dicing with fertility.
Menopause with a teenager is bad, menopause with a toddler is really bad.

In middle class circles it isn’t acceptable before 35 onwards.

I am 45, I’m the youngest mother in DD group of friends, she is 17, I was 28 giving birth, her friends parents well in the 50’s, most are divorced. I’ll be 52 when DS is 17, dreading it, couldn’t imagine been 52 with a 7 year old. I should have had mine earlier in hindsight.

Tbh a lot of her friends have problems with their parents as the parents just want peace and quiet, between menopause and their full life before children, they’re burnt out, very little input or patience. Generation disaster

Whataninterestinglookingpotato · 08/02/2026 13:03

girljulian · 08/02/2026 12:54

Not surprising and never would've been. My grandfather was born (in 1918) when his mother was 46. Eleanor of Aquitaine had King John when she was 42 and that was in 1166.

before reliable contraception people had kids throughout their fertile years. But it would have been kid number 8 in your 40s not waiting until you’re over 40 to even try. They feel different to me some how. Like with the first one you’re tried and tested and you have probably much older children around and there was more of a community back then.

These days, post 40 probably caring responsibilities for elderly parents looming on the horizon and no experience of raising kids prior. If anything it would seem much harder to transition from your comfortable life you’ve had for years into the trenches of the early days of parenthood. Less of a village and no older kids to help with the younger.

im now 40 but my kids are older. When I had mine my MIL and mother were fit and able to look after them. My mother in law now has dementia and needs to be cared for and my mother has developed quite a few health issues in her 60s. Though still able to watch older kids I wouldn’t leave her with a tot. I’m very glad I didn’t wait until my 40s to have them. Don’t get me wrong, I’m fit active and energetic and in no way do I feel too old to be pregnant, give birth and care for a baby. But my village is now elderly rather than middle aged and I’m quite happy channeling my boundless early 40s energy into active stuff for myself.

Augustus40 · 08/02/2026 13:01

I did not even want a baby until age 37. I had ds aged 41.

Minjou · 08/02/2026 12:55

Snowyowl99 · 08/02/2026 12:02

Yes..but it's not necessarily a good thing. Teenagers at 60 and beyond. Believe me that is not good!

Not good for you maybe. Some are perfectly happy with it.

girljulian · 08/02/2026 12:54

Not surprising and never would've been. My grandfather was born (in 1918) when his mother was 46. Eleanor of Aquitaine had King John when she was 42 and that was in 1166.

LightYearsAgo · 08/02/2026 12:51

Snowyowl99 · 08/02/2026 12:02

Yes..but it's not necessarily a good thing. Teenagers at 60 and beyond. Believe me that is not good!

Not good in what way?

Do you know many 60 year olds? It's not the 19th century, they aren't somehow decripit

Whataninterestinglookingpotato · 08/02/2026 12:46

In many areas of the U.K. it would be outside of the norm but on mumsnet it’s probably average. Because having kids post 40 is wonderful and responsible and anything under 35 is ridiculously young and you’ll be dragging your kids up and giving them terrible start in life.

x2boys · 08/02/2026 12:43

honeylulu · 08/02/2026 12:40

Someone having a baby at 44 is not that surprising as it will be perfectly possible for some women. But fertility clinics give statistics of a 3-5% chance of natural conception per cycle in a woman of that age (compared to 25% chance per cycle for a woman in her early 30s).

Therefore for a woman of 44, she is far more likely NOT to have conceived after a year of trying, by which time she is 45 and the odds are worse still. So it's also not usual/commonplace to have a baby at 44 (though that is skewed by the fact that most women won't be trying to conceive at that age anyway).

I'm very happy for women who want to conceive in their 40s and are successful but I think it's risky to assume that "I am still having periods so I can conceive whenever I want". I really wish it was as simple as that but it isn't. I had my first child at 30, conceived straight away, no issues. Started trying for second at 35 and it took 5 years. Took a year to conceive but then had multiple miscarriages and investigations - had poor AMH levels (indicated low egg levels/poor quality eggs), progesterone too low in luteal phase so was starting to lose my womb lining before embryo embedded, uterine scarring (reduced chance for embryo to catch hold) and to cap it all an auto immune disorder with no other symptoms apart from my body rejecting the embryo as hostile. I seemed outwardly healthy and was having regular periods.

I did conceive again naturally at almost 40 and armed with knowledge of the above managed to keep the pregnancy thanks to a blood plasma transfusion.

I'm now nearly 52 and still having regular periods but I can't kid myself that I could just decide to have another baby if I wanted to (I don't and have a copper coil just in case).

Im 52 too ,even if you did get pregnant i suspect the chances of having a full term healthy pregnancy and baby are greatly reduced.